Thomas_of_Cantimpré

Thomas of Cantimpré

Thomas of Cantimpré

Belgian theologian

Thomas of Cantimpré (Latin: Thomas Cantimpratensis or Thomas Cantipratensis[1]) (Sint-Pieters-Leeuw, 1201 – Louvain, 15 May 1272) was a Flemish Catholic medieval writer, preacher, theologian and a friar belonging to the Dominican Order. He is best known for his encyclopedic work on nature De natura rerum, for the moral text Bonum universale de Apibus and for his hagiographical writings.

15th-century illuminated manuscript of Thomas of Cantimpré's De rerum natura. Sheet showing 'monstruous human beings' such as cannibals.

Biography

Thomas of Cantimpré was born of noble parentage in 1201,[2] at Sint-Pieters-Leeuw (a small town near Brussels), in the Duchy of Brabant.

In 1206 his father (returning from Palestine, where he had fought alongside Richard I of England) sent Thomas to Liège, where he began to tackle the difficulties of the trivium and quadrivium, studying from age 5 to age 11; in Liège he also had the chance to meet Jacques de Vitry, who was preaching there.

In 1217, at the age of 16, he entered the Canons Regular of St. Augustine at the Abbey of Cantimpré, near Cambrai,[3] where was later ordained a priest. He was to spend fifteen years at Cantimpré, a constant source of edification for his brethren.

Later, in 1232, Thomas of Cantimpré entered the Dominican Order in Leuven (again in the Brabant), and in 1233 was sent by the Order to Cologne, so that he could pursue advanced theological studies: here, Thomas had the opportunity to study and make progress under the direction Albertus Magnus.

After 4 years in Cologne, Thomas was sent to Paris for further scholarly studies at the Dominican studium of Saint-Jacques, in preparation for his preaching mission.

By 1240, he had returned to Louvain, where he was appointed Magister of philosophy and theology, a charge he exercised with great distinction. In 1246, still at Louvain, he became subprior and lector.

The last part of his life was dedicated to preaching and he undertake missions throughout the Brabant, Germany, Belgium and France: for his great success in this field, Thomas was also honored with the title of "Preacher General".

Thomas of Cantimpré died in Leuven, supposedly on 15 May 1272.[4]

Writings

Thomas of Cantimpré was the author of several works of different types, all written in Latin.

In the hagiographical field, works include the Vita Joannis abbatis primi monasterii Cantimpratensis, a Supplementum ad vitam Mariae Oigniacensis, and also three lives dedicated to holy women belonging to the Diocese of Liège, namely, the'Vita S. Christinae virginis Mirabilis dictae, Vita preclare virginis Margarete de Ypris and Vita Piae Lutgardiae.

A minor work – only 105 lines – is the Hymnus de beato Jordano, written in honor of the blessed Jordan of Saxony (died 1237), a key figure of the Dominican Order.

De natura rerum

Further information: De natura rerum (Cantimpré)

Thomas' most significant work may be 'De natura rerum' (or Liber de natura rerum), a work of natural history to which he dedicated almost twenty years of labour, between 1225 and 1244. Among his publications, it was the one which had the greatest diffusion, as witnessed by the large number of surviving manuscripts, but also by the many authors who later drew upon it.

Bonum universale de apibus

Thomas of Cantimpré was also the author of the Bonum universale de apibus, a work of moral and spiritual edification[5] – composed between 1256/57 and 1263, but probably around 1259[6] – which is based on the allegory of life in a community of bees to deal with issues related to moral conduct and to the duties of superiors and subordinates.

The Bonum universale de apibus is organized in 2 books: the first one (De prelatis) deals with the "prelates" (bishops, abbots and other high-ranking clergy), while the second one (De subditis) deals with subordinates (both monks and laity). Each chapter presents at the beginning the exposition of a property of bees, followed by an allegorical interpretation of a moral kind and then by a series of exempla. While the passages on bees and allegorical interpretations are taken (as the author himself recounts[7]) from 'other books', Thomas takes up the matter of each exemplum "from his own experience or from contemporary oral, religious or secular sources".[8] Overall, the text therefore represents "a treatise on practical theology and morals".[9]

Like the De natura rerum, the Bonum universale had great fortune: the manuscript tradition is prolific, more than a hundred manuscripts.[10] There were made also several prints: a print in Deventer before 1478, then one in Paris and three more (1597, 1605, 1627) in Douai. The text has also inspired many writers during the centuries, including Johannes Nider, who took inspiration from the Bonum universale for the structure of his Formicarius (1436–1438).[11]

A modern critical edition of the work is still lacking.

