Governments_in_exile

Government-in-exile

Government-in-exile

Governing body located outside its claimed territory

"GiE" redirects here. For other uses, see GiE (disambiguation).

A government-in-exile (abbreviated as GiE) is a political group that claims to be the legitimate government of a sovereign state or semi-sovereign state, but is unable to exercise legal power and instead resides in a foreign country.[1] Governments in exile usually plan to one day return to their native country and regain formal power. A government in exile differs from a rump state in the sense that the latter controls at least part of its former territory.[2] For example, during World War I, nearly all of Belgium was occupied by Germany, but Belgium and its allies held on to a small slice in the country's west.[3] A government in exile, in contrast, has lost all its territory. However, in practice the difference might be minor; in the above example, the Belgian government at Sainte-Adresse was located in French territory and acted as a government in exile for most practical purposes.[citation needed]

The governments in exile tend to occur during wartime occupation or in the aftermath of a civil war, revolution, or military coup. For example, during German expansion and advance in World War II, some European governments sought refuge in the United Kingdom, rather than face destruction at the hands of Nazi Germany. On the other hand, the Provisional Government of Free India proclaimed by Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose sought to use support from the invading Japanese to gain control of the country from what it viewed as British occupiers, and in the final year of WWII, after Nazi Germany was driven out of France, it maintained the remnants of the Nazi-sympathizing Vichy government as a French government in exile at the Sigmaringen enclave.

A government in exile may also form from widespread belief in the illegitimacy of a ruling government. Due to the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War in 2011, for instance, the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces was formed by groups whose members sought to end the rule of the ruling Ba'ath Party.

The governments in exile may have little or no recognition from other states. The effectiveness of a government in exile depends primarily on the amount of support it receives, either from foreign governments or from the population of its own country. Some exiled governments come to develop into a formidable force, posing a serious challenge to the incumbent regime of the country, while others are maintained chiefly as a symbolic gesture.

The phenomenon of a government in exile predates the formal utilization of the term. In periods of monarchical government, exiled monarchs or dynasties sometimes set up exile courts, as the House of Stuart did when driven from their throne by Oliver Cromwell and again at the Glorious Revolution[4] (see James Francis Edward Stuart § Court-in-exile). The House of Bourbon would be another example because it continued to be recognized by other countries at the time as the legitimate government of France after it was overthrown by the populace during the French Revolution. This continued to last through the rule of Napoleon Bonaparte and the Napoleonic Wars from 1803–04 to 1815. With the spread of constitutional monarchy, monarchical governments which were exiled started to include a prime minister, such as the Dutch government during World War II headed by Pieter Sjoerds Gerbrandy.

The capital of a government-in-exile is known as a capital-in-exile, located outside the government's proclaimed territory. This differs from a temporary capital, which is located somewhere inside the government's controlled territory.

Activities

International law recognizes that governments in exile may undertake many types of actions in the conduct of their daily affairs. These actions include:

In cases where a host country holds a large expatriate population from a government in exile's home country, or an ethnic population from that country, the government in exile might come to exercise some administrative functions within such a population. For example, the WWII Provisional Government of Free India had such authority among the ethnically Indian population of British Malaya, with the consent of the then Japanese military authorities.

Current governments in exile

Current governments regarded by some as a "government-in-exile"

These governments once controlled all or most of their claimed territory, but continue to control a smaller part of it while also continuing to claim legitimate authority of the entire territory they once fully controlled.

More information Name, Exile ...

Deposed governments of current states

These governments in exile were founded by deposed governments or rulers who continue to claim legitimate authority of the state they once controlled.

More information Name, Exile since ...

Deposed governments of subnational territories

These governments in exile claim legitimacy of autonomous territories of another state and have been founded by deposed governments or rulers, who do not claim independence as a separate state.

More information Name, Exile ...

