Internet censorship in Hong Kong
After the Hong Kong national security law was commenced, power was given to the government to "take down any electronic messages published" if the government officials think those "messages" are possibly endangering national security (see Hong Kong national security law). This led to the increase of Internet censorship in Hong Kong. The government has blocked several anti-government or politically sensitive websites after the commencement of the law (see blockages after 30 June 2020).
Before then, there was relatively little Internet censorship in Hong Kong beyond laws that criminalize the distribution of unlicensed copyrighted material and obscene images, particularly child pornography when compared to the rest of China. Hong Kong law provided freedom of speech and press, and the government generally respected these rights in practice. Freedom of expression was protected by the Hong Kong Bill of Rights.
Government licences are not required to operate a website. There is some monitoring of the Internet. Democratic activists claim central government authorities closely monitor their e-mails and Internet use.
History and law
Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China (PRC). The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong and the SAR's charter, the Basic Law of the SAR, specified that Hong Kong will enjoy a high degree of autonomy except in matters of defence and foreign affairs. Chapter III of the Basic Law outlines "Fundamental Rights and Duties of the Residents" including freedom of expression and association and privacy rights. The Hong Kong Bill of Rights elaborates on these and other rights enjoyed by the people of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong government enforced the Hong Kong national security law on 30 June, 2020. The local law enforcement unit is now able to censor any resources when handling cases concerning offense endangering national security under Article 43.
Computer crime ordinances
"Section 161: Access to computer with criminal or dishonest intent" of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200) which was enacted in 1993 before the widespread use the Internet and the growth of e-commerce generally, provides that it is an offence to obtain access to a computer:
- with an intent to commit an offence;
- with a dishonest intent to deceive;
- with a view to gain for oneself or another;
- or with a dishonest intent to cause loss to another.
Section 27A of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106) enacted in 2000 provides that "any person who, by telecommunications, knowingly causes a computer to perform any function to obtain unauthorized access to any program or data held in a computer commits an offense and is liable on conviction to a fine of HK$20000".
Pursuant to the Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance (Cap 390), it is an offence to publish an obscene article. Publication covers distribution, circulation, selling, hiring, giving, or lending the obscene article. Distribution by e-mail falls within the definition of distribution, as does the placing of an obscene article on a website. Distribution does not require any element of financial gain. The definition includes "anything consisting of or containing material to be read or looked at or both read and looked at, any sound recording, and any film, video-tape, disc, or other record of a picture or pictures". An article will be considered obscene if, by reason by its obscenity, "it is not suitable to be published to any person". Obscenity includes "violence, depravity, and repulsiveness". The penalty for this offence is up to three years imprisonment and a fine of up to HK$1,000,000.
It is an offence to possess, produce, copy, import, or export pornography involving a child under 18 years of age, or to publish or cause to be published any advertisement that conveys or is likely to be understood as conveying the message that any person has published, publishes, or intends to publish any child pornography. The penalty for creation, publication, or advertisement of child pornography is eight years’ imprisonment, while possession carries a penalty of five years’ imprisonment.
The Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 528) provides the legal framework for copyright protection in Hong Kong. In April 2011 the government introduced the Copyright (Amendments) Bill 2011 that, if passed, will introduce (i) a new technology-neutral exclusive right for copyright owners to communicate their works through any mode of electronic transmission, with criminal sanctions against those who make unauthorised communication of copyright works to the public; (ii) safe harbour provisions for online service providers; and (iii) additional factors to consider by the courts when awarding additional damages for copyright infringement.
There are complaints that the proposed amendments prohibiting unauthorised use of copyright material in any medium without permission threatens freedom of speech. The bill may negatively affect works of satire or parody on the Internet because there is no "fair-use exception". The government's position is that the amendments strengthen intellectual property rights. Some pan-democratic activists and supporters termed the bill an "Internet Article 23" (a reference to Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23, controversial anti-subversion measures the government proposed in 2002 that led to Hong Kong's largest-ever street demonstrations, the proposed article was withdrawn in September 2003).
