Squamata

Squamata

Squamata

Order of reptiles


Squamata (/skwæˈmtə/, Latin squamatus, 'scaly, having scales') is the largest order of reptiles, comprising lizards and snakes. With over 11,500 species,[2] it is also the second-largest order of extant (living) vertebrates, after the perciform fish. Members of the order are distinguished by their skins, which bear horny scales or shields, and must periodically engage in molting. They also possess movable quadrate bones, making possible movement of the upper jaw relative to the neurocranium. This is particularly visible in snakes, which are able to open their mouths very wide to accommodate comparatively large prey. Squamates are the most variably sized living reptiles, ranging from the 16 mm (0.63 in) dwarf gecko (Sphaerodactylus ariasae) to the 6.5 m (21 ft) reticulated python (Malayopython reticulatus). The now-extinct mosasaurs reached lengths over 14 m (46 ft).

Quick Facts Scientific classification, Subgroups ...

Among other reptiles, squamates are most closely related to the tuatara, the last surviving member of the once diverse Rhynchocephalia, with both groups being placed in the clade Lepidosauria.

Evolution

The holotype of Slavoia darevskii, a fossil squamate

Squamates are a monophyletic sister group to the rhynchocephalians, members of the order Rhynchocephalia. The only surviving member of the Rhynchocephalia is the tuatara. Squamata and Rhynchocephalia form the subclass Lepidosauria, which is the sister group to the Archosauria, the clade that contains crocodiles and birds, and their extinct relatives. Fossils of rhynchocephalians first appear in the Early Triassic, meaning that the lineage leading to squamates must have also existed at the time.[3][4]

A study in 2018 found that Megachirella, an extinct genus of lepidosaurs that lived about 240 million years ago during the Middle Triassic, was a stem-squamate, making it the oldest known squamate. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted by performing high-resolution microfocus X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) scans on the fossil specimen of Megachirella to gather detailed data about its anatomy. These data were then compared with a phylogenetic dataset combining the morphological and molecular data of 129 extant and extinct reptilian taxa. The comparison revealed Megachirella had certain features that are unique to squamates. The study also found that geckos are the earliest crown group squamates, not iguanians.[5][6]

In 2022, the extinct genus Cryptovaranoides was described from the Late Triassic of England as a highly derived squamate belonging to the group Anguimorpha, which contains many extant lineages such as monitor lizards, beaded lizards and anguids. The presence of an essentially modern crown group squamate so far back in time was unexpected, as their diversification was previously thought to have occurred during the Jurassic and Cretaceous.[7] However, a 2023 study found that Cryptovaranoides most likely represents an archosauromorph with no apparent squamate affinities.[8] The oldest unambiguous fossils of Squamata date to the Middle Jurassic of the Northern Hemisphere,[9] with the first appearance of many modern groups, including snakes, during this period.[10]

Scientists believe crown group squamates probably originated in the Early Jurassic based on the fossil record,[3] with the oldest unambiguous fossils of squamates dating to the Middle Jurassic.[11] Squamate morphological and ecological diversity substantially increased over the course of the Cretaceous,[10] including the appeance of groups like iguanians and varanoids, and true snakes. Polyglyphanodontia, an extinct clade of lizards, and mosasaurs, a group of predatory marine lizards that grew to enormous sizes, also appeared in the Cretaceous.[12] Squamates suffered a mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary, which wiped out polyglyphanodontians, mosasaurs, and many other distinct lineages.[13]

The relationships of squamates is debatable. Although many of the groups originally recognized on the basis of morphology are still accepted, understanding of their relationships to each other has changed radically as a result of studying their genomes. Iguanians were long thought to be the earliest crown group squamates based on morphological data,[12] but genetic data suggest that geckos are the earliest crown group squamates.[14] Iguanians are now united with snakes and anguimorphs in a clade called Toxicofera. Genetic data also suggest that the various limbless groups – snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids – are unrelated, and instead arose independently from lizards.

