Croatia–Serbia_genocide_case

<i>Croatia–Serbia genocide case</i>

Croatia–Serbia genocide case

2015 International Court of Justice decision

Not to be confused with Genocide of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia.

The Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)[1] was heard before the International Court of Justice.

Quick Facts Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia), Court ...

The Republic of Croatia filed the suit against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on 2 July 1999, citing Article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.[2] The application was filed for Croatia by American lawyer David Rivkin.[3] With the transformation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia into Serbia and Montenegro and the dissolution of that country in 2006, Serbia is considered its legal successor.

The Republic of Serbia filed a counterclaim charging the Republic of Croatia with genocide, on 4 January 2010.[4] The application covers missing people, killed people, refugees, expelled people and all military actions and concentration camps with historical account of World War II persecution of Serbs committed by the Independent State of Croatia, puppet state of Nazi Germany, and Ustaše during World War II.[5]

Both applications had a financial aspect, seeking compensation of damages. Opening arguments began on Monday, 3 March 2014 and lasted until 1 April 2014.[6][7] On 3 February 2015, the International Court of Justice ruled that neither Serbia nor Croatia proved sufficient evidence that either side committed genocide, thereby dismissing both cases.[8]

Facts

Croatia waited until the conclusion of the Bosnian Genocide Case before it proceeded with its own case. Sakib Softić, who worked on the Bosnian case, stated that Croatia was in a much better position than his country was in its own court suit.[9]

Preliminary objections

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia returned its preliminary objections on 1 September 2002.[10] On 18 November 2008, the court decided on preliminary objections to the case filed by Serbia. The court ruled against Serbia's three objections to the case, while finding that one of these objections was not purely preliminary. Finally, the court decided that it had jurisdiction over the case.[2] Croatia was represented at the proceedings by its justice minister, Ivan Šimonović.[11] The decision made headlines in Croatia and Serbia, especially as it fell on the anniversary of the fall of Vukovar in 1991 to Serb forces.[12] Croatia has reported that since 1995, at least 120 mass graves have been discovered mainly in Eastern Slavonia, Dalmatia and Knin.[13]

Serbian officials sought for Croatia to withdraw from the lawsuit on multiple occasions.[14][15] Then President of Serbia Boris Tadić said that "Serbia considered in previous years, and still believes, that it is always better for all conflicts from wars during the 1990s to be solved in extra-judicial processes, through peaceful means, however, for such an approach of Serbia, partners on the other side are needed" and the Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremić said that "I think it would be better for Croatia for it to never come to this process. Our main goal and wish is not to sue each other, but to cooperate on the road towards EU integration, to build good neighborly relations, to solve problems which we have inherited."[16][17] In November 2013 Serbia's Prime Minister Ivica Dačić reiterated a wish for mutual withdrawal of lawsuits between the two countries.[18]

Serbia v. Croatia

Following the court ruling that it had the jurisdiction in Croatia's case, Serbian foreign minister Vuk Jeremić announced a plan to file a counter-suit against Croatia.[19] The application was submitted on 4 January 2010. The document included information on crimes committed against Serbs in Gospić, Sisak, Pakrac, Karlovac, Osijek, Paulin Dvor and during the operations Operation Flash, Operation Storm and Operation Medak Pocket. The lawsuit also covered all those victims murdered after the war as they tried to return to the homes which they had left as refugees. The lawsuit against Croatia contained a historical account, with a focus on Second World War-era persecution of Serbs.[4]

A public opinion poll in Serbia by Blic found that 69.7% of people supported the counter-suit, while 9.1% opposed it.[20] The lawsuit has been opposed by the minor opposition Liberal Democratic Party whose leader said that "Serbia needs a smart foreign policy, which will not respond with a mistake to a mistake that was made in the last century by Croatia".[21][22]

President Tomislav Nikolić of Serbia called for a mutual withdrawal of the genocide suits in January 2014.[23]

Relation to the ICTY

As the final verdict of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in the case of Prosecutor v. Gotovina et al. was a reversal of conviction (de facto acquittal), some German media speculated that this opens a possibility for Serbia to pay large reparations to Croatia.[24]

Timeline

More information Date, Event ...

See also

Notes

  1. [1]
    "Contentious Cases - International Court of Justice". Archived from the original on 28 August 2016. Retrieved 24 August 2016.
  2. [2]
    "Preliminary Objections" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-17. Retrieved 2008-11-19.
  3. [3]
    "Application Instituting Proceedings" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-26. Retrieved 2008-11-25.
  4. [4]
    Serbia files genocide lawsuit against Croatia Archived June 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  5. [5]
    No court trial would be better for Zagreb Archived December 22, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, english.blic.rs; accessed 28 April 2015.
  6. [6]
    "ICJ: Public hearings from Monday 3 March to Tuesday 1 April 2014" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  7. [7]
    "At ICJ, Croatia accuses Serbia of genocide". Retrieved 24 August 2016.
  8. [8]
    U.N. court: Serbs' actions in Croatia not considered genocide, bbc.co.uk; accessed 28 April 2015.
  9. [9]
    Softić prijatno iznenađen odlukom suda[permanent dead link], Dnevni avaz, dnevniavaz.ba; accessed 28 April 2015.
  10. [10]
    "Preliminary Objections of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-05. Retrieved 2008-11-25.
  11. [11]
    Šimonović: Odluka Međunarodnog suda pravde veliki je uspjeh Hrvatske[permanent dead link], vecernji.hr; accessed 28 April 2015.
  12. [12]
    Srbiji sude za genocid[permanent dead link]
  13. [13]
    Zvonimir Šeparović, Hrvatska tužba, p. 8-9, Hrvatsko žrtvoslovno društvo, Zagreb, 2014.
  14. [14]
    "Serbia favors withdrawal of genocide lawsuits - - on B92.net". Retrieved 24 August 2016.
  15. [15]
    Official: Serbia will not drop Croatian genocide lawsuit unilaterally, upi.com; accessed 28 April 2015.
  16. [16]
    Jeremić: Serbia doesn’t want to go to court Archived 2011-06-08 at the Wayback Machine, b92.net; accessed 28 April 2015.
  17. [17]
    Kontratužba protiv Hrvatske, rts.rs; accessed 28 April 2015.(in Serbian)
  18. [18]
    PM favors withdrawal of genocide lawsuits, b92.net; accessed 28 April 2015.
  19. [19]
    Jeremić: Tužba zbog "Oluje", b92.net; accessed 28 April 2015.
  20. [20]
    Stanje nacije[permanent dead link]
  21. [21]
    Čedo Jovanović: Protutužbom Srbija nastavlja s pogrešnom politikom, vecernji.hr; accessed 28 April 2015. (in Croatian)
  22. [22]
    Srbija podnela tužbu protiv Hrvatske, mondo.rs; accessed 28 April 2015.
  23. [23]
    "Unconditional withdrawal of genocide lawsuits", b92.net; accessed 28 April 2015.
  24. [24]
    Brey, Thomas (16 November 2012). "Ein Freispruch mit Folgen". Salzburger Nachrichten (in German). Retrieved 17 November 2012.[permanent dead link]
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Croatia–Serbia_genocide_case, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.