The Bonum universale de apibus subsequently had wide resonance also because it contains (in the paragraph Cur Iudaei Christianum sanguinem effundant quotannis[12]) the first systematic theorizing of the antisemitic so-called 'Blood Accusation', accusing Jews of the ritual murder of Christians. In an attempt to understand the reason behind these purported rituals, Thomas concocts a theory[13] that since the killing of Christ the Jews suffered from bleeding, as per the mob's cry to Pilate "May his blood be on us and on our children" (Mt 27:25), thus the Jews supposedly killed Christians, and then used their blood in rituals, believing, says Thomas, that in this way they could heal themselves. In fact, he claimed, they had erroneously interpreted to the letter the indication of one of their prophets that "only Christian blood could alleviate this sorrow", when in reality the prophecy figuratively referred to the blood of Christ (only sanguine Christiano), symbolically drunk during the Eucharist: the only good for the Jews would therefore have been conversion to the true faith. Thomas says he learned about this from an unspecified "converted Jew", probably[14] referring to Nicholas Donin.

Within the Bonum universale Thomas also mentions the blasphemous theory of the three impostors, according to which the founders of the three great religions – Moses, Jesus and Muhammad – would "subdue the world with their sects and their teachings: [...] Moses deceived the Jews, Jesus the Christians and Mohammed the Gentiles".[15] Thomas of Cantimpré attributes this idea to the theologian Simon of Tournai[16] (or Simon de Tornaco, as Thomas calls him), a master of theology at the University of Paris who, he claims, deserved (for having said that) an epileptic crisis that made him mute.

Hagiographical Works

Thomas of Cantimpré is also the author of various hagiographical texts, for which he is considered one of the first great authors of mystical hagiography.

With the exception of Vita Joannis abbatis primi monasterii Cantimpratensis – composed between 1224 and 1228[17] and relating to the founder and first abbot of the abbey of Cantimpré – Thomas writes mystical biographies on holy women, all linked to the territory of modern Belgium.

His mystic hagiographical works therefore represent a corpus of texts, composed roughly between 1231 and 1248, which appears as "a florilegium of lives of the holy women living around Liège":[18] through this set of hagiographic works, Thomas of Cantimpré offers "a mirror of the complexity and fluidity of the forms of religious life of the diocese of Liège".[19] It is also possible to analyze in detail the individual works that make up this hagiographical dossier.[20]

Supplementum ad vitam Mariae Oigniacensis

The first hagiographical work by Thomas was actually a Supplementum,[21] to the Life of Mary of Oignies, written in 1215 by Jacques de Vitry regarding the figure of Marie of Oignies.[22]

Thomas writes the Supplementum ad vitam Mariae Oigniacensis around 1230 at the specific request of the community of Oignies (or rather "forced by the prior of Oignies"[19]), who wanted to promote – thanks to the authorship of Thomas[23] – its image.

In addition to being Thomas's first work on a holy woman, the Supplementum is also one of the first written records of life in a Beguine community. Marie of Oignies is in fact one of the most famous beguines: she belonged to those "small republics of semi-religious women [...] protected but together controlled by the ecclesiastical authorities [...] for the creativity of their religious and devotional practices".[24]

Moreover, in the story that he tells of the life of Marie, Thomas shows that he was deeply impressed by her, so much so that he considered her as a teacher. With this c work, he aims at proposing an ideal of Christian life: under the emblem of Marie of Oignies, in fact, the author seeks to convey how "evil is not identifiable only in infidels and heretics, but it nestles in the hearts and in the very bosom of Christianitas".[19]

