Specific_modulus

Specific modulus

Specific modulus

Ratio of stiffness to mass for a material


Specific modulus is a materials property consisting of the elastic modulus per mass density of a material. It is also known as the stiffness to weight ratio or specific stiffness. High specific modulus materials find wide application in aerospace applications where minimum structural weight is required. The dimensional analysis yields units of distance squared per time squared. The equation can be written as:

where is the elastic modulus and is the density.

The utility of specific modulus is to find materials which will produce structures with minimum weight, when the primary design limitation is deflection or physical deformation, rather than load at breaking—this is also known as a "stiffness-driven" structure. Many common structures are stiffness-driven over much of their use, such as airplane wings, bridges, masts, and bicycle frames.

To emphasize the point, consider the issue of choosing a material for building an airplane. Aluminum seems obvious because it is "lighter" than steel, but steel is stronger than aluminum, so one could imagine using thinner steel components to save weight without sacrificing (tensile) strength. The problem with this idea is that there would be a significant sacrifice of stiffness, allowing, e.g., wings to flex unacceptably. Because it is stiffness, not tensile strength, that drives this kind of decision for airplanes, we say that they are stiffness-driven.

The connection details of such structures may be more sensitive to strength (rather than stiffness) issues due to effects of stress risers.

Specific modulus is not to be confused with specific strength, a term that compares strength to density.

Applications

Specific stiffness in tension

The use of specific stiffness in tension applications is straightforward. Both stiffness in tension and total mass for a given length are directly proportional to cross-sectional area. Thus performance of a beam in tension will depend on Young's modulus divided by density.

Specific stiffness in buckling and bending

Specific stiffness can be used in the design of beams subject to bending or Euler buckling, since bending and buckling are stiffness-driven. However, the role that density plays changes depending on the problem's constraints.

Beam with fixed dimensions; goal is weight reduction

Examining the formulas for buckling and deflection, we see that the force required to achieve a given deflection or to achieve buckling depends directly on Young's modulus.

Examining the density formula, we see that the mass of a beam depends directly on the density.

Thus if a beam's cross-sectional dimensions are constrained and weight reduction is the primary goal, performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density.

Beam with fixed weight; goal is increased stiffness

By contrast, if a beam's weight is fixed, its cross-sectional dimensions are unconstrained, and increased stiffness is the primary goal, the performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by either density squared or cubed. This is because a beam's overall stiffness, and thus its resistance to Euler buckling when subjected to an axial load and to deflection when subjected to a bending moment, is directly proportional to both the Young's modulus of the beam's material and the second moment of area (area moment of inertia) of the beam.

Comparing the list of area moments of inertia with formulas for area gives the appropriate relationship for beams of various configurations.

Beam's cross-sectional area increases in two dimensions

Consider a beam whose cross-sectional area increases in two dimensions, e.g. a solid round beam or a solid square beam.

By combining the area and density formulas, we can see that the radius of this beam will vary with approximately the inverse of the square of the density for a given mass.

By examining the formulas for area moment of inertia, we can see that the stiffness of this beam will vary approximately as the fourth power of the radius.

Thus the second moment of area will vary approximately as the inverse of the density squared, and performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density squared.

Beam's cross-sectional area increases in one dimension

Consider a beam whose cross-sectional area increases in one dimension, e.g. a thin-walled round beam or a rectangular beam whose height but not width is varied.

By combining the area and density formulas, we can see that the radius or height of this beam will vary with approximately the inverse of the density for a given mass.

By examining the formulas for area moment of inertia, we can see that the stiffness of this beam will vary approximately as the third power of the radius or height.

Thus the second moment of area will vary approximately as the inverse of the cube of the density, and performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density cubed.

However, caution must be exercised in using this metric. Thin-walled beams are ultimately limited by local buckling and lateral-torsional buckling. These buckling modes depend on material properties other than stiffness and density, so the stiffness-over-density-cubed metric is at best a starting point for analysis. For example, most wood species score better than most metals on this metric, but many metals can be formed into useful beams with much thinner walls than could be achieved with wood, given wood's greater vulnerability to local buckling. The performance of thin-walled beams can also be greatly modified by relatively minor variations in geometry such as flanges and stiffeners.[1][2][3]

Stiffness versus strength in bending

Note that the ultimate strength of a beam in bending depends on the ultimate strength of its material and its section modulus, not its stiffness and second moment of area. Its deflection, however, and thus its resistance to Euler buckling, will depend on these two latter values.