Hong Kong national security law
Article 43 of Hong Kong national security law states that platforms, publishers, and internet service providers may be ordered to take down electronic messages published that are “likely to constitute an offence endangering national security or is likely to cause the occurrence of an offence endangering national security". Individuals, organizations, and companies who do not comply with such requests could face fines of up to 100,000 Hong Kong dollars ($12,903) and put into prison for six months.
There are reports of media self-censorship since most media outlets are owned by businesses with interests on the mainland, causing authors and editors to defer to the perceived concerns of publishers regarding their business interests. Some scholars suggest that Hong Kong-based academics practice some self-censorship in their China-related work to preserve good relations and research and lecturing opportunities in the mainland.
In a poll published in June 2012 by the Hong Kong Journalists Association, 86.9% of the 663 journalists surveyed felt that press freedom had deteriorated in the past seven years. This is a 28.5% increase from a similar survey in 2007. Those who felt freedom had declined attributed the change to: tighter government control (92%), self-censorship in the industry (71%), interference from Beijing (67.5%), and pressure from the business sector (35.9%). According to respondents the policies that most affect the decline in freedom are: Spot news information being controlled by the police and the Fire Services Department (57%); releasing more official footage and articles and fewer news events being accessible to reporters (41.3); off-the-record briefings increasing tremendously (23.8); and a government proposal to criminalise stalking (16%).
Instances of censorship
Before 30 June, 2020
Local ISP shutdown – March 1995
In March 1995, Royal Hong Kong Police raided all but one of the pioneering local Internet Service Providers (ISP) offering dialup service, confiscated their servers and records and shut them down for a week, blocking the access of 5000 to 8000 of Hong Kong's early Internet adopters. The raids were thought to be instigated by Supernet, the one ISP not shut down, and coordinated by the Office of Telecommunications Authority (OFTA) working with the Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB) on the premise that the ISPs were operating without applying for a then-obscure Public Non-Exclusive Telecommunications Service (PNETS) Licence. The companies shut down were Hong Kong Internet & Gateway Services (HKIGS) hk.net, Hong Kong Link InfoLink Ilink, Internet Online Hong Kong, Cybernet, Internet Connections, and Asia Online.
Edison Chen photo scandal – January 2008
In January and February 2008, the Hong Kong Police Force arrested ten people who were accused of obtaining, uploading, or distributing pornographic images after Emperor Entertainment Group (EEG), a multi-billion entertainment company, filed a complaint about the availability of the photos on the Internet. The images in question, which were explicit in nature, were of the Hong Kong actor Edison Chen engaging in sex acts with various women, several of whom were local actresses. Chen admitted being the author and copyright owner of most of the photographs, and stated that the private photographs had been stolen and published illegally without his consent. A computer technician was convicted of three counts of obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent, and received a custodial sentence of eight and a half months.
The scandal shook the Hong Kong entertainment industry and received high-profile media attention locally and around the world. The police met with more than 200 people responsible for major Hong Kong websites and BBS communities to urge them to delete the pictures "as they have the responsibility to stop crimes". Related discussion threads were progressively deleted. The police ordered several locally registered web sites and BBS management firms to submit information about their clients, and had retrieved the IP addresses of more than 30 Internet users who allegedly posted photographs. The police crackdown raised questions over violations of the privacy and free speech rights of Internet users and the selective application of the law.
After 30 June, 2020
According to Article 43 of the city's new Hong Kong national security law, which enforces from 30 June 2020, the police now have the authority to order "a person who published information or the relevant service provider to delete the information or provide assistance.” (see Hong Kong national security law) Since then, the Hong Kong government has been blocking several anti-government or politically sensitive sites. (see below)
HKChronicles - January 2021
HKChronicles is a wiki-like website that details the personal information of Hong Kong police officers and pro-Beijing individuals. On 7 January, 2021, the website's owner Naomi announced in the website that she has received reports from users in Hong Kong that the website was inaccessible when using certain local Internet Service Providers (ISP). Several local news reporters confirmed that the site couldn't be accessed within the city. The police declined to comment on the blockage. However, in a statement, they said they “can require service providers to take restrictive actions against messages posted on digital platforms, which likely constitute the offense of endangering national security or incite a national security offense.” Hong Kong Broadband Network, one of the biggest mobile telecom companies in Hong Kong, said they have disabled access to the website in compliance with the requirement issued under the National Security Law on 13 January 2021.
