Ali Khamenei

On 7 May 2017, the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, criticized the 2030 National Education Act, saying:

It is the Islamic Republic here! Here, Islam is the benchmark! The Quran is the benchmark! It is not a place where the deficient, destructive, and corrupt Western lifestyle can infiltrate! ... The UNESCO 2030 education agenda and the like are not agendas that the Islamic Republic of Iran should have to surrender and submit to.

He also questioned why so-called international organization^{[clarification needed]} under the influence of big powers were making educational decisions for countries with differing histories and cultures.^[6][7]

Mohammad Mehdi Zahedi

According to Iranian politician Mohammad Mehdi Zahedi, the subject of Human rights in the 2030 Agenda is based on American concepts, which, he said, were far from the ideal of human generosity. He declared that Islam does emphasize gender justice and that there was no way to measure gender equality. He added that Iranians believe that any educational initiative must be based on Islamic tradition, because the Quran clearly speaks about education, but the 2030 Agenda strongly recommended that learning religious tradition and beliefs should not be emphasized in public education.^{[clarification needed][8]}

Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi

On 22 May 2017 Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi brought up the 2030 UNESCO document during a lecture for seminary students in the holy city of Qom. Describing many of the document's goals as "beautiful and humane", Makarem Shirazi said^{[clarification needed]}, meaning that it would "consolidate the hegemonic system". He also reiterated Rouhani's comments about adopting the document as long as it did not interfere with Iran's religion and culture and said, "They [the Rouhani administration] have put this in writing and sent a letter, signed by three ministers, to the supreme leader and sent a copy of it to us as well. However, they seem to have forgotten that the creators of this document will only agree to those exceptions and conditions written below it that do not oppose the spirit of the document."^[5][6] He also stated that the 2030 Agenda was full of words that must be interpreted in their way; for example, the word "family" was used in the Agenda refers to all kinds of families, including same-sex couples. In addition, due to the meaning represented for violence, Basij (The Organization for Mobilization of the Oppressed, one of the five forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) and the IRGC have to be considered examples of violence.^[9]

Hassan Rahimpour Azghadi

According to Hassan Rahimpour Azghadi, a member of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, last year UNESCO said it was committed to the goal that the 2030 Agenda be implemented in all countries, although participation was apparently voluntary, and that it was up to each government to carry out this educational Agenda by the year 2030. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Iran) stated that implementation of the 2030 Agenda was not obligatory, but that if the Agenda was not carried out, the government would be found negligent. Some people^{[clarification needed]} believe the 2030 Agenda is an example of cultural JCPOA, which produces nothing except treading on the rights of the people. According to the contents of the 2030 Agenda, it finds^{[clarification needed]} similarities between Islamic views and Liberal or Neo-liberal views about children's rights and the education of women and family, but there are essential paradoxes. We do not say all the contents of the 2030 Agenda are contrary to Islam, definitely there are matters that correspond to Islamic tradition, so we don't disagree with all of this Agenda, but the problem is, why was this document (which goes against Islam in some articles) signed by neglecting the "upper document"?^{[clarification needed]} Due to the 2030 Agenda Sex education for children is their right, but teaching sexual abstinence and modesty is treading on their rights.^{[clarification needed]} Based on the 2030 Agenda we have to answer to western educators about how the Agenda is being implemented in our schools. In signing the document, we had agreed that sex education for children guarantees the health of the family and that homosexuality is one of the basic rights of humans. The parameters of training a child are based on secularism. According to the 2030 Agenda foreign advisers must control^{[clarification needed]} education in Iran.^[10]

Hajar Tahriri Niksefat

Hajar Tahriri Niksefat, the head of the women's committee in the election headquarters of the town of Raisi in the northern province of Gilan, said she believed that educating children regarding gender equality was "not necessarily to the child's benefit, but could also be oppressive." She added, "In our country, family, marriage, controlling sexual desire, and satisfying it through proper channels are emphasized and taught at their appropriate time. We will not consider relations that in our national and religious teachings are viewed as improper, and we do not think it is fit to teach them in our schools."^[5]