Vita S. Christinae virginis Mirabilis dictae

Thomas of Cantimpré wrote his first 'autonomous' hagiography, even if it is already his second female portrait (after that of Marie of Oignies), on the life of Christina of St. Trond, a Belgian mystic (died 1224) known as Christina the Astonishing:[25] Thomas writes the work around 1232[26] starting from direct testimonies of those who had known the saint. In the figure of Christina, he again sought to represent an ideal, in this case an "extreme and rarefaction model of perfection, [which] reproposes, after a millennial pause, the mystical horizons of holy madness".[27]

The 'historical' value of this Life is profoundly doubtful (as can be seen also from the comparison with the information that Jacques de Vitry gives on Christina in the Prologue of the aforementioned Vita B. Mariae Oigniensis[26]) but on the literary level for this type of texts does not count so much the 'historical' truth, but rather the model of sanctity that emerges from the work.[28]

Vita preclare virginis Margarete de Ypris

The Vita preclare virginis Margarete de Ypris (or Vita Beatae Margaritae Iprensis) is the second "autonomous" mystical hagiography of Thomas, dedicated to the life of Margaret of Ypres,[29] A Belgian Blessed who died in 1237.

The Vita Margaritae was composed on commission[30] by the Dominican preacher Sigieri da Lilla certainly before 1244,[31] but probably long before that year: in fact, the tone of the story gives a "feeling of proximity and immediacy".[32]

From the impression that is given in the work, it is clear that through the figure of Margeret Thomas sought to propose an ideal of feminine devotion according to the Dominican vision; in the Life dedicated to her, in fact, Margaret represents the evidence that "female perfection is expressed in silence, in prayer and in submission".[27] We do not want to propose a need for isolation: the blessed is indeed – again coherently with the Dominican ideals – deeply "tied to the new reality of the presence of the Preachers in cities".[27]

Here Thomas of Cantimpré clearly expresses the Dominican conception of the centrality of the female presence, which "has an irreplaceable value for the success of the mission",[33] just as stated, in the same years, by the "Master General of the Order Jordan of Saxony".[33]

Vita Piae Lutgardiae

The Thomas' hagiographical masterpiece is certainly the Vita Piae Lutgardiae (or Vita Lutgardis), a work "far more elaborate and complete than the previous texts",[34] It is the life of Lutgardis of Tongres,[35] who died in 1246 and later became the saint patron of Flanders. Thomas wrote the work in 1248, but later reworked it in 1254–1255.

Unlike the two previous Vitae, linked to figures of secular penitents, with the Vita Lutgardis Thomas set out to portray of a Cistercian nun of Aywières: it is therefore "a cloistered portrait", that the author uses to explain "the mystical meaning of the enclosure, [...] atopic space in which it is possible to live the encounter with God in radical terms".[36]

Editions and translations

Editions

For the De natura rerum: Boese Helmut (ed.), Liber de natura rerum, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1973.

For the Bonum universale de apibus: George ColveneerR (ed.), Bonum universale de apibus, Bellerus, 1597. Available online (https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_HS5SAAAAcAAJ/page/n3).

For the Hymnus de beato Jordano: AA.SS., Hymnus de beato Jordano, Februarii tomus II, februarii XIII, Parigi-Roma, 1867, pp. 739–740.

For the Vita Joannis abbatis primi monasterii Cantimpratensis: Robert Godding (ed.), Une œuvre inédite de Thomas de Cantimpré: la «Vita Ioannis Cantipratensis» in «Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique», LXXVI, 1981, pp. 241–316.

For the Supplementum ad vitam Mariae Oigniacensis: Robert B.C. Huygens (ed.), Iacobus de Vitriaco, Vita Marie de Oignies. Thomas Cantipratensis, Supplementum, Turnhout, Brepols, 2012 (Corpus christianorum. Continuatio mediaevalis, 252).

For the Vita S. Christinae virginis Mirabilis dictae: AA.SS., Vita sanctae Christinae mirabilis, Iulii tomus V, iulii XXIV, Parigi-Roma, 1867, pp. 650–660.

For the Vita preclare virginis Margarete de Ypris: Giles Meersseman (ed.), Les frères Prêcheurs et le mouvement dévot en Flandre au XIIIe siècle, in «Archivium Fratrum Praedicatorum», XVIII, 1948, pp. 69–130, pp. 106–130.

For the Vita Piae Lutgardiae: AA.SS., Vita piae Lutgardis, Iunii tomus IV, Iunii XVI, Paris-Roma, 1867, pp. 187–210.

Translations

We indicate here some translations in modern languages:

  • Margot H. King, Thomas de Cantimpré. The Life of Christina the Astonishing, Toronto, Peregrina Publishing, 1999.
  • Barbara Newman (cur.), Thomas of Cantimpré: The Collected Saints' Lives: Abbot John of Cantimpré, Christina the Astonishing, Margaret of Ypres, and Lutgard of Aywières, Turnhout, Brepols, 2008 (Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts, 19).
  • Henri Platelle (cur.), Thomas de Cantimpré. Les exemples du «Livre des abeilles». Une vision médiévale, Turnhout, Brepols, 1997.
  • André Wankenne (cur.), Thomas de Cantimpré. Vie de Sainte Ludgarde, Namur, Presses Universitaires de Namur, 1991.

References

Footnotes

  1. [1]
    Not only ancient sources, but also modern studies and editions evidence some uncertainty about Thomas' Latin name, particularly between the variants Cantipratensis and Cantimpratensis. Here Cantimpratensis has been preferred.
  2. [2]
    The precise date (1201) is indicated in Biografia universale antica e moderna, ossia storia per alfabeto della vita publica e privata di tutte le persone che si distinsero per opere, azioni, talenti, virtù e delitti, vol. LVIII, Venezia, Molinari, 1829, p. 116. The year 1201 is also indicated in Charles Victor Langlois et alii, Histoire littéraire de la France: ouvrage commencé par des religieux bénédictins de la Congrégation de Saint Maur, et continué par des membres de l’Institut, Imprimerie nationale, 1838, p. 177. Other scholars seem to be more cautious, as they just point out that Thomas was born around 1200: see for example Barbara Newman, Introduction, in Id., Thomas of Cantimpré: The Collected Saints' Lives: Abbot John of Cantimpré, Christina the Astonishing, Margaret of Ypres, and Lutgard of Aywières, Turnhout, Brepols, 2008 (Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts, 19), pp. 3–51, p. 3.
  3. [3]
    The abbey was destroyed around during political upheavals in 1580. On this topic, see Biografia universale antica e moderna, p. 117.
  4. [4]
    See Histoire littéraire de la France, p. 177. The day of his death, but not the year, is indicated in an obituary of Leuven Monastery. See Biografia universale antica e moderna, p. 117.
  5. [5]
    Defined by Baudouin van den Abeele, p. 142: «oeuvre d’édification morale et spirituelle appuyée d’exempla et de similitudes tirées de la vie des abeilles».
  6. [6]
    On the dating, cf. Nicholas Louis, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, p. 31.
  7. [7]
    See Nicholas Louis, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, p. 32.
  8. [8]
    Nicholas Louis, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, p. 32: «tirés da sa propre expérience ou de sources orales contemporaines, religieuses ou laïques».
  9. [9]
    Nicholas LOUIS, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, p. 32: «traité de théologie pratique et de morale».
  10. [10]
    For a list of the work's manuscripts see Arlima (https://www.arlima.net/qt/thomas_de_cantimpre.doc#), but also the more specific and well-structured list in Nicolas Louis, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, pp. 52–56.
  11. [11]
    About that topic, see Catherine CHÊNE, Des fourmis et des hommes. Le «Formicarius» (1436–1438) de Jean Nider O.P., in «Micrologus. Natura, scienze e società medievali. Rivista della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», VIII, tomo I, 2000, pp. 297–350.
  12. [12]
    Bonum universale de apibus, liber II, cap. XXIX, § 23; the text (ed. cit., pp. 304–305) can be found at this link: https://web.archive.org/web/20070713201743/http://www.uni-rier.de/uni/fb3/geschichte/cluse/eu/dt_q1271.doc .
  13. [13]
    Cf. Albert Ehrman, The Origins of the Ritual Murder Accusation and Blood Libel, in «Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought», XV, n. 14, 1976, pp. 83–90, p. 86.
  14. [14]
    This is the opinion argued by H.L. Strack, (Blood Accusation, in The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. III, New York, Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1902, p. 260), but also by Ehrman, The Origins of the Ritual Murder Accusation and Blood Libel, p. 89, n. 13.
  15. [15]
    Thomas of Cantimpré, Bonum universale de apibus, ed. cit., p. 440. The text can be found at this link: https://web.archive.org/web/20070713201743/http://www.uni-rier.de/uni/fb3/geschichte/cluse/eu/dt_q1271.doc .
  16. [16]
    Please notice that he is not the XII century's homonyms canonical (1130–1201), which has a Wiki page. About this man, cf. Charles Victor Langlois et alii, Histoire littéraire de la France, pp. 391–392.
  17. [17]
    See Katrien Heene, Hagiography and Gender: A Tentative Case-Study on Thomas of Cantimpré, in «Scribere sanctorum gesta». Recueil d’études d’hagiographie médiévale offert à Guy Philippart, curr. Étienne Renard – Michel TrigaletT – Xavier Hermand, – Paul Bertrand, Turnhout, Brepols, 2005 (Hagiologia. Etudes sur la saintété en Occident. Studies on Western Sainthood 3), pp. 109–123, p. 109.
  18. [18]
    Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli, Mistici e mistica domenicana, in L’Ordine dei Predicatori. I Domenicani: storia, figure e istituzioni. 1216–2016, curr. Gianni Festa A e Marco Rainini, Bari, Laterza, 2016, pp. 351–388, pp. 365–366.
  19. [19]
    Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli, Mistici e mistica domenicana, p. 365.
  20. [20]
    This is how it is defined also by Barbara Newman, Introduction, p. 4.
  21. [21]
    See Hugh Feiss (cur.), Thomas de Cantimpré. Supplement to The life of Marie d’Oignies, Saskatoon, Peregrina Publishing, 1987, p. 12.
  22. [22]
    Cf. profile of Marie of Oignies (1177–1213) in Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli – Antonella degli’Innocenti – Francesco Santi, Scrittrici mistiche europee. Secoli XII-XIII, vol. I, Firenze, SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2015 (La mistica cristiana tra Oriente e Occidente, 24), pp. 112–151.
  23. [23]
    See Rachel Ulton e Bruce W. Holsinger, History in the Comic Mode: Medieval Communities and the Matter of Person, New York, Columbia University Press, 2007, p. 46.
  24. [24]
    Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli, Mistici e mistica domenicana, p. 364.
  25. [25]
    See the profile of 'Cristina l’Ammirabile' (1150–1224) in Scrittrici mistiche, pp. 152–185.
  26. [26]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, p. 152.
  27. [27]
    Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli, Mistici e mistica domenicana, p. 366.
  28. [28]
    See Gennaro Luongo, Santi martiri, in Forme e modelli della santità in Occidente dal Tardo antico al Medioevo, curr. Massimiliano Bassetti – Antonella degl’Innocenti – Enrico Mendestò, Spoleto, Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 2012, pp. 1–33, pp. 1–2.
  29. [29]
    See the profile of Margaret of Ypres (1216–1237) in Scrittrici mistiche, pp. 214–232.
  30. [30]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, p. 555.
  31. [31]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, pp. 214–215.
  32. [32]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, p. 215.
  33. [33]
    Alessandra Bartolomei Romagnoli, Mistici e mistica domenicana, p. 367.
  34. [34]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, p. 556.
  35. [35]
    See the profile of 'Lutgarda di Aywières' (1182–1246) in Scrittrici mistiche, pp. 233–273.
  36. [36]
    See Scrittrici mistiche, p. 234. On the reasons of the redrafting see Scrittrici mistiche, p. 555.

