Abortion_on_demand

Abortion law

Abortion law

Laws that allow, prohibit, or regulate abortion


Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. Such laws range from abortion being freely available on request, to regulation or restrictions of various kinds, to outright prohibition in all circumstances. Many countries and territories that allow abortion have gestational limits for the procedure depending on the reason; with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for rape, incest, or socioeconomic reasons, and more for fetal impairment or risk to the woman's health or life. As of 2022, countries that legally allow abortion on request or for socioeconomic reasons comprise about 60% of the world's population. In 2024, France became the first country to explicitly protect abortion rights in its constitution.[1]

Legality of abortion by country or territory
Legal on request:
 No gestational limit
 Gestational limit after the first 17 weeks
 Gestational limit in the first 17 weeks
 Unclear gestational limit
Legally restricted to cases of:
 Risk to woman's life, to her health*, rape*, fetal impairment*, or socioeconomic factors
 Risk to woman's life, to her health*, rape, or fetal impairment
 Risk to woman's life, to her health*, or fetal impairment
 Risk to woman's life*, to her health*, or rape
 Risk to woman's life or to her health
 Risk to woman's life
 Illegal with no exceptions
 No information
* Does not apply to some countries or territories in that category
Note: In some countries or territories, abortion laws are modified by other laws, regulations, legal principles or judicial decisions. This map shows their combined effect as implemented by the authorities.

Abortion continues to be a controversial subject in many societies on religious, moral, ethical, practical, and political grounds. Though it has been banned and otherwise limited by law in many jurisdictions, abortions continue to be common in many areas, even where they are illegal. According to a 2007 study conducted by the Guttmacher Institute and the World Health Organization, abortion rates are similar in countries where the procedure is legal and in countries where it is not,[2][3] due to unavailability of modern contraceptives in areas where abortion is illegal.[4] Also according to the study, the number of abortions worldwide is declining due to increased access to contraception.[2][3]

History

Abortion has existed since ancient times, with natural abortifacients being found amongst a wide variety of tribal people and in most written sources. The earliest known records of abortion techniques and general reproductive regulation date as far back as 2700 BC in China, and 1550 BC in Egypt.[5] Early texts contain little mention of abortion or abortion law. When it does appear, it is entailed in concerns about male property rights, preservation of social order, and the duty to produce fit citizens for the state or community. The harshest penalties were generally reserved for a woman who procured an abortion against her husband's wishes, and for slaves who produced abortion in a woman of high status. Religious texts often contained severe condemnations of abortion, recommending penance but seldom enforcing secular punishment. As a matter of common law in England and the United States, abortion was illegal anytime after quickening—when the movements of the fetus could first be felt by the woman. Under the born alive rule, the fetus was not considered a "reasonable being" in rerum natura; and abortion was not treated as murder in English law.

In the 19th century, many Western countries began to codify abortion laws or place further restrictions on the practice. Anti-abortion movements were led by a combination of groups opposed to abortion on moral grounds, and by medical professionals who were concerned about the danger presented by the procedure and the regular involvement of non-medical personnel in performing abortions. Nevertheless, it became clear that illegal abortions continued to take place in large numbers even where abortions were rigorously restricted. It was difficult to obtain sufficient evidence to prosecute the women and abortion doctors, and judges and juries were often reluctant to convict. For example, Henry Morgentaler, a Canadian pro-choice advocate, was never convicted by a jury. He was acquitted by a jury in the 1973 court case, but the acquittal was overturned by five judges on the Quebec Court of Appeal in 1974. He went to prison, appealed, and was again acquitted. In total, he served 10 months, suffering a heart attack while in solitary confinement. Many were also outraged at the invasion of privacy and the medical problems resulting from abortions taking place illegally in medically dangerous circumstances. Political movements soon coalesced around the legalization of abortion and liberalization of existing laws.

