| Type |
Case |
Citation |
Issues |
Joined by |
Other opinions |
101
|
Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoy |
562 U.S. 195 (2011)
|
Truth in Lending Act • Regulation Z • credit card issuer change-in-terms notice requirements |
Unanimous |
|
|
402
|
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC |
562 U.S. 223 (2011)
|
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 • state law design defect claims • federal preemption |
Ginsburg |
|
|
203
|
Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. |
562 U.S. 323 (2011)
|
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 • Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards on seat belt design • state law torts against auto manufacturers • federal preemption |
|
|
|
104
|
Michigan v. Bryant |
562 U.S. 344 (2011)
|
Sixth Amendment • Confrontation Clause • hearsay exception for statements to help police address ongoing emergency |
Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito |
|
|
105
|
Pepper v. United States |
562 U.S. 476 (2011)
|
Federal Sentencing Guidelines • consideration of postsentencing rehabilitation |
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg; Breyer, Alito (in part) |
|
|
406
|
Pitre v. Cain • [full text] |
562 U.S. 992 (2010)
|
Eighth Amendment • prison conditions • right to refuse medical treatment |
|
|
| Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari. She believed that the lower courts erred in dismissing a prison inmate's complaint, which alleged that, as punishment for his refusal to take his HIV medication as a protest against his transfer to a prison facility, prison officials subjected him to hard labor in extreme heat that posed a serious risk to his health. Sotomayor argued that the inmate stated an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference, and that it was incorrect for the lower court to dismiss his complaint for his failure to submit evidence in support prior to a responsive pleading being submitted. |
507
|
Gamache v. California • [full text] |
562 U.S. 1083 (2010)
|
harmless error • burden of proof |
Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan |
|
| Sotomayor filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari. Prior to rendering a guilty verdict and death sentence, a jury had been given access to a damaging video tape depicting the defendant that had not been admitted into evidence. The California Supreme Court, stating that the defendant had the burden of proving prejudice, determined that the introduction of the tape was harmless error. Sotomayor wrote to correct the court's error of law, noting that under Supreme Court precedent the burden is instead upon the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a constitutional trial error was harmless. She believed, however, that based on the evidence and the court's analysis, the outcome would have been the same in this case regardless of how the burden was allocated, and so did not disagree with the denial of certiorari. |
408
|
Williams v. Hobbs • [full text] |
562 U.S. 1097 (2010)
|
habeas corpus • evidentiary hearings • preservation of issues on appeal |
Ginsburg |
|
| Sotomayor dissented from the Court's denial of certiorari of a judgment reversing the granting of a habeas petition after an evidentiary hearing. The petitioner had been convicted of murder in state court and sentenced to death after his attorneys conceded his guilt at trial and failed to present any substantive mitigating evidence at sentencing. In District Court, he established that his counsel was ineffective and at the evidentiary hearing to establish prejudice, presented evidence of his childhood of abuse and neglect. In reversing the District Court's granting of the petition, the Eighth Circuit claimed that the State had preserved its objection to the evidentiary hearing, when in Sotomayor's view it not only made no clear objection but in fact, "voluntarily participate[d]...without objection, with an apparent intent of supplementing the record for its own purposes, and at a significant cost and expenditure of judicial resources." "Today", she wrote, "the Court refuses to review the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that a State may withhold an objection to a federal habeas evidentiary hearing until after the hearing is complete, the constitutional violation established, and habeas relief granted. Because I believe such a rule enables, and even invites, States to manipulate federal habeas proceedings to their own strategic advantage at an unacceptable cost to justice, I respectfully dissent." |
109
|
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano |
563 U.S. 27 (2011)
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 • Rule 10b-5 • failure of pharmaceutical company to disclose evidence of drug side effect • materiality |
Unanimous |
|
|
410
|
Cullen v. Pinholster |
563 U.S. 170 (2011)
|
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 • introduction of new evidence in habeas corpus proceedings • Sixth Amendment • ineffective assistance of counsel |
Ginsburg, Kagan (in part) |
|
|
411
|
Sossamon v. Texas |
563 U.S. 277 (2011)
|
prisoners' rights • Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act • Spending Clause • sovereign immunity |
Breyer |
|
|
212
|
United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation |
563 U.S. 307 (2011)
|
Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction • separate suits based on same operative facts |
Breyer |
|
|
413
|
Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting |
563 U.S. 582 (2011)
|
Immigration Reform and Control Act • Legal Arizona Workers Act • state requirement that businesses use E-Verify • suspension or revocation of business licenses for hiring unauthorized aliens • federal preemption |
|
|
|
214
|
Camreta v. Greene |
563 U.S. 692 (2011)
|
Article III • Case or Controversy Clause • standing • review of constitutional issue on appeal from defendant with qualified immunity • mootness |
Breyer |
|
|
215
|
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd |
563 U.S. 731 (2011)
|
material witness arrest of terrorism suspects • pretextual motivation • Fourth Amendment • qualified immunity |
Ginsburg, Breyer |
|
|
216
|
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. |
563 U.S. 776 (2011)
|
patent law • University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act of 1980 • vesting of federally funded patents in inventors or contractors |
|
|
|
117
|
DePierre v. United States |
564 U.S. 70 (2011)
|
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 • sentence enhancement for "cocaine base" |
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan; Scalia (in part) |
|
|
118
|
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership |
564 U.S. 91 (2011)
|
Patent Act of 1952 • presumption of patent validity • on-sale bar • clear and convincing evidence |
Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan |
|
|
419
|
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation |
564 U.S. 162 (2011)
|
fiduciary exception to attorney–client privilege • general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes |
|
|
|
220
|
Davis v. United States |
564 U.S. 229 (2011)
|
Fourth Amendment • exclusionary rule • good faith reliance on binding appellate precedent |
|
|
|
121
|
J. D. B. v. North Carolina |
564 U.S. 261 (2011)
|
Fifth Amendment • Miranda warning • effect of minor's age on determining custodial status |
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan |
|
|
222
|
Tapia v. United States |
564 U.S. 319 (2011)
|
extension of prison sentence to foster rehabilitation |
Alito |
|
|
223
|
Freeman v. United States |
564 U.S. 522 (2011)
|
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 • sentence reduction due to retroactive amendment of Sentencing Guidelines • plea bargain under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 |
|
|
|
424
|
PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing |
564 U.S. 604 (2011)
|
federal generic drug labeling requirements • federal preemption |
Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan |
|
|
225
|
Bullcoming v. New Mexico |
564 U.S. 647 (2011)
|
Sixth Amendment • Confrontation Clause • forensic laboratory report as testimony |
|
|
|