Reproduction

Trachylepis maculilabris skinks mating

The male members of the group Squamata have hemipenes, which are usually held inverted within their bodies, and are everted for reproduction via erectile tissue like that in the mammalian penis.[15] Only one is used at a time, and some evidence indicates that males alternate use between copulations. The hemipenis has a variety of shapes, depending on the species. Often it bears spines or hooks, to anchor the male within the female. Some species even have forked hemipenes (each hemipenis has two tips). Due to being everted and inverted, hemipenes do not have a completely enclosed channel for the conduction of sperm, but rather a seminal groove that seals as the erectile tissue expands. This is also the only reptile group in which both viviparous and ovoviviparous species are found, as well as the usual oviparous reptiles. The eggs in oviparous species have a parchment-like shell. The only exception is found in blind lizards and three families of geckos (Gekkonidae, Phyllodactylidae and Sphaerodactylidae), where many lay rigid and calcified eggs.[16][17] Some species, such as the Komodo dragon, can reproduce asexually through parthenogenesis.[18]

The Japanese striped snake has been studied in sexual selection.

Studies have been conducted on how sexual selection manifests itself in snakes and lizards. Snakes use a variety of tactics in acquiring mates.[19][dubious ] Ritual combat between males for the females with which they want to mate includes topping, a behavior exhibited by most viperids, in which one male twists around the vertically elevated fore body of his opponent and forcing it downward. Neck biting commonly occurs while the snakes are entwined.[20]

Facultative parthenogenesis

The effects of central fusion and terminal fusion on heterozygosity

Parthenogenesis is a natural form of reproduction in which the growth and development of embryos occur without fertilization. Agkistrodon contortrix (copperhead snake) and Agkistrodon piscivorus (cottonmouth snake) can reproduce by facultative parthenogenesis; they are capable of switching from a sexual mode of reproduction to an asexual mode.[21] The type of parthenogenesis that likely occurs is automixis with terminal fusion (see figure), a process in which two terminal products from the same meiosis fuse to form a diploid zygote. This process leads to genome-wide homozygosity, expression of deleterious recessive alleles, and often to developmental abnormalities. Both captive-born and wild-born A. contortrix and A. piscivorus appear to be capable of this form of parthenogenesis.[21]

Reproduction in squamate reptiles is ordinarily sexual, with males having a ZZ pair of sex-determining chromosomes, and females a ZW pair. However, the Colombian rainbow boa, Epicrates maurus, can also reproduce by facultative parthenogenesis, resulting in production of WW female progeny.[22] The WW females are likely produced by terminal automixis.

Inbreeding avoidance

When female sand lizards mate with two or more males, sperm competition within the female's reproductive tract may occur. Active selection of sperm by females appears to occur in a manner that enhances female fitness.[23] On the basis of this selective process, the sperm of males that are more distantly related to the female are preferentially used for fertilization, rather than the sperm of close relatives.[23] This preference may enhance the fitness of progeny by reducing inbreeding depression.

Evolution of venom

Recent research suggests that the evolutionary origin of venom may exist deep in the squamate phylogeny, with 60% of squamates placed in this hypothetical group called Toxicofera. Venom has been known in the clades Caenophidia, Anguimorpha, and Iguania, and has been shown to have evolved a single time along these lineages before the three groups diverged, because all lineages share nine common toxins.[24] The fossil record shows the divergence between anguimorphs, iguanians, and advanced snakes dates back roughly 200 million years ago (Mya) to the Late Triassic/Early Jurassic,[24] but the only good fossil evidence is from the Middle Jurassic.[25]

Snake venom has been shown to have evolved via a process by which a gene encoding for a normal body protein, typically one involved in key regulatory processes or bioactivity, is duplicated, and the copy is selectively expressed in the venom gland.[26] Previous literature hypothesized that venoms were modifications of salivary or pancreatic proteins,[27] but different toxins have been found to have been recruited from numerous different protein bodies and are as diverse as their functions.[28]

