List_of_formerly_open-source_software

List of formerly open-source or free software

List of formerly open-source or free software

Add article description

This is a list of notable software packages which were published as free and open-source software, or into the public domain, but were made proprietary software, or otherwise switched to a license (including source-available licenses) that is not considered to be free and open source.

More information Title, Orig. free date ...

See also

References

  1. [1]
    Bonér, Jonas (2022-09-07). "Why We Are Changing the License for Akka". Lightbend. Archived from the original on 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2022-10-31.
  2. [2]
    Kunert, Paul (2022-09-08). "Open source biz sick of FOSS community exploitation overhauls software rights". The Register. Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on 2022-09-29. Retrieved 2022-10-31.
  3. [3]
    Carabine, Matt (2023-10-11). "Evolving ArangoDB's Licensing Model for a Sustainable Future". ArangoDB. Archived from the original on 2023-10-17. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  4. [4]
    Capello, David. "Aseprite - New source code license". www.aseprite.org. Archived from the original on 2017-06-23. Retrieved 2021-11-20.
  5. [5]
    Mattis, Peter; Darnell, Ben; Kimball, Spencer (2019-06-04). "Why we're relicensing CockroachDB". Cockroach Labs. Archived from the original on 2022-11-07. Retrieved 2023-01-10.
  6. [6]
    Dadgar, Armon (2023-08-10). "HashiCorp adopts Business Source License". HashiCorp. Archived from the original on 2023-08-11. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  7. [7]
    Anderson, Scott (2021-03-26). "Business Source License (BSL 1.1) Adopted by Couchbase". The Couchbase Blog. Couchbase, Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-08-22. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  8. [8]
    Anderson, Scott (2022-02-25). "Couchbase Mobile changes source code license to BSL 1.1". The Couchbase Blog. Couchbase, Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-06-07. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  9. [9]
    Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. "Elastic changes open-source license to monetize cloud-service use". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-01-23.
  10. [10]
    Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (2021-04-13). "OpenSearch: AWS rolls out its open source Elasticsearch fork". TechRepublic. Retrieved 2021-09-03.
  11. [11]
    Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. "AWS, as predicted, is forking Elasticsearch". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-01-28.
  12. [12]
    "[Request] GPL Violation". Emby Community Blog. 2018-03-21. Archived from the original on 2018-12-25. Retrieved 2017-08-19.
  13. [13]
    Anderson, Tim (2021-09-06). "Why we abandoned open source: LiveCode CEO on retreat despite successful kickstarter". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2021-09-15. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
  14. [14]
    Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. (2019-01-16). "MongoDB "open-source" Server Side Public License rejected". ZDNet. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  15. [15]
    "MongoDB's licensing changes led Red Hat to drop the database from the latest version of its server OS". GeekWire. 2019-01-16. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  16. [16]
    Larabel, Michael (2010-03-22). "Nexuiz Gets Forked, Turned Into Xonotic". Phoronix. Retrieved 2016-10-30.
  17. [17]
    "October CMS Moves to Become a Paid Platform". October. 2021-04-12. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-09-19.
  18. [18]
    Laurent, Pierre-Edouard (2021-10-16). "Meilleur CMS (2022) : le comparatif des gestionnaires de contenus pour créer un site web". Clubic.com (in French). Retrieved 2022-06-22.
  19. [19]
    "We have forked October CMS". wintercms.com. Retrieved 2022-06-22.
  20. [20]
    "Attention! Security risk with OTRS 6!". OTRS. 2020-12-23. Retrieved 2023-02-02.
  21. [21]
    "A new license for Paint.NET v3.5". 2009-11-07. Retrieved 2015-02-11.
  22. [22]
    now a custom license granting broad use, redistribution, and modification rights, but assigning copyright to any version to Schrodinger, LLC.
  23. [23]
    "PyMOL | pymol.org". pymol.org. Retrieved 2021-11-07. Open-Source Philosophy
    PyMOL is a commercial product, but we make most of its source code freely available under a permissive license. The open source project is maintained by Schrödinger and ultimately funded by everyone who purchases a PyMOL license.
    Open source enables open science.
    This was the vision of the original PyMOL author Warren L. DeLano.
  24. [24]
    "schrodinger/pymol-open-source". GitHub. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
  25. [25]
    "PyMOL Molecular Graphics System". SourceForge.
  26. [26]
    "Open-Source PyMOL". Schrodinger, Inc. 2021-11-05. Retrieved 2021-11-07.
  27. [27]
    Trollope, Rowan (2024-03-20). "Redis Adopts Dual Source-Available Licensing". Redis. Archived from the original on 2024-03-20. Retrieved 2024-03-20.
  28. [28]
    "Linux Foundation Launches Open Source Valkey Community". Linux Foundation. 2024-03-28. Archived from the original on 2024-03-28. Retrieved 2024-03-28.
  29. [29]
    darkcrizt (2023-07-06). "Sourcegraph abandons open source in favor of a proprietary license". LinuxAddict (Linux Adictos). Archived from the original on 2023-08-24. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
  30. [30]
    Miller, Ron (2023-09-20). "Terraform fork gets renamed OpenTofu, and joins Linux Foundation". TechCrunch. Yahoo! Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-11-02. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  31. [31]
    Fay, Joe (2023-10-16). "HashiCorp CEO predicts OSS-free Silicon Valley unless the open source model evolves". The Stack. Archived from the original on 2023-10-29. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article List_of_formerly_open-source_software, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.