2003_Worcester_Council_election

2003 Worcester City Council election

2003 Worcester City Council election

Add article description


The 2003 Worcester City Council election took place on 1 May 2003 to elect members of Worcester City Council in Worcestershire, England. One third of the council was up for election and the Conservative Party gained overall control of the council from no overall control.[1]

After the election, the composition of the council was:

Campaign

13 seats were contested in the election with 2 seats available in St Nicholas ward after a Labour councillor stood down.[3] Labour defended 7 seats as against 5 for the Conservatives and 1 for the independents.[4] Meanwhile, the decision of the British National Party to put up a candidate in Holy Trinity ward received attention in the press.[3]

Worcester was a top Conservative target council in the 2003 local elections,[5][6] with gains here seen as important signal for the parties performance at the next general election.[7] The Conservatives had controlled the council as a minority administration since the 2000 election and were hoping to win a majority.[4] They said Labour had been out of touch when they ran the council and had made poor decisions such as using green fields for transport schemes.[4] However, Labour attacked the Conservatives for the council's budget, including a council tax rise of 9.5% and poor waste collection services; as well as the controversy over the closing and then rescue of Swan Theatre in Worcester.[4]

The level of postal voting in the election was up on previous years with 5,000 postal voting forms being sent, compared to 3,000 in 2002.[8][9]

Election result

The results saw the Conservatives win a majority on the council,[10] after gaining 2 seats from Labour but losing 1 seat to the Liberal Democrats.[11] This meant that Labour only held 10 seats which was the lowest number of seats they had held on the council up to then.[11] However Labour did manage to retain Holy Trinity ward, defeating the British National Party who came second in the ward.[11] Voter turnout was low, dropping as low as 18% in St Barnabus ward.[11]

More information Party, Seats ...

Ward results

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

References

  1. "Local elections". BBC News Online. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
  2. "Election Results". The Times. 2 May 2003. p. 17.
  3. "Worcestershire council nominations: Far right join in battle for city ; Worcester". Birmingham Mail. 8 April 2003. p. 13.
  4. Walker, Jonathan (20 April 2003). "Elections 2003: Tories hoping to tighten their grip for majority". Birmingham Post. p. 4.
  5. Dillon, Jo (20 April 2003). "Tories in election plot to boost IDS". The Independent on Sunday. p. 4.
  6. Sherman, Jill; Kite, Melissa (11 April 2003). "Blair risks forfeiting a dozen councils to mid-term blues". The Times. p. 16.
  7. Courtauld, Charlie (27 April 2003). "Worcester Woman is unimpressed and may not be voting at all ; The Tories invented her, then wooed her. But she seems likely to rebuff them again on Thursday". The Independent. p. 10.
  8. Walker, Jonathan (22 April 2003). "Demand for postal votes on the rise". Birmingham Post. p. 4.
  9. Parker, Simon (2 May 2003). "Backlash costs Labour 750 seats". guardian.co.uk. London. Retrieved 5 January 2010.
  10. "Tories cling on to Worcester". icBirmingham. 2 May 2003. Retrieved 5 January 2010.
  11. "Electoral Services - Results 2003". Political Science Resources. Archived from the original on 10 May 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2010.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article 2003_Worcester_Council_election, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.