Ukrainian embassy

The Ukrainian embassy assisted Chalupa with her research, though the extent and nature of the assistance are in dispute.^[7][2][12] According to Politico, the DNC encouraged Chalupa to ask the Ukrainian embassy to arrange a call with Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko to discuss Manafort, Trump, and their connections to Russia, but the embassy declined.^[7]

Andrii Telizhenko, who worked in the embassy as third secretary under Shulyar at the time, told Politico that she asked him to pass on to Chalupa any information he came across about connections between Trump, Manafort, and Russia.^[7] He claimed the embassy was coordinating with Chalupa and the Clinton campaign on investigating Manafort.^[7][13] In 2018, Telizhenko told the Ukrainian news site Strana.UA that Poroshenko worked with Chalupa to discredit Trump.^[13] He began repeating the story in 2019 to U.S. right-wing media, Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and House Intelligence Committee minority chair Devin Nunes.^[13][14] Ukrainian lawmaker Oleg Voloshyn also accused Poroshenko and Chaly of favoring the Clinton campaign and called for an investigation into the alleged cooperation between Chalupa and the Ukrainian Embassy.^[15] Both the embassy and Chalupa disputed the allegations.^[13][5] Ambassador Chaly denied any wrongdoing and called Telizhenko a liar.^[15]

In a written statement to The Hill, Chaly admitted that Chalupa had approached the embassy and tried to push the embassy to assist with supplying information on Manafort, including a request to allow a journalist to ask President Poroshenko questions about Manaforts dealings in Ukraine. Chaly said that at the time the embassy knew Chalupa as an activist and only discovered her connections to the DNC later. He stated that the embassy didn't cooperate with her, calling the request "inappropriate" and saying “We were surprised to see Alexandra’s interest in Mr. Paul Manafort’s case. It was her own cause. The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way, as we were convinced that this is a strictly U.S. domestic matter.”^[16]

Intimidation campaign

In late April 2016, Chalupa began receiving daily administrative alerts from Yahoo! warning her that state actors were attempting to break into her email account.^[17][7] After two weeks of daily alerts, she informed the DNC about the hacking attempts.^[17][7] That email became public when WikiLeaks published stolen DNC emails in July.^[17][7] The alerts continued into 2017.^[7]

In June 2016, someone broke into and searched her car, but left everything behind.^[7] She became convinced it was Russia-linked when two more family cars were broken into and ransacked but nothing was stolen.^[7] A few days later, a woman "wearing white flowers in her hair" tried to break into Chalupa's home.^[7] She mentioned the incident to Shulyar, who told her it resembled intimidation campaigns used against foreigners in Russia.^[7] Chalupa began receiving death threats in the second half of 2016.^[7]

FEC complaints

The conservative watchdog group Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed a complaint against Chalupa and the DNC with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in August 2017.^[18] The complaint^[19] alleges that the research assistance the Ukrainian embassy provided to her during the 2016 election campaign was an illegal campaign contribution to the DNC because of her work for them at the time.^[18] The pro-Trump super PAC Committee to Defend the President filed a similar FEC complaint against the DNC in September 2019, alleging that the DNC ordered Chalupa to investigate Manafort and Trump.^[20]

In 2019, the FEC sent a letter to Chalupa stating that its attorneys “found reason to believe that you violated [the Federal Election Campaign Act] by soliciting, accepting or receiving contributions from foreign nationals” and that “the Ukrainian Embassy made in-kind contributions to the DNC by performing opposition research on the Trump campaign at no charge to the DNC.”^[21] In a separate letter sent to the DNC, the FEC said that the DNC “does not directly deny that Chalupa obtained assistance from the Ukrainians nor that she passed on the Ukrainian Embassy’s research to DNC officials.” And that DNC officials “may have authorized Chalupa to act as an intermediary [with the Embassy] to solicit and receive negative information about the Trump campaign.”^[22]

In 2021, the FEC voted 4-2 to dismiss the allegations that Chalupa or the DNC had violated any federal campaign laws. The FEC general counsel’s office concluded that Chalupas actions amounted to soliciting an illegal foreign contribution to aid the Clinton campaign, but Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub said the investigation into the matter relied on tainted testimony from Andrii Telizhenko, who Weintraub claimed was a Russian agent.^[23]

Calls for DOJ investigation

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) on two occasions to investigate alleged coordination between Chalupa and the Ukrainian government to interfere in the 2016 election.^[24] In July 2017, he sent a letter^[25] in his capacity as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.^[24] Chalupa denied the claims, saying that she acted as a part time consultant in 2016, and that she was never asked by DNC officials to "go to the Ukrainian Embassy to collect information." She did admit to meeting with representatives of the Ukrainian Embassy, but claimed that these meetings had to do with "Immigrant Heritage Month women's networking event."^[26] Grassley and Senator Ron Johnson sent a second letter^[27] in September 2019 in their capacities as the chairs of the Senate Finance and Homeland Security Committees.^[24] Both letters cite the 2017 Politico article^[7] as evidence.^[24]

Impeachment Inquiry

During the US Congress' 2019 Impeachment Inquiry hearings, House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes several times cited Alexandra Chalupa as a fact witness that committee chairman Adam Schiff refused to bring before the committee. Chalupa responded that she would welcome the opportunity to testify and push back against the Republican narrative about her involvement with Ukrainian officials.^[2]