National_Organization_for_Women_v._Scheidler

<i>National Organization for Women v. Scheidler</i>

National Organization for Women v. Scheidler

1994 United States Supreme Court case


National Organization for Women v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) could apply to enterprises without economic motives; anti-abortion protesters could thus be prosecuted under it. An organization without an economic motive can still affect interstate or foreign commerce and thus satisfy the Act's definition of a racketeering enterprise.

Quick Facts National Organization for Women v. Scheidler, Argued December 8, 1993 Decided January 24, 1994 ...

The Court did not issue judgment on whether or not the Pro-Life Action Network, the organization in question, had committed actions that could be prosecuted under RICO.

G. Robert Blakey argued on behalf of Joseph Scheidler, while Miguel Estrada represented the United States as amicus curiae in favor of reversal.

See also

Further reading

Joseph Scheidler#NOW v. Scheidler discusses the wider course of the litigation, before and after the 1994 Supreme Court decision.



Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article National_Organization_for_Women_v._Scheidler, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.