Karlsruhe_Congress

Karlsruhe Congress

Karlsruhe Congress

Add article description

The Karlsruhe Congress was an international meeting of chemists organized by August Kekulé and held in Karlsruhe, Germany from 3 to 5 September 1860. It was the first international conference of chemistry with 140 participants.

Formulas of acetic acid given by August Kekulé in 1861.

The conference is known for the adoption of atomic weights in chemistry motivated by the participation of Stanislao Cannizzaro. During the congress he showed evidence using Avogadro's hypothesis, that certain gases were not made of atoms but of diatomic molecules.

It has been argued[1] that the Karlsruhe meeting was the first international meeting of chemists and that it led to the eventual founding of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).

Organization and invitation

The Karlsruhe Congress was called so that European chemists could discuss matters of chemical nomenclature, notation, and atomic weights. The organization, invitation, and sponsorship of the conference were handled by August Kekulé, Adolphe Wurtz, and Karl Weltzien.[2] As an example of the problems facing the delegates, Kekulé's Lehrbuch der Organischen Chemie gave nineteen different formulas used by chemists for acetic acid, as shown in the figure on this page.[3][4]

An understanding was reached on the time and place of the meeting, and printing of a circular addressed to European chemists listed below, which explained the objectives and goals of an international congress was agreed upon. The circular concluded: "...with the aim of avoiding any unfortunate omissions, the undersigned request that the individuals to whom this circular will be sent please communicate it to their scientist friends who are duly authorized to attend the planned conference."[5] The circular of the conference was sent to:

More information Country, City ...

Of the above, only 20 of 45 attended.[7]

Meeting

First two days

The congress opened in the assembly hall of the Baden Parliament the 3th September, with Weltzien serving as the general secretary. In his address, he highlighted the international and discipline-specific nature of the meeting. Kekulé delivered an opening address. Wurtz documented the proceedings for future publication. A dinner for 120 people was held in the museum hall.[8][9]

The next day, the assembly, led by Weltzien, discussed the committee's proposed theme of the day before regarding the disputed meanings of "atom," "molecule," and "equivalence." However, no conclusions were reached, leading the committee to meet twice on the same day. They decided to present three specific nomenclature proposals to the assembly for further consideration.[8]

Last day

The Karlsruhe meeting started with no firm agreement on the vexing problem of atomic and molecular weights. However, on the meeting's last day reprints of Stanislao Cannizzaro's 1858 paper on atomic weights,[10] in which he utilized earlier work by Amedeo Avogadro and André-Marie Ampère, were distributed. Cannizzaro's efforts exerted a heavy and, in some cases, an almost immediate influence on the delegates. Lothar Meyer later wrote that on reading Cannizzaro's paper,[11][12]

I was astonished at its clarity, the little manuscript covered all the important points in dispute. It was as if scales fell from my eyes, doubts vanished, and a feeling of calm certainty came over me.

An important long-term result of the Karlsruhe Congress was the adoption of the now-familiar atomic weights. Prior to the Karlsruhe meeting, and going back to John Dalton's work in 1803, several systems of atomic weights were in use.[13] In one case, a value of 1 was adopted as the weight of hydrogen (the base unit), with 6 for carbon and 8 for oxygen. As long as there were uncertainties over atomic weights then the compositions of many compounds remained in doubt. Following the Karlsruhe meeting, values of about 1 for hydrogen, 12 for carbon, 16 for oxygen, and so forth were adopted. This was based on a recognition that certain elements, such as hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen, were composed of diatomic molecules and not individual atoms.

Attendance

The number of people who wanted to participate was considerable, and on 3 September 1860, 140 chemists met together in the meeting room of the second Chamber of State, which was made available by the Frederick I, Grand Duke of Baden.

According to Wurtz, the printed list of members, supplemented by handwritten additions, contains 126 names listed below.[14]

  1. Austria:
  2. Belgium:
  3. France:
  4. Germany:
  5. Italy:
  6. Mexico: Posselt (Louis Posselt, 1817-1880, brother of Christian Posselt [de])
  7. Portugal:
    • Coimbra: Mide Carvalho (Mathias de Carvalho e Vasconcellos,[39] 1832-1910)
  8. Russia:
  9. Sweden:
  10. Switzerland:
  11. Spain:
    • Madrid: R. de Luna [es]
  12. United Kingdom:

References

  1. [1]
    Ihde, Aaron J. (1961). "The Karlsruhe Congress: A Centennial Retrospective". Journal of Chemical Education. 38 (2): 83–86. Bibcode:1961JChEd..38...83I. doi:10.1021/ed038p83.[permanent dead link] (subscription required)
  2. [2]
    Leicester, Henry M. (1956). The Historical Background of Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 191–192. ISBN 978-0-486-61053-5.
  3. [3]
    Kekulé, A. (1861). Lehrbuch der Organischen Chemie … , vol. 1 (in German). Erlangen, (Germany): Ferdinand Enke. p. 58.
  4. [4]
    The French chemist Auguste Laurent also listed many different contemporary representations of acetic acid (acide acétique) in his book: Laurent, Auguste (1854). Méthode de Chimie (in French). Paris, France: Mallet-Bachelier. pp. 27–28.
  5. [5]
    "Charles-Adolphe Wurtz". web.lemoyne.edu. Retrieved 2019-07-01.
  6. [6]
    Brooks, Nathan M. (1995-11-01). "Russian chemistry in the 1850s: A failed attempt at institutionalization". Annals of Science. 52 (6): 577–589. doi:10.1080/00033799500200411. ISSN 0003-3790.
  7. [7]
    de Milt, Clara (1951). "The Congress at Karlsruhe". Journal of Chemical Education. 28 (8): 421. doi:10.1021/ed028p421. ISSN 0021-9584.
  8. [8]
    Mönnich, Michael W. (2010). "Thriving for Unity in Chemistry: The First International Gathering of Chemists". Chemistry International. 32 (6).
  9. [9]
    Mönnich, Michael (2010). ""Für unsere schöne Wissenschaft eine Einigung anzubahnen"". Nachrichten aus der Chemie. 58 (5): 539–543. doi:10.1002/nadc.201071445. ISSN 1439-9598.
  10. [10]
    See:
  11. [11]
    Moore, F. J. (1931). A History of Chemistry. McGraw-Hill. pp. 182–184. ISBN 978-0-07-148855-6. (2nd edition)
  12. [12]
    Cannizzaro, Stanislao (1891) with Arthur Miolati, trans., and Lothar Meyer, ed. Abriss eines Lehrganges der theoretischen Chemie [Outline of a Course of Theoretical Chemistry] (Leipzig, (Germany): Wilhelm Engelmann, 1891), p. 59. On p. 59, Lothmar Meyer wrote: "Nach Schluss der Versammlung vertheilte Freund Angelo Pavesi im Auftrage des Verfassers eine kleine ziemlich unscheinbare Schrift, den hier wiedergegeben "Sunto" etc. Cannizzaro's, der schon einige Jahre früher erschienen, aber wenig bekannt geworden war. Auch ich erhielt ein Exemplar, das ich einsteckte, um es unterwegs auf der Heimreise zu lesen. Ich las es wiederholt auch zu Hause und war erstaunt über die Klarheit, die das Schriftchen über die wichtigsten Streitpunkte verbreitete. Es fiel mir wie Schuppen von den Augen, die Zweifel schwanden, und das Gefühl ruhigster Sicherheit trat an ihre Stelle." (At the conclusion of the meeting, friend Angelo Pavesi, on behalf of the author, distributed a small, inconspicuous pamphlet, Cannizzaro's "Sunto" etc. [which is] reproduced here [Note: "Sunto" refers to: Stanislao Cannizzaro (1858) "Lettera del Prof. Stanislao Cannizzaro al Prof. S. de Luca; Sunto di un corso di filosofia chimica fatto nella Reale Università di Genova dal Professore S. Cannizzaro," Il Nuovo Cimento, 7 : 321–366.], which had appeared a few years earlier but has been little known. I too received a copy, which I pocketed to read on the way home. I also read it at home repeatedly and was amazed at the clarity that the pamphlet spread about the main issues. It was as if the scales fell from my eyes, the doubts faded, and the feeling of calmest assurance took its place.)
  13. [13]
    An example of the confusion is provided by the table of atomic weights in the various prevailing systems, which appears in: Gehler, Johann Samuel Traugott (1840). Gmelin; Littrow; Muncke; Pfaff (eds.). Johann Samuel Traugott Gehler's Physikalisches Wörterbuch, 9. Band, 3. Abtheilung [Johann Samuel Traugott Gehler's Physical Dictionary, vol. 9, part 3] (in German). Leipzig, (Germany): E.B. Schwickert. pp. 1909–1912. In the tables of pages 1911–1912, Column C presents the relative atomic weights of the known elements, assigning to hydrogen (Wasserstoff) an atomic weight of 1. Column D contains the same relative atomic weights as column C, except that oxygen (Sauerstoff) is assigned a relative atomic weight of 100. (Gehler says of columns C and D: "In den Columnen C und D finden sich die Atomgewichte, wie sie sich nach den so eben entwickelten Grundsätzen als die wahrscheinlichsten ergeben möchten, … " (In columns C and D are found the atomic weights, as they would result from the principles [that have been] developed just now as the most probable ones … ) But this system assigns to oxygen an atomic weight of 8 and to carbon (Kohlenstoff) an atomic weight of 6.) Column E presents the relative atomic weights according to Berzelius, who assigned to hydrogen atoms (das Atomgewicht des einfachen Wasserstoffatoms (the atomic weight of single hydrogen atoms)) a value of 0.5 and who found oxygen to have a value of 8.01 — about 16 times greater than that of the hydrogen atom, which is correct. Column F contains the same relative atomic weights as column E, except that oxygen is assigned a relative atomic weight of 100.
