Minnesota_Amendment_1_(2012)

2012 Minnesota Amendment 1

2012 Minnesota Amendment 1

Proposed constitutional amendment


Minnesota Amendment 1 (also called Minnesota Marriage Amendment[1] or Minnesota Gay Marriage Amendment[2]) was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment proposed to ban marriage between same-sex couples in the state of Minnesota, that appeared on the ballot on November 6, 2012. It was rejected by 51.90% of voters.[3]

Quick Facts Results, Choice ...

Legislative approval

On May 11, 2011, the Minnesota Senate passed a bill to place a proposed amendment to the state constitution on the ballot that would ban same-sex marriage. The vote was 37–27, with all Republicans and one Democrat voting for the amendment. An identical bill was passed by the House on May 21; the vote was 70–62 with two Democrats and all but four Republicans voting for the amendment.[4] The proposed amendment was on the ballot on November 6, 2012.[5] The proposed amendment read: "Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota." It did not refer to civil unions or domestic partnerships.[6] The question being presented to voters on the ballot read: "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota?"[6]

Support and opposition

Julian Bond and Governor Mark Dayton at a "Vote No" rally in June 2012.

In March 2012, Minnesota's Roman Catholic bishops had an audience with Pope Benedict XVI, who told them that preserving the traditional definition of marriage was a priority. Roman Catholic Archbishop John Nienstedt of St. Paul and Minneapolis organized leaders of different religious denominations in support of the amendment and committed his own church to spend $650,000 on behalf of its passage. In September he joined other religious leaders in a demonstration in support of the amendment at the State Capitol.[7] The Minnesota Catholic Conference Marriage Defense Fund contributed more than half the $1.2 million raised by Minnesota for Marriage, the principal organization supporting the amendment, including $130,000 from the Knights of Columbus, a national Catholic organization.[8]

Immediately after the Minnesota legislature voted to put Amendment 1 on the ballot, Outfront Minnesota and Project 515, two groups working for LGBT rights in the state, formed Minnesotans United for All Families – the main campaign organization that would work to defeat the amendment. Over the course of a year and a half, Minnesotans United would raise and spend over $12 million, more than double the pro-amendment side.[9] More importantly, the Minnesotans United campaign formed a coalition group of allies with almost 700 member organizations that included political parties, labor unions, veterans, civic groups and businesses like General Mills.[10][11] The board and staff of the campaign reflected the same kind of diversity as its coalition partners and even included prominent Republicans.[9] Drawing on lessons learned from past campaigns in other states, Minnesotans United did not cede the religious ground – it hired a faith director to reach out to communities of faith, and more than 100 of its coalition members were churches and other faith groups from around the state.[12]

The centerpiece of the Minnesotans United for All Families campaign became its huge grassroots effort to have conversations with the voters about marriage. Rather than focus on equal rights and fairness, as was done in previous campaigns, Minnesotans United and its thousands of volunteers, had personal conversations over the phones and face to face about how marriage had the same importance and meaning for both straight and same-sex couples.[12] This messaging strategy, which was also used in the campaign's ad campaign, helped move conflicted voters and resulted in Minnesota being the first state, after 30 attempts, to defeat a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.[9] Minnesotans United is likely the biggest grassroots campaign in the state's history, having had 27,000 volunteers knock on over 400,000 doors and make over 900,000 phone calls in the final eight days of the campaign[13]

The Minnesota arm of President Obama's presidential re-election campaign announced his opposition to this proposed constitutional amendment in April.[14] Advertisements in opposition to the amendment also featured Minnesota Vikings football player Chris Kluwe.[15]

Opinion polls

Various public opinion surveys of Minnesota residents have asked questions regarding same-sex marriage. The questions vary, with some surveys referring directly to proposed Amendment and others asking more general questions.

More information Date of opinion poll, Conducted by ...

Results

More information Choice, Votes ...

County breakdown

More information County, No ...

See also


References

  1. Zachary, Alexander (October 3, 2012). "Weathering the Storms of the Minnesota Marriage Amendment". Huff Post. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  2. "2012 Referendum General Election Results". Uselectionatlas.org. November 7, 2012.
  3. "Minnesota Secretary Of State - Home". Sos.state.mn.us. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  4. French, Rose; Helgeson, Baird (October 7, 2012). "Marriage amendment: The archbishop draws the line". Star-Tribune. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
  5. Helgeson, Baird (October 18, 2012). "Minnesota's marriage amendment fight funded by Catholics across U.S." Star Tribune. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
  6. Ringham, Eric; Aslanian, Sasha (November 9, 2012). "EIGHTEEN MONTHS TO HISTORY: How the Minnesota marriage amendment was defeated -- money, passion, allies". Mprnews.org. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  7. Moylan, Martin (June 14, 2012). "General Mills opposes marriage amendment". Mprnews.org. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  8. "Businesses drawn into fight over marriage amendment". Star Tribune. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  9. "What happened here? Three observations about Minnesota's marriage vote". MinnPost.com. November 26, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  10. Louwagie, Pam (April 9, 2012). "Obama weighs in against Minnesota's marriage ballot". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on January 27, 2013. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
  11. Gervino, Tony (October 19, 2012). "The Punter Makes His Point". New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
  12. "SurveyUSA News Poll #18243". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  13. "Minnesotans like Dayton, split on gay marriage" (PDF). Publicpolicypolling.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  14. "Annual Minnesota Statewide Survey Fall 2011 – Findings Report" (PDF). Media1.stcloudstate.edu. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  15. "Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll #18726". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  16. "Dayton Sees Strong Approval in Minnesota" (PDF). Publicpolicypolling.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  17. "SurveyUSA News Poll #18953". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  18. "Minnesotans' opposition to marriage amendment growing". Publicpolicypolling.com. June 5, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  19. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19394". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  20. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19612". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  21. "Minnesota split on marriage amendment". Publicpolicypolling.com. September 12, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  22. "MINNESOTA POLL RESULTS: Marriage amendment". Star Tribune. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  23. "Minnesota marriage amendment narrowly trails" (PDF). Publicpolicypolling.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  24. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19873". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  25. "St. Cloud State poll shows slender lead for opponents of marriage amendment". MinnPost.com. October 26, 2012. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  26. "FALL STATEWIDE SURVEY OCTOBER, 2012" (PDF). Minnpost.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  27. "Breakdown of poll findings on marriage amendment". Star Tribune. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  28. "How the poll was conducted". Star Tribune. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  29. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #20056". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  30. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #20105". Surveyusa.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.
  31. "Obama up 8 in Minnesota, amendments trail for passage" (PDF). Publicpolicypolling.com. Retrieved February 24, 2019.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Minnesota_Amendment_1_(2012), and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.