By the first half of the 20th century, many countries had begun to liberalize abortion laws, at least when performed to protect the woman's life and in some cases on the woman's request. Under Vladimir Lenin, the Soviet Union became the first modern state in legalizing abortions on request—the law was first introduced in the Russian SFSR in 1920, in the Ukrainian SSR in July 1921, and then in the whole country.[6][7] The Bolsheviks saw abortion as a social evil created by the capitalist system, which left women without the economic means to raise children, forcing them to perform abortions. The Soviet state initially preserved the tsarist ban on abortion, which treated the practice as premeditated murder. However, abortion had been practiced by Russian women for decades and its incidence skyrocketed further as a result of the Russian Civil War, which had left the country economically devastated and made it extremely difficult for many people to have children. The Soviet state recognized that banning abortion would not stop the practice because women would continue using the services of private abortionists. In rural areas, these were often old women who had no medical training, which made their services very dangerous to women's health. In November 1920, the Soviet government legalized abortion in state hospitals. The state considered abortion as a temporary necessary evil, which would disappear in the future communist society, which would be able to provide for all the children conceived.[8][page needed] In 1936, Joseph Stalin placed prohibitions on abortions, which restricted them to medically recommended cases only, in order to increase population growth after the enormous loss of life in World War I and the Russian Civil War.[9][10][7] In the 1930s, several countries (Poland, Turkey, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Mexico) legalized abortion in some special cases (pregnancy from rape, threat to mother's health, fetal malformation). In Japan, abortion was legalized in 1948 by the Eugenic Protection Law,[11] amended in May 1949 to allow abortions for economic reasons.[12] Abortion was legalized in 1952 in Yugoslavia (on a limited basis[which?]), and again in 1955 in the Soviet Union on request. Some Soviet allies (Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Romania) legalized abortion in the late 1950s under pressure from the Soviets.[how?][13][additional citation(s) needed]

In the United Kingdom, the Abortion Act of 1967 clarified and prescribed abortions as legal up to 28 weeks (later reduced to 24 weeks). Other countries soon followed, including Canada (1969), the United States (1973 in most states, pursuant to Roe v. Wade—the U.S. Supreme Court decision which legalized abortion nationwide), Tunisia and Denmark (1973), Austria (1974), France and Sweden (1975), New Zealand (1977), Italy (1978), the Netherlands (1984), and Belgium (1990). However, these countries vary greatly in the circumstances under which abortion was to be permitted. In 1975, the West German Supreme Court struck down a law legalizing abortion, holding that they contradict the constitution's human rights guarantees. In 1976, a law was adopted which enabled abortions up to 12 weeks. After Germany's reunification, despite the legal status of abortion in former East Germany, a compromise was reached which deemed most abortions up to 12 weeks legal, but this law was struck down by the Federal Constitutional Court and amended to only remove the punishment in such cases, without any statement to legality. In jurisdictions governed under sharia law, abortion after the 120th day from conception (19 weeks from LMP) is illegal, especially for those who follow the recommendations of the Hanafi legal school, while most jurists of the Maliki legal school "believe that ensoulment occurs at the moment of conception, and they tend to forbid abortion at any point [similar to the Roman Catholic Church]. The other schools hold intermediate positions. [...] The penalty prescribed for an illegal abortion varies according to particular circumstances involved. According to sharia, it should be limited to a fine that is paid to the father or heirs of the fetus."[14]

Timeline of abortion on request

The table below lists in chronological order the United Nations member states that have legalized abortion on request in at least some initial part of the pregnancy, or that have fully decriminalized abortion. As of 2023, 67 countries have legalized or decriminalized abortion on request.

Notes

Where a country has legalized abortion on request, prohibited it, and legalized it again (e.g., former Soviet Union, Romania), only the later year is included. Countries that result from the merger of states where abortion on request was legal at the moment of unification show the year when it became legal across the whole national territory (e.g., Germany, Vietnam). Similarly, countries where not all subnational jurisdictions have legalized abortion on request are not included, leading to the exclusion of Australia, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. Countries where abortion on request was once legalized nationwide but has since been prohibited in at least part of the country, such as the United States and Poland, are also excluded. Countries are counted even if they were not yet independent at the time. The year refers to when the relevant law or judicial decision came into force, which may be different from the year when it was approved.

More information Year legalized, Countries ...

International law

There are no international or multinational treaties that deal directly with abortion but human rights law and International criminal law touch on the issues.

The Nuremberg Military Tribunal decided the case of United States v Greifelt and Others (1948) on the basis that abortion was a crime within its jurisdiction according to the law defining crimes against humanity and thus within its definition of murder and extermination.[36]

The Catholic Church remains highly influential in Latin America, and opposes the legalisation of abortion.[37] The American Convention on Human Rights, which in 2013 had 23 Latin American parties, declares human life as commencing with conception. In Latin America, abortion on request is only legal in Cuba (1965), Uruguay (2012),[38] Argentina (2021),[35] Colombia (2022)[39] and in parts of Mexico.[40][41] Abortions are completely banned in the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua, and only allowed in certain restricted circumstances in most other Latin American nations.[37]

In the 2010 case of A, B and C v Ireland, the European Court of Human Rights found that the European Convention on Human Rights did not include a right to an abortion.

