Geodesy
Geodesy (/dʒiːˈɒdɪsi/,[1] jeeODessee) is the Earth science of accurately measuring and understanding Earth's geometric shape, orientation in space and gravitational field.[2] The field also incorporates studies of how these properties change over time and equivalent measurements for other planets (known as planetary geodesy). Geodynamical phenomena include crustal motion, tides and polar motion, which can be studied by designing global and national control networks, applying space and terrestrial techniques and relying on datums and coordinate systems.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)

Geodesy 

Definition
The word geodesy comes from the Ancient Greek word γεωδαισία geodaisia (literally, "division of Earth").
It is primarily concerned with positioning within the temporally varying gravitational field. Geodesy in the Germanspeaking world is divided into "higher geodesy" ("Erdmessung" or "höhere Geodäsie"), which is concerned with measuring Earth on the global scale, and "practical geodesy" or "engineering geodesy" ("Ingenieurgeodäsie"), which is concerned with measuring specific parts or regions of Earth, and which includes surveying. Such geodetic operations are also applied to other astronomical bodies in the solar system. It is also the science of measuring and understanding Earth's geometric shape, orientation in space, and gravitational field.
To a large extent, the shape of Earth is the result of rotation, which causes its equatorial bulge, and the competition of geological processes such as the collision of plates and of volcanism, resisted by Earth's gravitational field. This applies to the solid surface, the liquid surface (dynamic sea surface topography) and Earth's atmosphere. For this reason, the study of Earth's gravitational field is called physical geodesy.
Geoid and reference ellipsoid
The geoid is essentially the figure of Earth abstracted from its topographical features. It is an idealized equilibrium surface of sea water, the mean sea level surface in the absence of currents and air pressure variations, and continued under the continental masses. The geoid, unlike the reference ellipsoid, is irregular and too complicated to serve as the computational surface on which to solve geometrical problems like point positioning. The geometrical separation between the geoid and the reference ellipsoid is called the geoidal undulation. It varies globally between ±110 m, when referred to the GRS 80 ellipsoid.
A reference ellipsoid, customarily chosen to be the same size (volume) as the geoid, is described by its semimajor axis (equatorial radius) a and flattening f. The quantity f = a − b/a, where b is the semiminor axis (polar radius), is a purely geometrical one. The mechanical ellipticity of Earth (dynamical flattening, symbol J_{2}) can be determined to high precision by observation of satellite orbit perturbations. Its relationship with the geometrical flattening is indirect. The relationship depends on the internal density distribution, or, in simplest terms, the degree of central concentration of mass.
The 1980 Geodetic Reference System (GRS 80) posited a 6,378,137 m semimajor axis and a 1:298.257 flattening. This system was adopted at the XVII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG). It is essentially the basis for geodetic positioning by the Global Positioning System (GPS) and is thus also in widespread use outside the geodetic community. The numerous systems that countries have used to create maps and charts are becoming obsolete as countries increasingly move to global, geocentric reference systems using the GRS 80 reference ellipsoid.
The geoid is "realizable", meaning it can be consistently located on Earth by suitable simple measurements from physical objects like a tide gauge. The geoid can, therefore, be considered a real surface. The reference ellipsoid, however, has many possible instantiations and is not readily realizable, therefore it is an abstract surface. The third primary surface of geodetic interest—the topographic surface of Earth—is a realizable surface.
Coordinate systems in space
The locations of points in threedimensional space are most conveniently described by three cartesian or rectangular coordinates, X, Y and Z. Since the advent of satellite positioning, such coordinate systems are typically geocentric: the Zaxis is aligned with Earth's (conventional or instantaneous) rotation axis.
Prior to the era of satellite geodesy, the coordinate systems associated with a geodetic datum attempted to be geocentric, but their origins differed from the geocenter by hundreds of meters, due to regional deviations in the direction of the plumbline (vertical). These regional geodetic data, such as ED 50 (European Datum 1950) or NAD 27 (North American Datum 1927) have ellipsoids associated with them that are regional "best fits" to the geoids within their areas of validity, minimizing the deflections of the vertical over these areas.
