Executive_Order_13990

Executive Order 13990

Executive Order 13990

Executive order signed by U.S. President Joe Biden


Executive Order 13990, officially titled Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis[1] is an executive order signed by President Joe Biden on January 20, 2021, which implements various environmental policies of his administration including revoking the permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline[2] and temporarily prohibiting drilling in the arctic refuge.[3]

Quick Facts Type, Order number ...

Provisions

Executive Order 13990 includes several provisions designed to reverse actions taken by the previous administration and recommit the United States to combating climate change. Key provisions of the order include:

  • Rejoining the Paris Agreement on climate change.[4]
  • Directing federal agencies to review and, if necessary, revise or suspend regulations and policies that may hinder environmental protection or public health.[5]
  • Establishing a review process to identify actions that may disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities.[6]
  • Directing federal agencies to ensure that their actions are based on the best available science and data.[7]
  • Revoking the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline.[8]
  • Placing a temporary moratorium on oil and gas leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge[9]


The order was one of fifteen signed during the first day of the Biden administration.[10]

Reactions

Climate experts like Rachel Cleetus and Jonna Hamilton praised the order. [11]

Many politicians from the Republican Party criticized the order.[12]

Litigation

Louisiana v. Biden (2022)

On February 11, 2022, Western Louisiana U.S. District Court Judge James D. Cain Jr. issued a preliminary injunction in Louisiana v. Biden (2022) in favor of the plaintiffs to block federal agency requirements to assess the social costs of greenhouse gas emissions in regulatory actions under the order.[13] On March 16, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the decision following an appeal by the U.S. Justice Department,[14] and on May 26, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order without comment or opposition dismissing an appeal filed by the plaintiffs to vacate the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision.[15][16][17]

Missouri v. Biden (2022)

On August 31, 2021, Eastern Missouri U.S. District Court Judge Audrey G. Fleissig issued an order dismissing a request filed by the plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden (2022) for a preliminary injunction to block federal agency requirements to assess the social costs of greenhouse gas emissions in regulatory actions under the order.[18] On September 3, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.[19] Oral arguments were held on June 16, 2022.[20][21]

See also


References

  1. "Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis". Federal Register. 2021-01-25. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
  2. "Keystone XL pipeline halted as Biden revokes permit". AP NEWS. 2021-01-20. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
  3. "Biden plans temporary halt of oil activity in Arctic refuge". AP NEWS. 2021-01-20. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
  4. "Executive Order on Rejoining the Paris Agreement". The White House. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
  5. "Fact Sheet: List of Agency Actions for Review". The White House. 20 January 2021. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
  6. "Executive Order 13990: Section 6". Federal Register. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
  7. "Executive Order 13990: Section 7". Federal Register. Retrieved 2023-05-04.
  8. "Biden signs executive actions on COVID, climate change, immigration and more". www.cbsnews.com. 21 January 2021. Retrieved 2021-02-21.
  9. Davenport, Coral (2015-01-08). "Experts Say That Battle on Keystone Pipeline Is Over Politics, Not Facts". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-07-24.
  10. Joselow, Maxine (February 22, 2022). "Court ruling on social cost of carbon upends Biden's climate plans". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  11. Phillips, Anna (March 16, 2022). "Appellate court rules Biden can consider climate damage in policymaking". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  12. Williams, Pete (May 26, 2022). "Supreme Court won't block Biden rule on societal cost of greenhouse gases". CNBC. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  13. Liptak, Adam (May 26, 2022). "Supreme Court Allows Greenhouse Gas Cost Estimates". The New York Times. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  14. Barnes, Robert; Phillips, Anna (May 26, 2022). "Supreme Court allows Biden climate regulations while fight continues". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  15. Frazin, Rachel (August 31, 2021). "Judge rebuffs red states' challenge to Biden's 'social costs' of greenhouse gases". The Hill. Nexstar Media Group. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
  16. Malo, Sebastien (September 3, 2021). "Rep. AGs appeal social costs of greenhouse gas lawsuit". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
  17. Earls, Maya (June 16, 2022). "States' Carbon Costs Dispute Sees Eighth Circuit Skepticism". Bloomberg Law. Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
  18. Davenport, Coral (June 19, 2022). "Republican Drive to Tilt Courts Against Climate Action Reaches a Crucial Moment". The New York Times. Retrieved August 11, 2022.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Executive_Order_13990, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.