Cambridge_University_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

Cambridge University (UK Parliament constituency)

Cambridge University (UK Parliament constituency)

Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1801–1950


Cambridge University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950.

Quick Facts 1603–1950, Seats ...

Franchise and method of election

This university constituency was created by a Royal Charter of 1603. It was abolished in 1950 by the Representation of the People Act 1948.

The constituency was not a geographical area. Its electorate consisted of the graduates of the University of Cambridge. Before 1918 the franchise was restricted to male graduates with a Doctorate or Master of Arts degree. Sedgwick records that there were 377 electors in 1727. For the 1754–1790 period, Namier and Brooke estimated the electorate at about 500.

The constituency returned two Members of Parliament. Before 1918 they were elected by plurality-at-large voting, but from 1918 onwards the two members were elected by the Single Transferable Vote method.

History

In the early 18th century, the electors of both English universities were mostly Tories, but the Whig ministers of King George I were able to persuade him to use his royal prerogative to confer Cambridge doctorates on a large number of Whigs, so that from 1727 the university largely returned Whig representatives. At Oxford, the King did not enjoy the same prerogative power, so that the University of Oxford constituency remained Tory, and indeed often Jacobite, in its preferences.

The leading 18th-century Whig politician Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle, was Chancellor of the University of Cambridge from 1748 to 1768 and recommended to the electors suitable candidates to represent them in Parliament. This practice continued under his successor, another Whig Duke and Prime Minister, Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton, Chancellor of the university from 1768 to 1811. However, Grafton was less influential as a politician than Newcastle had been and also less attentive towards the university, and as a result some of his nominations came in for criticism, notably that of his friend Richard Croftes.

Croftes was far from typical of a university member of parliament: he was neither the son of a peer, like the Hon. John Townshend, the Marquess of Granby, and Grafton's own son the Earl of Euston, nor a distinguished lawyer-politician, such as William de Grey, James Mansfield, and Sir Vicary Gibbs, nor a prominent political figure like William Pitt the Younger and Lord Henry Petty. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Pittite and Tory candidates began to be elected. At the appearance of this political development, some of the Pittite members, including the younger William Pitt himself, one of the members for the university from 1784 to 1806, described themselves as Whigs. As time passed, the division between the 19th century Tory and Whig parties became clearer.

The future Prime Minister, Viscount Palmerston, retained his university seat as a Whig after he left the Tory ranks, but in 1831 he was defeated. After Palmerston ceased to represent the university he was elected by a territorial constituency. From then until the 1920s, all of the university's members were Tories and/or Conservatives.

Even after the introduction of the single transferable vote in 1918, most of the members continued to be elected as Conservatives.

Members of Parliament

This is a list of people who have been elected to represent this university in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

1603 to 1660

  • Constituency created 1603
More information Year, First member ...

1660 to 1784

1784 to 1950

Notes:-

  • 1 Pitt called himself a Whig, but is usually retrospectively regarded as a Tory since most of his followers (whether their background was in the Whig or Tory tradition) came to call themselves the Tory Party in the decade after Pitt's death.
  • 2 Jebb died on 10 December 1905 – seat vacant at dissolution.
  • 3 Co. is an abbreviation for Coalition.
  • 4 Ind. is an abbreviation for Independent.
  • 5 Sir Geoffrey G. Butler died on 2 May 1929 – seat vacant at dissolution.

Elections before 1715

Election by block vote 1715–1918

1710s1720s1730s1740s1750s1760s1770s1780s1790s1800s1810s1820s1830s1840s1850s1860s1870s1880s1890s1900s1910s

Elections in the 1710s

More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1720s

  • Death of Paske
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1722): Stooks Smith gives Willoughby 319 votes.
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1727): Unusually, for a pre-1832 election, Stooks Smith records the total number of electors for the constituency as well as the number who voted; so a turnout figure can be calculated.

Elections in the 1730s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1734): Goodrick was an Opposition Whig

Elections in the 1740s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1750s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1760s

  • Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1770s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1780s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1780): Stooks Smith records Townshend as getting 237 votes.
  • Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • The 1784 election was broadly a contest between the new government of Pitt and the ousted Fox-North Coalition, in which both Townshend and Mansfield had held office.

Elections in the 1790s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1790): Party labels in the 1790–1832 period follow Stooks Smith, who classifies Pitt and his Pittite supporters as Tories without regard to what they would have actually called themselves.
  • Seat vacated on Pitt being appointed Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Seat vacated on Euston being appointed to an office
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1800s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Death of Pitt
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Palmerston was a Peer of Ireland
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1810s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1820s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Death of Smyth
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1827): Unusually for a pre-1832 election Stooks Smith provides a total electorate figure, so a turnout percentage can be calculated. See the 1727 result above for another instance.
  • Seat vacated on the appointment of Tindal as Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1830s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Manners-Sutton created 'The 1st Viscount Canterbury'.
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1837): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Law as a Peelite between this election and that of 1847.

Elections in the 1840s

More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1841): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.
  • Goulburn appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer.
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note 1 (1847): 3,800 registered electors; 4,682 votes cast; minimum possible turnout estimated by dividing votes by 2. To the extent that electors did not use both their votes, the figure will be an underestimate.
  • Note 2 (1847): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.

Elections in the 1850s

  • Death of Law.
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
  • Note (1852): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative for this election.
  • Death of Goulburn.
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1860s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1870s

More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1880s

More information Party, Candidate ...

Walpole's resignation caused a by-election.

More information Party, Candidate ...
Hope
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Raikes was appointed Postmaster General, requiring a by-election.

More information Party, Candidate ...
Stokes

Beresford-Hope's death caused a by-election.

More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1890s

Jebb
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1900s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections in the 1910s

More information Party, Candidate ...
More information Party, Candidate ...
Cox
More information Party, Candidate ...

Elections 1918–1950

General elections from 1918, when most constituencies polled on the same day, were on different polling days than for territorial constituencies. The polls for university constituencies were open for five days. The elections were conducted by Single Transferable Vote.

Elections in the 1910s

More information Party, Candidate ...

    Elections in the 1920s

    More information Party, Candidate ...
    • As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
    More information Party, Candidate ...
      More information Party, Candidate ...
      • As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
      More information Party, Candidate ...
      More information Party, Candidate ...

        Elections in the 1930s

        More information Party, Candidate ...
        More information Party, Candidate ...
        More information Party, Candidate ...
        • As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary

        Elections in the 1940s

        More information Party, Candidate ...
        More information Party, Candidate ...

          See also


          References

          • Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885–1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
          • British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
          • British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
          • British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press, revised edition 1977)
          • McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book: British Election Results 1832–1918 (8th edition, The Harvester Press 1971)
          • The House of Commons 1715–1754, by Romney Sedgwick (HMSO 1970)
          • The House of Commons 1754–1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
          • The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)
          • Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832–1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
          • Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886–1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
          • Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919–1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)
          • Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume IV 1945–1979, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1981)
          • Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "C" (part 1)
          Specific
          1. Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 28–31. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
          2. Fisher, David R. "Cambridge University". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
          3. Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
          4. "Cambridge University Election". Yorkshire Gazette. 9 February 1856. p. 3. Retrieved 14 September 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
          5. "Cambridge University Election". Cambridge Independent Press. 29 February 1868. p. 5. Retrieved 1 February 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
          6. Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.
          More information Parliament of the United Kingdom ...

          Share this article:

          This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Cambridge_University_(UK_Parliament_constituency), and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.