"Contrary to previous theories, our study shows that some exoplanets can never build gaseous atmospheres to begin with," says Eve Lee. (Credit: Getty Images )

Team sheds new light on super-Earth origin mystery

Super-Earths are not leftovers of mini-Neptunes, after all, according to a new study that challenges our understanding of planetary formation.

Shirley Cardenas-McGill • futurity
Feb. 11, 2021 4 minSource

Astronomers have long thought of super-Earths as the rocky cores of mini-Neptunes whose gassy atmospheres had blown away, but a new study challenges that theory.

Mini-Neptunes and super-Earths up to four times the size of our own are the most common exoplanets orbiting stars beyond our solar system.

In the new study in the Astrophysical Journal , astronomers show that some of these exoplanets never had gaseous atmospheres to begin with, shedding new light on their mysterious origins.

From observations, we know about 30% to 50% of host stars have one or the other, and the two populations appear in about equal proportion. But where did they come from?

One theory is that most exoplanets are born as mini-Neptunes but some are stripped of their gas shells by radiation from host stars, leaving behind only a dense, rocky core. This theory predicts that our galaxy has very few Earth-sized and smaller exoplanets known as Earths and mini-Earths. However, recent observations show this may not be the case.

To find out more, astronomers used a simulation to track the evolution of these mysterious exoplanets. Their model used thermodynamic calculations based on how massive their rocky cores are, how far they are from their host stars, and how hot the surrounding gas is.

“Contrary to previous theories, our study shows that some exoplanets can never build gaseous atmospheres to begin with,” says coauthor Eve Lee, assistant professor in the physics department at McGill University and the McGill Space Institute.

The findings suggest that not all super-Earths are remnants of mini-Neptunes. Rather, a single distribution of rocks formed the exoplanets , born in a spinning disk of gas and dust around host stars. “Some of the rocks grew gas shells, while others emerged and remained rocky super-Earths,” Lee says.

Scientists think planets form in a spinning disk of gas and dust around stars. Rocks larger than the moon have enough gravitational pull to attract surrounding gas to form a shell around the core. Over time this shell of gas cools down and shrinks, creating space for more surrounding gas to be pulled in, causing the exoplanet to grow. Once the entire shell cools down to the same temperature as the surrounding nebular gas, the shell can no longer shrink and growth stops.

For smaller cores, this shell is tiny, so they remain rocky exoplanets. The distinction between super-Earths and mini-Neptunes comes about from the ability of these rocks to grow and retain gas shells.

“Our findings help explain the origin of the two populations of exoplanets, and perhaps their prevalence” says Lee. “Using the theory proposed in the study, we could eventually decipher how common rocky exoplanets like Earths and mini-Earths may be.”

Source: McGill University

The post Team sheds new light on super-Earth origin mystery appeared first on Futurity .


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Futurity article, and is licenced under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Related Articles: