Perpich_v._Department_of_Defense

<i>Perpich v. Department of Defense</i>

Perpich v. Department of Defense

1990 United States Supreme Court case


Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning the Militia Clauses of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution, in which the court held that Congress may authorize members of the National Guard to be ordered to active federal duty for purposes of training outside the United States without either the consent of the governor of the affected state or the declaration of a national emergency. The plaintiff was Rudy Perpich, governor of Minnesota at the time.

Quick Facts Perpich v. Department of Defense, Argued March 27, 1990 Decided June 11, 1990 ...

In 1986, after governors George Deukmejian of California and Joseph E. Brennan of Maine refused to allow the deployment of their states' National Guard units to Central America for training, Congress passed the Montgomery Amendment, which prohibited state governors from withholding their consent. Massachusetts governor Michael Dukakis had also challenged the law, but lost in U.S. District Court in Boston in 1988.[1]

See also


References

  1. David Evans (June 12, 1990). "SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS U.S. CONTROL OVER GUARD". Chicago Tribune.

Further reading

  • Beckman, Norman (1991). "Limiting State Involvement in Foreign Policy: The Governors and the National Guard in Perpich v. Defense". Publius. 21 (3): 109–123. doi:10.2307/3330517. JSTOR 3330517.
  • Bovarnick, Jeff (1991). "Perpich v. United States Department of Defense: Who's in Charge of the National Guard?". New England Law Review. 26: 453. ISSN 0028-4823.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Perpich_v._Department_of_Defense, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.