It is only because GPS satellites orbit about the geocenter, that this point becomes naturally the origin of a coordinate system defined by satellite geodetic means, as the satellite positions in space are themselves computed in such a system.
Geocentric coordinate systems used in geodesy can be divided naturally into two classes:
 Inertial reference systems, where the coordinate axes retain their orientation relative to the fixed stars, or equivalently, to the rotation axes of ideal gyroscopes; the Xaxis points to the vernal equinox
 Corotating, also ECEF ("Earth Centred, Earth Fixed"), where the axes are attached to the solid body of Earth. The Xaxis lies within the Greenwich observatory's meridian plane.
The coordinate transformation between these two systems is described to good approximation by (apparent) sidereal time, which takes into account variations in Earth's axial rotation (lengthofday variations). A more accurate description also takes polar motion into account, a phenomenon closely monitored by geodesists.
Coordinate systems in the plane
In surveying and mapping, important fields of application of geodesy, two general types of coordinate systems are used in the plane:
 Planopolar, in which points in a plane are defined by a distance s from a specified point along a ray having a specified direction α with respect to a base line or axis;
 Rectangular, points are defined by distances from two perpendicular axes called x and y. It is geodetic practice—contrary to the mathematical convention—to let the xaxis point to the north and the yaxis to the east.
Rectangular coordinates in the plane can be used intuitively with respect to one's current location, in which case the xaxis will point to the local north. More formally, such coordinates can be obtained from threedimensional coordinates using the artifice of a map projection. It is impossible to map the curved surface of Earth onto a flat map surface without deformation. The compromise most often chosen—called a conformal projection—preserves angles and length ratios, so that small circles are mapped as small circles and small squares as squares.
An example of such a projection is UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator). Within the map plane, we have rectangular coordinates x and y. In this case, the north direction used for reference is the map north, not the local north. The difference between the two is called meridian convergence.
It is easy enough to "translate" between polar and rectangular coordinates in the plane: let, as above, direction and distance be α and s respectively, then we have
The reverse transformation is given by:
Heights
In geodesy, point or terrain heights are "above sea level", an irregular, physically defined surface. Heights come in the following variants:
Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Both orthometric and normal heights are heights in metres above sea level, whereas geopotential numbers are measures of potential energy (unit: m^{2} s^{−2}) and not metric. The reference surface is the geoid, an equipotential surface approximating mean sea level. (For normal heights, the reference surface is actually the socalled quasigeoid, which has a few metre separation from the geoid, because of the density assumption in its continuation under the continental masses.[3])
These heights can be related to ellipsoidal height (also known as geodetic height), which express the height of a point above the reference ellipsoid, by means of the geoid undulation. Satellite positioning receivers typically provide ellipsoidal heights, unless they are fitted with special conversion software based on a model of the geoid.
Geodetic data
Because geodetic point coordinates (and heights) are always obtained in a system that has been constructed itself using real observations, geodesists introduce the concept of a "geodetic datum": a physical realization of a coordinate system used for describing point locations. The realization is the result of choosing conventional coordinate values for one or more datum points.
In the case of height data, it suffices to choose one datum point: the reference benchmark, typically a tide gauge at the shore. Thus we have vertical data like the NAP (Normaal Amsterdams Peil), the North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD 88), the Kronstadt datum, the Trieste datum, and so on.
In case of plane or spatial coordinates, we typically need several datum points. A regional, ellipsoidal datum like ED 50 can be fixed by prescribing the undulation of the geoid and the deflection of the vertical in one datum point, in this case the Helmert Tower in Potsdam. However, an overdetermined ensemble of datum points can also be used.
