Template talk:World trade

WikiProject Trade (Rated Template-class)
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

monetary union

Is monetary union left out of this series on purpose? It seems like it belongs to me, but I'm no expert. Ingrid 16:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I s'pose it might be because it sort of doesn't fit into the logical progression groups of countries have existed who had a monetary union, but little more than that in terms of integration. Nightstallion (?) 18:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
I guess I'm still missing something. Isn't it also true that groups of countries have existed with a trade bloc and little else. Similarly for a customs union or free trade area? I imagine that once you get to a common market, you're pretty well integrated. It would make more sense to me for the template to look like:
Trade Series
International trade
History of international trade
Trade bloc
Free trade area
Customs union
Trade creation
Trade diversion
Monetary union
Common market
Economic and monetary union
But as I said, I'm not an expert, so didn't want to make a change without checking. Ingrid 04:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Trade Templates

While working on current account, I decided to make a trade template. A search didn't turn this one up and because the trade article is so messy, I didn't see this one. It was only after I completed and added this template to the trade article did I notice the trade bloc one. I really think trade is a large enough topic to be deserving of several templates (a big one and some smaller specialized ones) but I'm not sure how best to break them up.

I reccomend we try to figure this out quickly because Wikipedia's trade-related articles are in poor shape; this seems like a good way to start working on them. -David Youngberg 18:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC) certified pharmacy technician

I know this is an old post but I hope we can revive the discussion. I think David is right, the questions of how to improve the templates is still relevant. A concrete first step would be to decide whether we really need a sidebar on "World Trade" and another template which shows at the bottom of an article and which says "International Trade". I think one of the two is redundant. I would suggest to remove the one called "World Trade" (the term is, anyhow, not well-chosen). It would be good if we could agree that sidebars on trade should be more specific than the bottom-page template. Hope someone reads this...Karl Magnus (talk) 14:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Fair trade

Seems that Fair trade should be an item on this template. Morphh (talk) 02:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)