Natural selection has driven the origination and diversification of the toxins to counter the defenses of their prey. Once toxins have been recruited into the venom proteome, they form large, multigene families and evolve via the birth-and-death model of protein evolution,[29] which leads to a diversification of toxins that allows the ambush predators the ability to attack a wide range of prey.[30] The rapid evolution and diversification is thought to be the result of a predator–prey evolutionary arms race, where both are adapting to counter the other.[31]

Humans and squamates

Bites and fatalities

Map showing the global distribution of venomous snakebites

An estimated 125,000 people a year die from venomous snake bites.[32] In the US alone, more than 8,000 venomous snake bites are reported each year, but only one in 50 million people (five or six fatalities per year in the USA) will die from venomous snake bites.[33][34]

Lizard bites, unlike venomous snake bites, are usually not fatal. The Komodo dragon has been known to kill people due to its size, and recent studies show it may have a passive envenomation system. Recent studies also show that the close relatives of the Komodo, the monitor lizards, all have a similar envenomation system, but the toxicity of the bites is relatively low to humans.[35] The Gila monster and beaded lizards of North and Central America are venomous, but not deadly to humans.

Conservation

Though they survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, many squamate species are now endangered due to habitat loss, hunting and poaching, illegal wildlife trading, alien species being introduced to their habitats (which puts native creatures at risk through competition, disease, and predation), and other anthropogenic causes. Because of this, some squamate species have recently become extinct, with Africa having the most extinct species. Breeding programs and wildlife parks, though, are trying to save many endangered reptiles from extinction. Zoos, private hobbyists, and breeders help educate people about the importance of snakes and lizards.

Classification and phylogeny

Desert iguana from Amboy Crater, Mojave Desert, California

Historically, the order Squamata has been divided into three suborders:

Of these, the lizards form a paraphyletic group,[36] since the "lizards" are found in several distinct lineages, with snakes and amphisbaenians recovered as monophyletic groups nested within. Although studies of squamate relationships using molecular biology have found different relationships between some squamata lineagaes, all recent molecular studies[24] suggest that the venomous groups are united in a venom clade. Named Toxicofera, it encompasses a majority (nearly 60%) of squamate species and includes Serpentes (snakes), Iguania (agamids, chameleons, iguanids, etc.), and Anguimorpha (monitor lizards, Gila monster, glass lizards, etc.).[24]

One example of a modern classification of the squamates is shown below.[1][37]

Squamata
Dibamia

Dibamidae

Bifurcata
Gekkota
Unidentata
Scinciformata
Episquamata
Laterata
Teiformata

Gymnophthalmidae Merrem 1820

Teiidae Gray 1827

Lacertibaenia
Lacertiformata

Lacertidae

Amphisbaenia

Rhineuridae Vanzolini 1951

Bipedidae Taylor 1951

Blanidae Kearney & Stuart 2004

Cadeidae Vidal & Hedges 2008

Trogonophidae Gray 1865

Amphisbaenidae Gray 1865

Toxicofera
Serpentes

List of extant families

The over 10,900 extant squamates are divided into 67 families.

More information Family, Common names ...