In 2005, the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UN HRC) ordered Peru to compensate a woman (known as K.L.) for denying her a medically indicated abortion; this was the first time a United Nations Committee had held any country accountable for not ensuring access to safe, legal abortion, and the first time the committee affirmed that abortion is a human right.[42] K.L. received the compensation in 2016.[42] In the 2016 case of Mellet v Ireland, the UN HRC found Ireland's abortion laws violated International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights because Irish law banned abortion in cases of fatal fetal abnormalities.

National laws

While abortions are legal at least under certain conditions in almost all countries, these conditions vary widely. According to a United Nations (UN) report with data gathered up to 2019,[43] abortion is allowed in 98% of countries in order to save a woman's life. Other commonly-accepted reasons are preserving physical (72%) or mental health (69%), in cases of rape or incest (61%), and in cases of fetal impairment (61%). Performing an abortion because of economic or social reasons is accepted in 37% of countries. Performing abortion only on the basis of a woman's request is allowed in 34% of countries, including in Canada, most European countries and China.[43]

The exact scope of each legal ground also varies. For example, the laws of some countries cite health risks and fetal impairment as general grounds for abortion and allow a broad interpretation of such terms in practice, while other countries restrict them to a specific list of medical conditions or subcategories. Many countries that allow abortion have gestational limits for the procedure depending on the reason; with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for social, economic, rape, or incest reasons, and more for fetal impairment or threats to the woman's health or life.[43]:26

In some countries, additional procedures must be followed before the abortion can be carried out even if the basic grounds for it are met. How strictly all of the procedures dictated in the legislation are followed in practice is another matter. For example, in the United Kingdom, a Care Quality Commission's report in 2012 found that several NHS clinics were circumventing the law, using forms pre-signed by one doctor, thus allowing abortions to patients who only met with one doctor.[44]

Roe V. Wade has been established in the US for almost 50 years, put into motion in 1973,  before its overturn in 2022 due to Dobbs v. Jackson. This ruling made abortion access not a constitutional right. The decision, most of which was leaked in early May, means that abortion rights will be rolled back in nearly half of the states immediately, with more restrictions likely to follow. For all practical purposes, abortion will not be available in large swaths of the country. 13 States, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming enacted a trigger law which placed an immediate but varying statewide abortion ban immediately following the overturning. These trigger laws were designed specifically to take effect immediately upon the fall of the Roe precedent. Other states, were bans are in effect after 6 weeks gestation, including Idaho, Tennessee, and Texas – have similar laws, which would take effect after 30 days of the overturning.[45]

Pill abortion access is legal in 36 states. However, a lawsuit in Texas is currently against the production and distribution of this Abortion pill, misoprostol. The ban would affect millions of women in the US who cannot access a medical procedural abortion due to a state ban. The group suing the FDA has asked for a preliminary injunction to take one of the two drugs used in a medication abortion, mifepristone, off the market while the case plays out. This will effectively cause a nationwide ban of pill abortion if granted.[46]

Summary tables

Legend
permittedIn many cases, abortion is permitted only up to a certain gestational age.
If this limit is known and does not vary by subdivision, it is shown instead of "permitted".
permitted, with complex legality or practice
varies by subdivision
prohibited, with complex legality or practice
prohibited
unknown or unclear

Countries

The table below summarizes the legal grounds for abortion in all United Nations member states and United Nations General Assembly observer states and some countries with limited recognition. This table is mostly based on data compiled by the United Nations up to 2019,[47] with some updates, additions and clarifications citing other sources.

More information Country, Risk to life ...

Autonomous jurisdictions

The table below summarizes the legal grounds for abortion in autonomous jurisdictions not included in the previous table.

More information Jurisdiction, Risk to life ...

Comparative limits for countries with elective abortions

Legal limits may not be directly comparable. Limits may be expressed in trimesters, months, weeks of pregnancy (implantation), weeks from fertilization, or weeks from last menstrual period (LMP).

Color-coded map illustrating the term limits of elective abortion in Europe (in weeks from last menstrual period, fertilization or implantation)
  Illegal
  Legal but generally unavailable (Northern Ireland)
  Legal first 5 weeks (Turkmenistan)
  Legal first 10 weeks
  Legal first 11 weeks (Estonia)
  Legal first 12 weeks
  Legal first 13 weeks (3 months, Austria, Tunisia)
  Legal first 14 weeks
  Legal first 18 weeks
  Legal first 22 weeks (Iceland)
  Legal first 24 weeks
  Technically illegal, but generally available through 12 weeks (Finland)
  Technically illegal, but generally available through 24 weeks (Great Britain)
  Technically 12 weeks, but generally available through 22 weeks (ex-USSR)
  Technically 12 weeks, but generally available through 28 weeks (ex-USSR)
  Legal if the pregnancy is not from marriage; generally available under exemptions (Israel)
Status of elective abortion in the United States
  Illegal with exceptions[lower-alpha 168]
  Legal but no providers
  Legal through 12th week LMP*
  Legal through 15th week LMP* (1st trimester)
  Legal through 18th week LMP*
  Legal through 20th week LMP*
  Legal through 22nd week LMP* (5 months)
  Legal through 24th week LMP* (5½ months)
  Legal through second trimester[lower-alpha 171]
  Legal at any stage
*LMP is the time since the last menstrual period began.
This color-coded map illustrates the current legal status of elective-specific abortion procedures in each of the individual states, U.S. territories, and federal district.[lower-alpha 168] A colored border indicates a more stringent restriction or ban that is blocked by legal injunction or trigger provision (as of September 18, 2023).
Color-coded map illustrating availability of abortion in Canada, in weeks of embryonic age (from fertilization). Abortion is legal at all stages in Canada, but availability is subject to medical guidelines.
  Available first 12 weeks (PEI)
  Available first 13 weeks
  Available first 16 weeks
  Available first 19 weeks
  Available first 20 weeks
  Available first 24 weeks
  Available first 25 weeks

Countries with more restrictive laws

Supporter of legalized abortion at a rally in Paraná, Argentina. Argentina had restrictive laws until 2021.

According to a report by Women on Waves,[better source needed] approximately 25% of the world's population[as of?] lives in countries with "highly restrictive abortion laws"—that is, laws which either completely ban abortion, or allow it only to save the mother's life. This category includes several countries in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Oceania, as well as Andorra and Malta in Europe.[556] The Center for Reproductive Rights report that "[t]he inability to access safe and legal abortion care impacts 700 million women of reproductive age."[557]

Some of the countries of Central America, notably El Salvador, have also come to international attention due to very forceful enforcement of the laws, including the incarceration of a gang-rape victim for homicide when she gave birth to a stillborn son and was accused of attempting an illegal abortion.[558][559][560]

El Salvador has some of the strictest abortion laws of any country. Abortion under all circumstances, including rape, incest, and risk to the mothers health, is illegal. Women can be criminalized and penalized to up to 40 years in prison after being found guilty of an abortion. El Salvador's abortion laws are so severe that miscarriages and stillbirths can sometimes be enough for conviction. The Inter-American Court has already ruled that El Salvador was responsible for the death of Manuela, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2008 for aggravated homicide after suffering an obstetric emergency that resulted in her losing her pregnancy.[561] Lack of access to abortion is recognized by Uruguay, Mexico, Argentina, and Colombia as a human rights issue. This shows progress in underdeveloped nations.

Ireland

Ireland has had a long withstanding rule of the land called the Offenses Against Persons Act of 1861, which is what first prohibited abortions. This law was enacted to prohibit abortions in Ireland in 1920 when Ireland became its own independent country. To counteract the infiltration of pro abortion laws, Ireland's Catholic organizations formed the Pro Life Amendment Campaign. This organization was formed to create an abortion ban at a constitutional level. Ireland's 8th constitutional amendment was made in 1986, “acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and [gave] due regard to the equal right to life of the mother.”[562]

In 1992, a case of a 14 year old pregnant girl, threatening suicide to the courts if she were not allowed abortion, sparked change in Ireland's people. An appeals was made to the higher courts that suicidal thoughts were enough for endangerment of a mother's life for termination to be allowed. This case began the new wave of activism in Ireland which promoted the protection of the mother's life, and pushed for abortion rights. Activism grew into the larger public eye which prompted new laws to be made and introduced protecting the mother's life.[562]

New wave of activism in Ireland stretched until 2013 when the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act was signed into law. This law recognized the mother's life over the fetus's and would allow pregnancy termination in cases where the mother is in danger. In 2018 Ireland's abortion ban by constitution was repealed and abortions up to the first trimester were legalized and covered by Ireland's public health service.[562]

Beginning of pregnancy controversy

Controversy over the beginning of pregnancy occurs in different contexts, particularly in a legal context, and is particularly discussed within the abortion debate from the point of measuring the gestational age of the pregnancy. Pregnancy can be measured from a number of convenient points, including the day of last menstruation, ovulation, fertilization, implantation and chemical detection. A common medical way to calculate gestational age is to measure pregnancy from the first day of the last menstrual cycle.[lower-alpha 172] However, not all legal systems use this measure for the purpose of abortion law; for example countries such as Belgium, France, and Luxembourg use the term "pregnancy" in the abortion law to refer to the time elapsed from the sexual act that led to conception, which is presumed to be 2 weeks after the end of the last menstrual period.[lower-alpha 173]

Exceptions in abortion law

Exceptions in abortion laws occur either in countries where abortion is as a general rule illegal or in countries that have abortion on request with gestational limits. For example, if a country allows abortion on request until 12 weeks, it may create exceptions to this general gestation limit for later abortions in specific circumstances.[568]

There are a few exceptions commonly found in abortion laws. Legal domains which do not have abortion on demand will often allow it when the health of the mother is at stake. "Health of the mother" may mean something different in different areas: for example, prior to December 2018, Ireland allowed abortion only to save the mother's life, whereas abortion opponents in the United States argue health exceptions are used so broadly as to render a ban essentially meaningless.[569]

Laws allowing abortion in cases of rape or incest often differ. For example, before Roe v. Wade, thirteen U.S. states allowed abortion in the case of either rape or incest, but only Mississippi permitted abortion of pregnancies due to rape, and no state permitted it for just incest.[570]

Many[vague] countries allow abortion only through the first or second trimester, and some may allow abortion in cases of fetal defects, e.g., Down syndrome, or where the pregnancy is the result of a sexual crime.

Laws in some countries with liberal abortion laws protect access to abortion services. Such legislation often seeks to guard abortion clinics against obstruction, vandalism, picketing, and other actions, or to protect patients and employees of such facilities from threats and harassment. Other laws create a perimeter around a facility, known variously as a "buffer zone", "bubble zone", or "access zone", where demonstrations opposing abortion are not permitted. Protests and other displays are restricted to a certain distance from the building, which varies depending on the law. Similar zones have also been created to protect the homes of abortion providers and clinic staff. Bubble zone laws are divided into "fixed" and "floating" categories. Fixed bubble zone laws apply to the static area around the facility itself, and floating laws to objects in transit, such as people or cars.[571] Because of conflicts between anti-abortion activists on one side and women seeking abortion and medical staff who provides abortion on the other side, some laws are quite strict: in South Africa for instance, any person who prevents the lawful termination of a pregnancy or obstructs access to a facility for the termination of a pregnancy faces up to 10 years in prison (section 10.1 (c) of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act[572]).

On 3 November 2020, an association of 20 Kenyan charities urged the government of Kenya to withdraw from the Geneva Consensus Declaration (GCD), a US-led international accord that sought to limit access to abortion for girls and women around the world. GCD was signed by 33 nations, on 22 October 2020.[573]

Judicial decisions

More information Year, Jurisdiction ...

