Gross_v._FBL_Financial_Services,_Inc.

<i>Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.</i>

Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

2009 United States Supreme Court case


Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2009, involving the standard of proof required for a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Quick Facts Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Argued March 31, 2009 Decided June 18, 2009 ...

Jack Gross, an employee of FBL Financial Services, Inc., was transferred to another position and a former subordinate took on many of Gross' old responsibilities. They both received the same compensation, but Gross believed his reassignment was a demotion. Gross brought suit against FBL in April 2004 in District Court, claiming ADEA violations. The court found in his favor and awarded him $5,000,000 in lost compensation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the decision. The Supreme Court affirmed that reversal, finding that a plaintiff must prove by preponderance of evidence, that age was the "but for" cause of the adverse employment action.


References



    Share this article:

    This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Gross_v._FBL_Financial_Services,_Inc., and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.