Bibliography

  • Bartolomei Romagnoli, Alessandra – degli’Innocenti, Antonella – Santi, Francesco, Scrittrici mistiche europee. Secoli XII-XIII, vol. I, Firenze, SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2015 (La mistica cristiana tra Oriente e Occidente, 24).
  • Bartolomei Romagnoli, Alessandra, Agiografia e mistica nel Duecento: le «Vitae matrum» di Tommaso da Cantimpré, in «Hagiographica. Rivista di agiografia e biografia della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», XVII, 2010, pp. 207–252.
  • Bartolomei Romagnoli, Alessandra, Lutgarda nella mistica femminile, in «Hagiographica. Rivista di agiografia e biografia della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», XIX, 2012, pp. 221–281.
  • Bartolomei Romagnoli, Alessandra, Mistici e mistica domenicana, in L’Ordine dei Predicatori. I Domenicani: storia, figure e istituzioni. 1216–2016, curr. Gianni Festa e Marco Rainini Bari, Laterza, 2016, pp. 351–388.
  • Biografia universale antica e moderna, ossia storia per alfabeto della vita publica e privata di tutte le persone che si distinsero per opere, azioni, talenti, virtù e delitti, vol. LVIII, Venezia, Molinari, 1829, pp. 116–119 [Tommaso di Cantimpré].
  • Chêne, Catherine, Des fourmis et des hommes. Le «Formicarius» (1436–1438) de Jean Nider O.P., in «Micrologus. Natura, scienze e società medievali. Rivista della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», VIII, tomo I, 2000, pp. 297–350.
  • DE VOGÜÉ Adalbert, Une citation remarquable de Grégoire le Grand (In «I Reg.» 1,5) dans la «Vie de Jean de Cantimpré», in «Revue bénédictine», XCVIII, 1988, pp. 327–328.
  • DOonnadieu, Jean, Entre sentiment et ambition: les réseaux de Jacques de Vitry au miroir du «Supplementum ad Vitam Mariae Oignacensis» de Thomas de Cantimpré, in Vivre en société au Moyen Age. Occident chrétien, VIe-XVe siècle, curr. Claude CAROZZI – Daniel LE BLEVEC – Huguette TAVIANI-CAROZZI, Aix-en-Provence, Publications de l’Université de Provence, 2008, pp. 133–49.
  • Ehrman, Albert, The Origins of the Ritual Murder Accusation and Blood Libel, in «Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought», XV, n. 14, Rabbinical Council of America, 1976, pp. 83–90.
  • Feiss, Hugh (cur.), Thomas de Cantimpré. Supplement to The life of Marie d’Oignies, Saskatoon, Peregrina Publishing, 1987.
  • Friedman, John Block, Albert the Great’s Topoi of Direct Observation and His Debt to Thomas of Cantimpré, in Pre-Modern Encyclopaedic Texts. Proceedings of the Second COMERS Congress, Groningen, 1–4 July 1996, cur. Peter Binkley, Leiden-New York-Köln, Brill, 1997 (Brill's Studies in Intellectual History 79), pp. 379–92.
  • Fulton, Rachel e Holsinger, Bruce W., History in the comic mode medieval communities and the matter of person, New York, Columbia University Press, 2007.
  • Heene, Katrien, Hagiography and Gender: A Tentative Case-Study on Thomas of Cantimpré, in «Scribere sanctorum gesta». Recueil d’études d’hagiographie médiévale offert à Guy Philippart, curr. Etienne Renard – Michel Trigalet – Xavier Hermand – Paul Bertrand, Turnhout, Brepols, 2005 (Hagiologia. Etudes sur la saintété en Occident. Studies on Western Sainthood 3), pp. 109–123.
  • Herbermann, Charles George (ed.), The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. XIV, New York, The Encyclopedia Press, 1913, pp. 693–694 [Thomas of Cantimpré]. Consultabile online: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14693c.htm. [url consultato il 24-04-2019].
  • King, Margot H., Jacques de Vitry. The life of Marie d’Oignies, Toronto, Peregrina Publishing, 1989.
  • Langlois, S Charles Victor et alii, Histoire littéraire de la France: ouvrage commencé par des religieux bénédictins de la Congrégation de Saint Maur, et continué par des membres de l’Institut, vol. XIX, Paris, Imprimerie nationale, 1838, pp. 177–184 [Thomas de Cantimpré] e pp. 388–394 [Simon, chanoine de Tournai].
