Spinney_(Kettering_BC_Ward)

Spinney (Kettering BC Ward)

Add article description

Spinney is a 2-member ward within Kettering Borough Council, in Northamptonshire, England.

More information Kettering Borough Council) ...

It was established in boundary changes before the 1999 elections. The ward was last fought at borough council level in the 2003 local council elections, in which both seats were held by the Conservatives.

The most recent councillors prior to the Ward's abolition were Cllr. Bob Civil and Cllr. Matthew Lynch.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Spinney_(Kettering_BC_Ward), and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Spinney Ward (Kettering Borough Council)
Spinney within Kettering Borough
Kettering Borough within Northamptonshire	Northamptonshire within England

	Candidate	Votes	%	±%
Conservative	Bob Civil (E)	446	33.1	+5.5
Conservative	Matt Lynch (E)	394	29.3	+7.1
Liberal Democrats	John Turnbull	157	11.7	-5.8
Liberal Democrats	Chris McGlynn	147	10.9	-1.8
Labour	Adrian Chambers	109	8.1	-2.2
Labour	Alfred Elderton	94	7.0	-2.8

Ward Summary
Party		Votes	% Votes	% Change	Seats	Change
	Conservative	420	62.4	+29.2	2	0
	Liberal Democrats	152	22.6	-19.1	0	0
	Labour	102	15.1	-10.1	0	0
Total Votes Cast		674
Electorate		3,230
Turnout		20.9%

	Candidate	Votes	%
Conservative	Bob Civil (E)	568	27.6
Conservative	Matt Lynch (E)	457	22.2
Liberal Democrats	Terry Freeman	359	17.4
Liberal Democrats	Stuart Simons	261	12.7
Labour	Alfred Elderton	212	10.3
Labour	David Williams	202	9.8

Ward Summary
Party		Votes	% Votes	Seats	Change
	Conservative	513	49.8	2
	Liberal Democrats	310	30.1	0
	Labour	207	20.1	0
Total Votes Cast		839
Electorate
Turnout

Spinney_(Kettering_BC_Ward)

Spinney (Kettering BC Ward)

Councillors

Election results

Kettering Borough Council Elections 2003

Kettering Borough Council Elections 1999

See also

Share this article: