Template talk:Seasons in English football

WikiProject Football / English / Season article (Rated Template-class)
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
This template is supported by the English football task force.
This template is supported by the season article task force.

Number of seasons displayed

Is the template really that big that we can only show 10 seasons at a time? To show everything would require just one more row than (for example) Template:Stoke City F.C. seasons, which looks fine. It is frustrating not to be able to navigate directly to similar articles, so I propose that all articles be displayed in the navbox. If it really is too big (and I'm not sure if there is some limit or guideline on the size of navboxes) why not show (say) 50 seasons at a time? --Jameboy (talk) 20:18, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I should add that WP:NAV does say that navboxes "should be kept small in size", however these season articles are all part of the same set. --Jameboy (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I think it should show them all. Number 57 16:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree it should show them all, make it auto-collapsed so nobody gets scared. GiantSnowman 17:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Agreed, it should show them all. I've lost count of the number of times I've tried to access one season page from another but been denied because the gap between them is bigger than five. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 07:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Can't say I disagree with this. Only 10 seasons at a time is a ridiculously small number. Lukeno94 (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
There seems to be consensus so I have gone ahead and changed it. I'm no template expert so please make any fixes you see fit. I didn't change anything related to the categories, only the main list display. To save on number of rows, I didn't do the "decade alignment", but I'm open to changing that if people think it is worthwhile. --Jameboy (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
It looks good to me. It might become an issue when there are 300+ articles but I don't think we need to worry about that! Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 28 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number 57 15:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

– We had better facilitate concordance between a particular template's name and a related article's name, category's name. I wish they would match Category:Seasons in English football, Category:Seasons in Indian football, Football in England and Category:Football in England. They should bring into line with established naming conventions Template:Seasons in Brazilian football, Template:Seasons in French football, Template:Football in Germany, and so on. Sawol (talk) 07:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I went ahead and moved the Indian football template after seeing no objections here, and receiving a separate move request on my talk page. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.