Corruption_of_Foreign_Public_Officials_Act

<i>Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act</i>

Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act

Canadian anti-corruption law

The Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (CFPOA, French: Loi sur la corruption d’agents publics étrangers) is an anti-corruption law in force in Canada. It was passed in 1999, ratifying the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and is often referred to as the Canadian equivalent to the United States' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

Jurisdiction

Under section 5 subsection 1 of the CFPOA, every person who contravenes the Act (sections 3 and 4) outside Canada that is a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident,[1] or "a public body, corporation, society, company, firm or partnership that is incorporated, formed or otherwise organized under the laws of Canada or a province,"[2] is deemed to have committed the offence in Canada.[2] Thereby giving the Act jurisdictional powers over persons or entities committing bribery within Canada or Canadian bodies abroad. It also outlines in subsection 2 the jurisdiction to proceed with trials and punishment "in any territorial division in Canada."[2]

Provisions

The Act states that: "Every person commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain an advantage in the course of business, directly or indirectly gives, offers or agrees to give or offer a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind to a foreign public official or to any person for the benefit of a foreign public official as consideration for an act or omission by the official in connection with the performance of the official's duties or functions" or "to induce the official to use his or her position to influence any acts or decisions of the foreign state or public international organization for which the official performs duties or functions."[3]

In Canada "CFPOA 36 criminalizes the corruption of foreign public officials", and the "Criminal Code criminalizes the corruption of domestic public officials".[3]

Amendments

On June 19, 2013, an amendment to CFPOA, Bill S-14, was passed to strengthen the Act against corruption and bribery. This included a notification that the existing exclusion of facilitation payments in the Act, would be eliminated at a future date. facilitation payments or "grease payments", are "made to expedite or secure the performance by a foreign public official". Since October 31, 2017, facilitation payments are no longer excluded.[4] In 2009, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommended that member nations discourage the use of facilitating payments by businesses. This amendment aligned Canada further with other OECD countries.[4]

International Anti-Corruption Unit

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has "the exclusive authority to lay charges under the CFPOA."[5] In 2008, the RCMP established the International Anti-Corruption Unit was established in 2008 with two teams of seven−one based in Calgary and the other in Ottawa.[5]

Background

Canada has a history of not responding forcefully to combat international bribery of foreign public officials. In its March 2011 report, the OECD Working Group on Bribery said that the CFPOA was limited in its jurisdiction, had an insufficient numbers of investigators, and applied weak penalties in the event of a conviction.[6] According to the report since the implementation CFPOA in 1999 until 2011, there had been only case that led to a conviction under CFPOA—the 2005 Hydro Kleen case.[7] It involved a private lawsuit against the Alberta-based company, Hydro Kleen, which resulted in the company pleading guilty to bribing a US immigration official. The investigation was not regarded as a particularly complex one that required minimal investigation of one State employee based in North America. The fine of CAD 25,000 levied on the company after it had admitted to paying CAD 28,299 in bribes was hardly punitive.[7]

In May 2011, the NGO Transparency International suggested that Canada was a long way behind other developed countries, identifying it as one of 21 states undertaking "little or no enforcement" of their anti-bribery legislation". It reported that "Canada is the only G7 country in the little or no enforcement category, and has been in this category since the first edition of this report in 2005".[8]

According to the compliance consultancy Billiter Partners, by March 2011, Canadian authorities had never charged a "well-known Canadian firm for bribery" under CFPOA, unlike its counterpart in the United States, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.[7]

The first major CFPOA prosecution involved Niko Resources, a Canadian company that had bid on a multimillion-dollar contract for the supply of a security system in India.[9] the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) had begun their investigation the company in January 2010 over allegations that it had made improper payments to government officials in Bangladesh.[7] This high-profile CFPOA investigation resulted in charges being made in May 2010 against Nazir Karigar for allegedly "provided a luxury SUV worth over $190,000 and paid for the air travel for a Bangladesh minister to persuade him to decide a contract dispute in the [Nilo's] favor."[9] When Niko Resources pled guilt and "agreed to pay the Canadian government $9.5 million to settle the case, this was seen as a "positive sign" for future CFPOA cases.[9]

By May 2010, CFPOA prosecutors were investigating 20 corruption cases.[9]: 92 [7]

