Predatory publishing

Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing[1][2] or deceptive publishing,[3] is an exploitative academic publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy, and without providing editorial and publishing services that legitimate academic journals provide, whether open access or not. The phenomenon of "open access predatory publishers" was first noticed by Jeffrey Beall, when he described "publishers that are ready to publish any article for payment".[4] However, criticisms about the label "predatory" have been raised.[5] A lengthy review of the controversy started by Beall appears in The Journal of Academic Librarianship.[6]

"Think. Check. Submit." poster by an international initiative to help researchers avoid predatory publishing

Predatory publishers are so regarded because scholars are tricked into publishing with them, although some authors may be aware that the journal is poor quality or even fraudulent.[lower-alpha 1] New scholars from developing countries are said to be especially at risk of being misled by predatory publishers.[8][9] According to one study, 60% of articles published in predatory journals receive no citations over the five-year period following publication.[10][11]

Beall's List, a report that was regularly updated by Jeffrey Beall of the University of Colorado until January 2017,[12][lower-alpha 2] set forth criteria for categorizing publications as predatory.[13] A demand by Frontiers Media to open a misconduct case against Beall, which was launched by his university and later closed with no findings, was one of several reasons Beall may have taken his list offline, but he has not publicly shared his reasoning.[12][14] After the closure, other efforts to identify predatory publishing have sprouted, such as the paywalled Cabell's blacklist, as well as other lists (some based on the original listing by Beall).