Alternative governments of current states

These governments have been founded in exile by political organisations and opposition parties, aspire to become actual governing authorities or claim to be legal successors to previously deposed governments, and have been founded as alternatives to incumbent governments.

More information Name, Claimed exile ...

Alternative separatist governments of current subnational territories

See also: Lists of active separatist movements

These governments have been founded in exile by political organisations, opposition parties, and separatist movements, and desire to become the governing authorities of their territories as independent states, or claim to be the successor to previously deposed governments, and have been founded as alternatives to incumbent governments.

More information Name, Claimed exile ...

Exiled governments of non-self-governing or occupied territories

These governments in exile are governments of non-self-governing or occupied territories. They claim legitimate authority over a territory they once controlled, or claim legitimacy of a post-decolonization authority. The claim may stem from an exiled group's election as a legitimate government.

The United Nations recognizes the right of self-determination for the population of these territories, including the possibility of establishing independent sovereign states.

From the Palestinian Declaration of Independence in 1988 in exile in Algiers by the Palestine Liberation Organization, it has effectively functioned as the government in exile of the Palestinian State. In 1994, however the PLO established the Palestinian National Authority interim territorial administration as result of the Oslo Accords signed by the PLO, Israel, the United States, and Russia. Between 1994 and 2013, the PNA functioned as an autonomy, thus while the government was seated in the West Bank it was not sovereign. In 2013, Palestine was upgraded to a non-member state status in the UN. All of the above founded an ambiguous situation, in which there are two distinct entities: The Palestinian Authority, exercising a severely limited amount of control on the ground and the State of Palestine, recognized by the United Nations and by numerous countries as a sovereign and independent state, but not able to exercise such sovereignty on the ground. Both are headed by the same person—as of 2022, President Mahmoud Abbas—but are judicially distinct.

Potential governments in exile

Following an Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh, on the 28 September 2023 the Republic of Artsakh announced it would dissolve all state institutions by the 1st of January 2024.[52] However, on the 22 December, just 10 days before the state was intended to cease its operation, Artsakhi President Samvel Shahramanyan claimed that the dissolution decree was invalid. He claimed that there was "no document...of the Republic of Artsakh stipulating the dissolution of government institutions". Furthermore, Vladimir Grigorian, the Presidents advisor, added that a decree on 19 October had cancelled the decree from September meaning that the government would "continue their activities after January 1". He also added that "the Republic of Artsakh is dissolved only by the people's referendum, and no person, not even the president, has such powers and rights to dissolve the republic".[53]

As of 1 January, government activity is unknown. However, since Azerbaijan has taken control of the territory, the Government of Artsakh would effectively be rendered a government in exile if it is to continue operating.

Past governments in exile

More information Name, Exiled or founded (*) since ...

World War II

Main article: List of governments in exile during World War II

Many countries established a government in exile after loss of sovereignty in connection with World War II.

Governments in London

A large number of European governments-in-exile were set up in London.

More information Name, Leaders ...

Other exiled leaders in Britain in this time included King Zog of Albania and Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia.

Occupied Denmark did not establish a government in exile, although there was an Association of Free Danes established in London.[73] The government remained in Denmark and functioned with relative independence until August 1943 when it was dissolved, placing Denmark under full German occupation. Meanwhile, Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands were occupied by the Allies and effectively separated from the Danish crown. (See British occupation of the Faroe Islands, Iceland during World War II, and History of Greenland during World War II.)

Governments-in-exile in Asia

The Philippine Commonwealth (invaded 9 December 1941) established a government in exile, initially located in Australia and later in the United States. Earlier, in 1897, the Hong Kong Junta was established as a government in exile by the Philippine revolutionary Republic of Biak-na-Bato.

While formed long before World War II, the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea continued in exile in China until the end of the war.

At the fall of Java, and the surrender by the Dutch on behalf of Allied forces on 8 March 1942, many Dutch-Indies officials (including Dr van Mook and Dr Charles van der Plas) managed to flee to Australia in March 1942, and on 23 December 1943, the Royal Government (Dutch) decreed an official Netherlands East Indies government-in-exile, with Dr van Mook as Acting Governor General, on Australian soil until Dutch rule was restored in the Indies.[74]

Axis-aligned governments in exile

In the later stages of World War II, with the German Army increasingly pushed back and expelled from various countries, Axis-aligned groups from some countries set up "governments-in-exile" under the auspices of the Axis powers, in the remaining Axis territory - even though internationally recognized governments were in place in their home countries. The main purpose of these was to recruit and organize military units composed of their nationals in the host country.

More information Name, Exiled or founded (*) since ...

Persian Gulf War

Following the Ba'athist Iraqi invasion and occupation of Kuwait, during the Persian Gulf War, on 2 August 1990, Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and senior members of his government fled to Saudi Arabia, where they set up a government-in-exile in Ta'if.[84] The Kuwaiti government in exile was far more affluent than most other such governments, having full disposal of the very considerable Kuwaiti assets in western banks—of which it made use to conduct a massive propaganda campaign denouncing the Ba'athist Iraqi occupation and mobilizing public opinion in the Western world in favor of war with Ba'athist Iraq. In March 1991, following the defeat of Ba'athist Iraq at the hands of coalition forces in the Persian Gulf War, the Sheikh and his government were able to return to Kuwait.

Municipal councils in exile

Following the Turkish Invasion of Cyprus in 1974 and the displacement of many Greek Cypriots from North Cyprus, displaced inhabitants of several towns set up what are in effect municipal councils in exile, headed by mayors in exile. The idea is the same as with a national government in exile – to assert a continuation of legitimate rule, even though having no control of the ground, and working towards restoration of such control. Meetings of the exiled Municipal Council of Lapithos took place in the homes of its members until the Exile Municipality was offered temporary offices at 37 Ammochostou Street, Nicosia. The current Exile Mayor of the town is Athos Eleftheriou. The same premises are shared with the Exile Municipal Council of Kythrea.

Also in the Famagusta District of Cyprus, the administration of the part retained by the Republic of Cyprus considers itself as a "District administration in exile", since the district's capital Famagusta had been under Turkish control since 1974.

Fictional governments in exile

Works of alternate history as well as science fictional depictions of the future sometimes include fictional governments in exile.