In their 2016-2017 report to parliament, ongoing cases involved SNC-Lavalin,[10] Cryptometrics, and Canadian General Aircraft in Calgary.[11]

Concluded cases

Matters concluded involved cases related to the Padma Multipurpose Bridge Project, World Bank Group v. Wallace,[12] Griffiths Energy International Inc,[13] Niko Resources Ltd., and Hydro-Kleen Group Inc.[11]

On January 25, 2013, Calgary-based Griffiths International Energy Inc., a privately held oil and gas company pleaded guilty to bribing the Chadian Ambassador to Canada to bid for an oil and gas contract in Chad.[14][15][16] Griffiths had "voluntarily self-disclosed its internal investigation" to the RCMP's International Anti-Corruption Unit in November 2011.[3]: 33 

Conviction of individuals under CFPOA

In 2016, the court sentenced Nazir Karigar to a three-year prison term, the first conviction of an individual under the CFPOA.[17] The second CFPOA conviction of an individual was on December 17, 2018, when Quebec's Superior Court of Justice handed down a three-year sentence to Yanaï Elbaz for his "involvement in a bribery scheme in which SNC-Lavalin secured a $1.3 billion contract to build McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). Elbaz was a MUHC senior manager at the time. The trial and sentencing of Mr. Elbaz is "one of the most significant corruption convictions in Canadian history, and may mark a shift in Canada’s enforcement of its anti-bribery legislation".[17]

See also

References

  1. [1]
    Branch, Legislative Services (2018-07-31). "Subsection 2(1) Immigration and Refugee Protection Act". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  2. [2]
    Branch, Legislative Services (2017-10-31). "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
  3. [3]
    Boisvert, Anne-Marie Lynda; Dent, Peter; Quraishi, Ophelie Brunelle. Deloitte LLP (ed.). Corruption in Canada: Definitions and Enforcement May 2014 (PDF) (Report). Public Safety Canada. p. 67. ISBN 978-1-100-23797-8. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  4. [4]
    Dattu, Riyaz; Kuzma, Kaeleigh (October 30, 2017). "Canadian government eliminates facilitation payments exclusion in the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act". Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  5. [5]
    Fourteenth Annual Report to Parliament
  6. [6]
    Sher, Julian (March 28, 2011). "OECD Slams Canada's Lack of Prosecution of Bribery Offences". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  7. [7]
    "OECD Criticism Masks Changes in Canada's Anti-Corruption Landscape" (PDF). Billiter Partners. March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-10. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  8. [8]
    The Huffington Post, “Transparency International Criticizes Harper Administration For Not Enforcing Anti-Bribery Laws”
  9. [9]
    Garrett, Christopher J. (2012). "Combating Official Corruption in International Business Transactions". Journal of Contract Management: 7.
  10. [10]
    Government of Canada, Public Prosecution Service of Canada (2017-03-09). "PPSC - 2017–18 Departmental Plan". www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca. Retrieved 2019-02-12.
  11. [11]
    Government of Canada (2018). Canada’s Fight against Foreign Bribery - Eighteenth Annual Report to Parliament September 2016 – August 2017. Foreign Affairs Trade and Development Canada (Report). Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  12. [12]
    Steptoe; Low, Johnson LLP-Lucinda A.; Megaw, Jessica Piquet. "Canadian Supreme Court Upholds World Bank Immunities in World Bank Group v. Wallace, Encouraging a Continued Flow of Referrals to National Prosecutors". Lexology. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  13. [13]
    "Judge approves $10.35-million fine for Griffiths Energy in bribery case - The Globe and Mail". Retrieved 2019-02-19.
  14. [14]
    "Caracal Energy to acquire Transglobe to add assets in Egypt". Retrieved June 25, 2014.
  15. [15]
    Tait, Carrie (January 22, 2013). "Griffiths to pay millions in African bribery case". The Globe and Mail.
  16. [16]
    Blyschak, Paul (2014). "Corporate Liability for Foreign Corrupt Practices under Canadian Law". McGill Law Journal. 59 (3): 655–705. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  17. [17]
    Ritchie, Lawrence E. (January 11, 2019). "Individual defendant receives three-year sentence for Canadian corruption conviction". Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Corruption_of_Foreign_Public_Officials_Act, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.