Geier_v._American_Honda_Motor_Co.

<i>Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.</i>

Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

2000 United States Supreme Court case

Geier v. American Honda Motor Company, 529 U.S. 861 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a federal automobile safety standard pre-empted a stricter state rule.[1] The Court held that Alexis Geier, who suffered severe injuries in a 1987 Honda Accord, could not sue Honda for failing to install a driver-side airbag – a requirement under District of Columbia tort law but not Federal law – because Federal law pre-empted the District's rule.

Quick Facts Geier v. American Honda Motor Company, Argued December 7, 1999 Decided May 22, 2000 ...

Background

Alexis Geier suffered severe injuries in a 1987 Honda Accord that did not possess a driver's side airbag. Geier and her family sought damages under the District of Columbia tort law "claiming that American Honda Motor Company was negligent in not equipping the Accord with a driver's side airbag." The District Court ruled in favor of Honda finding that "Geier's claims were expressly pre-empted by the Act." and created a conflict because the safety features of the 1987 Honda Accord were in compliance with Federal Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 208, under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966.[2] The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed.[3]

Decision of the Supreme Court

Justice Stephen G. Breyer delivered the Court's 5–4 decision, which held: "[Geier's] 'no airbag' lawsuit conflicts with the objectives of FMVSS 208 and is therefore pre-empted by the Act."[4] The dissent challenged the majority's "unprecedented use of inferences from regulatory history and commentary as a basis for implied pre-emption."[5]

See also

References

  1. [1]
    Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000).
  2. [2]
    "Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. - 529 U.S. 861 (2000)". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
  3. [3]
    Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 166 F.3d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
  4. [4]
    Geier, 529 U.S. at 866.
  5. [5]
    Geier, 529 U.S. at 913 (Stevens, J., dissenting).

Further reading


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Geier_v._American_Honda_Motor_Co., and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.