Referendum_74

2012 Washington Referendum 74

2012 Washington Referendum 74

Add article description


Referendum 74 (R-74 or Ref 74) was a Washington state referendum to approve or reject the February 2012 bill that would legalize same-sex marriage in the state.[1] On June 12, 2012, state officials announced that enough signatures in favor of the referendum had been submitted and scheduled the referendum to appear on the ballot in the November 6 general election.[2] The law was upheld by voters in the November 6, 2012 election by a final margin of 7.4% (53.7% approve, 46.3% reject) and the result was certified on December 5.[3]

Quick Facts Results, Choice ...
Results by county. Size shows total votes cast, Approved is green, Rejected is orange

Ballot measure

The ballot title read as follows:[4]

The legislature passed Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6239 concerning marriage for same-sex couples, modified domestic-partnership law, and religious freedom, and voters have filed a sufficient referendum petition on this bill.

This bill would allow same-sex couples to marry, preserve domestic partnerships only for seniors, and preserve the right of clergy or religious organizations to refuse to perform, recognize, or accommodate any marriage ceremony.

Should this bill be:

Approved [ ]

Rejected [ ]

The following summary accompanied the ballot measure:

This bill allows same-sex couples to marry, applies marriage laws without regard to gender, and specifies that laws using gender-specific terms like husband and wife include same-sex spouses. After 2014, existing domestic partnerships are converted to marriages, except for seniors. It preserves the right of clergy or religious organizations to refuse to perform or recognize any marriage or accommodate wedding ceremonies. The bill does not affect licensing of religious organizations providing adoption, foster-care, or child-placement.

History

Title 26 of the Revised Code of Washington, entitled "domestic relations", governs marriage in Washington state.[5] A 2012 bill, Senate Bill 6239, would legalize same-sex marriage and convert into a marriage on June 30, 2014, any undissolved state registered domestic partnership that does not involve at least one party aged 62 years or older.[6][7] It also would add language in Section 26.04.010 exempting religious organizations from any requirement to "provide accommodations, facilities, advantages, privileges, services, or goods related to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage".[8] Governor Christine Gregoire signed the engrossed bill on February 13.[9] The bill was scheduled to take effect June 7 – 90 days after the legislative session — but opponents submitted on June 6 the necessary signatures to suspend the bill and require a statewide voter referendum.[10][11][12] On June 12, the Washington secretary of state announced that they had submitted enough signatures to place the referendum on the ballot for the November general election.[2][13]

Support and opposition

Statements for and against the bill are available online as part of the official online voter's guide for the referendum.[14] Per Section 42.17A on "campaign disclosure and contribution", the Washington state Public Disclosure Commission posted campaign information online, including information for referendums and initiatives, showing seven groups registered for approval of the bill and one against.[15] Of these, Washington United for Marriage (WUM) and Preserve Marriage Washington were the most active, for and against the bill, respectively.

WUM lists "a coalition of more than 500 organizations and businesses" on its website.[16] Amazon's Jeff Bezos and his then-wife pledged $2.5 million to support the same-sex marriage law.[17] Steve Ballmer of Microsoft and co-founder Bill Gates each donated $100,000 to the campaign in support as well. Starbucks, Nike, Inc., REI, Alcoa, Expedia, Inc., T-Mobile, Nordstrom, the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, and dozens of other businesses also supported the bill.[18][19][20] United States President Barack Obama encouraged support as well.[21]

Opposition to the bill was coordinated largely by the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle, which encouraged support for rejecting the bill among all parishes.[22] Parishes planned "in-pew donations as part of what it is calling Preserve Marriage month" and NOM was expected to bring in additional money from outside the state.[23][24]

Several newspapers in Washington state supported the bill, with the Seattle Times also launching an interactive social media campaign to encourage readers to support the bill publicly.[25] Other endorsements included the Tacoma News-Tribune,[26] Spokane's The Spokesman-Review,[27] Vancouver's The Columbian,[28] Yakima Herald-Republic,[29] Tri-City Herald,[30] Everett's The Herald,[31] The Olympian,[32] The Wenatchee World,[33] and the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin.[34]

Campaign fundraising

Referendum 74 generated a large number of individual donations which may have surpassed the 2008 record of 13,500 for the Washington Death with Dignity Act.[24] As of July 3, 2012, Referendum 74 sponsor Preserve Marriage Washington (seeking "rejection" votes) had reportedly raised $132,000, while Washington United for Marriage (seeking "approval" votes) raised $1.9 million.[35] As of August, campaign-financing proponents[who?] showed a 13-to-1 fundraising advantage for same-sex marriage, but a National Organization for Marriage campaign director was confident that $4 million would appear as needed.[36] A Public Disclosure Commission complaint has been filed, accusing both Preserve Marriage Washington and the National Organization for Marriage of having failed to report donations as required by law.[37] As of October 5, 2012, proponents of Referendum 74 Washington United for Marriage have raised $9.4 million in donations and opponents Preserve Marriage Washington have raised about $1 million.[38]

Opinion polls

Various public opinion surveys of Washington residents asked questions regarding same-sex marriage. The questions vary, with some surveys referring directly to Referendum 74 and others asking more general questions. A post-election poll indicated much stronger support for such marriage among women than men across several categories.[39]

More information Date of opinion poll, Conducted by ...

Results

Recently married couples leaving Seattle City Hall are greeted by well-wishers on the first day of same-sex marriage in Washington state.

County breakdown

More information County, Yes ...

Upon certification, Secretary of State Sam Reed partially credited the referendum for encouraging voter turnout of 81%, the highest in the nation.[62] County offices in King and Thurston counties opened at 12:01 a.m. after the measure was certified, with celebrations in support outside of several government offices,[63] with various same-sex weddings scheduled, free of charge, beginning just after midnight on December 9, just after the mandatory three-day waiting period applying to all Washington weddings.[64][65]

See also

Other same-sex marriage referendums


References

  1. "Proposed Referendum Measures—2012". Washington State Secretary of State. February 13, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2012.
  2. "Anti-gay-marriage measure qualifies for Wash. state ballot". USA Today. June 12, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  3. Official Press Release (December 5, 2012). "Gov. Gregoire and Secretary Reed certify Referendum 74". Governor of Washington. Archived from the original on January 8, 2013. Retrieved December 10, 2012.
  4. "Proposed Referendum Measures 2012". Washington State Secretary of State. March 13, 2012. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
  5. "Title 26 RCW: Domestic relations". Revised Code of Washington. Washington State Legislature. February 13, 2012. Retrieved August 26, 2012.
  6. Senators Murray, Pflug, Hobbs, Litzow, Kohl-Welles, Ranker, Tom, Harper, Pridemore, Keiser, Kline, Regala, Eide, Rolfes, McAuliffe, Brown, Nelson, Chase, Fraser, Frockt, Conway, Kilmer, and Prentice; by request of Governor Gregoire (January 16, 2012). "Senate Bill 6239" (PDF). State of Washington 62nd Legislature 2012 Regular Session. Retrieved August 26, 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. "Gregoire signs gay marriage into law". February 13, 2012. Retrieved February 13, 2012.
  8. "Washington state House approves same-sex marriage". Seattle Post Intelligencer. February 8, 2012. Retrieved February 9, 2012.
  9. "Washington State Senate approves same-sex marriage". MSNBC. February 1, 2012. Archived from the original on February 2, 2012.
  10. "Online Voter's Guide". Washington State Secretary of State. 2012. Archived from the original on March 29, 2013. Retrieved September 10, 2012.
  11. "Continuing Political Committees". Public Disclosure Commission. 2012. Archived from the original on September 7, 2013. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  12. "Coalition Partners". Washington United for Marriage. 2012. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  13. Michael D. Shear (July 27, 2012). "Amazon's Founder Pledges $2.5 Million in Support of Same-Sex Marriage". New York Times. Retrieved July 27, 2012.
  14. Rachel La Corte (July 2, 2012). "APNewsBreak: Ballmer, Gates support gay marriage". The Seattle Times. AP. Retrieved July 3, 2012.
  15. Lornet Turnbull (August 13, 2012). "REI endorses same-sex marriage in Washington state". The Seattle Times. Retrieved August 14, 2012.
  16. Brunner, Jim (October 25, 2012). "Obama endorses yes vote on gay marriage in Washington state". Politics Northwest Blog. Seattle Times. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
  17. Janet I. Tu & Jayme Fraser (August 4, 2012). "Low-profile Seattle archbishop not afraid of controversies". The Seattle Times. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  18. Turnbull, Lornett (August 20, 2012). "Gay-marriage campaigns on verge of unleashing their ads". The Seattle Times. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  19. Westneat, Danny (August 21, 2012). "Out-of-state money chooses what we vote on". The Seattle Times. Retrieved August 24, 2012.
  20. Editorial board (September 14, 2012). "Ref. 74: Join our 'I do' social media campaign to support same-sex marriage". Seattle Times. Retrieved September 16, 2012.
  21. Editorial Board (September 17, 2012). "R-74: Yes vote on marriage equality is right for Washington". Editorial. The News-Tribune. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
  22. Editorial Board (September 16, 2012). "Affirm R-74 because state has no role in personal choice". Editorial. The Spokesman-Review. Retrieved September 16, 2012.
  23. Editorial Board (September 16, 2012). "Referendum 74 Endorsed". In Our View. The Columbian. Retrieved September 16, 2012.
  24. Yakima Herald-Republic Editorial Board (October 23, 2012). "All couples deserve the right to wed, approve R-74". Yakima Herald-Republic. Retrieved October 23, 2012.
  25. Editorial Board (October 14, 2012). "Same-sex marriage: Yes". Tri-City Herald. Retrieved October 14, 2012.
  26. Editorial Board (October 3, 2012). "Vote for marriage equality". Herald Endorsement. The Herald (Everett). Retrieved October 3, 2012.
  27. Editorial Board (September 21, 2012). "A vote for R-74 is a vote for marriage equality and basic rights". The Olympian. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  28. Wenatchee World Editorial Board (October 6, 2012). "R-74 affirms our changing norms". The Wenatchee World. Retrieved October 10, 2012.
  29. Editorial Board (September 13, 2012). "Voters should affirm gay marriage law". Editorial. Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. Archived from the original on November 15, 2012. Retrieved September 18, 2012.
  30. "Washington state anti-gay marriage initiative fails". Reuters. July 3, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2012.
  31. Turnbull, Lornett (August 20, 2012). "Gay-marriage campaigns on verge of unleashing their ads". The Seattle Times. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  32. "PDC complaint filed against R-74 backers". Associated Press report. The Seattle Times. August 16, 2012. Retrieved August 22, 2012.
  33. "PDC Ballot Measure Map". October 5, 2012. Archived from the original on September 27, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2012.
  34. Mapes, Jeff (December 13, 2012). "Women powered gay marriage initiative to victory in Washington, poll shows". The Oregonian. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
  35. This margin of error is based on a 95 percent confidence interval.
  36. "KING 5 poll: State divided over gay marriage". KING5 News. January 19, 2012. Retrieved June 26, 2012.
  37. "A Survey of Likely Voters in Washington State" (PDF). Strategies 360. May 30, 2012. Retrieved June 7, 2012.
  38. "McKenna takes lead in Wa. gubernatorial race" (PDF). Public Policy Polling. June 19, 2012. Retrieved June 20, 2012.
  39. "KING 5 poll: Majorities in Washington favor gay marriage, marijuana initiatives". Archived from the original on February 17, 2013. Retrieved October 6, 2012.
  40. "KCTS 9 Washington Poll" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 25, 2012. Retrieved October 18, 2012.
  41. "KING 5 poll: Initiatives still ahead; AG race now a toss-up". Archived from the original on October 20, 2012. Retrieved October 19, 2012.
  42. "Strategies360" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 30, 2012. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
  43. "KCTS 9 Washington Poll" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 18, 2014. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  44. "KING 5 Poll: Governor's race a dead heat with 5 days to go". Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved November 2, 2012.
  45. Reed, Sam (December 5, 2012). "Gregoire & Reed certify 2012 election, including marriage & marijuana laws". News Release. Washington State Secretary of State. Retrieved December 7, 2012.
  46. Mapes, Jeff (December 6, 2012). "Same-sex marriages begin in Washington state". The Oregonian, p A1. The Oregonian. Retrieved December 7, 2012.
  47. "Same-sex weddings". The Columbian. December 6, 2012. Retrieved December 7, 2012.
  48. Ho, Vanessa (November 7, 2012). "Dec. 6: Gay marriage's history-making day". Seattlepi.com.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Referendum_74, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.