JT_Stratford_&_Son_v_Lindley

JT Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley

JT Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley

Add article description

JT Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley [1965] AC 269 is a UK labour law case that concerns economic tort and strike action.

Quick Facts Court, Decided ...

Facts

The union embargoed JT Stratford & Son, the parent company of a subsidiary that the union was in dispute with. They refused to handle the barges of JT Stratford.

Judgment

The House of Lords held

Lord Reid said the following.[1]

The respondents' action made it practically impossible for the appellants to do any new business with the barge hirers.

It was not disputed that such interference is tortious if any unlawful means are employed.

See also

Notes

  1. [1]
    [1965] AC 269, 324


Stub icon

This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article JT_Stratford_&_Son_v_Lindley, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.