Template_talk:Wakefield,_West_Yorkshire

Template talk:Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Template talk:Wakefield, West Yorkshire


WikiProject iconYorkshire Template‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTemplate:Wakefield, West Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis template has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 10 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 06:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)



Template:Wakefield, West YorkshireTemplate:Wakefield – Per Wakefield, WY is primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Relisting. (t · c) buidhe 07:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Is this necessary, Crouch, Swale? With primary topics, we tolerate the introduction of some ambiguity because this will facilitate searches for a major portion of readers. But this consideration is absent outside of the reader-facing parts of the encyclopedia. {{Wakefield, West Yorkshire}} has the advantage of being precise and unambiguous, and I'm struggling to see what benefit there would be in making its title shorter. This is a navbox, so there's no need to try saving editors typing time. – Uanfala (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
    Well it makes it easier for those wanting to add a template to articles since users are likely to assume it matches the main article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
    I'd tend to agree with Uanfala. Fiddling around with Template titles, and other things that readers don't see is often an unnecessary waste if time, for no real benefit.   Amakuru (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
    I'll also add that Wakefield, West Yorkshire may not keep its primary topic forever, given the traffic that Wakefield (TV series) has been getting. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Uanfala. Soroka is not forgotten, NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 16:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Template_talk:Wakefield,_West_Yorkshire, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.