  • Louis, Nicolas, Essaimage et usages du «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré, in Lecteurs, lectures et groupes sociaux au Moyen Age. Actes de la journée d’études organisée par le Centre de recherches «Pratiques médiévales de l’écrit» (PraME) de l’Université de Namur et le Département des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque royale de Belgique, Bruxelles, 18 mars 2010, curr. Xavier Hermand, – Etienne Renard – Céline Van Hoorbeeck, Turnhout, Brepols, 2014 (Texte, Codex et Contexte 17), pp. 29–56.
  • Luongo, Gennaro, Santi martiri, in Forme e modelli della santità in Occidente dal Tardo antico al Medioevo, curr. Massimiliano Bassetti – Antonella degli'Innocenti – Enrico Menestò, Spoleto, Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 2012, pp. 1–33.
  • Newman, Barbara, Introduction, in Id., Thomas of Cantimpré: The Collected Saints' Lives: Abbot John of Cantimpré, Christina the Astonishing, Margaret of Ypres, and Lutgard of Aywières, Turnhout, Brepols, 2008 (Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts, 19), pp. 3–51.
  • Platelle, Henri, L’image des Juifs dans Thomas de Cantimpré: de l’attirance à la repulsion, in «Bulletin de la Société nationale des antiquaires de France», LXIV, Paris, 1982, pp. 334–336.
  • Platelle, Henri, Une vision médiévale: les historiettes du Livre des abeilles de Thomas de Cantimpré, in Id., Présence de l’Au-delà. Une vision médiévale du monde, Paris, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2004, pp. 137–147.
  • Pollini, Nadia, La nature dans le «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré entre philosophie naturelle et instruction morale?, in «Exempla docent»: les exemples des philosophes de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Actes du colloque international 23–25 octobre 2003, Université de Neuchâtel, cur. Thomas RICKLIN, Paris, Vrin, 2006 (Etudes de philosophie médiévale 92), pp. 151–162.
  • Pollini, Nadia, Les propriétés des abeilles dans le «Bonum universale de apibus» de Thomas de Cantimpré (1200–1270), in «Micrologus. Natura, scienze e società medievali. Rivista della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», VIII, tomo I, 2000, pp. 261–296.
  • Pyle, Cynthia M., The Art and Science of Renaissance Natural History: Thomas of Cantimpré, Candido Decembrio, Conrad Gessner, and Teodoro Ghisi in Vatican Library MS Urb. lat. 276, in «Viator», XXVII, 1996, pp. 265–321.
  • Strack, H.L., Blood Accusation, in The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. III, New York, Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1902, pp. 260–267. Consultabile online: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3408-blood-accusation [url consultato il 24-04-2019].
  • Van den Abeele, Baudouin, A la recherche de l'Experimentator de Thomas de Cantimpre, in Expertus sum, SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo, Firenze, 2010, pp. 41–65.
  • Van den Abeele, Baudouin, Diffusion et avatars d’une encyclopédie: le Liber de natura rerum de Thomas de Cantimpré, in Une lumière venue d’ailleurs, curr. G. DE CALLATAŸ e B. Van den Abeele, Louvain-la-Neuve, Brepols, 2008, pp. 141–176.
  • Van den Abeele, Baudouin, Encyclopédies en milieu de cour, in «Micrologus. Natura, scienze e società medievali. Rivista della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», XVI, 2008, pp. 31–55.
  • Van den Abeele, Baudouin, Migrations médiévales de la grue, in «Micrologus. Natura, scienze e società medievali. Rivista della Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medio Evo Latino», VIII, tomo I, 2000, pp. 65–78.
  • Archives de littérature du Moyen Âge (ARLIMA)
  • Public Domain Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Thomas of Cantimpré". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  • The digitalization of an illustrated manuscript of the De natura rerum: https://patrimoine-numerique.ville-valenciennes.fr/ark:/29755/B_596066101_MS_0320.
  • The Bonum universale de apibus on archive.org https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_UM5bV2aYqGAC.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Thomas_of_Cantimpré, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.