Relation_between_Schrödinger's_equation_and_the_path_integral_formulation_of_quantum_mechanics

Relation between Schrödinger's equation and the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics

Relation between Schrödinger's equation and the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics

Relationship between branches of physics


This article relates the Schrödinger equation with the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics using a simple nonrelativistic one-dimensional single-particle Hamiltonian composed of kinetic and potential energy.

Background

Schrödinger's equation

Schrödinger's equation, in bra–ket notation, is

where is the Hamiltonian operator.

The Hamiltonian operator can be written

where is the potential energy, m is the mass and we have assumed for simplicity that there is only one spatial dimension q.

The formal solution of the equation is

where we have assumed the initial state is a free-particle spatial state . [clarification needed]

The transition probability amplitude for a transition from an initial state to a final free-particle spatial state at time T is

Path integral formulation

The path integral formulation states that the transition amplitude is simply the integral of the quantity

over all possible paths from the initial state to the final state. Here S is the classical action.

The reformulation of this transition amplitude, originally due to Dirac[1] and conceptualized by Feynman,[2] forms the basis of the path integral formulation.[3]

From Schrödinger's equation to the path integral formulation

The following derivation[4] makes use of the Trotter product formula, which states that for self-adjoint operators A and B (satisfying certain technical conditions), we have

even if A and B do not commute.

We can divide the time interval [0, T] into N segments of length

The transition amplitude can then be written

Although the kinetic energy and potential energy operators do not commute, the Trotter product formula, cited above, says that over each small time-interval, we can ignore this noncommutativity and write

The equality of the above can be verified to hold up to first order in δt by expanding the exponential as power series.

For notational simplicity, we delay making this substitution for the moment.

We can insert the identity matrix

N − 1 times between the exponentials to yield

We now implement the substitution associated to the Trotter product formula, so that we have, effectively

We can insert the identity

into the amplitude to yield

where we have used the fact that the free particle wave function is

The integral over p can be performed (see Common integrals in quantum field theory) to obtain

The transition amplitude for the entire time period is

If we take the limit of large N the transition amplitude reduces to

where S is the classical action given by

and L is the classical Lagrangian given by

Any possible path of the particle, going from the initial state to the final state, is approximated as a broken line and included in the measure of the integral

This expression actually defines the manner in which the path integrals are to be taken. The coefficient in front is needed to ensure that the expression has the correct dimensions, but it has no actual relevance in any physical application.

This recovers the path integral formulation from Schrödinger's equation.

From path integral formulation to Schrödinger's equation

The path integral reproduces the Schrödinger equation for the initial and final state even when a potential is present. This is easiest to see by taking a path-integral over infinitesimally separated times.

(1)

Since the time separation is infinitesimal and the cancelling oscillations become severe for large values of , the path integral has most weight for y close to x. In this case, to lowest order the potential energy is constant, and only the kinetic energy contribution is nontrivial. (This separation of the kinetic and potential energy terms in the exponent is essentially the Trotter product formula.) The exponential of the action is

The first term rotates the phase of ψ(x) locally by an amount proportional to the potential energy. The second term is the free particle propagator, corresponding to i times a diffusion process. To lowest order in ε they are additive; in any case one has with (1):

As mentioned, the spread in ψ is diffusive from the free particle propagation, with an extra infinitesimal rotation in phase which slowly varies from point to point from the potential:

and this is the Schrödinger equation. Note that the normalization of the path integral needs to be fixed in exactly the same way as in the free particle case. An arbitrary continuous potential does not affect the normalization, although singular potentials require careful treatment.


References

  1. Dirac, P. A. M. (1958). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Fourth ed.). Oxford. ISBN 0-19-851208-2.
  2. Brown, Laurie M. (1958). Feynman's Thesis: A New Approach to Quantum Theory. World Scientific. ISBN 981-256-366-0.
  3. Hall, Brian C. (2013). Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 267. Springer. Section 20.2. ISBN 978-1461471158.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Relation_between_Schrödinger's_equation_and_the_path_integral_formulation_of_quantum_mechanics, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.