Various searches and following links backwards and forwards digs up some other guides not on this template. Some may not want to be on the template, but some might and should be asked. Would also be good to look at the discussions about such guides from last year, as I recall some moments of controversy that could be avoided if the same applies this year. Carcharoth (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Guess we can but ask :) 01:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

If you want to search and ask, "ACE2009" turns up at least two other guides. Carcharoth (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Got all of 'em that are currently indexed, I think. And cleaned up the template code. --MZMcBride (talk) 09:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

These sort of guides should be allowed but should not be linked to via a template. This allows certain established insiders to have an unfair influence on an election that is already heavily stacked towards established insiders. Polargeo 2 (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Not sure anyone's paying attention to the watchlist of a dead template, chief. I will raise the issue at this year's election talkpage later, as it is worth discussing. Skomorokh 16:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)