Transitional Justice Commission - February 2021
On 13 February 2021, Hong Kong netizens reported that the website of Taiwan's Transitional Justice Commission cannot be accessed from Hong Kong. Some local medias confirmed that they couldn't access the site without using a Virtual Private Network (VPN). The police refused to comment on the blockage.
Block of Taiwanese sites - April 2021
On 24 April 2021, some netizens discovered that they could not enter the website of Presbyterian Church in Taiwan (www.pct.gov.tw). Later, they reported that the official website of Democratic Progressive Party (www.dpp.org.tw) and Recruitment Centre of National Armed Force (https://www.rdrc.mnd.gov.tw) also couldn't be accessed from Hong Kong. Some local news medias confirmed. The police refused to comment.
By 27 April 2021, the Stand News retested the three websites and found out that the websites of Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and Democratic Progressive Party are now accessible. However, they still couldn't establish a connection to the official site of Recruitment Centre of National Armed Force.
2021 Hong Kong Charter - June 2021
Since 18 June 2021, some local ISP users reported they could not browse the website of 2021 Hong Kong Charter (2021hkcharter.com). Sources said local ISP received order from the police and prevented users from accessing the website from 18 June. Initiators of the website said it was blocked on 19 June. Police refused to comment.
List of websites blocked
This list might not cover every websites blocked as some blockages may not have been discovered.
|Website||URL||Category||Language(s)||Duration of blockage||Methodology||Current Status|
|Encyclopedia,||Chinese(Traditional),||7 January 2021 -||TCP/IP blocking
|Transitional Justice Commission||www.tjc.gov.tw
|Governmental||Chinese(Traditional)||13 February 2021 -||HTTP blocking||Unknown|
|Presbyterian Church in Taiwan||www.pct.org.tw||Church||Chinese(Traditional)||24 - 27 April 2021||TCP/IP blocking||Unblocked|
|Democratic Progressive Party||www.dpp.org.tw||Political orgainzation||Chinese(Traditional)||24 - 27 April 2021||Unknown||Unblocked|
|Recruitment centre of National Armed Force||rdrc.mnd.gov.tw||Governmental||Chinese(Traditional)||24 April 2021 -||TCP/IP blocking||Blocked|
|2021 Hong Kong Charter||2021hkcharter.com||Politics||English, Chinese(Traditional)||18/19 June 2021 -||Unknown||Blocked|
- Hong Kong Bill of Rights Archived 25 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 8 June 1991, Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Hong Kong" Archived 1 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine, 2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, Bureau of Democracy, Human rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State, 24 May 2012
- "Chapter III: Fundamental Rights and Duties of the Residents" Archived 5 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Hong Kong Basic Law, adopted 4 April 1990, effective 1 July 1997
- Soo | AP, Zen. "Hong Kong police granted sweeping powers under security law". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 6 July 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "Section 161: Access to computer with criminal or dishonest intent" Archived 5 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Chapter 200 Crimes Ordinance, Bilingual Laws Information System, Department of Justice, Hong Kong, 1997. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Section 27A: Unauthorized access to computer by telecommunications" Archived 5 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Chapter 106 Telecommunications Ordinance, Bilingual Laws Information System, Department of Justice, Hong Kong, 2000. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Chapter 390: Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance" Archived 8 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine, enacted in 1987, amended in 1997, 2000, 2003, 2012, Bilingual Laws Information System, Department of Justice, Hong Kong. Retrieved 30 June 2012.
