Judgment_as_a_matter_of_law

Judgment as a matter of law

Judgment as a matter of law

United States legal practise

In the United States courts, a motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a motion made by a party, during trial, claiming the opposing party has insufficient evidence to reasonably support its case.[1] It asserts that the evidence allows only one result: victory for the moving party, even if a jury has found otherwise.[2] JMOL is also known as a directed verdict, which it has replaced in American federal courts.[3]

"JMOL" redirects here. For the chemistry software, see Jmol.

JMOL is similar to judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment, all of which test the factual sufficiency of a claim.[4] Judgment on the pleadings is a motion made after pleading and before discovery; summary judgment happens after discovery and before trial; JMOL occurs during trial.[5]

In United States federal courts, JMOL is a creation of Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.[6][7] JMOL is decided by the standard of whether a reasonable jury could find in favor of the party opposing the JMOL motion.[8] If there is no evidence to support a reasonable conclusion for the opposing party, judgment is entered by the court and the case is over.[9] If there is sufficient evidence to make a reasonable conclusion in favor of the opposing party, but there is equally strong evidence to support an opposite conclusion, the party with the burden of persuasion fails.[10]

Timing is very important in making a motion for JMOL; the motion can be made only after the opposing party has presented its case.[11] In civil cases, the plaintiff presents its case, the defendant presents its case, and the plaintiff may present a rebuttal. Therefore, once the plaintiff has presented its case, the defendant but not the plaintiff can move for JMOL. However, once the defendant has finished presenting its case, both the plaintiff and the defendant can move for JMOL.

JMOL motions may also be made after the verdict is returned and are then called "renewed" motions for judgment as a matter of law (RJMOL), but the motion is still commonly known by its former name, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or JNOV (from the English judgment and the Latin non obstante veredicto).

See also

References

  1. [1]
    "motion for judgment as a matter of law". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  2. [2]
    Fundamentals of Litig. Prac. § 32:3 (2021) (updated 2022).
  3. [3]
    Fundamentals of Litig. Prac. § 32:3 (2021) (updated 2022).
  4. [4]
    "What is the difference between judgment as a matter of law and summary judgment? | uslawessentials". uslawessentials.com. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  5. [5]
    "What is the difference between judgment as a matter of law and summary judgment? | uslawessentials". uslawessentials.com. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  6. [6]
    "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" (PDF). 1 December 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
  7. [7]
    "Rule 50. Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
  8. [8]
    Fundamentals of Litig. Prac. § 32:5 (2021) (updated 2022).
  9. [9]
    Fundamentals of Litig. Prac. § 32:5 (2021) (updated 2022).
  10. [10]
    Fundamentals of Litig. Prac. § 32:5 (2021) (updated 2022).
  11. [11]
    "What is the difference between judgment as a matter of law and summary judgment? | uslawessentials". uslawessentials.com. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Judgment_as_a_matter_of_law, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.