Tigers may need a ‘genetic rescue’
A "genetic rescue" involving the mating of different subspecies may offer the best way to save increasingly fragmented tiger populations.
A “genetic rescue” may offer the best way to save tigers, researchers say.
Tigers face uncertain futures primarily due to habitat fragmentation, human-wildlife conflict, and poaching.
As global tiger populations decline, so does their genetic diversity. But until now it’s been unclear how the animals’ dwindling numbers are affecting them at the genetic level.
To find out, researchers sequenced 65 genomes from four of the surviving tiger subspecies . The findings confirm that strong genetic differences exist between different tiger subspecies but show, surprisingly, that these differences emerged relatively recently, as Earth underwent a major climatic shift and our own species grew increasingly dominant.
“The increasing dominance of humans across the world means that our understanding of which attributes of species and populations are best suited to the Anthropocene becomes ever more important,” says Elizabeth Hadly, professor in environmental biology at Stanford University, referring to the proposed geological epoch marked by significant human impact on the environment.
“Some Bengal tiger populations are essentially small islands surrounded by an inhospitable sea of humanity. These tigers cannot disperse and so have only their close relatives to choose as mates.”
“Some populations are well adapted to a future dominated by humans and our new climates and others are not, so any type of management of species should be informed by what we can glean from their genomes,” adds Hadly, also a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
“Conservation genomics is far from a perfect science, but this tiger study hints at the power of adequate sampling across both the species range and its genome.”
The study reveals that the world’s existing tiger subspecies began exhibiting signs of dramatic and recent contractions starting only around 20,000 years ago—a period that coincided with both the global transition out of the Pleistocene Ice Age and the rise of human dominance in Asia. Each subspecies of tiger the team studied showed unique genomic signatures as a consequence of their increasing isolation from one another.
For example, local environmental genomic adaptation to cold temperatures was found in the Siberian (or Amur) tigers, the northernmost tigers found in the Russian Far East. These adaptations were absent in the other tiger subpopulations studied.
Tigers from Sumatra, meanwhile, showed evidence of adaptations for body size regulation, which could help explain their overall smaller size. Despite these adaptations, tigers from these populations have low genetic diversity, suggesting that if populations continue to decline, genetic rescue may need to be considered.
One form that rescue might take is through the mating of different tiger subspecies together as a way of increasing their genetic diversity and protecting against the ill effects of inbreeding. Inbreeding occurs when populations are so small and isolated from other populations that related individuals breed with each other.
Over time, this leads to lower genomic diversity and to the emergence of recessive diseases, physical deformities, and fertility problems that often result in behavioral, health, and population declines. Although increasing genetic diversity is one goal, another might be to select for inherited traits that confer higher survival in a changing world.
Even Bengal tigers from India, which comprise about 70% of the world’s wild tigers and exhibit relatively high genomic diversity compared to other subspecies, showed signs of inbreeding in some populations, the study concludes.
“Some Bengal tiger populations are essentially small islands surrounded by an inhospitable sea of humanity. These tigers cannot disperse and so have only their close relatives to choose as mates,” Hadly says.
While many studies investigating endangered species using genomics sequences from a single or just a few individuals, this work reiterates that individuals are not likely to be representative of a population or species status. Researchers need to do further work investigating the consequences of potential inbreeding and diversity declines across the subspecies.
“As genomics has become available to conservation , it is apparent that collaborative studies to investigate the diversity within species are critical,” says study first author Ellie Armstrong, a Stanford PhD student in Hadly’s lab and first author of the paper, published in Molecular Biology and Evolution .
“Inferences made from single genomes, while excellent additions to our knowledge of diversity in general, cannot be extrapolated to entire species, especially when using captive animals to infer adaptation to complex habitat change.”
Source: Stanford University
Share this article: