Cujo_(film)

<i>Cujo</i> (film)

Cujo (film)

1983 film by Lewis Teague


Cujo is a 1983 American horror film based on Stephen King's 1981 novel of the same name and directed by Lewis Teague. It was written by Don Carlos Dunaway and Barbara Turner (using the pen name Lauren Currier),[4][5] and starring Dee Wallace, Daniel Hugh Kelly and Danny Pintauro.

Quick Facts Cujo, Directed by ...

The film follows a mother and her son who are trapped inside their car, while protecting themselves from a rabid St. Bernard.

Despite mixed reviews and modest box office receipts during its theatrical release, the film has gathered a cult following in the years since its release. It was released four months before Christine, another Stephen King story released theatrically the same year.[6]

Plot

Cujo, a friendly St. Bernard, chases a wild rabbit and inserts his head into a cave, where a rabid bat bites him on the nose. The Trenton family—advertising executive Vic, housewife Donna, and young son Tad—take their car to the rural home of abusive mechanic Joe Camber for repairs, where they meet Cujo, the Camber family's pet, and get along well with him.

Vic and Donna's marriage is tested when Vic learns that Donna has been having an affair with her ex-boyfriend from high school, Steve Kemp. The early signs of Cujo's infection start to appear, though no one notices. Joe's wife Charity and his son Brett decide to leave for a week to visit Charity's sister. The furious stage of Cujo's infection sets in. Cujo refrains from attacking Brett but goes completely mad and kills the Cambers' alcoholic neighbor Gary. He then mauls Joe to death.

Vic goes out of town on a business trip as Donna and Tad return to the Cambers' house for more car repairs. Cujo attacks them, and they are forced to take shelter in their Ford Pinto. Donna tries to drive home, but the car's alternator dies and the two are trapped inside. The hot sun makes conditions unbearable, and Donna realizes that she must do something before they both die from heatstroke or dehydration.

Attempts at escape are foiled by Cujo repeatedly attacking the car, breaking a window, and biting Donna. Vic returns and finds Donna and Tad missing and his house vandalized by Kemp. Police realize his wife and son might be at the Cambers'. Local sheriff George Bannerman goes but Cujo mauls him to death.

Donna attempts to get to the house to bring an overheated Tad water; she fights Cujo with a baseball bat until it breaks. Cujo jumps and is impaled in the stomach by the broken bat. Donna takes the sheriff's gun and contemplates shooting the dog, but decides saving Tad is more important. Cujo tries again to attack Donna and she kills him before Vic arrives and reunites with his family.

Cast

Production

The original director was Peter Medak, who left the project two days into filming, along with DOP Anthony B. Richmond. They were replaced by Lewis Teague and Jan de Bont respectively.[8] Cujo was played by four St. Bernards, several mechanical dogs, and a black Labrador–Great Dane mix in a St. Bernard costume.[9] In some shots, stuntman Gary Morgan played Cujo while wearing a large dog costume.[10] Karl Miller was the trainer for the dogs in Cujo.[11]

Reception

Box office

Cujo was a modest box office success for Warner Brothers. The film was released on August 12, 1983, in the United States, opening in second place that weekend.[12] It grossed a total of $21,156,152 domestically,[3] making it the fourth-highest-grossing horror film of 1983 behind Jaws 3-D, Psycho II, and Twilight Zone: The Movie.[13]

Critical response

Reviews from critics were mixed. Janet Maslin of The New York Times wrote the film was "by no means a horror classic, but it's suspenseful and scary".[14] Variety panned it as "a dull, uneventful entry in the horror genre, a film virtually devoid of surprises or any original suspense".[15] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune gave the film one star out of four, calling it "one of the dumbest, flimsiest excuses for a movie I have ever seen".[16] Roger Ebert called it "dreadful",[17] and Linda Gross of the Los Angeles Times wrote that "no theater is air conditioned enough to justify watching this scary, gory and beastly movie".[18]

Steve Jenkins of The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote that "for the most part Cujo works very effectively as a near reductio ad absurdum of the woman-in-peril-mode", but disliked that the film changed the ending from the book, thinking it made "absolutely no sense in terms of the film's logic".[19] Author and film critic Leonard Maltin gave the film three out of a possible four stars, calling it "genuinely frightening", and also writing: "Builds slowly but surely to [its] terrifying (but not gory) climax".[20] Despite the mixed reception, Stephen King called the film "terrific" and named it one of his favorite adaptations.[21]

On review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a 59% approval rating based on 46 reviews, with the website's consensus stating: "Cujo is artless work punctuated with moments of high canine gore and one wild Dee Wallace performance".[22] On Metacritic, the film holds a 57/100 based on reviews from 8 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[23]

Possible second adaptation

In 2015, Sunn Classic Pictures announced that it would develop another adaptation titled C.U.J.O., which stands for "Canine Unit Joint Operations".[24] Nothing came of it after its announcement.

See also


References

  1. "Blu-Ray Art and Details: Near Dark, Cujo, and Frailty". May 22, 2012.
  2. "Cujo (1983)". catalog.afi.com. AFI.
  3. "Cujo (1983)". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved November 7, 2011.
  4. Gingold, Michael (April 6, 2016). "RIP "Cujo" scripter Barbara Turner". Fangoria. Archived from the original on April 16, 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  5. "Cujo - Cast & Crew". AllRovi. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2012.
  6. "Cujo - reviewing the cult classic through modern eyes, 35 years on". Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2021.
  7. "Barking For A Living". The Bark. December 1, 2010. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  8. London, Michael (August 19, 1983). "A Pack Of Bogus Bernards Helps Give 'Cujo' Its Bite". Los Angeles Times. Part VI, p. 1.
  9. Maslin, Janet (August 13, 1983). "Film: 'Cujo,' Good Dog Gone Wrong". The New York Times: 13.
  10. "Cujo". Variety: 23. August 17, 1983.
  11. Siskel, Gene (August 12, 1983). "Trashy 'Cujo' shouldn't happen to a dog". Chicago Tribune. section 3, p. 1
  12. Ebert, Roger (October 26, 1983). "The Dead Zone". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved October 13, 2018.
  13. Gross, Linda (August 15, 1983). "Rabid Dog On The Rampage In 'Cujo'". Los Angeles Times. Part VI, p. 4.
  14. "Cujo". The Monthly Film Bulletin. 60 (598): 302. November 1983.
  15. Maltin, Leonard; Sader, Luke; Clark, Mike; Edelman, Rob (2013). Leonard Maltin's 2014 Movie Guide. Penguin Press. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-451-41810-4.
  16. "Cujo (1983)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved December 22, 2023.
  17. "Cujo", Metacritic, CBS Interactive, retrieved October 24, 2019
  18. Miska, Brad (July 6, 2015). "Stephen King's 'Cujo' Remake Title Gets Rabies: 'C.U.J.O.'". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved July 7, 2015.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Cujo_(film), and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.