1900_United_States_Senate_special_election_in_Mississippi

1900–01 United States Senate elections

1900–01 United States Senate elections

Add article description


The 1900–01 United States Senate elections were held on various dates in various states, coinciding with President William McKinley's re-election as well as the 1900 House of Representatives elections. As these U.S. Senate elections were prior to the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913, senators were chosen by state legislatures. Senators were elected over a wide range of time throughout 1900 and 1901, and a seat may have been filled months late or remained vacant due to legislative deadlock.[1] In these elections, terms were up for the senators in Class 2.

Quick Facts 30 of the 90 seats in the United States Senate (as well as special elections) 46 seats needed for a majority, Majority party ...

Both the Republicans and the Democrats gained two seats at the expense of various third parties and vacancies. Special elections were held to fill vacant seats in Pennsylvania, Utah, and Montana (of which the Republicans won the two former and Democrats the latter) as well as to replace appointees in Minnesota, Nebraska, and Vermont (all of which were carried by the Republicans). Republicans flipped Democratic-held seats in Minnesota, as well as a Populist seat in Nebraska and a Silver Republican held seat in South Dakota. The Silver Republican party kept itself to net neutral gain by flipping a Republican held seat in Idaho. The Democratic party, meanwhile, flipped Republican held seats in Montana and Colorado as well as a Populist held seat in North Carolina.

In Nebraska and Montana's special election, senators were elected shortly after the beginning of the 57th Congress on March 4. In Delaware, the legislature again failed to elect a candidate, leaving both senate seats vacant– the only time a state has gone without representation in the Senate since the first Congress.

Results summary

Senate party division, 57th Congress (1901–1903)

  • Majority party: Republican (55)
  • Minority party: Democratic (29)
  • Other parties: Populist (2); Silver Republican 2; Vacant 2
  • Total seats: 90

Change in Senate composition

Before the elections

At the beginning of 1900.

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
D15 D14 D13 D12 D11 D10 D9 D8 D7 D6
D16
Ran
D17
Ran
D18
Ran
D19
Ran
D20
Ran
D21
Ran
D22
Retired
D23
Retired
D24
Retired
D25
Retired
SR2 SR1 S1 S2 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Ran
D26
Retired
SR3
Ran
R51
Retired
R50
Unknown
R49
Ran
R48
Ran
R47
Ran
R46
Ran
R45
Ran
R44
Ran
V1
Majority → V2
R36
Ran
R37
Ran
R38
Ran
R39
Ran
R40
Ran
R41
Ran
R42
Ran
R43
Ran
V3
R35
Ran
R34 R33 R32 R31 R30 R29 R28 R27 R26
R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25
R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5

Result of the general elections

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
D15 D14 D13 D12 D11 D10 D9 D8 D7 D6
D16
Re-elected
D17
Re-elected
D18
Re-elected
D19
Re-elected
D20
Re-elected
D21
Hold
D22
Hold
D23
Hold
D24
Hold
D25
Hold
SR1 S1 S2 P1 P2 P3 P4 D28
Gain from P
D27
Gain from R
D26
Gain from R
SR2 SR3
Gain from R
R48
Gain from SR
R47
Re-elected
R46
Re-elected
R45
Re-elected
R44
Hold
R43
Re-elected
V5
D Loss
V1
Majority → V4
R Loss
V2
R36
Re-elected
R37
Re-elected
R38
Re-elected
R39
Re-elected
R40
Re-elected
R41
Re-elected
R42
Hold
V3
R35
Re-elected
R34 R33 R32 R31 R30 R29 R28 R27 R26
R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25
R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5

Beginning of the next Congress

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
D15 D14 D13 D12 D11 D10
Change from SR
D9 D8 D7 D6
D16 D17 D18 D19 D20 D21 D22 D23 D24 D25
R52
Gain from V
R53
Gain from V
SR2 SR1 P1 P2 P3 D28 D27 D26
R51
Change from P
R50
Change from S
R49
Change from S
R48 R47 R46 R45 R44 V4
D Loss
V1
Majority →
R36 R37 R38 R39 R40 R41 R42 R43 V3 V2
R35 R34 R33 R32 R31 R30 R29 R28 R27 R26
R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25
R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5
More information Key: ...

Race summaries

Elections to the 56th Congress

In these elections, the winner was seated in the current (56th) Congress during 1900 or in 1901 before March 4; ordered by election date.

More information State, Incumbent ...

Elections to the 57th Congress

In these general elections, the winners were elected for the term beginning March 4, 1901; ordered by state.

All of the elections involved the Class 2 seats.

More information State, Incumbent ...

Early election to the 58th Congress

In this election, the winner was seated in the 58th Congress, starting March 4, 1903.

More information State, Incumbent ...

Elections during the 57th Congress

In these elections, the winners was elected in 1901 after March 4 and seated in the 57th Congress.

More information State, Incumbent ...

Pennsylvania (special)

The special election in Pennsylvania was held on January 15, 1901, after the regularly scheduled legislative election in January–April 1899 failed to elect a Senator. Former Senator Matthew Quay, who had left the Senate for nearly two years because of the political stalemate, was again elected by the Pennsylvania General Assembly to the United States Senate.[39][40]

Republican Matthew Quay was re-elected by the Pennsylvania General Assembly, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate, in the 1893 election. With Sen. Quay's term expiring on March 4, 1899, the General Assembly convened on January 18, 1899, to elect a Senator for the next term. Between January 18 and April 19, 1899, seventy-nine ballots were recorded in an attempt to elect a Senator. Instead, the legislature adjourned sine die without electing a Senator due to a dispute between Sen. Quay's political machine and an anti-Quay faction within the Republican Party, along with Democratic Party opposition.[39]

Sen. Quay's term expired on March 4, 1899. Since a Senator had not been elected for the successive term, the seat was vacated. At the time, Quay was under indictment for misuse of funds. He was acquitted, after which Governor William Stone appointed Quay to the vacated Senate seat (a power the Governor did not legally have until the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1913). The Senate refused to recognize Quay's appointment, and the seat remained vacant until a Senator could be officially elected (which would ultimately be Quay himself, after a nearly two-year hiatus). This incident, among others, would later be cited by supporters of the 17th Amendment, which mandated the direct election of U.S. Senators.[39]

The Pennsylvania General Assembly convened on January 15, 1901, for a special election to elect a Senator to serve out the remainder of the term that began on March 4, 1899. The results of the vote of both houses combined are as follows:

More information Party, Candidate ...

See also


Notes

  1. "17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)". National Archives and Records Administration. February 8, 2022.
  2. Tribune Almanac (1901), pp. 299–300.
  3. "Dubois lands the prize". Lewiston Morning Tribune. Idaho. January 16, 1901. p. 1.
  4. Clark, p. 245.
  5. A different source tallied the results with an additional vote for both Gear and White.[2]
  6. "Warren Wins in Wyoming". The New York Times. January 23, 1901. p. 5.
  7. "Fusion" here meant Democratic.Tribune Almanac (1902), pp. 299–300
  8. "U.S. Senate Election - 1899" (PDF). Wilkes University. Retrieved December 23, 2012.
  9. "U.S. Senate Election - 15 January 1901" (PDF). Wilkes University. Retrieved December 23, 2012.

References


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article 1900_United_States_Senate_special_election_in_Mississippi, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.