Wikipedia:MFD

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion


Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.

Filtered versions of the page are available at

Information on the process

What may be nominated for deletion here:

  • Pages not covered by other XFD venues, including pages in these namespaces: Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText: and the various Talk: namespaces
  • Userboxes (regardless of namespace)
  • Pages in the File namespace that have a local description page but no local file (if there is a local file, Wikipedia:Files for discussion is the right venue)
  • Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XfD venue.

Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.

Before nominating a page for deletion

Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:

Deleting pages in your own userspace
  • If you want to have your own userpage or a draft you created deleted, there is no need to list it here; simply tag it with {{db-userreq}} or {{db-u1}}. If you wish to clear your user talk page or sandbox, just blank it.
Duplications in draftspace?
  • Duplications in draftspace are usually satisfactorily fixed by redirection. If the material is in mainspace, redirect the draft to the article, or a section of the article. If multiple draft pages on the same topic have been created, tag them for merging. See WP:SRE.
Deleting pages in other people's userspace
  • Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding {{subst:Uw-userpage}} ~~~~  to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using {{db-userreq}}.
  • Take care not to bite newcomers – sometimes using the {{subst:welcome}} or {{subst:welcomeg}} template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first.
  • Problematic userspace material is often addressed by the User pages guidelines including in some cases removal by any user or tagging to clarify the content or to prevent external search engine indexing. (Examples include copies of old, deleted, or disputed material, problematic drafts, promotional material, offensive material, inappropriate links, 'spoofing' of the MediaWiki interface, disruptive HTML, invitations or advocacy of disruption, certain kinds of images and image galleries, etc) If your concern relates to these areas consider these approaches as well, or instead of, deletion.
  • User pages about Wikipedia-related matters by established users usually do not qualify for deletion.
  • Articles that were recently deleted at AfD and then moved to userspace are generally not deleted unless they have lingered in userspace for an extended period of time without improvement to address the concerns that resulted in their deletion at AfD, or their content otherwise violates a global content policy such as our policies on Biographies of living persons that applies to any namespace.
Policies, guidelines and process pages
  • Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the policy as {{historical}} or redirecting it somewhere.
  • Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors.
WikiProjects and their subpages
  • It is generally preferable that inactive WikiProjects not be deleted, but instead be marked as {{WikiProject status|inactive}}, redirected to a relevant WikiProject, or changed to a task force of a parent WikiProject, unless the WikiProject was incompletely created or is entirely undesirable.
  • WikiProjects that were never very active and which do not have substantial historical discussions (meaning multiple discussions over an extended period of time) on the project talk page should not be tagged as {{historical}}; reserve this tag for historically active projects that have, over time, been replaced by other processes or that contain substantial discussion (as defined above) of the organization of a significant area of Wikipedia. Before deletion of an inactive project with a founder or other formerly active members who are active elsewhere on Wikipedia, consider userfication.
  • Notify the main WikiProject talk page when nominating any WikiProject subpage, in addition to standard notification of the page creator.
Alternatives to deletion
  • Normal editing that doesn't require the use of any administrator tools, such as merging the page into another page or renaming it, can often resolve problems.
  • Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.
Alternatives to MfD
  • Speedy deletion If the page clearly satisfies a "general" or "user" speedy deletion criterion, tag it with the appropriate template. Be sure to read the entire criterion, as some do not apply in the user space.

Please familiarize yourself with the following policies

How to list pages for deletion

Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:

More information Instructions on listing pages for deletion: ...

Administrator instructions

More information V, Jan ...

Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.

Archived discussions

A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.

Current discussions

Pages currently being considered for deletion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section.

April 18, 2024

User:Juechenliu

User:Juechenliu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8A%89%E6%9F%94%E9%81%A0 Flounder fillet (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete stale non-translated content as a misuse of a user page that shouldn't be moved anywhere.—Alalch E. 11:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Mr14113

User:Mr14113 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be%C5%BEi%C4%8Dna_ad-hok_mre%C5%BEa Flounder fillet (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete stale non-translated content as a misuse of a user page that shouldn't be moved anywhere; article exists at Vehicular ad hoc network.—Alalch E. 11:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Afzalkhan87

User:Afzalkhan87 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Clearly mostly a malformed partial copy of a mainspace article. WP:COPIES Flounder fillet (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Nasir Ullah

User:Nasir Ullah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Chitral (princely state). Flounder fillet (talk) 08:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Blackwater2015

User:Blackwater2015 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of a Wikipedia: namespace page, attribution violation. Flounder fillet (talk) 08:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ill Camille
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted. (non-admin closure)Alalch E. 12:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Ill Camille

User:Ill Camille (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page appears to be an unreferenced autobiography of a living person, and is promotional. This has been the only editing by this editor. Either this is not intended as a Wikipedia draft, and is web hosting by an editor who is not otherwise using Wikipedia, or it is intended as a Wikipedia draft, in which case it is an unreferenced biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy Delete - G11 promotional user page with promotional username. Flounder fillet (talk) 07:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Additional information: this is one of hundreds if not thousands of similar user pages that exist solely to promote random musicians and were created by users with no mainspace edits. I am not exaggerating. Not sure why there are so many, possibly created by some kind of spammer-for-hire service. Flounder fillet (talk) 10:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
If you've identified a cluster of such pages it's fine to tag them en masse with the appropriate speedy deletion tags. —Alalch E. 12:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Requested G11.—Alalch E. 12:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

User:Suraj Kr Sarkar

User:Suraj Kr Sarkar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is a partial copy of Torsa River, and so is a redundant fork. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Agree, this article should be deleted. Bduke (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Rayan al-ahmary

User:Rayan al-ahmary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page, which is the only edit by this editor, appears to be a translation of a copy of Samarium cobalt magnet from Arabic. It is a redundant fork, and so not a current copy of Wikipedia's information on the subject, and an attribution violation. The question that is known only to the editor, if even to them, is why an editor would do nothing but create a translation of a page into Arabic and save it as a user page. Regardless of why, it is not permitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:DON RAJA

User:DON RAJA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is an old copy of Portal:Geography, and is the only edit made by this one-edit wonder. As a copy of a portal, it is a redundant fork that has none of the navigational features of a portal. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Yes, delete it. Bduke (talk) 03:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete.—Alalch E. 12:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

April 17, 2024

User:Giomurtaz

User:Giomurtaz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Machine translation shows that this is a copy from Wikipedia of a large amount of information about Minecraft. This has been the only editing by this user, except that the user talk page is a copy of the Roblox page, probably by the same user but logged out, and in English. This is probably U5 and in any case is not related to the English Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 02:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Plgu-lds

User:Plgu-lds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)
User:Plgu-lds/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This user page and this sandbox appear to be almost identical, and are the only edits made by this editor. They are almost certainly copied from a copyrighted source (although I did not find it on a brief search). They are not in any form resembling drafts and so do not appear to be related to Wikipedia. They are probably U5 and probably G12. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - +68,145‎ edit saved only half an hour after the previous one, user definitely copied at least a significant part of this page from somewhere without crediting the original author. Flounder fillet (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Giomurtaz

User talk:Giomurtaz (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox Flounder fillet (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Handmarvin/sandbox

User:Handmarvin/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Ancient WP: COPIES of Roblox. Flounder fillet (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Littlef08

User:Littlef08 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox created by blocked vandal. Flounder fillet (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 12:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Foodgamer2020

User:Foodgamer2020 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox (again) Flounder fillet (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Roman middlewich

User:Roman middlewich (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox Flounder fillet (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Jaestin123th7/sandbox

User:Jaestin123th7/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Partial WP:COPIES of Roblox. Flounder fillet (talk) 19:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment - This is a fragmentary copy. Probably the same human in June 2021. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Attribution violation. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikitree1354/sandbox

User:Wikitree1354/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

More WP:COPIES of Roblox Flounder fillet (talk) 19:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment - Not !voting at this time. This is not really a copy, so much as multiple copies of a piece of the Roblox article. Will check whether this is a valid test in a sandbox. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Attribution violation. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Jmint21

User:Jmint21 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Crudely copy-pasted WP:COPIES of Roblox and YouTube Flounder fillet (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - These never were complete copies, and incomplete copies are useless. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Infolksman/sandbox

User:Infolksman/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox created by a user blocked for LTA. Flounder fillet (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:BarryYT

User:BarryYT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox Flounder fillet (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as a redundant fork of an existing article, which does not match the content of the article as the article is updated.

User:Aidil2018

User:Aidil2018 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page consists of predictions of political events, and outlines for predictions of sports events, that were in the future at the time that it was created, but are now in the past. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. These predictions were the primary editing of two user accounts, almost certainly one human, who made only a few other edits. They are marginal as to U5, and were crystal balling. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - Not blatant, but still a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation - user was clearly trying to use Wikipedia as some kind of free substitute for spreadsheet software for purposes unrelated to the project. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:The8Annihilator/sandbox

User:The8Annihilator/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox Flounder fillet (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Guillermo Morán Loyola

User:Guillermo Morán Loyola (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

A machine translation of this user page from the Spanish begins: "Architectural synthesis. Compendium of personal research." So this appears to be original research by an editor whose only contribution was this original research. It will never be a viable draft, both because it has no references, and because it is original research. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - likely a use of Wikipedia for unrelated purposes, therefore a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete compendium of personal research per nom.—Alalch E. 12:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:منجى محروس

User:منجى محروس (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Machine translation from Arabic shows that this is a very long and very poorly organized discussion of Christian scriptures, by an editor who created it in their user page, and has not used Wikipedia otherwise. It is not clear whether this was meant to be a draft article or a school assignment or whatever, so it is not obviously a candidate for U5, but it can never be brought into any usable form. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - User posted this massive page 12 minutes after creating an account, this is 100% copy-pasted and probably copyvio (copyvio checker unfortunately doesn't work for Arabic). Flounder fillet (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Jamayare21

User:Jamayare21 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Machine translation shows that this is an unreferenced draft article about a village in Hiraan in Somalia. It is the only contribution of an editor who did nothing else. It does not qualify for U5 because it appears to be a poor-quality draft, but it is not about to be part of the English Wikipedia either in its current form or in a machine translation. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - WP:COPIES of https://so.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceel_Cali Flounder fillet (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Txsasdx3000bot2

User:Txsasdx3000bot2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Roblox. Flounder fillet (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Edison Broce Urriola

User:Edison Broce Urriola (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is an unreferenced autobiography of a living person. The subject appears to be politically notable, but that notability is not verified, and verifiability is a non-negotiable policy. Creating this fake article in user space was the only activity by this editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Delete - unreferenced BLP, also given the length and the fact that this was created in a single edit this is likely either a copy or copyvio. Different article about same subject already exists in mainspace. Flounder fillet (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Elbertajrq

User:Elbertajrq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is an unreferenced autobiography of a living person . The fact that the subject is politically notable is not a reason to keep an unreferenced BLP. McClenon mobile (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 10:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Also delete User:Elbertajrq/sandbox for the same reasons. Shorter, newer, referenced article about this individual exists on mainspace. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Financial Assistant

User:Financial Assistant (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Financial Stability Flounder fillet (talk) 04:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Yo Yo Sourav Kundu

User:Yo Yo Sourav Kundu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Appears to be crudely copypasted from mainspace, likely from the deleted article Hirdesh Singh. BLP in userspace, multiple unsourced paragraphs, would require repair to restore inline citations where they were present in the original. Flounder fillet (talk) 04:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Albanianhistory111

User:Albanianhistory111 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Montenegro Flounder fillet (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - This is a malformed copy of an article, and so has the disadvantages of a proper copy, but has other disadvantages also. It has no apparent utility . Robert McClenon (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LeniRico
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted. (non-admin closure)Alalch E. 08:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:LeniRico