See also

Lists

References

  1. [1]
    "Princeton University WordNet". Wordnetweb.princeton.edu. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  2. [2]
    Tir, J. (22 February 2005).Keeping the Peace After Secessions: Territorial Conflicts Between Rump and Secessionist States". Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved 22 May 2009.
  3. [3]
    De Schaepdrijver, Sophie (2014). "Violence and Legitimacy: Occupied Belgium, 1914–1918". The Low Countries: Arts and Society in Flanders and the Netherlands. 22: 46. OCLC 948603897.
  4. [4]
    Corp, Edward (2009). A Court in Exile: The Stuarts in France, 1689-1718. Cambridge University Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0521108379.
  5. [5]
    Lori Reese (23 August 1999). "China's Christian Warrior". Time. Vol. 154, no. 7/8. Archived from the original on 11 May 2010. After four years of civil war, Chiang and the nationalists were forced to flee to the island of Taiwan. There they established a government-in-exile and dreamed of retaking the mainland.
    "Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975)". BBC. Archived from the original on 18 January 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015. There Chiang established a government in exile which he led for the next 25 years.
    "Timeline: Milestones in China-Taiwan relations since 1949". Reuters. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015. 1949: Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists lose civil war to Mao Zedong's Communist forces, sets up government-in-exile on Taiwan.
    "Establishment of the People's Republic Of China (Oct 1, 1949)". Public Broadcasting Service. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2015. after the inauguration of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing on October 1, 1949, Chiang and the Nationalists installed the rival Republic of China (ROC) as a government in exile on Taiwan.
    "Tsai blasted for R.O.C. legitimacy remark". China Post. 27 May 2010. Archived from the original on 30 May 2010. Retrieved 12 June 2010.
    "Treaty confirmed sovereignty: Ma". Taipei Times. 29 April 2009. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
    Kerry Dumbaugh (23 February 2006). "Taiwan's Political Status: Historical Background and Ongoing Implications". Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 20 December 2009. While on October 1, 1949, in Beijing a victorious Mao proclaimed the creation of the People's Republic of China (PRC), Chiang Kai-shek re-established a temporary capital for his government in Taipei, Taiwan, declaring the ROC still to be the legitimate Chinese government-in-exile and vowing that he would "retake the mainland" and drive out communist forces.
    John J. Tkacik Jr. (19 June 2008). "Taiwan's "Unsettled" International Status: Preserving U.S. Options in the Pacific". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on 27 July 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2009. Chiang Kai-shek wanted to fight it out on an all-or-nothing basis. There are also reports that Chiang's advisors convinced him that if the ROC mission stayed to represent Taiwan, Chiang would be under pressure to demonstrate in some constitutional way that his Chinese government-in-exile represented the people of Taiwan rather than the vast population of China. Doing so would require Chiang to dismantle his existing regime (which was elected in 1947 on the Chinese mainland and continued to rule in Taiwan under emergency martial law provisions without benefit of elections), adopt an entirely new constitution, and install an entirely new government.
    "ROC Government in Exile Is Illogical (English transl.)". NOWnews Network. 1 June 2010. Archived from the original on 14 June 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2010.
    Time, Far Eastern Economic Review, Stanford University, the US State Department, PBS, BBC, US Congressional Research Service, UK Parliament, UK Foreign Office, Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, and numerous law journals have all referred to the Republic of China on Taiwan as a government in exile. However, the ROC has diplomatic relations with 11 UN member states and the Holy See. The PRC claims that the ROC government no longer exists. "Republic of China government in exile". Retrieved 27 February 2010.
    Jonathan I. Charney; J. R. V. Prescott (July 2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China and Taiwan". American Journal of International Law. Archived from the original on 22 June 2004. Retrieved 28 February 2011.
  6. [6]