References

  1. Wiens, J. J.; Hutter, C. R.; Mulcahy, D. G.; Noonan, B. P.; Townsend, T. M.; Sites, J. W.; Reeder, T. W. (2012). "Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species". Biology Letters. 8 (6): 1043–1046. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703. PMC 3497141. PMID 22993238.
  2. "Species Numbers (as of May 2021)". reptile-database.org. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  3. Jones, Marc E.; Anderson, Cajsa Lipsa; Hipsley, Christy A.; Müller, Johannes; Evans, Susan E.; Schoch, Rainer R. (25 September 2013). "Integration of molecules and new fossils supports a Triassic origin for Lepidosauria (lizards, snakes, and tuatara)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 13 (1): 208. Bibcode:2013BMCEE..13..208J. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-208. PMC 4016551. PMID 24063680.
  4. Bolet, Arnau; Stubbs, Thomas L.; Herrera-Flores, Jorge A.; Benton, Michael J. (2022). "The Jurassic rise of squamates as supported by lepidosaur disparity and evolutionary rates". eLife. 11. doi:10.7554/eLife.66511. PMC 9064307. PMID 35502582.
  5. Simōes, Tiago R.; Caldwell, Michael W.; Talanda, Mateusz; Bernardi, Massimo; Palci, Alessandro; Vernygora, Oksana; Bernardini, Federico; Mancini, Lucia; Nydam, Randall L. (30 May 2018). "The origin of squamates revealed by a Middle Triassic lizard from the Italian Alps". Nature. 557 (7707): 706–709. Bibcode:2018Natur.557..706S. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0093-3. PMID 29849156. S2CID 44108416.
  6. Weisberger, Mindy (30 May 2018). "This 240-Million-Year-Old Reptile Is the 'Mother of All Lizards'". Live Science. Purch Group. Archived from the original on 21 June 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2018.
  7. Whiteside, David I.; Chambi-Trowell, Sofía A. V.; Benton, Michael J. (2 December 2022). "A Triassic crown squamate". Science Advances. 8 (48): eabq8274. Bibcode:2022SciA....8.8274W. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq8274. hdl:1983/a3c7a019-cfe6-4eb3-9ac0-d50c61c5319e. ISSN 2375-2548. PMID 36459546. S2CID 254180027. Archived from the original on 8 December 2022. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  8. Brownstein, Chase D.; Simões, Tiago R.; Caldwell, Michael W.; Lee, Michael S. Y.; Meyer, Dalton L.; Scarpetta, Simon G. (October 2023). "The affinities of the Late Triassic Cryptovaranoides and the age of crown squamates". Royal Society Open Science. 10 (10). doi:10.1098/rsos.230968. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 10565374. PMID 37830017. S2CID 263802572.
  9. Tałanda, Mateusz; Fernandez, Vincent; Panciroli, Elsa; Evans, Susan E.; Benson, Roger J. (3 November 2022). "Synchrotron tomography of a stem lizard elucidates early squamate anatomy". Nature. 611 (7934): 99–104. Bibcode:2022Natur.611...99T. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05332-6. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 36289329. S2CID 253160713. Archived from the original on 28 December 2023. Retrieved 13 October 2023.
  10. Herrera-Flores, Jorge A.; Stubbs, Thomas L.; Benton, Michael J. (March 2021). "Ecomorphological diversification of squamates in the Cretaceous". Royal Society Open Science. 8 (3): rsos.201961, 201961. Bibcode:2021RSOS....801961H. doi:10.1098/rsos.201961. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 8074880. PMID 33959350.
  11. Tałanda, Mateusz; Fernandez, Vincent; Panciroli, Elsa; Evans, Susan E.; Benson, Roger J. (26 October 2022). "Synchrotron tomography of a stem lizard elucidates early squamate anatomy". Nature. 611 (7934): 99–104. Bibcode:2022Natur.611...99T. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05332-6. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 36289329. S2CID 253160713. Archived from the original on 28 December 2023. Retrieved 13 October 2023.
  12. Gauthier, Jacques; Kearney, Maureen; Maisano, Jessica Anderson; Rieppel, Olivier; Behlke, Adam D. B. (April 2012). "Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History. 53: 3–308. doi:10.3374/014.053.0101. S2CID 86355757.
  13. "Iguana Anatomy". Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 28 September 2008.
  14. Morales, Alex (20 December 2006). "Komodo Dragons, World's Largest Lizards, Have Virgin Births". Bloomberg Television. Archived from the original on 8 October 2007. Retrieved 28 March 2008.
  15. Shine, Richard; Langkilde, Tracy; Mason, Robert T (2004). "Courtship tactics in garter snakes: How do a male's morphology and behaviour influence his mating success?". Animal Behaviour. 67 (3): 477–83. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.05.007. S2CID 4830666.
  16. Blouin-Demers, Gabriel; Gibbs, H. Lisle; Weatherhead, Patrick J. (2005). "Genetic evidence for sexual selection in black ratsnakes, Elaphe obsoleta". Animal Behaviour. 69 (1): 225–34. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.012. S2CID 3907523.
  17. Booth W, Smith CF, Eskridge PH, Hoss SK, Mendelson JR, Schuett GW (2012). "Facultative parthenogenesis discovered in wild vertebrates". Biology Letters. 8 (6): 983–5. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0666. PMC 3497136. PMID 22977071.
  18. Booth W, Million L, Reynolds RG, Burghardt GM, Vargo EL, Schal C, Tzika AC, Schuett GW (2011). "Consecutive virgin births in the new world boid snake, the Colombian rainbow Boa, Epicrates maurus". Journal of Heredity. 102 (6): 759–63. doi:10.1093/jhered/esr080. PMID 21868391.
  19. Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelström H (1997). "Sperm choice by females". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 12 (11): 445–6. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)85751-5. PMID 21238151.
  20. Fry, Brian G.; Vidal, Nicolas; Norman, Janette A.; Vonk, Freek J.; Scheib, Holger; Ramjan, S.F. Ryan; et al. (February 2006). "Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes". Nature. 439 (7076): 584–588. Bibcode:2006Natur.439..584F. doi:10.1038/nature04328. PMID 16292255. S2CID 4386245.
  21. Fry, B. G.; Vidal, N.; Kochva, E.; Renjifo, C. (2009). "Evolution and diversification of the toxicofera reptile venom system". Journal of Proteomics. 72 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.009. PMID 19457354.
  22. Kochva, E (1987). "The origin of snakes and evolution of the venom apparatus". Toxicon. 25 (1): 65–106. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(87)90150-4. PMID 3564066.
  23. Fry, B. G.; Scheib, H.; Young, B.; McNaughtan, J.; Ramjan, S. F. R.; Vidal, N. (2008). "Evolution of an arsenal". Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 7 (2): 215–246. doi:10.1074/mcp.m700094-mcp200. PMID 17855442.
  24. Calvete, J. J.; Sanz, L.; Angulo, Y.; Lomonte, B.; Gutierrez, J. M. (2009). "Venoms, venomics, antivenomics". FEBS Letters. 583 (11): 1736–1743. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.029. PMID 19303875. S2CID 904161.
  25. Barlow, A.; Pook, C. E.; Harrison, R. A.; Wuster, W. (2009). "Coevolution of diet and prey-specific venom activity supports the role of selection in snake venom evolution". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1666): 2443–2449. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0048. PMC 2690460. PMID 19364745.
  26. "Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation" (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2007.
  27. "Venomous Snake FAQs". University of Florida. Archived from the original on 7 December 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
  28. "First Aid Snake Bites". University of Maryland Medical Center. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 30 December 2007.
  29. "Komodo dragon kills boy, 8, in Indonesia". NBC News. 4 June 2007. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 30 December 2007.
  30. Reeder, Tod W.; Townsend, Ted M.; Mulcahy, Daniel G.; Noonan, Brice P.; Wood, Perry L.; Sites, Jack W.; Wiens, John J. (2015). "Integrated Analyses Resolve Conflicts over Squamate Reptile Phylogeny and Reveal Unexpected Placements for Fossil Taxa". PLOS One. 10 (3): e0118199. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1018199R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118199. PMC 4372529. PMID 25803280.
  31. Zheng, Yuchi; Wiens, John J. (2016). "Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Part B): 537–547. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.009. PMID 26475614.
  32. S. Blair Hedges. "Families described". Hedges Lab | Evolutionary Biology. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
  33. Cogger(1991), p.23

Further reading


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Squamata, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.