  14. [14]
    "Charles-Adolphe Wurtz". web.lemoyne.edu. Retrieved 2019-06-18.
  15. [15]
    Oesterreichisch-ungarischer Ordens-Almanach (in German). Sommer. 1876.
  16. [16]
    Archiv Der Pharmazie: Chemistry in Life Sciences (in German). Wiley-Blackwell. 1865.
  17. [17]
    Jahresberichte über die leistungen der chemischen technologie (in German). O. Wigand. 1866.
  18. [18]
    "Le Canu,Louis-René Études chimiques sur le Sang Humain. Thèse". www.medicusbooks.com. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
  19. [19]
    Figurovskii, N. A.; Solov'ev, Yu I. (2012-12-06). Aleksandr Porfir'evich Borodin: A Chemist's Biography. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783642727320.
  20. [20]
    "Eugène Jacquemin (1828–1909)". data.bnf.fr. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
  21. [21]
    Nationalizing Science: Adolphe Wurtz and the Battle for French Chemistry. MIT Press. 8 November 2000. ISBN 9780262264297.
  22. [22]
    "Frédéric Charles Schlagdenhauffen". geni_family_tree. Retrieved 2019-06-27.
  23. [23]
    "Woldemar Alexander Adolph von Schneider". geni_family_tree. Retrieved 2019-07-11.
  24. [24]
    Boeckmann, Emil (1837-01-01). "Ueber einige Doppelverbindungen von Cyanquecksilber mit Schwefelcyan‐Metallen". Annalen der Pharmacie. 22 (2): 153–158. doi:10.1002/jlac.18370220205.
  25. [25]
    Partington, J. R. (1964-06-18). History of Chemistry. Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 9781349005543.
  26. [26]
    "[Earliest: (01/01/1846 TO 12/31/1930)] AND [Author: Ludwig, H] : Search". onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 2019-07-11.
  27. [27]
    "handbuch der allgemeinen waarenkunde von seubert karl – ZVAB". www.zvab.com. Retrieved 2019-07-13.
  28. [28]
    Ärzte, Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und (1861). Tageblatt der Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte (in German).
  29. [29]
    Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft (in German). Verlag Chemie. 1878.
  30. [30]
    Brock, William H. (2002-06-20). Justus Von Liebig: The Chemical Gatekeeper. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521524735.
  31. [31]
    Ärzte, Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und (1861). Tageblatt der Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte (in German).
  32. [32]
    Fruton, Joseph Stewart (1990). Contrasts in Scientific Style: Research Groups in the Chemical and Biochemical Sciences. American Philosophical Society. p. 282. ISBN 9780871691910. Gustav Reinhold Hoffmann (1831–1919).
  33. [33]
    Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie (in German). C.F. Winter'sche. 1859.
  34. [34]
    Ärzte, Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und (1861). Tageblatt der Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte (in German).
  35. [35]
    Hermann, Armin; Wankmüller, Armin (1980). Physik, physiologische Chemie und Pharmazie an der Universität Tübingen (in German). Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN 9783164428019.
  36. [36]
    Archiv for Pharmacie Og Technisk Chemie Med Deres Grundvidenskaber (in Danish). 1864.
  37. [37]
    Buchner, Max (2014-01-13). Aus der Vergangenheit der Universität Würzburg: Festschrift Zum 350 Jährigen Bestehen der Universität (in German). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 9783642995781.
  38. [38]
    McDonald, Donald; Hunt, Leslie B. (1982-01-01). A History of Platinum and its Allied Metals. Johnson Matthey Plc. ISBN 9780905118833.
  39. [39]
    Formosinho, Sebastião J. (2007-08-01). Nos Bastidores da Ciência: 20 anos depois (in Portuguese). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra / Coimbra University Press. ISBN 9789898074096.
  40. [40]
    "Bischoff, Henri". hls-dhs-dss.ch (in French). Retrieved 2019-06-27.
  41. [41]
    Archives, The National. "The Discovery Service". discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
  42. [42]
    Gadd, Ian Anders; Eliot, Simon; Louis, William Roger; Robbins, Keith (November 2013). History of Oxford University Press: Volume II: 1780 to 1896. OUP Oxford. ISBN 9780199543151.

Further reading

(Note the incorrect spelling of Weltzien's name.)
  • Ihde, Aaron J. (1984). The Development of Modern Chemistry. Dover. pp. 228–230. ISBN 978-0-486-64235-2.
(Originally published in 1964.)
(Note the incorrect month given for the conference.)
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Karlsruhe_Congress, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.