User:LeniRico (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

On its face, this user page is an unreferenced autobiography of a living person. Because it is unreferenced, there is no way to be sure that it is or is not true, but on two readings, it seems to be the originator's fantasy. If it is not true, then it is a hoax. If it is true, it is still an unreferenced biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete - blatant U5 as personal webpage and/or writing not relevant to Wikipedia. Flounder fillet (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with the above. Bduke (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Requested G12 (and U5).—Alalch E. 01:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    And deleted for WP:G11 too. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

User:Leakerman42

User:Leakerman42 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Selena Gomez Flounder fillet (talk) 01:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:ERIC SAMUEL KUHOGA

User:ERIC SAMUEL KUHOGA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is a resume by a user who has made no other use of Wikipedia than to post this resume, and so can be deleted as U5. It is also an unreferenced biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete U5 is a criterion for speedy deletion. A speedy deletable page is obviously also deletable. Flounder fillet (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - agree with above. Bduke (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Andrea Firmin

User:Andrea Firmin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This user page is an unreferenced biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - as U5/G11 explicit use of a user page as a personal webpage and self-promotion. Flounder fillet (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - agree with above. Bduke (talk) 02:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Anonymous ddoser

User:Anonymous ddoser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of bankruptcy Flounder fillet (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Letstrybetaaccount

User:Letstrybetaaccount (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Linux. Flounder fillet (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:YahyaMardanshahe

User:YahyaMardanshahe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of Death of Mahsa Amini Flounder fillet (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - This is a fully referenced copy of an article in user space by a user who has done nothing else, and so is a content fork that will not be updated. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

April 16, 2024

User:Naidu Empires

User:Naidu Empires (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of a page on Tamil wikipedia Flounder fillet (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as U5. There has not been any request for translation, but that is not the issue. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Freelearner123

User:Freelearner123 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES. Crude copy-pastes of English language and Respiratory system mixed with each other. Flounder fillet (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - Because this is what the nominator says it is, it is semantically meaningless. It qualifies as U5 by an editor who came to Wikipedia, left this coprolite, and departed. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above comments.—Alalch E. 10:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:THE COOLEST PERSON EVER20324

User:THE COOLEST PERSON EVER20324 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES of list of the tallest people Flounder fillet (talk) 21:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Guaporez

User:Guaporez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Appears to be WP:COPIES of Salsa (dance) Flounder fillet (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - Probably copied for a school assignment. Copies of articles in user space are content forks, which diverge from the articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.—Alalch E. 23:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Aim is important

User:Aim is important (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Appears to be partial WP:COPIES of an old version of historical fiction. (paragraph about Pharaoh is still present in current revision of that page) Flounder fillet (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - A fragmentary copy of an article still is not a permitted use of user space. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.—Alalch E. 23:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Chip tuning

User:Chip tuning (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:FAKEARTICLE, possibly WP:COPIES of an ancient version of chip tuning. Flounder fillet (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:SmartSpace

User:SmartSpace (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Over a decade old one-edit wonder Ctrl+a ctrl+c copy of Abraham Lincoln. WP:COPIES Flounder fillet (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - This is an unsourced copy of a biography of a dead person. It was likely created as homework for a school assignment, but that does not matter one way or the other. It is a content fork because it is not being updated when the article is being edited. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.—Alalch E. 23:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Gilbert roman

User:Gilbert roman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES. Copy of Pape Latyr N'Diaye. Flounder fillet (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikiqedia Encyclopedia

User:Wikiqedia Encyclopedia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Old partial copy of mainspace article. WP:COPIES Flounder fillet (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nominator. Another improper copy, and the work of another blocked one-edit wonder. (Some of the one-edit wonders are not blocked.) Robert McClenon (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.—Alalch E. 23:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:KellyAudio

User:KellyAudio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Flounder fillet (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - As the nominator says, this is a fake article. The creating account is globally locked, maybe as a promotional account. This page was the work of another one-edit wonder. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. WP:COPIES applies; see Gene Lavanchy.—Alalch E. 23:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete U5/G11. Copied content from mainspace BLP as basis for an autobiography. Uhai (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Davis1997

User:Davis1997 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Appears to be an old copy of a mainspace article. WP:COPIES Flounder fillet (talk) 13:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - As per nom, this is an old copy of an article. This copy was made by an editor who made one edit, creating this copy, and then departed. The user may have used it for a school paper, but that is not important. Some of the other nominations by the nominator are similar illustrations. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Question - User:Flounder fillet - Do you have a query that finds these copies by an editor who made one copy and then disappeared? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    The "potential U5s" database report (well, actually a modified version of it, because it's broken right now) detects these along with U5s (and a wide range of other strange user behaviour, I'd say about half of the English-language user pages in it's output are deletion-worthy) because it looks for long userpages of users with no mainspace edits. Flounder fillet (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    Also everything I nominated today is from ordering Cryptic's query by least edits, except "Harry Potter with Tin Tin", which I found because it is one of the longest userpages found by this query in all of Wikipedia. Flounder fillet (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    Interesting. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Keep 'em coming.—Alalch E. 23:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Harry Potter with Tin Tin

User:Harry Potter with Tin Tin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:COPIES. Old copy of Virat Kohli. Flounder fillet (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete - In addition to being a useless copy of an article, this is an unsourced biography of a living person. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment - The editor made one edit, or one surviving edit, to create this copy, and then departed. The nominator is finding them. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.—Alalch E. 23:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

April 15, 2024

Wikipedia:Translation/Urban Network

Wikipedia:Translation/Urban Network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Incomplete translation from Japanese, abandoned since 2008. Other subpages of Wikipedia:Translation such as Wikipedia:Translation/Tanja Ostojić seem to be requests for translation. TSventon (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Isn't there a CSD criterion for this? There certainly should be. Otherwise, delete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment to User:Pigsonthewing - How frequent are these abandoned subpages? CSD criteria should be Objective, Uncontestable, Frequent, and Nonredundant. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete - This seems to be abandoned in project space. It also seems to be in English, so it doesn't appear to be a request for translation. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
The first half of the page is in English, the second in Japanese. TSventon (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak keep : just update the translation and rename the page Bouzinac (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Bouzinac, you may be the person most interested in keeping the page. Updating the whole translation would be a major task, particularly as the page (like the 2008 ja article) has no sources. Producing a stub like would be easier and keep the history. TSventon (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. If putting any effort in translation start by translating the current Japanese article at ja:アーバンネットワーク. The content on the nominated page is unsourced. The antiquated revision of the Japanese article of which it is a copy is also unsourced. The current revision reads differently and has a fair number of references. We cover this topic in West Japan Railway Company#Urban Network; that is also unsourced and coverage seems weak. It would certainly be better to start fresh if translating. Creating an incentive for editors to translate this antiquated unsourced content is a net negative when they could be translating the good content.—Alalch E. 00:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete Ancient, useless cruft. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Lt Gen Rajeev Chaudhry, Vsm (Veteran)

User:Lt Gen Rajeev Chaudhry, Vsm (Veteran) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

A WP:FAKEARTICLE that was deleted as U5 and recreated by user with no explanation Flounder fillet (talk) 23:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

