# Tautochrone curve

A tautochrone or isochrone curve (from Greek prefixes tauto- meaning same or iso- equal, and chrono time) is the curve for which the time taken by an object sliding without friction in uniform gravity to its lowest point is independent of its starting point on the curve. The curve is a cycloid, and the time is equal to π times the square root of the radius (of the circle which generates the cycloid) over the acceleration of gravity. The tautochrone curve is related to the brachistochrone curve, which is also a cycloid.

## The tautochrone problem

It was in the left hand try-pot of the Pequod, with the soapstone diligently circling round me, that I was first indirectly struck by the remarkable fact, that in geometry all bodies gliding along the cycloid, my soapstone for example, will descend from any point in precisely the same time.

Moby Dick by Herman Melville, 1851

The tautochrone problem, the attempt to identify this curve, was solved by Christiaan Huygens in 1659. He proved geometrically in his Horologium Oscillatorium, originally published in 1673, that the curve was a cycloid.

On a cycloid whose axis is erected on the perpendicular and whose vertex is located at the bottom, the times of descent, in which a body arrives at the lowest point at the vertex after having departed from any point on the cycloid, are equal to each other...[1]

Huygens also proved that the time of descent is equal to the time a body takes to fall vertically the same distance as diameter of the circle that generates the cycloid, multiplied by π/2. In modern terms, this means that the time of descent is ${\displaystyle \pi {\sqrt {r/g}}}$, where r is the radius of the circle which generates the cycloid, and g is the gravity of Earth, or more accurately, the earth's gravitational acceleration.

This solution was later used to solve the problem of the brachistochrone curve. Johann Bernoulli solved the problem in a paper (Acta Eruditorum, 1697).

The tautochrone problem was studied by Huygens more closely when it was realized that a pendulum, which follows a circular path, was not isochronous and thus his pendulum clock would keep different time depending on how far the pendulum swung. After determining the correct path, Christiaan Huygens attempted to create pendulum clocks that used a string to suspend the bob and curb cheeks near the top of the string to change the path to the tautochrone curve. These attempts proved unhelpful for a number of reasons. First, the bending of the string causes friction, changing the timing. Second, there were much more significant sources of timing errors that overwhelmed any theoretical improvements that traveling on the tautochrone curve helps. Finally, the "circular error" of a pendulum decreases as length of the swing decreases, so better clock escapements could greatly reduce this source of inaccuracy.

Later, the mathematicians Joseph Louis Lagrange and Leonhard Euler provided an analytical solution to the problem.

## Lagrangian solution

If the particle's position is parametrized by the arclength s(t) from the lowest point, the kinetic energy is proportional to ${\displaystyle {\dot {s}}^{2}.}$ The potential energy is proportional to the height y(s). One way the curve can be an isochrone is if the Lagrangian is that of a simple harmonic oscillator: the height of the curve must be proportional to the arclength squared.

${\displaystyle y(s)=s^{2},}$

where the constant of proportionality has been set to 1 by changing units of length. The differential form of this relation is

${\displaystyle dy=2s\,ds,}$
${\displaystyle dy^{2}=4s^{2}\,ds^{2}=4y\,(dx^{2}+dy^{2}),}$

which eliminates s, and leaves a differential equation for dx and dy. To find the solution, integrate for x in terms of y:

${\displaystyle {dx \over dy}={{\sqrt {1-4y}} \over 2{\sqrt {y}}},}$
${\displaystyle x=\int {\sqrt {1-4u^{2}}}\,du,}$

where ${\displaystyle u={\sqrt {y}}}$. This integral is the area under a circle, which can be naturally cut into a triangle and a circular wedge:

${\displaystyle x={\frac {1}{2}}u{\sqrt {1-4u^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{4}}\arcsin 2u,}$
${\displaystyle y=u^{2}.}$

To see that this is a strangely parametrized cycloid, change variables to disentangle the transcendental and algebraic parts by defining the angle ${\displaystyle \theta =\arcsin 2u}$. This yields

${\displaystyle 8x=2\sin \theta \cos \theta +2\theta =\sin 2\theta +2\theta ,}$
${\displaystyle 8y=2\sin ^{2}\theta =1-\cos 2\theta ,}$

which is the standard parametrization, except for the scale of x, y and θ.

## "Virtual gravity" solution

The simplest solution to the tautochrone problem is to note a direct relation between the angle of an incline and the gravity felt by a particle on the incline. A particle on a 90° vertical incline undergoes full gravitational acceleration ${\displaystyle g}$, while a particle on a horizontal plane undergoes zero gravitational acceleration. At intermediate angles, the acceleration due to "virtual gravity" by the particle is ${\displaystyle g\sin \theta }$. Note that ${\displaystyle \theta }$ is measured between the tangent to the curve and the horizontal, with angles above the horizontal being treated as positive angles. Thus, ${\displaystyle \theta }$ varies from ${\displaystyle -\pi /2}$ to ${\displaystyle \pi /2}$.

The position of a mass measured along a tautochrone curve, ${\displaystyle s(t)}$, must obey the following differential equation:

${\displaystyle {\frac {d^{2}s}{{dt}^{2}}}=-\omega ^{2}s}$

which, along with the initial conditions ${\displaystyle s(0)=s_{0}}$ and ${\displaystyle s'(0)=0}$, has solution:

${\displaystyle s(t)=s_{0}\cos \omega t\,}$

It can be easily verified both that this solution solves the differential equation and that a particle will reach ${\displaystyle s=0}$ at time ${\displaystyle \pi /2\omega }$ from any starting position ${\displaystyle s_{0}}$. The problem is now to construct a curve that will cause the mass to obey the above motion. Newton's second law shows that the force of gravity and the acceleration of the mass are related by:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}-g\sin \theta &={\frac {d^{2}s}{{dt}^{2}}}\\&=-\omega ^{2}s\,\end{aligned}}}

The explicit appearance of the distance, ${\displaystyle s}$, is troublesome, but we can differentiate to obtain a more manageable form:

${\displaystyle g\cos \theta \,d\theta =\omega ^{2}\,ds\,}$

or

${\displaystyle ds={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos \theta \,d\theta \,}$

This equation relates the change in the curve's angle to the change in the distance along the curve. We now use trigonometry to relate the angle ${\displaystyle \theta }$ to the differential lengths ${\displaystyle dx}$, ${\displaystyle dy}$ and ${\displaystyle ds}$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}ds={\frac {dx}{\cos \theta }}\\ds={\frac {dy}{\sin \theta }}\end{aligned}}}

Replacing ${\displaystyle ds}$ with ${\displaystyle dx}$ in the above equation lets us solve for ${\displaystyle x}$ in terms of ${\displaystyle \theta }$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}ds&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos \theta \,d\theta \\{\frac {dx}{\cos \theta }}&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos \theta \,d\theta \\dx&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos ^{2}\theta \,d\theta \\&={\frac {g}{2\omega ^{2}}}\left(\cos 2\theta +1\right)\,d\theta \\x&={\frac {g}{4\omega ^{2}}}\left(\sin 2\theta +2\theta \right)+C_{x}\end{aligned}}}

Likewise, we can also express ${\displaystyle ds}$ in terms of ${\displaystyle dy}$ and solve for ${\displaystyle y}$ in terms of ${\displaystyle \theta }$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}ds&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos \theta \,d\theta \\{\frac {dy}{\sin \theta }}&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\cos \theta \,d\theta \\dy&={\frac {g}{\omega ^{2}}}\sin \theta \cos \theta \,d\theta \\&={\frac {g}{2\omega ^{2}}}\sin 2\theta \,d\theta \\y&=-{\frac {g}{4\omega ^{2}}}\cos 2\theta +C_{y}\end{aligned}}}

Substituting ${\displaystyle \phi =2\theta \,}$ and ${\displaystyle r={\frac {g}{4\omega ^{2}}}\,}$, we see that these parametric equations for ${\displaystyle x}$ and ${\displaystyle y}$ are those of a point on a circle of radius ${\displaystyle r}$ rolling along a horizontal line (a cycloid), with the circle center at the coordinates ${\displaystyle (C_{x}+r\phi ,C_{y})}$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=r(\sin \phi +\phi )+C_{x}\\y&=-r\cos \phi +C_{y}\end{aligned}}}

Note that ${\displaystyle \phi }$ ranges from ${\displaystyle -\pi \leq \phi \leq \pi }$. It is typical to set ${\displaystyle C_{x}=0}$ and ${\displaystyle C_{y}=r}$ so that the lowest point on the curve coincides with the origin. Therefore:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=r(\phi +\sin \phi )\\y&=r(1-\cos \phi )\\\end{aligned}}}

Solving for ${\displaystyle \omega }$ and remembering that ${\displaystyle T={\frac {\pi }{2\omega }}}$ is the time required for descent, we find the descent time in terms of the radius ${\displaystyle r}$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}r&={\frac {g}{4\omega ^{2}}}\\\omega &={\frac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {\frac {g}{r}}}\\T&=\pi {\sqrt {\frac {r}{g}}}\\\end{aligned}}}

(Based loosely on Proctor, pp. 135139)

## Abel's solution

Niels Henrik Abel attacked a generalized version of the tautochrone problem (Abel's mechanical problem), namely, given a function T(y) that specifies the total time of descent for a given starting height, find an equation of the curve that yields this result. The tautochrone problem is a special case of Abel's mechanical problem when T(y) is a constant.

Abel's solution begins with the principle of conservation of energy since the particle is frictionless, and thus loses no energy to heat, its kinetic energy at any point is exactly equal to the difference in gravitational potential energy from its starting point. The kinetic energy is ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}mv^{2}}$, and since the particle is constrained to move along a curve, its velocity is simply ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dt}}}$, where ${\displaystyle \ell }$ is the distance measured along the curve. Likewise, the gravitational potential energy gained in falling from an initial height ${\displaystyle y_{0}\,}$ to a height ${\displaystyle y\,}$ is ${\displaystyle mg(y_{0}-y)\,}$, thus:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{2}}m\left({\frac {d\ell }{dt}}\right)^{2}&=mg(y_{0}-y)\\{\frac {d\ell }{dt}}&=\pm {\sqrt {2g(y_{0}-y)}}\\dt&=\pm {\frac {d\ell }{\sqrt {2g(y_{0}-y)}}}\\dt&=-{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2g(y_{0}-y)}}}{\frac {d\ell }{dy}}\,dy\end{aligned}}}

In the last equation, we've anticipated writing the distance remaining along the curve as a function of height (${\displaystyle \ell (y))}$, recognized that the distance remaining must decrease as time increases (thus the minus sign), and used the chain rule in the form ${\displaystyle d\ell ={\frac {d\ell }{dy}}dy}$.

Now we integrate from ${\displaystyle y=y_{0}}$ to ${\displaystyle y=0}$ to get the total time required for the particle to fall:

${\displaystyle T(y_{0})=\int _{y=y_{0}}^{y=0}\,dt={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2g}}}\int _{0}^{y_{0}}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {y_{0}-y}}}{\frac {d\ell }{dy}}\,dy}$

This is called Abel's integral equation and allows us to compute the total time required for a particle to fall along a given curve (for which ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$ would be easy to calculate). But Abel's mechanical problem requires the converse given ${\displaystyle T(y_{0})\,}$, we wish to find ${\displaystyle f(y)={\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$, from which an equation for the curve would follow in a straightforward manner. To proceed, we note that the integral on the right is the convolution of ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$ with ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\sqrt {y}}}}$ and thus take the Laplace transform of both sides with respect to variable ${\displaystyle y}$:

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}[T(y_{0})]={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2g}}}{\mathcal {L}}\left[{\frac {1}{\sqrt {y}}}\right]F(s)}$

where ${\displaystyle F(s)={\mathcal {L}}\left[{\frac {d\ell }{dy}}\right]}$ Since ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}\left[{\frac {1}{\sqrt {y}}}\right]={\sqrt {\frac {\pi }{s}}}}$, we now have an expression for the Laplace transform of ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$ in terms of ${\displaystyle T(y_{0})\,}$'s Laplace transform:

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}\left[{\frac {d\ell }{dy}}\right]={\sqrt {\frac {2g}{\pi }}}s^{\frac {1}{2}}{\mathcal {L}}[T(y_{0})]}$

This is as far as we can go without specifying ${\displaystyle T(y_{0})\,}$. Once ${\displaystyle T(y_{0})\,}$ is known, we can compute its Laplace transform, calculate the Laplace transform of ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$ and then take the inverse transform (or try to) to find ${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$.

For the tautochrone problem, ${\displaystyle T(y_{0})=T_{0}\,}$ is constant. Since the Laplace transform of 1 is ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{s}}}$, i.e., ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}[T(y_{0})]={\frac {T_{0}}{s}}}$, we find the shape function ${\displaystyle f(y)={\frac {d\ell }{dy}}}$:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}F(s)={\mathcal {L}}\left[{\frac {d\ell }{dy}}\right]&={\sqrt {\frac {2g}{\pi }}}s^{\frac {1}{2}}{\mathcal {L}}[T_{0}]\\&={\sqrt {\frac {2g}{\pi }}}T_{0}s^{-{\frac {1}{2}}}\end{aligned}}}

Making use again of the Laplace transform above, we invert the transform and conclude:

${\displaystyle {\frac {d\ell }{dy}}=T_{0}{\frac {\sqrt {2g}}{\pi }}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {y}}}}$

It can be shown that the cycloid obeys this equation. It needs one step further to do the integral with respect to ${\displaystyle y}$ to obtain the expression of the path shape.

(Simmons, Section 54).