Changing the coordinates of a point set referring to one datum, so to make them refer to another datum, is called a datum transformation. In the case of vertical data, this consists of simply adding a constant shift to all height values. In the case of plane or spatial coordinates, datum transformation takes the form of a similarity or Helmert transformation, consisting of a rotation and scaling operation in addition to a simple translation. In the plane, a Helmert transformation has four parameters; in space, seven.
 A note on terminology
In the abstract, a coordinate system as used in mathematics and geodesy is called a "coordinate system" in ISO terminology, whereas the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) uses the term "reference system". When these coordinates are realized by choosing datum points and fixing a geodetic datum, ISO says "coordinate reference system", while IERS says "reference frame". The ISO term for a datum transformation again is a "coordinate transformation".[4]
Point positioning
Point positioning is the determination of the coordinates of a point on land, at sea, or in space with respect to a coordinate system. Point position is solved by computation from measurements linking the known positions of terrestrial or extraterrestrial points with the unknown terrestrial position. This may involve transformations between or among astronomical and terrestrial coordinate systems. The known points used for point positioning can be triangulation points of a higherorder network or GPS satellites.
Traditionally, a hierarchy of networks has been built to allow point positioning within a country. Highest in the hierarchy were triangulation networks. These were densified into networks of traverses (polygons), into which local mapping surveying measurements, usually with measuring tape, corner prism, and the familiar^{[where?]} red and white poles, are tied.
Nowadays all but special measurements (e.g., underground or highprecision engineering measurements) are performed with GPS. The higherorder networks are measured with static GPS, using differential measurement to determine vectors between terrestrial points. These vectors are then adjusted in traditional network fashion. A global polyhedron of permanently operating GPS stations under the auspices of the IERS is used to define a single global, geocentric reference frame which serves as the "zero order" global reference to which national measurements are attached.
For surveying mappings, frequently Real Time Kinematic GPS is employed, tying in the unknown points with known terrestrial points close by in real time.
One purpose of point positioning is the provision of known points for mapping measurements, also known as (horizontal and vertical) control. In every country, thousands of such known points exist and are normally documented by national mapping agencies. Surveyors involved in real estate and insurance will use these to tie their local measurements.
Geodetic problems
In geometric geodesy, two standard problems exist—the first (direct or forward) and the second (inverse or reverse).
 First (direct or forward) geodetic problem
 Given a point (in terms of its coordinates) and the direction (azimuth) and distance from that point to a second point, determine (the coordinates of) that second point.
 Second (inverse or reverse) geodetic problem
 Given two points, determine the azimuth and length of the line (straight line, arc or geodesic) that connects them.
In plane geometry (valid for small areas on Earth's surface), the solutions to both problems reduce to simple trigonometry. On a sphere, however, the solution is significantly more complex, because in the inverse problem the azimuths will differ between the two end points of the connecting great circle, arc.
On the ellipsoid of revolution, geodesics may be written in terms of elliptic integrals, which are usually evaluated in terms of a series expansion—see, for example, Vincenty's formulae. In the general case, the solution is called the geodesic for the surface considered. The differential equations for the geodesic can be solved numerically.
Observational concepts
Here we define some basic observational concepts, like angles and coordinates, defined in geodesy (and astronomy as well), mostly from the viewpoint of the local observer.
 Plumbline or vertical: the direction of local gravity, or the line that results by following it.
 Zenith: the point on the celestial sphere where the direction of the gravity vector in a point, extended upwards, intersects it. It is more correct to call it a direction rather than a point.
 Nadir: the opposite point—or rather, direction—where the direction of gravity extended downward intersects the (obscured) celestial sphere.
 Celestial horizon: a plane perpendicular to a point's gravity vector.
 Azimuth: the direction angle within the plane of the horizon, typically counted clockwise from the north (in geodesy and astronomy) or the south (in France).
 Elevation: the angular height of an object above the horizon, Alternatively zenith distance, being equal to 90 degrees minus elevation.
 Local topocentric coordinates: azimuth (direction angle within the plane of the horizon), elevation angle (or zenith angle), distance.