April 14, 2024

Draft:Devanga Dharma

Draft:Devanga Dharma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Article already exists in verbatim at Devanga, minus a few words author wants removed (see all five copies of edit requests made 13 April 2024 on Talk: Devanga). Requests were declined due to lack of a WP:RS. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

please remove some content like shudra from devanga page please see reference in devanga dharma page Harishsk2022 (talk) 05:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
remove this line it is not true we are not lower caste "They are of Shudra status in the Hindu caste system." Harishsk2022 (talk) 05:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete the draft as a recent copy of the old article. It should never have been made, and it’s existence is an ongoing attribution hazard, and it serves no purpose. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as a copyright violaton. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • [EC] Delete this content fork. Oh yes, it's a copyright violation too. -- Hoary (talk) 11:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete but do not speedily delete, because G12 doesn't apply since WP:RIA can be employed; of course, in spite of that, the page should be deleted.—Alalch E. 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - copy of existing article and blatant attempt to game the system and get around the page protection of the original. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as attribution violation and unnecessary copy. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete in the spirit of WP:COPIES. I have performed a WP:RIA edit summary as a precaution, but that does not mean we should keep this attribution hazard around. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

April 13, 2024

Draft:The Monument Mythos

Draft:The Monument Mythos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

Person who created subject requests deletion of the draft. DeIIveloper (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

For context see Draft talk:The Monument Mythos#Please, delete this draft for my mental sanity and User talk:Pppery#Monument Mythos Speedy Deletion. No opinion on whether this should be deleted or not. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep. The draft is okay.—Alalch E. 12:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
    He said to delete it. I don't know what you're on about. DeIIveloper (talk) 18:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
    There is no policy grounds on which to delete. It's a fine draft with potential for inclusion in the encyclopedia, and if not quite as a standalone article, it could be merged into the already-existing content on this topic at Analog horror#The Monument Mythos; and not only should, it will be merged, because I will do it (unless the draft is moved to article space, which I haven't decided on yet). See also the discusion on my talk page: User talk:Alalch E.#The Monument Mythos article. —Alalch E. 18:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
    @DeIIveloper: Please don't blank the page like you did here: Special:Diff/1218824521Alalch E. 02:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep. User:Alalch E. has adopted it. There is no reason to delete. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This isn't very mature. He's in a really bad mental spot and I think its for the better to help him recover. There is no reason to adopt an article about a subject that the creator of said subject would like to be removed. Technically, it is his and he has the right to do whatever he wants with it, and he wants it gone from this site. End of discussion. Nada. Nope. Nothing more. DeIIveloper (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
By publishing on Wikipedia, you agree to the Terms of Use and agree to irrevocably release your text under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and GFDL.
Sorry. If you want to make a personal appeal, make it to User:Alalch E..
Perhaps he can find some help in User:Tamzin/Guidance for editors with mental illnesses. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Alex didn't agree to this. He did nothing to the article. We did, but he didn't and now he wants it gone. DeIIveloper (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
It is not clear whether this topic is notable or not. It may or may not be. In either case, I recommend removing all BLP information. The person is not notable, and although not private, there are BLP concerns that can be respected without detriment to coverage of the topic. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think it makes the content better but I did it. —Alalch E. 23:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep - This seems like a draft with promise, even if currently I'm a bit dubious about its notability (much of the sources seem to be top 10 lists and trend pieces). If nothing else it can be merged into Analog horror#The Monument Mythos. I'll also note for DeIIveloper that this article doesn't belong to the creator of the work and, while in the case of a BLP of a relatively unknown person who requests deletion, we may acquiesce, per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE), this is not a biography and has very little bio information in it, so doesn't really qualify. Cakelot1 talk 09:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
funny joke haha DeIIveloper (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep. It's a draft, notability doesn't need to be established for a page to exist in this namespace. The content here is useful, even if it ends up being merged into another article. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 23:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep per above. Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 13:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
delete. the guy who made the series wants the draft deleted for his sake. the lack of compassion above is astounding. ltbdl (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Compassion doesn't build an encyclopedia. The topic was treated in a sensitive and due way, and the user who claims to be the person connected to the subject matter was talked to patiently and respectfully, and things were explained to him. —Alalch E. 12:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Compassion doesn't build an encyclopedia[.] Yes, Reliable sources do! Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 13:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
it'd be quite funny if alex copyrighted the MM and absolutely decimates the article and/or entry on the Analog Horror page. Dellvell (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think that's how it works. Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 17:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
bwomp DeIIveloper (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
?? Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 01:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

