Madonna_and_Child_with_St._Anne_(Dei_Palafrenieri)_(Caravaggio)

<i>Madonna and Child with St. Anne (Dei Palafrenieri)</i>

Madonna and Child with St. Anne (Dei Palafrenieri)

Painting by Caravaggio

The Madonna and Child with St. Anne (Dei Palafrenieri) or Madonna and the Serpent[1], is one of the mature religious works of the Italian Baroque master Caravaggio, painted in 1605–1606, for the altar of the Archconfraternity of the Papal Grooms (Italian: Arciconfraternita di Sant'Anna de Parafrenieri)[2] in the Basilica of Saint Peter[3] and taking its theme from Genesis 3:15.[3][4] The painting was briefly exhibited in the parish church for the Vatican, Sant'Anna dei Palafrenieri, before its removal, due to its unorthodox portrayal of the Virgin Mary.[5] There are a lot of reasons why the piece may have been removed, such as the nudity of the child Jesus and the Virgin Mary revealing too much of her breast.[4] The reputation of the model that Caravaggio used to portray the Virgin Mary could be another reason as to why this altarpiece was withdrawn.[6] The altarpiece was sold to Cardinal Scipione Borghese and now hangs in his palazzo (Galleria Borghese).

Quick Facts Madonna and Child with St Anne, Artist ...

History

Caravaggio received this commission from the Confraternity for Palafrenieri on December 1, 1605.[1] He worked on the piece and completed it in under four months.[1] It is unknown as to why the Confraternity picked Caravaggio to do the altarpiece; it is known that he was paid 25 scudi for the painting,[1][4] according to a document found by scholar Luigi Spezzaferro, dated October 31st. The altarpiece was placed in the new basilica on April 8 and was removed again on April 16, to the Palafrenieri's Church of St. Anne, a church in honor of St. Anne.[1]

Model

The model that Caravaggio used to depict as the Virgin Mary was named Maddalena Antonietti, also known as Lena.[6] Lena modeled for Caravaggio before, in his piece called Madonna of the Pilgrims.,[6] also known as the Madonna of Loreto (1603).[6] Caravaggio developed a deep relationship with the model Lena, which explains why she was used in other works.[6] Maurizio Marini has noted that while many have stated that Lena was a prostitute; there is no evidence to confirm this.[7] However, this relationship was more serious compared to the other mistresses Caravaggio had.[6] She came from a lower class and modeled for artists to support herself.[7]

Removal and Rejection

Spezzaferro believed that the painting was removed due to the way Caravaggio depicted St. Anne.[1] Traditionally in Christianity, Saint Anne was praised as a symbol of Grace.[8] Caravaggio depicted her as if she were just an ordinary older woman standing next to Mary and Christ.[1] Another reason as to why the painting may have been removed was that Caravaggio did not put enough effort into depicting the Holy Family grouping.[1] It was not the first time one of Caravaggio's paintings was removed from a church; another example is the Death of the Virgin, which was removed from Santa Maria della Scala.[1]

Art historian John Spike is not sure as to what the main reason this piece was removed and he cannot pinpoint it to one specific reason.[4] Scholar Maurizio Marini believed one of the biggest reasons Caravaggio's altarpiece was removed was due to his being a murderer that committed many crimes.[7] Caravaggio killed Ranuccio Tomassoni of Terni in a duel.[6] The Church had the altarpiece up for two months and later it was removed.[1]

Another reason for the rejection could be that Caravaggio used the model Lena to depict her as the Virgin Mary.[7] The Church may have rejected the piece knowing Lena was not an appropriate person to represent a holy figure since she was a prostitute.[6] Lena developed a relationship with Mariano Pasqualone that led Caravaggio to attack Pasqualone with a sword at a restaurant called Via Della Scrofa.[7]

The infant Jesus being fully naked may have also caused controversy and could be another reason as to why the altarpiece was removed from St. Peter's.[4] During the Counter-Reformation, the Church did not want to display art that displayed nudity, especially depicting such a holy entity.[9]

Iconography

Depiction

While not his most successful arrangement, it is an atypical representation of the Virgin Mary for its time and must have been shocking to some contemporary viewers.[2] The depiction of the Virgin Mary, with the aid of her son, whom she holds, tramples and crushes on a serpent, the emblem of evil or original sin.[1] Serpents symbolized heresy which signifies not believing in God.[4] Believing in God was seen as the truth if a person believed in any other representation of a god figure instead of Jesus, it was seen as sinful.[9] Mary and Jesus are crushing the serpent together with their feet and looking down upon the serpent. The snake is coiling up due to rejecting the presence of all three figures. Both Mary and Jesus are barefoot, and Jesus is a fully naked uncircumcised child.[3]

Saint Anne

A close-up image of Virgin Mary showing too much breast. A visual that could possibly be why the altarpiece was removed.