 North celestial pole: the extension of Earth's (precessing and nutating) instantaneous spin axis extended northward to intersect the celestial sphere. (Similarly for the south celestial pole.)
 Celestial equator: the (instantaneous) intersection of Earth's equatorial plane with the celestial sphere.
 Meridian plane: any plane perpendicular to the celestial equator and containing the celestial poles.
 Local meridian: the plane containing the direction to the zenith and the direction to the celestial pole.
Measurements
The level is used for determining height differences and height reference systems, commonly referred to mean sea level. The traditional spirit level produces these practically most useful heights above sea level directly; the more economical use of GPS instruments for height determination requires precise knowledge of the figure of the geoid, as GPS only gives heights above the GRS80 reference ellipsoid. As geoid knowledge accumulates, one may expect the use of GPS heighting to spread.
The theodolite is used to measure horizontal and vertical angles to target points. These angles are referred to the local vertical. The tacheometer additionally determines, electronically or electrooptically, the distance to target, and is highly automated to even robotic in its operations. The method of free station position is widely used.
For local detail surveys, tacheometers are commonly employed although the oldfashioned rectangular technique using angle prism and steel tape is still an inexpensive alternative. Realtime kinematic (RTK) GPS techniques are used as well. Data collected are tagged and recorded digitally for entry into a Geographic Information System (GIS) database.
Geodetic GPS receivers produce directly threedimensional coordinates in a geocentric coordinate frame. Such a frame is, e.g., WGS84, or the frames that are regularly produced and published by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS).
GPS receivers have almost completely replaced terrestrial instruments for largescale base network surveys. For planetwide geodetic surveys, previously impossible, we can still mention satellite laser ranging (SLR) and lunar laser ranging (LLR) and verylongbaseline interferometry (VLBI) techniques. All these techniques also serve to monitor irregularities in Earth's rotation as well as plate tectonic motions.
Gravity is measured using gravimeters, of which there are two kinds. First, "absolute gravimeters" are based on measuring the acceleration of free fall (e.g., of a reflecting prism in a vacuum tube). They are used to establish the vertical geospatial control and can be used in the field. Second, "relative gravimeters" are springbased and are more common. They are used in gravity surveys over large areas for establishing the figure of the geoid over these areas. The most accurate relative gravimeters are called "superconducting" gravimeters, which are sensitive to onethousandth of onebillionth of Earthsurface gravity. Twentysome superconducting gravimeters are used worldwide for studying Earth's tides, rotation, interior, and ocean and atmospheric loading, as well as for verifying the Newtonian constant of gravitation.
In the future, gravity and altitude will be measured by relativistic time dilation measured by optical clocks.
Units and measures on the ellipsoid
Geographical latitude and longitude are stated in the units degree, minute of arc, and second of arc. They are angles, not metric measures, and describe the direction of the local normal to the reference ellipsoid of revolution. This is approximately the same as the direction of the plumbline, i.e., local gravity, which is also the normal to the geoid surface. For this reason, astronomical position determination – measuring the direction of the plumbline by astronomical means – works fairly well provided an ellipsoidal model of the figure of Earth is used.
One geographical mile, defined as one minute of arc on the equator, equals 1,855.32571922 m. One nautical mile is one minute of astronomical latitude. The radius of curvature of the ellipsoid varies with latitude, being the longest at the pole and the shortest at the equator as is the nautical mile.
A metre was originally defined as the 10millionth part of the length from equator to North Pole along the meridian through Paris (the target was not quite reached in actual implementation, so that is off by 200 ppm in the current definitions). This means that one kilometre is roughly equal to (1/40,000) * 360 * 60 meridional minutes of arc, which equals 0.54 nautical mile, though this is not exact because the two units are defined on different bases (the international nautical mile is defined as exactly 1,852 m, corresponding to a rounding of 1,000/0.54 m to four digits).
