2014_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom

2014 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

2014 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Add article description

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2014. They are ordered by neutral citation.

In 2014 Lord Neuberger was the President of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale was the Deputy President.

The table lists judgments made by the court and the opinions of the judges in each case. Judges are treated as having concurred in another's judgment when they either formally attach themselves to the judgment of another or speak only to acknowledge their concurrence with one or more judges. Any judgment which reaches a conclusion that differs from the majority on one or more major points of the appeal has been treated as dissent.

All dates are for 2014 unless expressly stated otherwise.

Table key


 Delivered a judgment (majority)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (majority)

Delivered a judgment (dissenting)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (dissent)

Did not participate in the decision

2014 judgments

More information Case name, Citation ...

Notes

  1. [1]
    An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case.
  2. [2]
    The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.
  3. [3]
    The chart shows the judgment of the court in the case of P. Two other appeals (from MIG and MEG) were held concurrently and allowed by a majority of 4 to 3 (Lords Clarke, Carnwath and Hodge dissenting).
  4. [4]
    An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case
  5. [5]
    The chart shows the judgment by the court in the appeals by Nicklinson and Lamb. It also unanimously allowed an appeal by the DPP and dismissed a cross-appeal by Martin.
  6. [6]
    Lord Thomas also sat on this case. He gave the lead judgment alongside Lord Reed.
  7. [7]
    Lord Collins also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.
  8. [8]
    Lord Collins also sat on this case. He gave a judgment for the majority that Lord Sumption agreed with.
  9. [9]
    The chart shows the decision for the appeal. The decision on the cross-appeal was by a majority of four to one (Lady Hale dissenting).
  10. [10]
    The chart shows the judgment of the court in the appeal of Haney, Kaiyam and Massey. The article 5 appeal by Robinson was dismissed by a majority of four to one (Lord Mance dissenting).
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article 2014_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.