Saint Anne, whom the painting is intended to honor, is a wrinkled old grandmother, who witnesses the event. She is depicted more loosely, sketchily, and thinner than the other two figures.[1] Saint Anne is on the farther right wearing a dark navy-blue dress. She is the mother of the Virgin Mary and the grandmother of Jesus Christ. The Virgin Mary and Saint Anne are depicted with thin gold ring halos. However, Jesus is the only figure who does not have a halo.[1] This is strange because usually in Christian artwork, Jesus is depicted having the brightest halo to draw attention to him, Caravaggio did not do that in this painting.[1]

Jesus

Jesus's left hand is depicted doing a gesture where he is putting his middle finger and thumb together creating a circle.[4] Everything else is in the shadows, and the figures gain monumentality in the light.[3] This depiction is known as tenebrism.[1] The brightest figure in this altarpiece with a lot of highlights is Jesus. The light shines on him due to being the focus and being known as "the light of the world,” stated John Spike.[4] He has more power compared to his mother and grandmother. Mary receives more light compared to Saint Anne because she is standing behind her son.[1] Mary has light hitting more on her because she carried and gave birth to Jesus. Mary and Saint Anne both represent and have a status in the Christian hierarchy, but not a lot of status compared to Jesus.[1] That is why they are both depicted behind Jesus. The serpent is receiving some light due to being crushed by Jesus and the Virgin Mary.[1]

Nudity

Caravaggio depicted Jesus' as nude because showing his genitals represents the true human body.[4] Caravaggio and Michelangelo believed that depicting him nude lets the viewers know that Jesus came to be represented as a free human nature from the "Adamic contagion of shame," stated by Leo Steinberg.[4] The contagion of shame was physical health and death.

Mary is leaning with her son and her cleavage is showing and she is seen wearing a tight fitted bodice.[4] This iconography of the breast being a tight-fitted bodice came from the medieval period and traditional wear. The symbolism of showing her breast represents Madonna of Mercy’s breast milk.[4] Breast milk is a substance and nutrition that Christ would drink and was seen as a symbol of her role in Co-redemptrix.[4] The breasts of Mary can be compared to Christ’s wounds.

Virgin Mary's Clothing

Mary in this painting is wearing unusual clothing from her norm; she is usually depicted wearing a veil in blue and a dress in white.[4] At this time young Roman women would wear these dresses.[4] The outfit she is usually seen in multiple paintings is a matronly veil, mantle, and robe. In this painting, Caravaggio depicted her wearing a veil neckline dress where she is revealing too much of her breasts.[1]

See also

Notes

  1. [1]
    Wallace, Catharine T (2011). Retracing Her Roots: The Reforming Church and St. Anne in Triplicate; a Study of Caravaggio's Madonna dei Palafrenieri for New St. Peter's. ISBN 9781124691107. OCLC 1285300682.
  2. [2]
    Bologna, Ferdinando (2005). "Caravaggio, the final years (1606-1610)". In Nicola Spinosa (ed.). Caravaggio: The Final Years. Naples: Electa Napoli. pp. 16–47. ISBN 8851002649.
  3. [3]
    "Venerabile Arciconfraternita di Sant'Anna de Parafrenieri". Archived from the original on 2018-11-13. Retrieved 2010-11-16.
  4. [4]
    Spike, John T., Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, and Michèle K. Spike. 2010. Caravaggio / John T. Spike ; with the Assistance of Michèle K. Spike. 2nd rev. ed. New York ;: Abbeville Press.
  5. [5]
    Caravaggio: the original sinner
  6. [6]
    Hunt, Patrick (2004). Caravaggio. Haus Pub. OCLC 742317610.
  7. [7]
    Marini, Maurizio (2009). "Senso e trascendenza nella Madonna de'Parafrenieri del Caravaggio". Artibus et Historiae. 30 (59): 135–144. ISSN 0391-9064. JSTOR 40343669.
  8. [8]
    Ashley., Straughan, Carolyn (1998). Hidden artifice: Caravaggio and the case of the "Madonna of the Serpent.". Cornell University. ISBN 978-0-591-69932-6. OCLC 841777434.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. [9]
    Gash, John M. (2003), "Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da", Oxford Art Online, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t013950, ISBN 978-1-884446-05-4, retrieved 2023-03-28
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Madonna_and_Child_with_St._Anne_(Dei_Palafrenieri)_(Caravaggio), and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.