Progenote

First universal common ancestor

First universal common ancestor

Possible earliest ancestor of the LUCA ancestral cell


The first universal common ancestor (FUCA) is a proposed non-cellular entity that is the earliest ancestor of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) and its descendants, including every modern cell.[1][2] FUCA would also be the ancestor of ancient sister lineages of LUCA, none of which have modern descendants.[2]

FUCA is thought to have been composed of progenotes, proposed ancient biological systems that would have used RNA for their genome and self-replication, in place of DNA.[3][4][5] By comparison, LUCA would have had a complex metabolism and genome with hundreds of genes and gene families.[1]

The now-extinct sister lineages descended from FUCA are thought to have horizontally transferred some of their genes into the genome of early descendants of LUCA.[2]

Origins

Long before the appearance of compartmentalized biological entities like FUCA, life had already began to organize itself and emerge in a pre-cellular era known as the RNA world.[3] The universal presence of both biological translation mechanism and genetic code in every biological systems indicates monophyly, a unique origin for all biological systems including viruses and cells.[1][3]

FUCA would have been the first organism capable of biological translation, using RNA molecules to convert information into peptides and produce proteins.[1] This first translation system would have been assembled together with primeval, possibly error-prone genetic code.[1] FUCA would also be the first biological system to have genetic code.[6]

The development of FUCA likely took a long time.[1] FUCA was generated without genetic code, from the ribosome,[1] itself a system evolved from the maturation of a ribonucleoprotein machinery.[3] FUCA appeared when a proto-peptidyl transferase center started to first emerge, when RNA world replicators started to be capable to catalyze the bonding of amino acids into oligopeptides.[1]

The first genes of FUCA were most likely encoding ribosomal, primitive tRNA-aminoacyl transferases and other proteins that helped to stabilize and maintain biological translation.[6] These random peptides produced possibly bound back to the single strand nucleic acid polymers and allowed a higher stabilization of the system that got more robust and was further bound to other stabilizing molecules.[1] When FUCA had matured, its genetic code was completely established.[1]

FUCA was composed by a population of open-systems, self-replicating ribonucleoproteins.[3] With the arrival of these systems, began the progenote era.[3] These systems evolved into maturity when self-organization processes resulted in the creation of a genetic code.[3] This genetic code was for the first time capable to organize an ordered interaction between nucleic acids and proteins through the formation of a biological language.[3] This caused pre-cellular open systems to then start to accumulate information and self-organize, producing the first genomes by the assembly of biochemical pathways, which probably appeared in different progenote populations evolving independently.[3]

In the reduction hypothesis, where giant viruses evolved from primordial cells that became parasitic, viruses might have evolved after FUCA and before LUCA.[2]

Progenotes

Progenotes (also called ribocytes or ribocells)[7][8][9] are semi-open or open biological systems capable of performing an intense exchange of genetic information, before the existence of cells and LUCA.[4][3] The term progenote was coined by Carl Woese in 1977,[10] around the time he introduced the concept of the three domains of life (bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes) and proposed that each domain originated from a different progenote.[11][12] The meaning of the term changed with time. In the 1980s, Doolittle and Darnell used the word progenote to designate the ancestor of all three domains of life,[13] now referred to as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA).[14]

The terms ribocyte and ribocell refer to progenotes as protoribosomes, primeval ribosomes that were hypothetical cellular organisms with self-replicating RNA but without DNA,[8][15] and thus with a RNA genome instead of the usual DNA genome.[5] In Carl Woese's Darwinian threshold period of cellular evolution, the progenotes are also thought to have had RNA as informational molecule instead of DNA.[7]

The evolution of the ribosome from ancient ribocytes, self-replicating machines, into its current form as a translational machine may have been the selective pressure to incorporate proteins into the ribosome's self-replicating mechanisms, so as to increase its capacity for self-replication.[16][17] Ribosomal RNA is thought to have emerged before cells or viruses, at the time of progenotes.[3]

Progenotes composed and were the descendants of FUCA,[3] and FUCA is thought to have organized the process between the initial organization of biological systems and the maturation of progenotes.[3] Progenotes were dominants in the Progenote age, the time where biological systems originated and initially assembled.[3] The Progenote age would have happened after the pre-biotic age of the RNA-world and Peptide-world but before the age of organisms and mature biological systems like viruses, bacteria and archaea.[3]

The most successful progenotes populations were probably the ones capable to bind and process carbohydrates, amino acids and other intermediated metabolites and co-factors.[3] In progenotes, compartmentalization with membranes was not yet completed and translation of proteins was not precise. Not every progenote had its own metabolism; different metabolic steps were present in different progenotes. Therefore, it is assumed that there existed a community of sub-systems that started to cooperate collectively and culminated in the LUCA.[7]

Ribocytes and viruses

In the eocyte hypothesis, the organism at the root of all eocytes may have been a ribocyte of the RNA-world. For cellular DNA and DNA handling, an "out of virus" scenario has been proposed: storing genetic information in DNA may have been an innovation performed by viruses and later handed over to ribocytes twice, once transforming them into bacteria and once transforming them into archaea.[18]

Similarly in viral eukaryogenesis, a hypothesis theorizing that eukaryotes evolved from a DNA Virus, ribocytes may have been an ancient host for the DNA virus.[19] As ribocytes used RNA to store their genetic info,[19] viruses may initially have adopted DNA as a way to resist RNA-degrading enzymes in the host ribocells. Hence, the contribution from such a new component may have been as significant as the contribution from chloroplasts or mitochondria. Following this hypothesis, archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes each obtained their DNA informational system from a different virus.[20]

See also


References

  1. Prosdocimi, Francisco; José, Marco V.; de Farias, Sávio Torres (2019), Pontarotti, Pierre (ed.), "The First Universal Common Ancestor (FUCA) as the Earliest Ancestor of LUCA's (Last UCA) Lineage", Evolution, Origin of Life, Concepts and Methods, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 43–54, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30363-1_3, ISBN 978-3-030-30363-1, S2CID 199534387, archived from the original on 2022-06-29, retrieved 2023-11-02
  2. Harris, Hugh M. B.; Hill, Colin (2021). "A Place for Viruses on the Tree of Life". Frontiers in Microbiology. 11. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.604048. ISSN 1664-302X. PMC 7840587. PMID 33519747.
  3. de Farias, Sávio Torres; Jose, Marco V.; Prosdocimi, Francisco (2021). "Is it possible that cells have had more than one origin?". Bio Systems. 202: 104371. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104371. ISSN 1872-8324. PMID 33524470. Archived from the original on 2023-12-30. Retrieved 2024-02-23.
  4. Woese, Carl (1998-06-09). "The universal ancestor". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95 (12): 6854–6859. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.6854W. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6854. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 22660. PMID 9618502.
  5. Prosdocimi, Francisco; Farias, Farias (2020). From FUCA To LUCA: A Theoretical Analysis on the Common Descent of Gene Families. doi:10.31080/ASMI.2020.03.0494 (inactive 31 January 2024). Retrieved 2023-11-02.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)
  6. José, Marco V.; Rêgo, Thais Gaudêncio; Farias, Sávio Torres de (2015-12-03). "A proposal of the proteome before the last universal common ancestor (LUCA)". International Journal of Astrobiology. 15 (1): 27–31. doi:10.1017/S1473550415000464. ISSN 1473-5504.
  7. Yarus M (2002). "Primordial genetics: phenotype of the ribocyte". Annual Review of Genetics. 36: 125–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.36.031902.105056. PMID 12429689.
  8. Forterre P, Krupovic M (2012). "The Origin of Virions and Virocells: The Escape Hypothesis Revisited". Viruses: Essential Agents of Life. pp. 43–60. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4899-6_3. ISBN 978-94-007-4898-9.
  9. Woese, C. R.; Fox, G. E. (1977-09-20). "The concept of cellular evolution". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 10 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1007/BF01796132. ISSN 0022-2844. PMID 903983. S2CID 24613906. Archived from the original on 2023-11-08. Retrieved 2024-02-23.
  10. Woese CR, Fox GE (November 1977). "Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 74 (11): 5088–90. Bibcode:1977PNAS...74.5088W. doi:10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088. PMC 432104. PMID 270744.
  11. Doolittle, W. F.; Darnell, J. E. (1986-03-01). "Speculations on the early course of evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 83 (5): 1271–1275. Bibcode:1986PNAS...83.1271D. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.5.1271. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 323057. PMID 2419905.
  12. Weiss, Madeline C.; Preiner, Martina; Xavier, Joana C.; Zimorski, Verena; Martin, William F. (2018-08-16). "The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics". PLOS Genetics. 14 (8): e1007518. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007518. ISSN 1553-7390. PMC 6095482. PMID 30114187.
  13. Forterre P, Krupovic M (2012). "The Origin of Virions and Virocells: The Escape Hypothesis Revisited". Viruses: Essential Agents of Life. pp. 43–60. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4899-6_3. ISBN 978-94-007-4898-9.
  14. Root-Bernstein M, Root-Bernstein R (February 2015). "The ribosome as a missing link in the evolution of life". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 367: 130–158. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.025. PMID 25500179.
  15. Fox GE (September 2010). "Origin and Evolution of the Ribosome". Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2 (9): a003483. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003483. PMC 2926754. PMID 20534711.
  16. Forterre P, Krupovic M (2012). "The Origin of Virions and Virocells: The Escape Hypothesis Revisited". In Witzany G (ed.). Viruses: Essential Agents of Life. pp. 43–60. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4899-6_3. ISBN 978-94-007-4898-9.
  17. Claverie, Jean-Michel (2006). "Viruses take center stage in cellular evolution". Genome Biology. 7 (6): 110. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-6-110. PMC 1779534. PMID 16787527.
  18. Forterre, Patrick (March 2006). "Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: a hypothesis for the origin of cellular domain". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (10): 3669–74. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.3669F. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510333103. JSTOR 30048645. PMC 1450140. PMID 16505372.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Progenote, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.