{{editprotected}} At Template:WikiProject Poland/sandbox the code has been updated to support the meta-template (this one is fairly simple as it is only quality and importance). One category will end up being renamed as well, which is fairly simple to do once updated. I also update it to put the documentation on a subpage (already made) which is commonly done now on protected templates especially. —Borgarde^talk 09:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Please create the Unassessed category ASAP, as well as any of the mentioned optional categories that the Poland project wishes to utilise. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. Thanks.—Borgarde^talk 10:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} One slight error, please change: |PROJECT = WikiProject Poland to |PROJECT = Poland This will fix the error in the displayed when the banners are shelled. Everything else is fine. —Borgarde^talk 10:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 10:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

{{editprotected}}

|QUALITY_SCALE=subpage

To allow Future and Book classes. Severo^TC 11:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Not done:. The custom class mask does not currently support the B-class checklist which this banner uses. This will need to be fixed to avoid reclassifying hundreds of articles. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:31, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

I think I've fixed that. If there's still problems with it, let me know and I'll fix it. Severo^TC 18:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

I am curious what is the edit about? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

To allow future and book class assessments, for things where "unassessed" and NA just don't work that well. Severo^TC 18:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

It might be better to propose this on the project talk page first. Future-class is a rarely used class and other project members might have a view of this. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Agree with Martin, it'd probably be best to discuss this change on WT:POLAND.  Not done for now. decltype (talk) 07:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I guess we can spam that on the project's talk page. Personally I don't care one way or another, and I doubt anybody else will, but it will make the project look more active. Severo, I do appreciate you caring - as with much else, usually a lot of things like this are carried by one person :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 07:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Raised with no objection for one week. Severo^TC 08:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

 Done. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The B class checklist is missing the sixth criterion. Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Assessment#Quality scale has implemented the accessibility criterion. Therefor the comment out brackets need to be removed from b6. Specifically:

line 15 of the template under QUALITY_SCALE

Currently reads:

|b1={{{b1|}}}|b2={{{b2|}}}|b3={{{b3|}}}|b4={{{b4|}}}|b5={{{b5|}}}<!--|b6={{{b6|}}}-->

Should read:

|b1={{{b1|}}}|b2={{{b2|}}}|b3={{{b3|}}}|b4={{{b4|}}}|b5={{{b5|}}}|b6={{{b6|}}}

line 21 of the template under HOOK_ASSESS

Currently reads:

|b1={{{b1|}}}|b2={{{b2|}}}|b3={{{b3|}}}|b4={{{b4|}}}|b5={{{b5|}}}<!--|b6={{{b6|}}}-->

Should read:

|b1={{{b1|}}}|b2={{{b2|}}}|b3={{{b3|}}}|b4={{{b4|}}}|b5={{{b5|}}}|b6={{{b6|}}}

Thanks.   --Bejnar (talk) 03:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not do that. Nobody but me assess those articles, and I am not even sure what this criterion means. I certainly don't feel like ever reassessing the hundreds of articles I've done for this parameter. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

@Piotrus: I assess these articles as well, so do others, see for example Talk:Bataliony Chłopskie. I don't know the history behind the statements at Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Assessment#Quality scale; however, if you don't like them, the place to take that up is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland/Assessment so that it can be changed there. --Bejnar (talk) 06:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I wrote that page, mostly by copying guidelines from similar pages - see it's history. My comment about nobody else doing the assessment comes from the fact that nobody else is posting at Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Reviews. If you do them, and find this criteria useful, and plan on using it, that's fine, I withdraw my objection. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Not done: due to lack of consensus. Bejnar: I suggest you bring this up at the project talk page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Although this template doesn't support |needs-infobox=, Category:Poland articles needing infoboxes exists. Should the parameter be added, or should the category be deleted? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)