- "Chapter 528: Copyright Ordinance" Archived 14 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, enacted in 1997, amended in 2001, 2003, and 2007, Bilingual Laws Information System, Department of Justice, Hong Kong. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Legislative Council Brief for the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2011" Archived 23 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Commerce, Industry and Tourism Branch, Commerce and Economic Development Bureau, Hong Kong, 2 June 2011. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Hong Kong artists cry foul over copyright bill" Archived 7 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Beh Lih Yi, Agence France-Presse (AFP), 20 May 2012
- "Hong Kong editor's performance fuels broader press freedom concerns" Archived 5 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine, China Media Bulletin: Issue No. 62, Freedom House, 28 June 2012
- "Survey: Government Manipulation Eroded Press Freedom" Archived 29 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine, Hong Kong Journalists Association
- Policy on Internet Access Providers and On-line Service Providers in Overseas Countries (RP04/95-96) Archived 4 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine, Research and Library Services Division, Hong Kong Legislative Council Secretariat, December 1995, 11 pages. Retrieved 16 April 2008.
- "Footnote 14" in Telecommunications: The Other Hong Kong Report[permanent dead link], John Ure, Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong, 26 July 1995. Retrieved 30 June 2012
- "Eight now held in internet sex probe" Archived 5 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Damon Pang, Bonnie Chen and Diana Lee, The Standard, 4 February 2008
- "Tech jailed for stealing sex-with-starlet photos" Archived 27 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine, The Sydney Morning Herald, 13 May 2009
- "Alleged HK celebrity sex photos create a stir" Archived 25 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Lydia Chen, Shanghai Daily, 31 January 2008
- "Internet Sex Video Case Stirs Free-Speech Issues in Hong Kong" Archived 9 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Keith Bradsher, The New York Times, 13 February 2008
- "Hong Kong internet firm blocked website over security law". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "In a first under security law, Hong Kong police order telecom firms to block anti-government doxing website - report". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 11 January 2021. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- "網站「香港編年史」無法連接 總編：疑政府要網絡商封網 據報國安處首用國安法封網 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- Mozur, Paul; Krolik, Aaron (9 January 2021). "A Hong Kong Website Gets Blocked, Raising Censorship Fears". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- Ossoff, Jon (14 January 2021). "Hong Kong ISP blocks access to pro-democracy website under national security law". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "港版國安法︱香港寬頻事隔6日改口 首認按《國安法》封「香港編年史」網站 ｜ 蘋果日報". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "【國安封網】香港寬頻：已按《國安法》要求 停止連線至「香港編年史」網站 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "台灣促進轉型正義委員會網站疑被禁 須用VPN經德、美登入 ｜ 蘋果日報". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "台灣「促進轉型正義委員會」疑被港「封網」 經 VPN 仍可瀏覽 保安局、警方拒絕評論 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- "港府疑再封網 民進黨官網、國軍募兵網站無法瀏覽 ｜ 蘋果新聞網 ｜ 蘋果日報". 蘋果新聞網 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "香港築網絡長城 疑封鎖「台灣基督長老教會」網站 《文匯報》引消息稱教會涉傑斯國安法案 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Taiwan Church Website Blocked by Hong Kong National Security Police". Radio Free Asia. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "【封網疑團】香港可重新登入台灣民進黨等兩網站 仍無法登入國軍招募網 保安局拒評 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- 鄭秋玲, 孔繁栩 (18 June 2021). "國安法一年｜「香港約章」網站再被禁 消息︰港電訊商被勒令封網". 香港01 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 20 June 2021.
- "2021 香港約章網站疑遭禁 本港用 VPN 方可瀏覽 發起人羅冠聰：港人將面對資訊壁壘 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Retrieved 20 June 2021.
- "In a first under security law, Hong Kong police order telecom firms to block anti-gov't doxing website - report". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 11 January 2021. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Mozur, Paul; Krolik, Aaron (9 January 2021). "A Hong Kong Website Gets Blocked, Raising Censorship Fears". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Ossoff, Jon (14 January 2021). "Hong Kong ISP blocks access to pro-democracy website under national security law". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "警疑封編年史新IP 株連數百網站 IT人批損香港營商環境 ｜ 蘋果日報". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- "【國安封網】中大學者：封網手法不一 或無明確指示 憂引入大陸「防火長城」 | 調查報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- "台灣促進轉型正義委員會網站疑被禁 須用VPN經德、美登入 ｜ 蘋果日報". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "台灣「促進轉型正義委員會」疑被港「封網」 經 VPN 仍可瀏覽 保安局、警方拒絕評論 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Archived from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.