Temporal change
In geodesy, temporal change can be studied by a variety of techniques. Points on Earth's surface change their location due to a variety of mechanisms:
 Continental plate motion, plate tectonics[5]
 Episodic motion of tectonic origin, especially close to fault lines
 Periodic effects due to tides and tidal loading[6]
 Postglacial land uplift due to isostatic adjustment
 Mass variations due to hydrological changes, including the atmosphere, cryosphere, land hydrology and oceans
 Subdaily polar motion[7]
 Lengthofday variability[8]
 Earth's centerofmass (geocenter) variations[9]
 Anthropogenic movements such as reservoir construction or petroleum or water extraction
The science of studying deformations and motions of Earth's crust and its solidity as a whole is called geodynamics. Often, study of Earth's irregular rotation is also included in its definition. The geodynamics studies require terrestrial reference frames[10] that are realized by the stations belonging to the Global Geodedetic Observing System (GGOS[11]).
Techniques for studying geodynamic phenomena on the global scale include:
 Satellite positioning by GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and BeiDou
 Verylongbaseline interferometry (VLBI)
 Satellite laser ranging (SLR)[12] and lunar laser ranging (LLR)
 DORIS
 Regionally and locally precise levelling
 Precise tacheometers
 Monitoring of gravity change using land, airborne, shipborne, and spaceborne gravimetry
 Satellite altimetry based on microwave and laser observations for studying the ocean surface, sea level rise, and ice cover monitoring
 Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) using satellite images
Notable geodesists
It has been suggested that this section be split out into another article titled List of geodesists. (Discuss) (November 2020) 
Geodesists before 1900
 Pythagoras 580–490 BC, ancient Greece[13]
 Eratosthenes 276–194 BC, ancient Greece
 Hipparchus c. 190–120 BC, ancient Greece
 Posidonius c. 135–51 BC, ancient Greece
 Claudius Ptolemy c. AD 83–168, Roman Empire (Roman Egypt)
 AlMa'mun 786–833, Baghdad (Iraq/Mesopotamia)
 Abu Rayhan Biruni 973–1048, Khorasan (Iran/Samanid Dynasty)
 Muhammad alIdrisi 1100–1166, (Arabia & Sicily)
 Regiomontanus 1436–1476, (Germany/Austria)
 Abel Foullon 1513–1563 or 1565, (France)
 Pedro Nunes 1502–1578 (Portugal)
 Gerhard Mercator 1512–1594 (Belgium & Germany)
 Snellius (Willebrord Snel van Royen) 1580–1626, Leiden (Netherlands)
 Christiaan Huygens 1629–1695 (Netherlands)
 Pierre Bouguer 1698–1758, (France & Peru)
 Pierre de Maupertuis 1698–1759 (France)
 Alexis Clairaut 1713–1765 (France)
 Johann Heinrich Lambert 1728–1777 (France)
 Roger Joseph Boscovich 1711–1787, (Rome/ Berlin/ Paris)
 Ino Tadataka 1745–1818, (Tokyo)
 Georg von Reichenbach 1771–1826, Bavaria (Germany)
 PierreSimon Laplace 1749–1827, Paris (France)
 Adrien Marie Legendre 1752–1833, Paris (France)
 Johann Georg von Soldner 1776–1833, Munich (Germany)
 George Everest 1790–1866 (England and India)
 Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel 1784–1846, Königsberg (Germany)
 Heinrich Christian Schumacher 1780–1850 (Germany & Russian Empire)
 Carl Friedrich Gauss 1777–1855, Göttingen (Germany)
 Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve 1793–1864, Dorpat and Pulkovo (Russian Empire)
 J. H. Pratt 1809–1871, London (England)
 Friedrich H. C. Paschen 1804–1873, Schwerin (Germany)
 Johann Benedikt Listing 1808–1882 (Germany)
 Johann Jacob Baeyer 1794–1885, Berlin (Germany)
 George Biddell Airy 1801–1892, Cambridge & London
 Karl Maximilian von Bauernfeind 1818–1894, Munich (Germany)
 Wilhelm Jordan 1842–1899, (Germany)
 Hervé Faye 1814–1902 (France)
 George Gabriel Stokes 1819–1903 (England)
 Carlos Ibáñez e Ibáñez de Ibero 1825–1891, Barcelona (Spain)
 Henri Poincaré 1854–1912, Paris (France)
 Alexander Ross Clarke 1828–1914, London (England)
 Charles Sanders Peirce 1839–1914 (United States)
 Friedrich Robert Helmert 1843–1917, Potsdam (Germany)
 Heinrich Bruns 1848–1919, Berlin (Germany)
 Loránd Eötvös 1848–1919 (Hungary)
20th century geodesists
 John Fillmore Hayford, 1868–1925, (US)
 Feodosy Nikolaevich Krasovsky, 1878–1948, (Russian Empire, USSR)
 Alfred Wegener, 1880–1930, (Germany and Greenland)
 William Bowie, 1872–1940, (US)
 Friedrich Hopfner, 1881–1949, Vienna, (Austria)
 Tadeusz Banachiewicz, 1882–1954, (Poland)
 Felix Andries VeningMeinesz, 1887–1966, (Netherlands)
 Martin Hotine, 1898–1968, (England)
 Yrjö Väisälä, 1889–1971, (Finland)
 Veikko Aleksanteri Heiskanen, 1895–1971, (Finland and US)
 Karl Ramsayer, 1911–1982, Stuttgart, (Germany)
 Buckminster Fuller, 1895–1983 (United States)
 Harold Jeffreys, 1891–1989, London, (England)
 Reino Antero Hirvonen, 1908–1989, (Finland)
 Mikhail Sergeevich Molodenskii, 1909–1991, (Russia)
 Maria Ivanovna Yurkina, 1923–2010, (Russia)
 Guy Bomford, 1899–1996, (India?)[14]
 Antonio Marussi, 1908–1984, (Italy)
 Hellmut Schmid, 1914–1998, (Switzerland)
 William M. Kaula, 1926–2000, Los Angeles, (US)
 John A. O'Keefe, 1916–2000, (US)
 Thaddeus Vincenty, 1920–2002, (Poland)
 Willem Baarda, 1917–2005, (Netherlands)
 Irene Kaminka Fischer, 1907–2009, (US)
 Arne Bjerhammar, 1917–2011, (Sweden)
 KarlRudolf Koch 1935, Bonn, (Germany)
 Helmut Moritz, 1933, Graz, (Austria)
 Petr Vaníček, 1935, Fredericton, (Canada)
 Erik Grafarend, 1939, Stuttgart, (Germany)
 HansGeorg Wenzel (1949–1999), (Germany)
 Floyd Hough, 1898–1976, (US)
See also
 Fundamentals
 Governmental agencies
 National mapping agency
 U.S. National Geodetic Survey
 National GeospatialIntelligence Agency
 United States Geological Survey
 International organizations
 International Association of Geodesy
 International Federation of Surveyors
 International Geodetic Student Organisation
 Other
References
 "geodesy  Definition of geodesy in English by Lexico Dictionaries". Lexico Dictionaries  English. Retrieved 20190815.
 "What Is Geodesy". National Ocean Service. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
 Foroughi, Ismael; Tenzer, Robert (2017). "Comparison of different methods for estimating the geoidtoquasigeoid separation". Geophysical Journal International. 210 (2): 1001–1020. doi:10.1093/gji/ggx221. hdl:10397/75053. ISSN 0956540X.
 (ISO 19111: Spatial referencing by coordinates).
 Altamimi, Zuheir; Métivier, Laurent; Rebischung, Paul; Rouby, Hélène; Collilieux, Xavier (June 2017). "ITRF2014 plate motion model". Geophysical Journal International. 209 (3): 1906–1912. doi:10.1093/gji/ggx136.