    "CIA report shows Taiwan concerns". Taipei Times. 9 June 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2013. [Quoting from a declassified CIA report on Taiwan written in March 1949] From the legal standpoint, Taiwan is not part of the Republic of China. Pending a Japanese peace treaty, the island remains occupied territory in which the US has proprietary interests.
  7. [7]
    Robert I. Starr (13 July 1971). "Starr Memorandum of the Dept. of State". Retrieved 18 May 2012. Following World War II, the Republic of China, under the Kuomintang (KMT) became the governing polity on Taiwan. In 1949, after losing control of mainland China following the Chinese civil war, the ROC government under the KMT withdrew to occupied Taiwan and Chiang Kai-shek declared martial law. Japan formally renounced all territorial rights to Taiwan in 1952 in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, but neither in that treaty nor in the peace treaty signed between Japan and China was the territorial sovereignty of Taiwan awarded to the Republic of China.
  8. [8]
    Tzu-Chin Huang. "Disputes over Taiwan Sovereignty and the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty Since World War II" (PDF). Institute of Modern History, Academia sinica. Central Academic Advisory Committee and Academic Affairs Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
    Charles Holcombe (2011). A History of East Asia: From the Origins of Civilization to the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press. p. 337. ISBN 978-0-521-51595-5.
    Barbara A. West (1 January 2009). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase Publishing. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-4381-1913-7.
    Richard J. Samuels (21 December 2005). Encyclopedia of United States National Security. SAGE Publications. p. 705. ISBN 978-1-4522-6535-3.
  9. [9]
    "Раду БНР признали экстремистским формированием". reform.by [be] (in Russian). 7 June 2023. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
  10. [10]
    "Official website of the Belarusian National Republic". Radabnr.org. Retrieved 28 May 2021.
  11. [11]
    Wilson, Andrew (2011). Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship. Yale University Press. p. 96. ISBN 9780300134353. Retrieved 8 May 2013.
  12. [12]
    Profile, abcnews.go.com; accessed 31 March 2021.
  13. [13]
    "Opponents of Myanmar coup form unity government, aim for 'federal democracy'". Reuters. 16 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  14. [14]
    "Who's Who in Myanmar's National Unity Government". The Irrawaddy. 16 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  15. [15]
    , newsweek.com; accessed 17 August 2021.
  16. [16]
    , digitaljournal.com; accessed 18 August 2021
  17. [17]
    Official website. Presidential representative of Ukraine in Crimea.
  18. [18]
    https://web.archive.org/web/*/ppu.gov.ua [bare URL]
  19. [19]
    https://web.archive.org/web/*/loga.gov.ua [bare URL]
  20. [20]
    "South Korea's Governors-in-Theory for North Korea". The Wall Street Journal. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
  21. [21]
    "National Council of Resistance of Iran". ncr-iran.org. Archived from the original on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  22. [22]
    Công An, Bộ. "Thông báo về tổ chức khủng bố "Việt Tân"". demo.bocongan.gov.vn. Retrieved 27 March 2019.[permanent dead link]
  23. [23]
    "Timeline: Equatorial Guinea". BBC News. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  24. [24]
    "Mission statement". syriancouncil.org. 25 November 2011. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  25. [25]
    "Ukraine's former prime minister Azarov announces establishing Ukraine Salvation Committee". Russian News Agency TASS. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 3 August 2015.
  26. [26]
    "Экс-премьер Азаров заявил о создании "Комитета спасения Украины"". RIA Novosti. 3 August 2015. Retrieved 3 August 2015.
  27. [27]
    Reznik, Irina; Kravchenko, Stepan (19 August 2015). "Exiled Ukraine Premier Seeks to Regain Power, Though Not Crimea". Bloomberg. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  28. [28]
    "Putin's Latest Ukraine Gambit: A Puppet Government in Exile". Newsweek. 20 August 2015.
  29. [29]
    "Голос".
  30. [30]
    "В Беларуси признали "экстремистским формированием" созданный Светланой Тихановской Объединенный переходный кабинет". Current Time TV (in Russian). 8 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  31. [31]
    "Акт о Переходном Парламенте (Регламент Съезда, принято 05.11.2022 г.) - Съезд Народных Депутатов". 4 November 2022.
