The article Clare Cousins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

failed notability guidelines 5 days ago and has been tagged with copy/paste

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I have some minor updates to make to the page, mainly to do with adding sources and correcting slight misinformation about Norman Foster. I’m employed by the firm, so help here would be most appreciated. Talk:Foster_and_Partners#December_2023_proposal_of_edits StaffordJasper (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Members of WikiProject Architecture, I hope this message finds you all well and thriving in your contributions to the architectural heritage on Wikipedia. I am reaching out to seek your valuable expertise and assistance in enhancing the article for Portal Fernández Concha, a notable architectural landmark with significant historical and cultural importance.

The Portal Fernández Concha, with its rich history and architectural uniqueness, presents an opportunity to enrich Wikipedia's repository of architectural knowledge. However, the current article faces several challenges, including ensuring accuracy in historical context, architectural detail, and balancing content to meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability.

Here are some areas where your expertise would be invaluable:

• Historical Accuracy and Context: Ensuring the historical narrative of Portal Fernández Concha is accurate, well-referenced, and provides a comprehensive view of its significance in architectural history.
• Architectural Details: Expanding on the architectural aspects of the building, including design, style, influences, and any unique features that highlight its importance in the architectural landscape.
• Balanced Content: Assistance in achieving a balanced perspective that includes not just the architectural and historical significance, but also addresses contemporary issues and public perceptions without veering into promotional or unduly negative content.
• Reliable Sourcing: Help in identifying and citing reliable sources that can substantiate the facts about Portal Fernández Concha, ensuring the article meets Wikipedia's standards for verifiability.
• Photographs and Illustrations: If anyone has access to or can point towards copyright-compliant images that could enhance the article visually, it would greatly contribute to the article's quality.

I believe that with the collective knowledge and expertise of this community, we can significantly improve the Portal Fernández Concha article, making it a valuable and informative resource for all readers interested in architecture and history. I am eager to collaborate and would greatly appreciate any guidance, suggestions, or direct contributions you can offer. Please feel free to dive into the article, make edits, or discuss potential improvements on the article's talk page or here.

Thank you for considering this request, and I look forward to your valuable contributions and insights. Best regards, TraceySear840 (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

TraceySear840 - for clarity, I think we are talking about this, Draft:Portal Fernandez Concha? And I see there is an article on Spanish Wikipedia, . Would a starting point be an attributed translation of the Spanish article? KJP1 (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

p.s. - Apologies, I should have said, I slightly refactored your comments for ease of reading. KJP1 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

No issues! thanks for editing. The spanish article is really limited sadly. So I used it as a base and then expanded into the key sections of the artcile. I tried my best to be encyclopedic etc. TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

and yes its Draft:Portal Fernandez Concha TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Fine - I'll take a look. KJP1 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks TraceySear840 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

articles like this are greatbut I have no idea where they get their sources https://landie.cl/jueves-adicto/memorias-y-prejuicios-del-portal-fernandez-concha/

Ps I have found all the current and historical arquitectural plans for the building.If those are useful? TraceySear840 (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

This is the position on the plaza in 1890 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/plaza-de-armas-de-santiago-en-1890-5

This is the building in 1922 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/portal-fernandez-concha-en-1922

This is apparently 1929 (could be 1927) https://www.enterreno.com/moments/remodelacion-del-portal-fernandez-concha-1929

This is 1895 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/santiago-portal-fernandez-concha TraceySear840 (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

p.s. those photos are all free to use public domain TraceySear840 (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Examples of recent internal remodelations/architecture related sources

https://schwarzhaus.cl/pages/01-portal-fernandez-concha-santiago

https://www.urbancubearquitectas.com/copia-de-dc-759-603

https://estudiopedrosilva.cl/Portal-Fernandez-Concha-2019 TraceySear840 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

I see that you have resubmitted the draft, without taking on board the first reviewer's comments, and have now taken the second reviewer, who also rejected it, to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. That's not an approach I'd support, and I can't help you further. KJP1 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

There are discussions at Talk:Montacute House about image placement and infobox format which would benefit from editor input. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Grand Cinema (Shanghai)#Requested move 4 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Three Rivers Stadium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Cannons (house) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

The Blackstone Hotel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 01:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

I have nominated PNC Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 20:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Fortress of Klis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I was wondering if anyone could provide me with more guidance regarding page titles for churches, specifically in the case of Italian churches. For minor churches not commonly known in the English language, this rules should apply: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (architecture), yielding translated names (eg, *St. Joseph's Church). Howeer, in practice, I see that on the English Wikipedia most Italian churches are titled in Italian with just the saint denomination and no word for "church" (eg, the actual San Giuseppe). What is the correct naming rule? Thanks a lot. Plumbago Capensis (talk) 07:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)