Selectivity can be a challenge in nitrations because as a rule more than one compound may result but only one is desired, so alternative products act as contaminants or are simply wasted. Accordingly, it is desirable to design syntheses with suitable selectivity; for example, by controlling the reaction conditions, fluorenone can be selectively trinitrated[9] or tetranitrated.[10]
The substituents on aromatic rings affect the rate of this electrophilic aromatic substitution. Deactivating groups such as other nitro groups have an electron-withdrawing effect. Such groups deactivate (slow) the reaction and directs the electrophilic nitronium ion to attack the aromatic meta position. Deactivating meta-directing substituents include sulfonyl, cyano groups, keto, esters, and carboxylates. Nitration can be accelerated by activating groups such as amino, hydroxy and methyl groups also amides and ethers resulting in para and ortho isomers.
The direct nitration of aniline with nitric acid and sulfuric acid, according to one source,[11] results in a 50/50 mixture of para- and meta-nitroaniline isomers. In this reaction the fast-reacting and activating aniline (ArNH2) exists in equilibrium with the more abundant but less reactive (deactivated) anilinium ion (ArNH3+), which may explain this reaction product distribution. According to another source,[12] a more controlled nitration of aniline starts with the formation of acetanilide by reaction with acetic anhydride followed by the actual nitration. Because the amide is a regular activating group the products formed are the para and ortho isomers. Heating the reaction mixture is sufficient to hydrolyze the amide back to the nitrated aniline.
In the Wolffenstein–Böters reaction, benzene reacts with nitric acid and mercury(II) nitrate to give picric acid.
With aryl chlorides, triflates and nonaflates, ipso nitration may also take place.[13] The phrase ipso nitration was first used by Perrin and Skinner in 1971, in an investigation into chloroanisole nitration.[14] In one protocol, 4-chloro-n-butylbenzene is reacted with sodium nitrite in t-butanol in the presence of 0.5 mol% Pd2(dba)3, a biarylphosphine ligand and a phase-transfer catalyst to provide 4-nitro-n-butylbenzene.[15]
John McMurry Organic Chemistry 2nd Ed.
Esteves, P. M.; Carneiro, J. W. M.; Cardoso, S. P.; Barbosa, A. G. H.; Laali, K. K.; Rasul, G.; Prakash, G. K. S.; e Olah, G. A. (2003). "Unified Mechanism Concept of Electrophilic Aromatic Nitration Revisited: Convergence of Computational Results and Experimental Data". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (16): 4836–49. doi:10.1021/ja021307w. PMID 12696903. Queiroz, J. F.; Carneiro, J. W. M.; Sabino A. A.; Sparapan, R.; Eberlin, M. N.; Esteves, P. M. (2006). "Electrophilic Aromatic Nitration: Understanding Its Mechanism and Substituent Effects". J. Org. Chem. 71 (16): 6192–203. doi:10.1021/jo0609475. PMID 16872205. Bordwell, F. G.; Garbisch, Edgar W. (July 1960). "Nitrations with Acetyl Nitrate. I. The Nature of the Nitrating Agent and the Mechanism of Reaction with Simple Alkenes". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 82 (14): 3588–3598. doi:10.1021/ja01499a029. Mechanism and synthesis Peter Taylor, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain), Open University
Perrin, C. L.; Skinner, G. A. (1971). "Directive effects in electrophilic aromatic substitution ("ipso factors"). Nitration of haloanisoles". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 93 (14): 3389. doi:10.1021/ja00743a015.