  32. [32]
    "Official website of the Government in Exile of the Free City of Danzig". Free State of Danzig. Archived from the original on 6 April 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2013. [Original URL is now a porn site.]{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  33. [33]
    Capps, Patrick; Evans, Malcolm David (2003). Asserting Jurisdiction: International and European Legal Approaches', edited by Patrick Capps, Malcolm Evans and Stratos Konstadinidis, which mentions Danzig on page 25 and has a footnote directly referencing the Danzig Government in exile website in a footnote also on page 25. Hart. ISBN 9781841133058. Retrieved 8 May 2013.
  34. [34]
    "Sydney Morning Herald, November 15th, 1947". Retrieved 8 May 2013.
  35. [35]
    Saha, Santosh C. (2006). Perspectives on Contemporary Ethnic Conflict. Lexington Books. p. 63. ISBN 9780739110850. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
  36. [36]
    Minahan, James (2002). Encyclopedia of the Stateless Nations: S-Z. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 2055. ISBN 978-0-313-32384-3. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
  37. [37]
    Widjojo, Muridan S. "Cross-Cultural Alliance-Making and Local Resistance in the Moluccas during the Revolt of Prince Nuku, c. 1780–1810" PhD Dissertation, Leiden University, 2007 (Publisher: KITLV, Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 1, 2008) Pp. 141–149 ISSN 1979-8431
  38. [38]
    "Biafraland". Biafraland. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  39. [39]
    Paul Goble (5 November 2019). "Tatar government in exile calls on Tatars not to serve in Russian army". Kyiv Post. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
  40. [40]
    Huseyn Aliyev (24 February 2011). "Peace-Building From The Bottom: A Case Study Of The North Caucasus". Eurasia Review. Retrieved 10 May 2011.
  41. [41]
    "Ukraine recognizes the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria". news.yahoo.com. 18 October 2022.
  42. [42]
    "Ukraine recognizes the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria". english.nv.ua.
  43. [43]
    "Ukraine's parliament recognizes Chechen Republic of Ichkeria as temporarily occupied by Russia". The Kyiv Independent. 18 October 2022.
  44. [44]
    "East Turkistan Government-in-Exile". East Turkistan Government-in-Exile. Retrieved 15 December 2019.
  45. [45]
    "Tibet.net". Archived from the original on 10 December 2011.
  46. [46]
    "Religions - Buddhism: Dalai Lama". BBC. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  47. [47]
    "Southerncameroonsig.typepad.com". Southerncameroonsig.typepad.com. 20 August 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  48. [48]
    "KNC.org.uk" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2011.
  49. [49]
    "The Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam". Tgte-us.org. Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  50. [50]
    Tilmatine, Mohand. "La construction d'un mouvement national identitaire kabyle: du local au transnational". p. 28.[permanent dead link]
  51. [51]
    "westernarmeniangovernment.org - ԳԼԽԱՎՈՐ". www.westernarmeniangovernment.org.
  52. [52]
    Sauer, Pjotr (28 September 2023). "Nagorno-Karabakh's breakaway government says it will dissolve itself". The Guardian.
  53. [53]
    "Nagorno-Karabakh Separatist Leader Says Dissolution Decree Not Valid".
  54. [54]
    "Tshaoline.org". Tshaonline.org. 20 September 1967. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  55. [55]
    Schmitt, Hans A. Prussia's Last Fling: The Annexation of Hanover, Hesse, Frankfurt, and Nassau, 15 June – 8 October 1866. Central European History 8, No. 4 (1975), pp. 316–347.
  56. [56]
    Windell, George (1954). The Catholics and German unity, 1866–1871. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9780816658916.
  57. [57]
    Talmon, Stefan (1998). Recognition of governments in international law. Oxford University Press. p. 299. ISBN 0-19-826573-5.
  58. [58]
    Oh, Kongdan; Hassig, Ralph C. (2002). Korea Briefing: 2000-2001 : First Steps Toward Reconciliation and Reunification. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 9780765609540.
  59. [59]
    "Decision of DPRK Supreme People's Assembly". Korean Central News Agency. 16 January 2024. Retrieved 16 January 2024.
  60. [60]
    Colin Leys, John S. Saul, and Susan Brown. Namibia's Liberation Struggle: The Two-Edged Sword (London: James Currey, 1995). pp. 20–21, 40.
  61. [61]
