(Credit: Getty Images )

Simple method protects more NICU babies from Staph germs

Using antibiotic cream and antiseptic wipes can cut the chance that parents will pass dangerous Staph bacteria to their baby in the NICU.

Johns Hopkins University • futurity
Dec. 31, 2019 6 minSource

A mother holds her premature baby under a blanket covered in baby footprints. The baby has tubes coming out of its nose

A relatively simple strategy can reduce the chance of parents exposing their babies in the neonatal intensive care unit to one of the most commonly diagnosed and potentially deadly microbial scourges in a hospital: Staphylococcus aureus.

For sick or premature babies spending their first days of life in a hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the soothing voice and gentle touch of a loving parent can have a tremendous effect toward a positive outcome—that is, unless mom or dad’s visit leaves the infant with something extra: a dangerous bacterial infection.

Researchers detail the findings from their preliminary clinical trial in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Fighting staph infections in the NICU

“Traditional procedures for preventing hospital-acquired staph infections in the NICU have primarily focused on keeping staff and facilities as sterile as possible,” says lead author Aaron Milstone, associate hospital epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Hospital and professor of pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “Our study is among the first to focus on parents as a source of the bacteria and then test the effectiveness of an intervention to combat the problem.”

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an estimated 30% of the adult population are long-term carriers of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Most of the time, these people are healthy and the microorganisms they harbor cause no harm. However, in healthcare settings where patients may have weakened immune systems, the bacteria can become a serious, even deadly, threat.

An unchecked spread of the bacteria—both the antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant (such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA) strains—can lead to severe complications, including bacteremia or sepsis (blood infections), pneumonia, endocarditis (heart valve infection), and osteomyelitis (bone infection).

In the neonatal intensive care unit, S. aureus infections not only threaten a sick or premature infant’s survival but their neurological development as well. In a 2015 study, Milstone and others estimated that there are more than 5,000 cases of invasive S. aureus infections each year in NICUs across the nation and that 10% of the children will likely die before hospital discharge.

What mom and dad can do

To reduce the spread of S. aureus, the researchers turned to a simple regimen for mothers and fathers to follow while their child is in intensive care. The preventive measure includes the application of an antibiotic (mupirocin) ointment into the nose and skin cleansing with a wipe containing 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, an antiseptic widely used on patients to remove surface bacteria around a surgical site before an operation.

Researchers conducted the Treating Parents to Reduce NICU Transmission of S. aureus (TREAT Parents) clinical trial to test the proposed strategy’s effectiveness. The researchers selected for study 190 newborn babies admitted to two NICUs at hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland between November 2014 and December 2018. Each of the infants had at least one parent who tested positive for S. aureus when screened at the time of their child’s entry into the NICU. Researchers did baseline S. aureus counts for the infants at the same time.

The parents of 89 babies self-administered the antibiotic nasal ointment twice a day for five days and cleaned designated skin areas (hands, arms, legs, chest, neck, back, and the skin between the buttocks and groin) with antiseptic wipes for the same time period. The control group, consisting of the remaining 101 parental couples, used identically packaged placebo treatments of petroleum jelly and nonantiseptic wipes.

Researchers monitored both sets of babies for S. aureus colonization until discharge from the NICU. They analyzed bacteria recovered from the infants to determine if they matched the same strain seen in at least one parent.

Among the 190 infants studied overall, 42, or about 22%, acquired S. aureus that matched bacteria recovered from either their mother or father, or from both parents. In this group, four babies had MRSA strains acquired from a parent.

Of the 101 babies with parents in the control group, 29 (nearly 29%) had parentally acquired bacteria compared with only 13 of the 89 babies (nearly 15%) whose parents were given actual antibiotic ointment and antiseptic wipes to use.

“These results from our preliminary trial indicate that treatment with intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine wipes may significantly reduce the number of infants in the NICU who will get S. aureus from contact with a parent,” Milstone says.

“It is our hope that one day this technique can be combined with personal cleanliness for medical staff and environmental safety protocols for facilities to provide a stronger defense against NICU-acquired infections.”

Before that goal can be reached, Milstone says, larger clinical trials are necessary to replicate and validate these findings, along with determining whether the parental cleanliness protocol should apply to the families of all infants in the NICU or just those with babies at greatest risk. He adds that efforts to refine the procedure to optimize its effectiveness and ease of use should follow this research.

Support for the study came from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Source: Johns Hopkins University

The post Simple method protects more NICU babies from Staph germs appeared first on Futurity.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Futurity article, and is licenced under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Related Articles: