Sensible_Sentencing_Trust

Sensible Sentencing Trust

Sensible Sentencing Trust

New Zealand political advocacy group


The Sensible Sentencing Trust was a political advocacy group based in Napier, New Zealand. The Trust's stated goal is "to educate both the public and victims of serious violent and/or sexual crime and homicide" It focuses on advocating for the rights of victims and tougher penalties against offenders.[1]

The Sensible Sentencing Trust logo

Goals and issues

The Sensible Sentencing Trust' stated purpose sole purpose is "to educate both the public and victims of serious violent and/or sexual crime and homicide." Key goals include educating victims of their rights and entitlements, educating the public about the light of victims, and supporting victims of crime through education, trauma support, accessing protection, and providing social rehabilitation.[1]

The Trust has campaigned for several goals including:

  • tightening criteria for name suppression[2][3]
  • adding burglary to the schedule of "three strikes" offenses[2][3]
  • imposing mandatory maximum sentences on unprovoked attacks[2]
  • introducing a "degrees of murder" sentencing regime including a "life means life" provision for first degree murder[2]
  • replacing the "Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity" (NGBRI) verdict with one of "Proven, but insane"[2]
  • amending the definition of "reckless murder" in the Crimes Act 1961 to include kicking and stomping the victim's head[2]
  • introducing the offense of home invasion to the Crime Act 1961[2]
  • establishing a Victims Commissioner[2]
  • abolishing parole[2]
  • introducing cumulative sentencing[2]
  • compensating jurors based on their income rate[2]
  • tightening the criteria for restorative justice.[3]

Organisational structure

The Sensible Sentencing Trust consists of two separate trusts.[4]

  1. The Sensible Sentencing Trust (SST) which advocates on behalf of victims of serious violent and/or sexual crime and homicide in New Zealand. SST is a registered charitable trust which does not have donee status with the Inland Revenue Department (IRD).[4][5]
  2. The Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (SSGT) which serves to educate the public as to the plight of victims and to ensure such victims and their families are fully aware of their rights and entitlements, providing both education and practical support during their time of trauma. SSGT is a registered charitable trust which has donee status with the Inland Revenue Department.[4][5]

History

Formation

The Sensible Sentencing Trust was formed by Garth McVicar in 2001 in response to the prosecution and trial of Mark Middleton for threatening to kill Paul Dally who tortured, raped, and killed Middleton's 13-year-old stepdaughter Karla Cardno in 1989. Due to public sympathy for Middleton over Dally's crimes, Judge Michael Lance sentenced Middleton to nine months' jail suspended for two years. McVicar supported Middleton during his trial.[6]

Following Middleton's prosecution and trial, McVicar and 30 supporters established the Sensible Sentencing Trust to advocate for tougher sentencing for violent offenders including life imprisonment. Membership quickly grew to 135,000 by 2002. In addition, the Trust attracted 3,000 donors and chapters were established across New Zealand. In addition, the Trust established a youth division.[7]

By 2009, McVicar claimed that the Trust had over 150,000 members including between 15 and 20 Members of Parliament including former ACT MPs David Garrett and Stephen Franks.[6] Notable Trust members have included Stephen Couch and Rita Coskery. Couch was the sister of Susan Couch, a survivor of a 2001 triple homicide at the Panmure Returned and Services' Association (RSA) club perpetrated by William Dwane Bell. Couch as a Trust Member has advocated the reintroduction of capital punishment and three strikes legislation. Coskery was the mother of Auckland pizza delivery driver Michael Choy, who was assaulted and murdered by several youths including Bailey Junior Kurariki.[7]

Campaigns

The Sensible Sentencing Trust has claimed credit for pushing several changes in the New Zealand justice system favouring victims including:

  • lobbying for the Sentencing Parole and Reform Bill 2001, which increased the sentence for murder from 10 to 17 years.[8][7][9]
  • bail reforms in 2007 which increased the minimum non parole period for violent, sexual and drug offenders.[7][10]
  • placing victims' rights on the political radar[8][7]
  • lobbying for the Prisoner and Victims' Claims Bill to prevent criminals from profiting from their crimes in 2004.[8]
  • a $50 Offender Levy in 2009[8]
  • supported the Sentencing and Parole Reform Act 2010, which provided for progressively increased sentencing for repeat offenders within a category of 40 listed violent and sexual offences.[11]
  • securing compensation for Panmure RSA survivor Sue Crouch from the Department of Corrections.[8]
  • the introduction of Bail Amendment and Victims of Crime Reform legislation.[8]
  • lobbying for the retention of the Sentencing and Parole Reform Act 2010 including commissioning a public opinion poll.[12][8]
  • launching a campaign to stop recidivist impaired drivers.[7]
  • sponsoring a petition in May 2021 calling for tougher legislation against "coward punch" attacks following the death of mixed martial artist Fau Vake.[13]

Loss of charitable status and reorganisation

In 2010, the Trust's tax-free charitable status was revoked by the Charities Commission, on the grounds that it had become a political lobby group rather than a charity. In response, McVicar accused the Charities Commission of "muzzling organisations like us that are rocking the boat a little bit". To comply with the Charities Commission's requirements, McVicar announced that the Trust would split into two separate organisations: a charity advocating for victims of crime called the Sensible Sentencing Group Trust and a separate non-charitable political arm that would lobby for harsher criminal penalties called the Sensible Sentencing Trust.[5]

Election activities

The Trust was a registered electoral promoter at the 2011 general election.[14]

The Trust did not register as a promoter for the 2014 general election, but founder McVicar contended the Napier electorate and the party list as a member of the Conservative Party.[15] Former trust member Ruth Money criticised McVicar's decision to align the Trust with a political party due to revelations that former Conservative leader Colin Craig had sexually harassed former secretary Rachel MacGregor. Money had advocated for MacGregor and opined that McVicar's decision was the "beginning of the end" of his leadership.[7]

Online offenders' database

In early 2002, the Trust established an online offender database in response to the New Zealand Government's refusal to undertake this task, in spite of repeated requests to do so.[16]

In mid-January 2014, the Trust launched a new website and updated offender database. The SST claimed that the Trust would protect the public and help keep offenders accountable for their crimes. McVicar also announced that the organisation would publish two databases; one for Serious Violent Offenders and one for Paedophiles and Sexual Offenders. At its launch, the updated database contained over 5,000 criminal records with information on release conditions, previous convictions, and a Database Sentencing Tracker for viewing the sentence length of offenders.[17]

Following a privacy breach in 2014, the Trust agreed to provide training to volunteers, but only one person was trained and they left shortly after.[18]

In December 2018, the Privacy Commissioner John Edwards chastised the Trust for wrongfully misidentifying a man as a pedophile on its online database for almost two years. He stated that the Trust had a "continuously negligent, cavalier, and dangerous approach to privacy."[19][20][21] In response to criticism by the Privacy Commissioner, McVicar admitted that the organisation "absolutely cocked up and deserved to be publicly identified." He also confirmed that the Trust would correct the inaccurate information on its database. However, he criticised Edwards for making an issue of identifying the Trust while not calling for the names of recidivist violent offenders to be placed in a publicly accessible database.[18]

New leadership, 2018present

In December 2018, McVicar stepped down as leader of the Sensible Sentencing Trust and was succeeded by his youngest daughter Jess McVicar, who became the organisation's National Spokesperson.[7]

In January 2021, former New Zealand First Member of Parliament Darroch Ball became the co-leader of the Sensible Sentencing Trust alongside Jess McVicar.[22] As co-leader, Ball criticised the Green Party Co-Leader and minister Marama Davidson for attending a function hosted by the Mongrel Mob gang.[23]


References

  1. "Our Aims". Sensible Sentencing Trust. 6 February 2022. Archived from the original on 6 February 2022. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  2. "Our Goals". Sensible Sentencing Trust. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  3. "Our Policies". Sensible Sentencing Trust. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  4. "About Us". Sensible Sentencing Trust. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  5. Sharpe, Marty (30 June 2012). "Charity Rejection Splits Sensible Sentencing Trust". The Dominion Post. Wellington. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021.
  6. Coddington, Deborah (8 November 2009). "Blinded justice". The New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  7. Dennett, Kelly (27 October 2019). "Plotting the survival of the Sensible Sentencing Trust". Sunday Star Times. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  8. "Our Achievements". Sensible Sentencing Trust. Archived from the original on 6 February 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  9. Chhana, Rajesh; Spier, Philip; Roberts, Susan; Hurd, Chris (March 2004). "The Sentencing Act 2002: Monitoring the First Year" (PDF). Ministry of Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  10. "Government News Release". Beehive.govt.nz. New Zealand Government. 13 December 2008. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  11. "SST Three Strikes Policy". Sensible Sentencing Trust. Archived from the original on 5 February 2022. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  12. Kirk, Stacey (7 August 2014). "Garth McVicar leaves SST for Conservatives". Stuff. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  13. "Recent (from 2002)". Law and Order Referendum. Sensible Sentencing Trust. 2002. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 31 July 2019.
  14. "SST Launches New Website and Offender Databases". Sensible Sentencing Trust. 13 January 2014. Archived from the original on 16 January 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  15. Daly, Michael (19 December 2018). "'Negligent, cavalier' Sensible Sentencing Trust wrongly labels man a paedophile". Stuff. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  16. "Sensible Sentencing Trust falsely labels man as paedophile". Privacy Commissioner. 19 December 2018. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  17. Leask, Anna (22 December 2018). "Innocent man wrongly branded a paedophile by Sensible Sentencing Trust speaks". The New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 18 March 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  18. "Former NZ First MP Darroch Ball new co-leader of Sensible Sentencing Trust". Stuff. 4 January 2021. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  19. "'An insult': Marama Davidson criticised for attending Mongrel Mob event". Newstalk ZB. 3 May 2021. Archived from the original on 2 May 2021. Retrieved 6 May 2021.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Sensible_Sentencing_Trust, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.