 Sośnica, Krzysztof; Thaller, Daniela; Dach, Rolf; Jäggi, Adrian; Beutler, Gerhard (August 2013). "Impact of loading displacements on SLRderived parameters and on the consistency between GNSS and SLR results". Journal of Geodesy. 87 (8): 751–769. doi:10.1007/s0019001306441.
 Zajdel, Radosław; Sośnica, Krzysztof; Bury, Grzegorz; Dach, Rolf; Prange, Lars; Kazmierski, Kamil (January 2021). "Subdaily polar motion from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo". Journal of Geodesy. 95 (1): 3. doi:10.1007/s0019002001453w.
 Zajdel, Radosław; Sośnica, Krzysztof; Bury, Grzegorz; Dach, Rolf; Prange, Lars (July 2020). "Systemspecific systematic errors in earth rotation parameters derived from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo". GPS Solutions. 24 (3): 74. doi:10.1007/s1029102000989w.
 Zajdel, Radosław; Sośnica, Krzysztof; Bury, Grzegorz (January 2021). "Geocenter coordinates derived from multiGNSS: a look into the role of solar radiation pressure modeling". GPS Solutions. 25 (1): 1. doi:10.1007/s10291020010373.
 Zajdel, R.; Sośnica, K.; Drożdżewski, M.; Bury, G.; Strugarek, D. (November 2019). "Impact of network constraining on the terrestrial reference frame realization based on SLR observations to LAGEOS". Journal of Geodesy. 93 (11): 2293–2313. doi:10.1007/s00190019013070.
 Sośnica, Krzysztof; Bosy, Jarosław (2019). "Global Geodetic Observing System 2015–2018". doi:10.24425/gac.2019.126090. Cite journal requires
journal=
(help)  Pearlman, M.; Arnold, D.; Davis, M.; Barlier, F.; Biancale, R.; Vasiliev, V.; Ciufolini, I.; Paolozzi, A.; Pavlis, E. C.; Sośnica, K.; Bloßfeld, M. (November 2019). "Laser geodetic satellites: a highaccuracy scientific tool". Journal of Geodesy. 93 (11): 2181–2194. doi:10.1007/s0019001901228y.
 "DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY TECHNICAL REPORT 80003". Ngs.noaa.gov. Retrieved 8 December 2018.
 "Guy Bomford tribute". Bomford.net. Retrieved 8 December 2018.
Further reading
 F. R. Helmert, Mathematical and Physical Theories of Higher Geodesy, Part 1, ACIC (St. Louis, 1964). This is an English translation of Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorieen der höheren Geodäsie, Vol 1 (Teubner, Leipzig, 1880).
 F. R. Helmert, Mathematical and Physical Theories of Higher Geodesy, Part 2, ACIC (St. Louis, 1964). This is an English translation of Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorieen der höheren Geodäsie, Vol 2 (Teubner, Leipzig, 1884).
 B. HofmannWellenhof and H. Moritz, Physical Geodesy, SpringerVerlag Wien, 2005. (This text is an updated edition of the 1967 classic by W.A. Heiskanen and H. Moritz).
 W. Kaula, Theory of Satellite Geodesy : Applications of Satellites to Geodesy, Dover Publications, 2000. (This text is a reprint of the 1966 classic).
 Vaníček P. and E.J. Krakiwsky, Geodesy: the Concepts, pp. 714, Elsevier, 1986.
 Torge, W (2001), Geodesy (3rd edition), published by de Gruyter, ISBN 3110170728.
 Thomas H. Meyer, Daniel R. Roman, and David B. Zilkoski. "What does height really mean?" (This is a series of four articles published in Surveying and Land Information Science, SaLIS.)
 "Part I: Introduction" SaLIS Vol. 64, No. 4, pages 223–233, December 2004.
 "Part II: Physics and gravity" SaLIS Vol. 65, No. 1, pages 5–15, March 2005.
 "Part III: Height systems" SaLIS Vol. 66, No. 2, pages 149–160, June 2006.
 "Part IV: GPS heighting" SaLIS Vol. 66, No. 3, pages 165–183, September 2006.