Regina Ip


Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee GBM GBS JP (Chinese: 葉劉淑儀; née Lau; born 24 August 1950) is a Chinese politician. She is currently a member of the Executive Council (ExCo) and Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo), as well as the founder and current chairperson of the New People's Party. She was formerly a prominent government official of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) and was the first woman to be appointed the Secretary for Security to head the disciplinary service. She is also the founder and Chairwoman of Savantas Policy Institute, a think-tank in Hong Kong.


Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee

葉劉淑儀
Non-official Member of the Executive Council
Assumed office
1 July 2017
Appointed byCarrie Lam
In office
17 October 2012  15 December 2016
Appointed byLeung Chun-ying
Member of the Legislative Council
Assumed office
1 October 2008
Preceded byAnson Chan
ConstituencyHong Kong Island
Chairwoman of the New People's Party
Assumed office
9 January 2011
Preceded byNew party
Secretary for Security
In office
31 August 1998  25 July 2003
Preceded byPeter Lai
Succeeded byAmbrose Lee
Director of Immigration
In office
1996 – 1998
Preceded byLaurence Leung
Succeeded byAmbrose Lee
Director of Industry Department
In office
1995 – 1996
Preceded byDenise Yue
Succeeded byFrancis Ho
Personal details
Born
Lau Suk-yee

(1950-08-24) 24 August 1950 (age 70)
Hong Kong
NationalityChinese
Political partyNew People's Party
Spouse(s)
Sammy Ip Man-ho
(m. 19811997)
ChildrenCynthia Ip
ParentsLau Fook-seng
Wa Choi-Fung
ResidenceBowen Road, Hong Kong
EducationSt. Stephen's Girls' College
Alma materUniversity of Hong Kong (BA)
University of Glasgow (MLitt)
Stanford University (MS, MA)
Signature

Ip became a controversial figure for her role advocating the passage of the national security legislation to implement Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23, and after this legislation was withdrawn, she became the first principal official to resign from the administration of Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa. She took a sabbatical to study for a master's degree. She contested the 2007 Hong Kong Island by-election for the Legislative Council but was defeated by Anson Chan in the two-horse race. She ran again in the 2008 Legislative Council election and won, gaining a seat in the Hong Kong Island. She was re-elected in 2012 and 2016 elections.

Ip is widely known to be keen on the Chief Executive top post. She ran in both 2012 and 2017 Chief Executive elections but did not secure a minimum number of 150 nominations from the 1,200-member Election Committee to enter the race on both occasions. In 2020, Larry Diamond, her supervisor at Stanford University, publicly criticized Ip's handling of the democracy movement and freedom of the press in Hong Kong.[1][2]

Early life


Ip was born in what was then British Hong Kong in 1950; her father was a Chinese Singaporean trader Lau Fook-seng, and her mother was actress Wa Choi-Fung (華彩鳳),[3] the second wife of her father.[4] She attended St. Stephen's Girls' College,[5] after which she read English literature at the University of Hong Kong, graduating with first-class honours; she later obtained a Master of Letters degree from the University of Glasgow,[4] where she studied Elizabethan poet, Sir Philip Sidney.[6]

Government career


In the 1970s Ip joined the Hong Kong Government as an Administrative Officer.[4] In 1986, she, accompanied by her husband, went to Stanford Graduate School of Business to study for an MS in Management under the Sloan Programme.[6][7] She took various bureaucratic positions before she was appointed Director of Industry Department in September 1995.

Ministerial career

In August 1996, she was appointed Director of Immigration – a post usually filled by officials from within the Immigration Department. She was the first woman to hold the post, and continued until after the 1997 handover. While she held that post, the UK government decided to grant full British citizenship for 50,000 Hong Kong families. She was also head of immigration during the right of abode saga, when the Hong Kong government requested the National People's Congress in Beijing to intervene after the courts ruled against the government, essentially granting the Hong Kong government the ability to simply ignore the court's ruling after it granted right of abode to the children of Hong Kong residents who held right of abode whether or not those children were born in Hong Kong.[4]

In July 1998, Ip was appointed to the post of Secretary for Security[8] – again, the first woman to hold that post.[4] She became the first government minister to "declare her political stance".[9]

Ip became one of the so-called 14 principal officials and a member of the Executive Council during Tung Chee-hwa's second term in government on 1 July 2002. She was well known at that time as a hawkish, uncompromising figure in the Government, with some describing her as "a staunch, arrogant, authoritarian and yet outspoken bureaucrat."[10] As security minister, she promoted the adoption of the controversial Article 23 of Hong Kong's Basic Law. After massive public protests and the government's withdrawal of the proposed national security legislation, Ip resigned from office on 25 June 2003, citing personal reasons.

Political career


In 2003, Ip returned to Stanford University to pursue a master's degree in East Asian Studies, with Larry Diamond as her supervisor. Her thesis, Hong Kong: Case Study in Democratic Development in Transitional Society, reportedly expressed admiration for a bicameral system and suggested that political parties in Hong Kong be strengthened and be more inclusive.[11] She returned to Hong Kong in 2006. She set up a policy think tank, Savantas Policy Institute, giving rise to media speculation that she was planning to run for the office of Chief Executive sometime in the future. In September 2007, she declared her intention to run for the Legislative Council in the Hong Kong Island by-election. She apologised for her handling of the Article 23 situation, hoped to put it behind her. However, she received only 43% of the vote, defeated by Anson Chan.[12]

Legislative Councillor

Ip ran in the 2008 Hong Kong legislative election in the Hong Kong Island geographical constituency, forming a ticket including dermatologist Louis Shih and two elected District Councillors, Albert Wong and Ronald Chan. Her ticket won a total of 61,073 votes, the second highest on Hong Kong Island and the fourth highest Hong Kong wide.[13] She was sworn in as Legislative Councillor on 8 October 2008.

In January 2011, she launched a middle-class oriented party called New People's Party.[14] The party held two seats in the legislature, herself and Michael Tien, after the 2012 Legislative council election, in which Ip was elected with 30,289 votes, despite losing almost half of the votes. She was subsequently appointed to the Executive Council of Hong Kong by Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying after the election, in which she served until December 2016 when she ran for the Chief Executive for the second time. Her party expanded its district base when it allied with the Civil Force in 2014. Ip was re-elected to the Legislative Council in 2016, with the highest votes of 60,760 in Hong Kong Island.

2012 Chief Executive bid

Ip was known to be interested in the Chief Executive post. She expressed her intention to run in the 2012 election but dropped out on 15 December. Following a number of scandals surrounding Henry Tang, Ip re-announced her candidacy in the race on 20 February.[15] She withdrew her candidacy after failing to receive enough nominations before the deadline and thus did not qualify to stand for the election on 29 February, which made her campaign last for only nine days.[16]

2017 Chief Executive bid

Ip has expressed her intention to consider running in the 2017 Chief Executive election. After incumbent Leung Chun-ying announced he would not seek for re-election, Ip resigned from the Executive Council to launch her campaign. She announced her candidacy on 15 December under the campaign slogan "Win back Hong Kong" after receiving her party's endorsement. She called for a relaunch of the electoral reform process under Beijing's restrictive framework as decreed by the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) on 31 August 2020. She also pledged to enact controversial Article 23 with "suitable measures".[17]

Ip got emotional and tear-eyed in a media gathering, "[I]n the past ten years I started from nothing, working hard bit by bit, splashing out my own money, putting in much mental and physical effort," Ip said as her voice shook. "Can you say I had not taken on responsibilities for the Hong Kong society? When I handled Article 23, I did not perform satisfactorily?" she defended herself, "I have taken responsibility under the accountability system and have already apologised multiple times. I was not shameless, I did not hold onto my powers. I stepped down from the administration. I'll leave for society to judge whether I have the guts to take on responsibilities. I definitely have taken on a lot of responsibilities." Ip's remarks came after Leung Chun-ying praised Lam for her "ability and willingness to take on responsibilities" As Carrie Lam declared her candidacy and Tsang was expected to run, political analysts said that could endanger Regina Ip's chances of getting the minimum 150 nominations to enter the race. Ip revealed that two or three electors, including businessman Allan Zeman, have turned their backs on her to support Lam.[18]

Supported by her New People's Party and a few electors from business sectors, Ip also gained a nomination from a pro-democrat elector from the Accountancy subsector, who wished to send Ip into the race to split Lam's votes.[19][20] However, as Lam aimed to grab more than 600 nominations, Ip faced an uphill battle to secure her nominations. She urged "a certain candidate" not to ask for additional backing since that person had secured more than enough nominations already.[21] Ip withdrew from the election, conceding the number of nominations hours before the nomination deadline on 1 March, for the second time after her 2012 bid. She received the number of nominations "far behind what was needed". She attributed her failure to the restrictive selection process of the 1,200 structure of the Election Committee membership as she was "squeezed out" by the Beijing-supported Lam and democrats-supported Tsang and Woo.[22]

Views


Ip has taken controversial stances during her career including advocating for the Public Order Ordinance and defending government policy denying right of abode to the children of Hong Kong people born in mainland China since the 1997 handover.

Article 23

According to Ku, Ip had turned herself into a provocative political figure due to her departure from the 'institutionalised bureaucratic ritual' adopted by civil servants in the past.[23] She spearheaded the government's attempt to codify Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23, and pushed hard for it to be legislated by July 2003.[24] Between September 2002 and July 2003 her popularity plunged. In October 2002, she made a remark about Adolf Hitler at the City University.[25]

Hitler was elected by the people. But he ended up killing seven million people. This proves that democracy is not a cure-all medicine.

Ip downplayed any opposition to the bill, predicting only 30,000 people would show up at the planned demonstration(s).[26] Ip blamed political and religious leaders for creating a "herd mentality".[26] Her popularity plummeted when one remark after another contradicted popular opinion, most notably in regard to her commitment to push the bill despite the commotion and chaos of the SARS outbreak in 2003.[27]

Detractors also took shots at her bushy hairstyle, nicknaming her "Broomhead" (掃把頭). This included a comic book which caricatured her in police uniform and signature bushy hairstyle. She openly admitted that although she disliked the nickname, she would not change her hairstyle just to please her critics.[28] Regarding the controversy she said "I think I would like to be remembered as somebody who was not afraid to speak out, even if that might affect my popularity."[4] Ip later said "I made a mistake in promoting the bill" and apologized for remarks she had made while pushing for Article 23.[29]

Views on democracy

Ip has been criticised for her perceived inconsistent stance toward democracy. Following her return from the United States, she shifted her public position during her campaign for a seat in the legislative assembly in 2007 by saying "the only way forward for Hong Kong is complete democratization", in contrast to her position before. Todd Crowell of the Asia Times referred to her as a "born-again democrat".[11] Anson Chan, her main rival supported by the pro-democracy camp in the 2007 by-election, labelled her a "fake democrat" because of this.[30]

Views on press freedom

In July 2008, Ip was once again embroiled in controversy for her comments about police tactics used against reporters covering the heated scenes in queues for Olympics tickets. In commenting about the man-handling of Hong Kong reporters by the Beijing police, she had said that "neck-shoving [techniques]... were most effective in stopping trouble-makers". The following day, she stated that she supported freedom of the press and apologised for the "slip of the tongue", clarifying that she was neither implying that journalists were troublemakers, nor endorsing the actions of the police. Democratic Party lawmaker Yeung Sum referred to this as a Freudian slip that showed up her true colours.[31][32]

Views on Occupy Central

Ip opposed Occupy Central, and endorsed actions taken by the police against protesters. She claimed that the Occupy Central pro-democracy protesters frequently utilized smartphone apps to organize, plan, and prepare their activities. Ip specifically singled out Twitter, Google Maps, Firechat, Telegram and Zello Walkie Talkie as the apps most used by the student activists to communicate among themselves. To justify the use of these apps as evidence of foreign interference, Ip claimed that Zello Walkie Talkie was used in Taiwan's Sunflower Student Movement and the Ukraine Orange Revolution. Both student movements allegedly received assistance from external parties.[33]

Allegedly racist comments on Filipino maids

In April 2015, Ip wrote in a controversial article in Ming Pao that she had received complaints while she was Secretary for Security from 1998 to 2003, from "foreign women" in Discovery Bay that the government was "allowing Filipino domestic helpers to seduce their husbands", and was accused of being sexist and racist by many media reports. The Philippines consulate expressed its concern over the "unfortunate choice of words" by Ip. A domestic helpers advocacy group demonstrated in front of her office, calling on her to apologise. She apologised to those who were offended by her and insisted that the article was misinterpreted.[34][35]

Views on fur wearing

Ip was under fire for wearing a red mink coat to a Legislative Council meeting in January 2016. She defended her clothing choice, saying that "wearing fur is actually the same as eating beef…Mink farming can be more humane than rearing chicken or cattle." She was criticised by animal rights activists.[36]

Lying about Liaison Office visit

On 5 September 2016 one day after the 2016 Hong Kong Legislative Council election in which she was re-elected, Ip's car was photographed at the Liaison Office. She told Ming Pao that she was not in the car and she was sending some books she wrote to her friends there. She later admitted that she lied about it as she was requested by the other party to keep the visit confidential. She was criticised as the pan-democrats had been accusing the Liaison Office for meddling in local politics and elections. She apologised to the public and Ming Pao and denied that she was there for thanking the Liaison Office for its support.[37]

New York Times Op-ed Article, "Hong Kong Is China, Like It or Not"

On October 1, 2020, the New York Times published an opinion piece by Ip, titled "Hong Kong Is China, Like It or Not".[38] In the piece, Ip defended the Hong Kong Police Force's actions during the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests and publicly supported the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. She also stated that Hong Kong's citizenry should reevaluate the future of the territory.

A realistic goal for Hong Kong ought to be remaining the freest and most international city in China and retaining its unique international status, thanks to the city’s many bilateral agreements with foreign countries and its membership in numerous international organizations. Foreign governments should not benchmark what happens in Hong Kong against standards that prevail in Western countries; those are governed by a political system entirely different from China’s. Instead, they should benchmark Hong Kong against the rest of China, and measure how the city can maintain its unique characteristics — openness, a commitment to personal rights and freedoms, respect for the rule of law and the ability to reinvent itself economically. Beijing’s national security law is saving “one country, two systems” by ensuring that Hong Kong does not become a danger to China.

Regina Ip, New York Times, excerpt from "Hong Kong Is China, Like It or Not"

Mainstream journalists also rejected the article, including Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Mei Fong.[39] The National Review and The Spectator criticized the op-ed, as did HuffPost freelance reporter Yashar Ali and CBS News correspondent Kathryn Watson.[40] American politicians Mitt Romney,[41] Tom Cotton,[42] Guy Reshenthaler[43] and Mike Gallagher[44] also rejected the article's claims and denounced the New York Times' decision to release the article.

Political authors Antonio Garcia Martinez,[45] Matt Taibbi[46] and Brookings Institution senior fellow Shadi Hamid rejected the article's views, with Hamid stating that it was "what authoritarianism actually looks like".[47] Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies professors Hal Brands[48] and Yascha Mounk rejected the article's premise, with Mounk writing that the op-ed was an example of "systematic racism in American journalism".[49] Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Meighan Stone expressed that the article depicted a false balance in favor of the Chinese government, specifically referencing the Chinese government's role in the Xinjiang re-education camps and the death of activist Liu Xiaobo.[50] Harvard University Nieman Journalism Lab director Joshua Benton compared the article to Nazi propaganda.[51]

Political authors Antonio Garcia Martinez,[52] Matt Taibbi[53] and Brookings Institution senior fellow Shadi Hamid rejected the article's views, with Hamid stating that it was "what authoritarianism actually looks like".[54] Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies professors Hal Brands[55] and Yascha Mounk rejected the article's premise, with Mounk writing that the op-ed was an example of "systematic racism in American journalism".[56] Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Meighan Stone expressed that the article depicted a false balance in favor of the Chinese government, specifically referencing the Chinese government's role in the Xinjiang re-education camps and the death of activist Liu Xiaobo.[57] Harvard University Nieman Journalism Lab director Joshua Benton compared the article to Nazi propaganda.[58] Satirical news program China Uncensored also criticized the article, describing it as "lies and communist propaganda".[59]

BN(O) and dual citizenship

In October 2020, SCMP reported that Ip has previously said that if the Chinese foreign ministry imposes restrictions on Hong Kong BN(O) passports, then the Hong Kong Immigration Department may instruct airline companies to stop issuing tickets to those with BN(O) passports.[60] In February 2021, SCMP reported that the move to ban BN(O) passports has left ethnic minorities without a valid passport, as many have encountered issues while applying for a Hong Kong passport.[61] The move would practically stop the freedom of these Hong Kong citizens from leaving Hong Kong.

In January 2021, Ip wrote an opinion article on SCMP, stating that those with dual passports in Hong Kong should choose between their non-Hong Kong citizenship or their right of abode in Hong Kong, saying that those who choose their non-Hong Kong foreign citizenship "could also lose the right of abode in Hong Kong and the attendant right to vote in Hong Kong elections."[62][63] This is despite the fact that high-level government officials, including Carrie Lam, Tam Yiu-chung, and Tung Chee-hwa have children with foreign citizenship.[64] Ip mentions that her suggestion was just a proposal and she did not raise the issue with the Hong Kong SAR government.[65]

In February 2021, Hong Kong Free Press reported that around 7,000 people had emigrated from Hong Kong to the UK since June 2020, with Ip claiming those people had "no money, skills or education."[66]

In March 2021, Ip said that those in Hong Kong who use the BN(O) passport for working holiday visa applications to 14 countries should be denied the ability to fly on airlines by the government.[67]

Overseas voting

While discussing a proposal to allow overseas Hong Kongers to vote, Ip gave her reasoning for not allowing all overseas Hong Kongers to vote, and only allowing those living in mainland China to vote. Ip said that under the "One country" principle, those who live in China should get first priority when it comes to overseas voting.[68]

Separation of powers

In October 2020, Ip claimed that Hong Kong has never had separation of powers, and that government officials should reiterate that the city does not have it.[69]

Expulsion of Legislative Council members

In November 2020, following the expulsion of 4 pro-democracy lawmakers in the Legislative Council, Ip defended the expulsion and said "They cannot be just democrats in name. They have to not only embrace true democratic values in the sense of respecting the rule of law and the rights of other people with whom they disagree, they also have to respect the sovereignty, security of our country."[70] Additionally, Ip said that "Time will tell that it was the right decision to take."[70]

Arrests of pro-democracy figures

After the arrest of 53 pro-democracy figures in January 2021, Ip defended the arrests, stating that their goal of taking control of the Legislative Council and not approving the budget would not be tolerated.[71]

Xinjiang

In March 2021, after some companies suspended the use of cotton from Xinjiang due to human rights concerns, Ip stated that those companies were spreading lies about Xinjiang, and that she would boycott Burberry.[72] Ip claimed that she would not wear products from the brand "until Burberry has retracted or apologised for its unfounded allegations against Xinjiang."[73] After some people asked her to burn her scarves, Ip said that she would just "put them away for the time being."[73]

RTHK

In 2019, Ip said that RTHK should stop producing news in Chinese.[74] In April 2021, Ip suggested that RTHK be shut down, and said that RTHK staff "often challenge the government's bottom line."[74]

LGBT and women's rights

Ip has expressed desires to legislate against discrimination against LGBT people and supported the city to host the 2022 Gay Games. She, however, stopped short of supporting the legalisation of same-sex marriage in Hong Kong. On other social issues, such as sexism, Ip has criticised the media for focusing on what she called "focusing on a female politician's hairstyle, clothing and make up" rather than her work and has expressed desire to reserve seats for women in election committees.[75]

Personal life


Ip married engineer Sammy Ip Man-ho (1935–1997) in 1981. Sammy Ip was a son of Ip Ching-ping, founder of the Ching Hing Construction Company. Sammy Ip has a sister Henrietta Ip who was a member of the Legislative Council (1982–1991). Their marriage was opposed by Sammy Ip's family.[citation needed] The couple has a daughter, Cynthia Ip Wing-yan, who was born in 1989. Regina Ip's husband died of liver cancer in 1997.[76]

See also


Notes


  1. "戰狼葉劉有辱師門 | 顧書維". 眾新聞 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
  2. Lau, Jessie. "Hong Kong's Public Broadcaster Under Siege". thediplomat.com. Archived from the original on 20 November 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2020.
  3. "華彩鳳". Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 12 September 2019.
  4. Shamdasani, Ravina (17 July 2003). Ip was undone [clarification needed] by Article 23, The South China Morning Post
  5. Regina Ip (2 December 2006). 'I remember being told to cultivate vices' The South China Morning Post
  6. "Stanford Business Magazine May 2002, Volume 70, Number 3: "On Guard in Hong Kong"". Retrieved 10 March 2018.[permanent dead link]
  7. "Regina Ip a mentor to her fellow HK students at Stanford" Archived 11 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine, South China Morning Post, 9 July 2006, Stanford University
  8. "迎向燦爛的未來". Ming Pao. News Weekly 1810, and 19 July 2003.
  9. Gittings, Danny (2017). Introduction to the Hong Kong Basic Law. Hong Kong. p. 118. ISBN 9789888139484.
  10. Ku, Agnes S. (2004). "Negotiating the Space of Civil Autonomy in Hong Kong: Power, Discourses and Dramaturgical Representation" (PDF). China Quarterly. 179: 654. doi:10.1017/S0305741004000529. S2CID 144187220. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  11. Todd Crowell (14 July 2006). "'Iron Ladies' resurface in Hong Kong". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2006. Retrieved 27 November 2007.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  12. 2007 LegCo by-election results Archived 15 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  13. "Legco election results: HONG KONG ISLAND". www.info.gov.hk. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  14. Yan, Cathy (8 January 2011). "Hong Kong's Ip Launches Political Party". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 10 February 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2011. Joining Ms Ip as deputy chairmen are former Liberal Party member Michael Tien and Louis Shih, former chairman of the pro-democracy organization SynergyNet.
  15. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 20 February 2012.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  16. "Regina Ip fails in bid to join CE race" Archived 20 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine. RTHK. 29 February 2012
  17. "Regina Ip declares her entry into leadership race with pledge to enact controversial Article 23". South China Morning Post. 15 December 2016.
  18. "Ip chokes back tears over Lam praise". The Standard. 18 January 2017. Archived from the original on 18 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  19. "【特首選戰】提名期展開 林鄭穩握186票入閘 胡官獲零的突破". HK01. 14 February 2017. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  20. "【特首選戰】民主派選委雪中送炭提名葉劉 稱欲保送入閘鎅林鄭票". HK01. 23 February 2017. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  21. "Buck for Hong Kong ministers does not stop with bosses, chief executive hopeful Carrie Lam says". South China Morning Post. 18 February 2017. Archived from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  22. "Regina Ip drops out of Hong Kong chief executive race". South China Morning Post. 1 March 2017. Archived from the original on 1 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  23. "State Power, Political Theatre and Reinvention of the Pro-democracy Movement in Hong Kong" Archived 21 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Staging Politics (2007), chap 10. Agnes Shuk-mei Ku, Associate Professor of Social Sciences, HK University of Science and Technology
  24. Wong, Yiu-Chung. One Country, Two Systems in Crisis: Hong Kong's Transformation Since the Handover, Lexington Publishing. ISBN 0-7391-0492-6.
  25. "Ip lashed on Hitler jibe" Archived 22 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, The Standard, 28 October 2002
  26. Pepper, Suzanne. Keeping Democracy at Bay (2007). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-0877-3.
  27. Carroll, John M. A Concise History of Hong Kong, 2007, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 0-7425-3422-7.
  28. Li Huiling (17 July 2003). "Antony Leung, Regina Ip, former political stars now step down" (in Chinese). Lianhe Zaobao (Zaobao.com). Archived from the original on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 27 November 2007.
  29. Diana Lee, "Slightly sorry, Regina's now raring to go" Archived 22 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, The Standard, 28 September 2007
  30. "The gloves come off in second TV poll debate", South China Morning Post, 26 November 2007. Retrieved 28 November 2007.
  31. Ambrose Leung (31 July 2008). "Regina Ip 'really sorry' for siding with Beijing police". South China Morning Post. p. A2.
  32. "Regina Ip 'really sorry' for siding with Beijing police". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  33. Larry Ong (1 November 2014). "Hong Kong Lawmaker: Occupy Central Protesters' Use of Twitter, Google Maps Evidence of 'Foreign Interference'". EpochTimes.
  34. Lam, Jeffie (24 April 2015). "Regina Ip apologises for comments about Filipino maids in Hong Kong". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015. Retrieved 24 April 2015.
  35. Kyodo (25 April 2015). "HK politician apologizes over Filipino sex maid spat". Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  36. "Lawmaker Regina Ip under fire for wearing mink… and comparing it to eating beef". Hong Kong Free Press. 28 January 2016. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
  37. Lau, Stuart (9 September 2016). "Regina Ip admits she lied about Beijing liaison office visit". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 24 September 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  38. Ip, Regina (1 October 2020). "Opinion | Hong Kong Is China, Like It or Not". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 4 October 2020. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  39. Mei Fong/ 方凤美 [@meifongwriter] (1 October 2020). "Where HK lawmaker Regina Ip does a hit and run on the battered remains of 'one country 2systems," backs up, and runs it over one more time. t.co/qn1wxHZxfy" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  40. Coleman, Justine (1 October 2020). "NYT opinion piece backing China's crackdown in Hong Kong sparks backlash". TheHill. Archived from the original on 4 October 2020. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  41. Romney, Mitt [@SenatorRomney] (1 October 2020). "As China steps up its propaganda efforts in US newspapers, it's clear that the Chinese Communist Party is feeling the pressure of intensifying global scrutiny. t.co/2VgLExGocf" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  42. Cotton, Tom [@TomCottonAR] (1 October 2020). "According to the @nytimes, publishing op-eds from U.S. Senators expressing views held by a majority of Americans "puts lives at risk." Also according to the @nytimes: suck it up, Hong Kong. Utterly despicable. t.co/doH2L0JeVX" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  43. Reschenthaler, Guy [@GReschenthaler] (1 October 2020). "The Chinese Communist Party silenced those who support democracy in Hong Kong through illegal force. If the NYT & the Democrat party have their way, it'll soon be illegal to express an opinion opposing this headline in the United States. t.co/7vFxG4feui" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  44. Gallagher, Mike [@RepGallagher] (1 October 2020). "Hard to believe that after the CCP brutally ended what was left of Hong Kong's autonomy, the NYT still sees fit to feature propaganda from Party mouthpieces in its pages. No discourse is served by giving totalitarian lackeys a seat at the table. t.co/FnD1C1TS6F" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  45. Antonio García Martínez [@antoniogm] (1 October 2020). ""The West tends to glorify these people as defenders of Hong Kong's freedoms, but they have done great harm to the city by going against its constitutional order and stirring up chaos and disaffection toward our motherland." The NYT has lost its mind. t.co/wu5rCMutr6" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  46. Taibbi, Matt [@mtaibbi] (1 October 2020). "This rivals Tom Friedman's "In Three Holes" piece for worst Times editorial ever. t.co/og6tblpF9Y" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  47. Hamid, Shadi [@shadihamid] (1 October 2020). "Worse than the Tom Cotton oped, but with none of the staff revolt. This @nytimes oped from is what authoritarianism actually looks like, not the Trump version that pundits have been warning us about for 4 years which hasn't come and won't come: t.co/IXvWHkDyeH" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  48. Brands, Hal [@HalBrands] (1 October 2020). "Hmm...I wonder if NYT will apologize for running this op-ed, which is clearly so dangerous to the advocates of democracy and autonomy in Hong Kong. t.co/lQ7x5FhoRv" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  49. Mounk, Yascha [@Yascha_Mounk] (1 October 2020). "The boss of the NYT op-ed page was fired because he ran a controversial op-ed by a sitting U.S. Senator. But a few months later, a propagandist for an authoritarian regime gets to argue that a violent putdown of peaceful protests was needed in the same pages. This is just nuts. t.co/qDW1jLNSnm" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  50. Stone, Meighan [@meighanstone] (1 October 2020). "Shame on @nytimes for "both sides-ism" on Chinese regime that imprisons Uighurs for "re-education" in over 380 detention facilities, arrests those who run for democratic office & jailed 2010 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Liu Xiaobo until his solitary death. t.co/YAiuArxQ5u" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  51. Benton, Joshua [@jbenton] (1 October 2020). "The Sudetenland Is Germany, Like It or Not t.co/9FGMQyUCi5" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  52. Antonio García Martínez [@antoniogm] (1 October 2020). ""The West tends to glorify these people as defenders of Hong Kong's freedoms, but they have done great harm to the city by going against its constitutional order and stirring up chaos and disaffection toward our motherland." The NYT has lost its mind. t.co/wu5rCMutr6" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  53. Taibbi, Matt [@mtaibbi] (1 October 2020). "This rivals Tom Friedman's "In Three Holes" piece for worst Times editorial ever. t.co/og6tblpF9Y" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  54. Hamid, Shadi [@shadihamid] (1 October 2020). "Worse than the Tom Cotton oped, but with none of the staff revolt. This @nytimes oped from is what authoritarianism actually looks like, not the Trump version that pundits have been warning us about for 4 years which hasn't come and won't come: t.co/IXvWHkDyeH" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  55. Brands, Hal [@HalBrands] (1 October 2020). "Hmm...I wonder if NYT will apologize for running this op-ed, which is clearly so dangerous to the advocates of democracy and autonomy in Hong Kong. t.co/lQ7x5FhoRv" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  56. Mounk, Yascha [@Yascha_Mounk] (1 October 2020). "The boss of the NYT op-ed page was fired because he ran a controversial op-ed by a sitting U.S. Senator. But a few months later, a propagandist for an authoritarian regime gets to argue that a violent putdown of peaceful protests was needed in the same pages. This is just nuts. t.co/qDW1jLNSnm" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  57. Stone, Meighan [@meighanstone] (1 October 2020). "Shame on @nytimes for "both sides-ism" on Chinese regime that imprisons Uighurs for "re-education" in over 380 detention facilities, arrests those who run for democratic office & jailed 2010 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Liu Xiaobo until his solitary death. t.co/YAiuArxQ5u" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  58. Benton, Joshua [@jbenton] (1 October 2020). "The Sudetenland Is Germany, Like It or Not t.co/9FGMQyUCi5" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  59. China Uncensored [@ChinaUncensored] (3 October 2020). "The New York Times is publishing literal Chinese propaganda. This was written by Hong Kong Executive Councilwoman and quisling Regina Ip. This isn't diverse political opinion. It's lies and communist propaganda. t.co/DUxBR69VKm" (Tweet). Retrieved 24 December 2020 via Twitter.
  60. "China threatens to stop recognising BN(O) passports after Britain's visa move". South China Morning Post. 23 October 2020. Archived from the original on 24 October 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
  61. "Hong Kong's ethnic minority groups stranded with just BN(O) passports". South China Morning Post. 2 February 2021. Archived from the original on 9 February 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
  62. "Time for Hongkongers to decide who they really are". South China Morning Post. 10 January 2021. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  63. Kong, Dimsumdaily Hong (10 January 2021). "Legislative Councillor in Hong Kong proposes central government to abolish rights to dual nationality for HK citizens". Dimsum Daily. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  64. "Hong Kong's ruling elite fight to extinguish freedom whilst clutching foreign passports, money and property abroad". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 4 July 2020. Archived from the original on 3 September 2020. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  65. "Pro-establishment figure calls for curbs on Hongkongers obtaining dual citizenship". 10 January 2021. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021.
  66. "Pro-Beijing lawmaker criticises UK over extended residency rights for Hongkongers, claims those who left have 'no skills or education'". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 2 February 2021. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  67. "Deny airline boarding if working holiday applicants use BN(O), suggests Beijing loyalist | Apple Daily". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 27 March 2021. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  68. "EXCLUSIVE: Only 17% of Hongkongers approve of proposal to allow HK election voting in China despite Lam claim - HKFP-PORI poll". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 27 October 2020. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
  69. "Beijing loyalist accuses British colonial government of 'indoctrinating' Hongkongers with claims of separation of powers". Apple Daily 蘋果日報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 30 October 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  70. "Pan-dems have only themselves to blame: Regina Ip - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  71. "'Pan-dems have to pay for crossing red line' - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  72. "Hong Kong Cantopop singer Eason Chan cuts ties with Adidas after brands reject Xinjiang 'forced labour'". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 25 March 2021. Archived from the original on 26 March 2021. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
  73. "Eason Chan slammed by fans for cutting ties with Adidas amid Xinjiang cotton row". South China Morning Post. 26 March 2021. Archived from the original on 26 March 2021. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
  74. "'Avoid suppression claims by stopping RTHK services' - RTHK". news.rthk.hk. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 14 April 2021.
  75. "Regina Ip: The 'Iron Lady' who wants to lead Hong Kong". BBC. 30 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
  76. Regina Ip's daughter recalls the pain of the spotlight Archived 27 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine, South China Morning Post, 27 June 2014