Approximate specific stiffness for various materials

Specific stiffness of the full range of materials
Specific stiffness of materials within the range 0.9–5.0 g/cm3 density and 10–1300 GPa stiffness
More information Material, Young's modulus (GPa) ...
More information Material, Young's modulus (GPa) ...
More information Material, Young's modulus (GPa) ...

See also


References

  1. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-27. Retrieved 2010-11-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. "Flange Local Buckling". Archived from the original on 2010-05-27. Retrieved 2010-11-22.
  3. Bonanni, David L.; Johnson, Eric R.; Starnes, James H. (31 July 1988). Local buckling and crippling of composite stiffener sections. Nasa-Tm. College of Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University via National Library of Australia (new catalog).
  4. Schaedler, Tobias A.; Jacobsen, Alan J.; Carter, Wiliam B. (2013-09-13). "Toward Lighter, Stiffer Materials". Science. 341 (6151): 1181–1182. doi:10.1126/science.1243996. ISSN 0036-8075.
  5. Coldewey, Devin (2024-01-17). "NASA's robotic, self-assembling structures could be the next phase of space construction". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2024-03-21.
  6. Alaoui, Adil Hafidi; Woignier, Thierry; Scherer, George W.; Phalippou, Jean (2008). "Comparison between flexural and uniaxial compression tests to measure the elastic modulus of silica aerogel". Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 354 (40–41): 4556–4561. Bibcode:2008JNCS..354.4556A. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.014. ISSN 0022-3093.
  7. "Densities of Solids". www.engineeringtoolbox.com.
  8. "Archived copy". dynalabcorp.com. Archived from the original on 18 November 2003. Retrieved 15 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  9. "Material Properties Data: Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF)". Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
  10. Dunand, D. C. (2004). "Processing of Titanium Foams" (PDF). Advanced Engineering Materials. 6 (6): 369–376. doi:10.1002/adem.200405576. ISSN 1438-1656. S2CID 15118192.
  11. Sabate, Borrega; Gibson, Lorna J. (May 2015). "Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood". Mechanics of Materials. 84: 75–90. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014. hdl:1721.1/108580. S2CID 54736632. Retrieved 2019-08-09.
  12. "Sitka Spruce". Archived from the original on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
  13. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-13. Retrieved 2015-04-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  14. "Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-02-22. Retrieved 2019-08-12.
  15. Storm, Shaye (2004). Elert, Glenn (ed.). "Density of glass". The Physics Factbook. Retrieved 2022-01-24.
  16. Weatherell, J. A. (1 May 1975). "Composition of Dental Enamel". British Medical Bulletin. 31 (2): 115–119. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071263. PMID 1164600.
  17. "Reinforcement types". Archived from the original on 2010-12-20. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
  18. "E-Glass Fibre". AZoM.com. 30 August 2001.
  19. "S-Glass Fibre". AZoM.com. 30 August 2001.
  20. "Metapress - A Fast Growing Resource for Young Entrepreneurs". 14 December 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2010.
  21. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-07. Retrieved 2010-11-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  22. "YIG properties" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-02-25. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
  23. Piggott, M. R.; Harris, B. (1980). "Compression strength of carbon, glass and Kevlar-49 fibre reinforced polyester resins". Journal of Materials Science. 15 (10): 2523–2538. Bibcode:1980JMatS..15.2523P. doi:10.1007/BF00550757. S2CID 133594285.
  24. "Home - Dyneema®" (PDF). www.dyneema.com.
  25. Billone, M.C; Donne, M.Dalle; Macaulay-Newcombe, R.G (1995). "Status of beryllium development for fusion applications" (PDF). Fusion Engineering and Design. 27: 179–190. doi:10.1016/0920-3796(95)90125-6. ISSN 0920-3796.
  26. "saffil". www.saffil.com.
  27. "Product info" (PDF). www51.honeywell.com. 2000.
  28. "Boron Fiber Properties". www.specmaterials.com.
  29. Lavin, J. Gerard; Kogure, Kei; Sines, G. (1995). "Mechanical and physical properties of post-creep, pitch-based carbon filaments". Journal of Materials Science. 30 (9): 2352–2357. Bibcode:1995JMatS..30.2352L. doi:10.1007/BF01184586. S2CID 137212713.
  30. "Physical Properties of Common Woods". Archived from the original on 2010-06-09. Retrieved 2010-11-22.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Specific_modulus, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.