April 12, 2024

Draft:Doucet, Quebec

Draft:Doucet, Quebec (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This place does not appear to exist. I couldn't find it in the Canadian Geographical Names Database (). There are a number of places or features called Lac-Doucet, but the only one that is a place (and not a geographical feature) is located at 46° 28′ 4″ N, 72° 38′ 23″ W, which is near Trois-Rivieres, neither north nor west. But notwithstanding not being able to find it on a map, I did find a source for the claimed coldest temperature record () which we've repeated (unsourced) in other articles, which seems like it warrants further investigation. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Well, I did find a Doucet, Quebec in the Canadian government's weather database, and it does record a temperature of -54.4 C on February 5, 1923. () There is no data for this place after the mid-1930s, and the coordinates given are the middle of a forest. Maybe there was a logging camp or something near here 100 years ago? I haven't been able to find any more information, AI has made Google absolutely useless for this kind of thing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Ignore. MfD is not a help service for AfC. See WP:NDRAFT. Reasons to nominate a draft include any line item at WP:NOT, or tendentious resubmission. Or an unsourced BLP. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Existence operating systems

Draft:Existence operating systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

"Draft template" created by an anonymous IP, with no obvious explanation of what it would be used for. The text of it is "If i better operating system is needed, please add, copy and paste your template source page", but it's rather unclear what operating systems and template code have to do with each other, so it's not clear what purpose pasting your template source page anywhere would serve, and the template fails to explain where your template source page is to be pasted.
If this kind of thing were necessary at all, it would need to be created by established Wikipedians who knew what they were doing. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. Page containing almost only incomprehensible text, close to WP:G1. Saved by the "Please note that it is not template, its draft template" part, which is comprehensible. The rest is not comprehensible.—Alalch E. 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Useless, and very close to G1. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. This template has only been used once on this page as an April Fool's prank, although the edit was done after April 1st. 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 18:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

April 11, 2024

User:HansWobbe/Books/SrEd References

User:HansWobbe/Books/SrEd References (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This is a grab bag deletion of discussion regarding a network of related pages created by banned User:HansWobbe. This is discussion is focused on his "lightly edited template pages", which I feel have a good case for deletion given they probably fall under WP:UP#GOALS. Most of these seem to have been in an effort ot make a Wikipedia book (a now depricated feature). I'm doing this so I don't have to open an MfD for all of these articles, and will list them below:

Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Procedural close or Keep -I have not reviewed the pages, but it is probable that some of them should be deleted and some should be kept. The editor has been indefinitely blocked, not banned, and the guidelines say that we normally keep files of departed or blocked users, who might return. (I think that I disagree with the guideline, but it is a plausible guideline, and should be respected.) Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Template:User hate CCP