    Mann, Zarni (14 September 2012). "Burmese Exile Govt Dissolves After 22 years". The Irrawaddy. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
  62. [62]
    Myo, Nay (17 September 2012). "Burma's exiled government dissolved". Mizzima. Archived from the original on 31 May 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2013.
  63. [63]
    "Корак ка оснивању Дубровачке републике, Accessed 2013-12-26". Archived from the original on 5 November 2013.
  64. [64]
    Azerbaijan begins controversial renovation of Armenian church, Joshua Kucera, 7 May 2021, Eurasianet
  65. [65]
    "Nagorno-Karabakh" separate administrative-territorial unit no longer exists - Azerbaijani MP, 30 April 2021, Azernews
  66. [66]
    Nom *. "Bdpgabon.org". Bdpgabon.org. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  67. [67]
    "Library.stanford.edu". Library.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 26 June 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  68. [68]
    Gall, Carlotta (21 January 2007). "At Border, Signs of Pakistani Role in Taliban Surge". The New York Times.
  69. [69]
    "Taliban shifts to southwest Pakistan". The Washington Times. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  70. [70]
    "Archived copy" (PDF). www.understandingwar.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 February 2011. Retrieved 11 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  71. [71]
    "Peacehalle.com". Peacehall.com. Retrieved 20 September 2012.
  72. [72]
    Than, Tin Maung Maung (2006). "MYANMAR: Challenges Galore but Opposition Failed to Score". Southeast Asian Affairs. 2006: 183–207. doi:10.1355/SEAA-06L. ISSN 0377-5437. JSTOR 27913310.
  73. [73]
    The Who's who of the Allied Governments and Allied Trade & Industry. Allied Publications. 1944. p. 173.
    Arthur Durham Divine (1944). Navies in Exile. E.P. Dutton. p. 214.
    Knud J. V. Jespersen (1 January 2002). No Small Achievement: Special Operations Executive and the Danish Resistance, 1940–1945. University Press of Southern Denmark. p. 48. ISBN 978-87-7838-691-5.
  74. [74]
    Lockwood, R. (1975). Black Armada and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1942–49. Australasian Book Society Ltd., Sydney, Australia. ISBN 9 09916 68 3
  75. [75]
    "Horia Sima Vol. 1_0062" (PDF). Central Intelligence Agency. 19 July 1945. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
  76. [76]
    Pétain et la fin de la collaboration: Sigmaringen, 1944–1945, Henry Rousso, éditions Complexe, Paris, 1984
  77. [77]
    Οι Τσιρονίκος και Ταβουλάρης συνελήφθησαν, Εφημερίδα «Ελευθερία», Παρασκευή 11 Μαΐου 1945, σελίδα 2.
  78. [78]
    Ο Τσιρονίκος παρεδόθη χθες εις τας Ελληνικάς Αρχάς, Εφημερίδα «Εμπρός», Τρίτη 27 Αυγούστου 1946, σελίδα 5.
  79. [79]
    Ο Ε.Τσιρονίκος υπέβαλε αίτηση χάριτος, Εφημερίδα «Εμπρός», Τρίτη 27 Αυγούστου 1946, σελίδα 5.
  80. [80]
    Jose, Ricardo. "Governments in Exile" (PDF). University of the Philippines. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2014. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  81. [81]
    "Today is the birth anniversary of President Jose P. Laurel". Official Gazette. Archived from the original on 5 May 2016. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
  82. [82]
    Ooi, Keat Gin (2004). Southeast Asia: a historical encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor, Volume 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 776. ISBN 978-1-57607-770-2. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  83. [83]
    Adriano, Pino; Cingolani, Giorgo (2018). Nationalism and Terror: Ante Pavelić and Ustasha Terrorism from Fascism to the Cold War. Central European University Press. p. 390. ISBN 978-9633862063.
  84. [84]
    "Exiled Kuwaiti Rulers Set Up Government". Orlando Sentinel. 24 August 1990 – via Washington Post.
  85. [85]
    Husemann, Harald (2000). Stark, Susanne (ed.). If Adolf Had Come. Brill Publishers. pp. 399–424. doi:10.1163/9789004486720_030. ISBN 9789042006980. S2CID 239141844. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  86. [86]
    Borsilli, Timothy (10 March 2022). "Why Kaiserreich is the ultimate Hearts of Iron 4 mod". Wargamer.

Further reading

  • Vít, Smetana; Kathleen, Geaney, eds. (2018). Exile in London: The Experience of Czechoslovakia and the Other Occupied Nations, 1939–1945. Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press. ISBN 978-80-246-3701-3.
  • Yapou, Eliezer (1998). Governments in Exile, 1939–1945. Retrieved 9 October 2016.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Governments_in_exile, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.