Lambeth_LBC_v_Commission_for_Racial_Equality

<i>Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality</i>

Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality

Add article description

Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality [1990] ICR 768 is a UK labour law concerning exceptions from the rules prohibiting discrimination, now found in the Equality Act 2010 Schedule 9.

Quick Facts Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality, Court ...

Facts

The Council reserved two positions for Afro-Caribbean or Asian applicants in the housing department.[1] These groups were 50% of the council’s tenants. The Council wanted to be ‘more sensitive to the needs and experiences of black people’. Tribunal held that because the jobs involved limited contact with the public they did not involve ‘personal services’[2] under the Race Relations Act 1976 s 5(2)(d). The Employment Appeals Tribunal rejected the appeal.[3]

Judgment

Balcombe LJ looked at the dictionary definitions of ‘personal’ and said it would matter if there was face to face contact. It is a question of mixed law and fact. He found no error of law by the tribunal.

Mann LJ and Mustill LJ concurred.

See also

Notes

  1. [1]
    Kathy Daniels; Lynda Macdonald (2005). Equality, Diversity and Discrimination: A Student Text. CIPD Publishing. p. 119. ISBN 978-1-84398-112-1.
  2. [2]
    Peter Chandler (2003). Waud's Employment Law: The Practical Guide for Human Resource Managers, Trade Union Officials, Employers, Employees and Lawyers. Kogan Page Publishers. pp. 242–243. ISBN 978-0-7494-3888-3.
  3. [3]
    [1989] ICR 641
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Lambeth_LBC_v_Commission_for_Racial_Equality, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.