Template:User hate CCP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC. Divisive userbox. Broc (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. The word 'hate' should not appear in userboxes.—Alalch E. 09:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
    I lean to supporting this, but not without limit. A userbox might mention hate without expressing or advocating hate.
    There are several transcluders. The transcluders should be advised of this discussion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
    Courtesy ping to the transcluders of this userbox: SunDawn Moreno Ardan1 EnverTheHero Magnatyrannus Partyfrittata R09a21045 TeddyRoosevelt1912 Carlinal Michigander901 PoisonHK Delta2571 -- Broc (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
    Broc, SmokeyJoe, specifically pinging people who are likely to !vote in a certain way is WP:VOTESTACKING. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
    No, it is not. The proposal is to alter these people’s userpages, altering their self-introductions, with an allegation that they are doing something wrong. There are therefore key stakeholders. Their contribution here is not to vote, but to explain, or defend. If the userbox is deleted, they may be accused of disruption if they put a similar back. This outcome is an obvious failing of natural justice. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    If like to ask them, what is it about the CCP that they hate. Then, I’m sure it can be improved by an edit. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep - Hate of a political class of tyrants should not be equated with a group of individuals. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
    How is a party which counts 98 million members not "a group of individuals"? Broc (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep. Dislike towards an organization (that has done "things") is different than hating millions of Chinese. I didn't think the word "hate" should immediately be construed as divisive. I didn't think "hating" the Nazi Party or ISIS is violating WP:UBCR. SunDawn (contact) 11:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
    Ok, now read the userbox as "This user hates the US Republican Party". Do you still consider it non-divisive? If the template said "oppose" I would have no problem with it, but hate is a different thing. Broc (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep: My usage of the anti-CCP infobox isn't of any malice towards Chinese culture or society at all, but as a protest against the party's omnipresent dominance and human rights violations that led to a moral decline within the country's political state, if not with China altogether. This includes but is not limited to Mao Zedong's cult of personality (similar with Joseph Stalin's), several massacres (Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution and Red August, the Tiananmen massacre and suppression of its discussion and the related), declining human and Internet rights, and other forms of crimes against humanity. That's what I hate about the party and its impact; I believe other users with the infobox aren't drastically different in motive. The party's slogan is "Serve the People", but it only serves itself, of a code not revealed to anyone with any sympathy. I wouldn't be anti-communist in the first place if all of this never happened. My use of this infobox is not light, and it speaks out for the preservation of common sense and human dignity. Carlinal (talk) 13:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Wording Change: I am a Hong Konger, and this template sums up a large part about my childhood in the city, so I'm definitely against deleting the template entirely (please see Hong Kong-Mainland China conflict). I personally have no problem using the word "hate" towards a political organization that has no respect for human rights whatsoever, but I can understand why some would feel problematic about this. So, I would be fine if the template is re-worded to take out the word "hate" but keep much of the meaning, something along the lines of: "This user strongly condemns the CCP (for its gross violations of human rights)". TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Strong oppose for being more divisive than the current wording. NasssaNser 00:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

April 10, 2024

Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp

Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)

This subpage isn't useful, despite the tag on it. Highly implausible query. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 17:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete, pending a statement from User:L293D, who tagged it as useful, because I don't see the utility of this page, but am ready to consider an explanation. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Create the mainspace redirect to QWERTY. Not an implausible implausible query. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Create Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp as a redirect per SmokeyJoe. Undeletion is consistent with policy. The deletions were not consensus-based. There was an RfD but it lasted a day and was also interrupted by a speedy deletion, and this can not be considered a deletion by consensus: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 August 31#Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp → QWERTY. The nomination statement in that RfD is also completely erroneous. Unlike what the nominator said, this is not something created by mashing keys randomly in different combinations. This redirect was like Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm. "Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp" produces results when googled.—Alalch E. 08:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
    Although qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm is arguably a more plausible query than qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp. I don't think we need redirects from every possible key combination. I just RfD'd Qwertqwert for the same reason. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 17:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
    It should be recreated then nominated at RfD. I think it's plausible. Please keep in mind that the deletions were not carried out per a consensus. —Alalch E. 17:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete Nonsense. Nobody is going to search for the QWERTY keyboard by writing the keys vertically. No reason to keep this around forever. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
    I already have. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
    You'd be surprised on Urban Dictionary... —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Create redirect and send to RfD: If the redirect wasn't deleted by consensus, we should just create it and, if anyone objects to it, send it to RfD. If the RfD is closed as delete, this will naturally be deleted. I personally think it's WP:CHEAP, but I digress. Queen of | speak 18:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Create redirect and send to RfD: Yes, there was an RfD in 2008, but it had little participation and the result was a speedy deletion anyway. I would say there's not much point going to DRV for this. A lot of bored people in work/school (I would know) end up just mashing random key combinations. Just look at the pageviews for Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm. Even if we divide that by 5, that's still ~30 page views/month, which is sizeable. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as an unlikely query. Even if we bring it up again at WP:RFD, there is little chance for this page to survive that process. NasssaNser 14:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Old business

Closed discussions

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:MFD, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.