See also

Notes

  1. In 2021, the Chinese government issued guidelines reducing "non-medically necessary" abortions as a "step toward women's development".[16] The guidelines do not provide detail on what a "non-medically necessary" abortion is, nor what specific policies the government has planned to achieve this goal.[17][18]
  2. The law from 1957 legalizing the abortion on request was limited in 1962 when additional approval for each abortion had to be obtained from so called Abort Commission (which rejected about 15% of the requests). The Abort Commissions were abolished by law in 1986. Until 1993 each approved abortion was paid by state.[19][20]
  3. In some parts of Overseas France, abortion on request became legal in 2001.[22][23][24]
  4. Year when all subnational jurisdictions legalized abortion on request.
  5. Including Svalbard.[307]
  6. The law legalizing abortion on request was approved in 1978 and came into force in 1979.[25]
  7. In the Caribbean Netherlands, abortion on request became legal in 2011.[26][27]
  8. After explicit legalization struck down by supreme court decision, the law only removes punishment for abortion on request but with no statement about its legality.
  9. The law legalizing abortion on request was approved in 1995 and came into force in 1996.[31]
  10. The law legalizing abortion on request was approved in 2014 and came into force in 2015.[33]
  11. The law legalizing abortion on request was approved in 2018 and came into force in 2019.[34]
  12. The law legalizing abortion on request was approved in 2020 and came into force in 2021.[35]
  13. Including Åland.[158]
  14. The law of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan consisted primarily of statutory law and a limited use of Islamic jurisprudence.[49] The Afghan penal code criminalized abortion and only removed the penalty if the abortion was prescribed by a doctor to save the woman's life,[50][51] but other sources said that Afghanistan also allowed abortion in case of fetal impairment,[52] and rarely for economic reasons if accepted by a religious council.[53] After the 2021 Taliban offensive, the new government announced its intention to implement Islamic law exclusively, and it is unclear which legal grounds for abortion it accepts.[54]
  15. The UN source says that this ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[56] However, other sources say that abortion is not legally allowed under any circumstance in Andorra.[57]
  16. The UN source incorrectly shows Angola as allowing abortion on request, citing a penal code draft from 2014 that did not become law.[58] The version of the penal code enacted in 2020 and entered into force in 2021 allows abortion only in certain circumstances.[59]
  17. A 2001 UN source says that abortion must be performed within the first 16 weeks and that it may be permitted after this period under very exceptional circumstances.[61]
  18. Before independence, a judicial decision in the parent country allowed abortion for this ground, but the decision has not been explicitly recognized by Antigua and Barbuda.[61][62]:14
  19. Abortion for this ground is permitted in all subdivisions except the Northern Territory.[64][65]
  20. Applies the laws of Western Australia.[68]
  21. Applies the laws of Western Australia.[69]
  22. Applies the laws of the Australian Capital Territory.[70]
  23. Most laws of New South Wales and Queensland, including their abortion laws, are set to apply to Norfolk Island after 2026.[72][73] The Criminal Code of Norfolk Island, which remains in force in the territory, does not prohibit abortion.[74]
  24. Abortion up to 24 weeks may be performed if the medical practitioner considers the abortion is appropriate in all the circumstances, having regard to all relevant medical circumstances, the woman's current and future physical, psychological and social circumstances, and professional standards and guidelines. Later abortion may be performed, if two medical practitioners consider the abortion is appropriate in all the circumstances, having regard to the mentioned matters.[75] These criteria are not considered as allowing abortion on request.[64][65]
  25. If the woman was under age 14 when getting pregnant, no limit is specified.
  26. The penal code says that abortion is permitted for therapeutic purposes but is unclear whether it means only to save the woman's life or also to preserve her health. The UN source marks it as a permitted ground.
  27. The UN source marks it as a legal ground because the Penal Code explicitly prohibits abortion only if performed without the consent of the woman and of a medical practitioner.[84] However, the decree regulating medical practice prohibits abortion unless the pregnancy threatens the woman's life.[85]
  28. The UN source does not explicitly mark this legal ground for abortion but says that "Menstrual regulation is available on request for women with a last menstrual period of 10 weeks or less."[47]
  29. The law permits abortion for medical reasons without gestational limit, for social reasons up to 22 weeks of gestation, and on request up to 12 weeks of gestation.[87] By regulation, fetal impairment is included as a medical reason,[88] and rape is included as a social reason.[89]
  30. Defined as 12 weeks from conception, considered as 14 weeks from the last menstrual period.[91]
  31. The penal code prohibits abortion except to save the woman's life, when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest, or when the woman is of unsound mental condition.[93] Guidelines for health workers mention grounds of risk to the woman's health and fetal impairment, and define a gestational limit of 180 days.[94]
  32. This ground is only cited in guidelines for health workers, not by law.[93][94]
  33. This ground is established by a regulation implementing a judicial decision, although it is not mentioned in the decision itself or in the law.[95]
  34. Continues to apply the abortion law of the Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[96][97]
  35. The penal code criminalizes abortion and only removes the penalty if the abortion is done to save the woman's life or if the pregnancy is the result of rape.[100] Due to a decision by the Supreme Federal Court, abortion is also permitted in case of anencephaly, and it may also be authorized by court order in other fatal cases of fetal impairment.[101][102][103]
  36. The penal code says that social demands are taken into account in a conviction for abortion.[107] It is unclear if this circumstance reduces the penalty or may remove it.
  37. There is no abortion law in Canada, but its subdivisions and professional bodies have regulations restricting the procedure to various grounds or gestational limits.[110][111]
  38. The penal code says that abortion may be permitted to an underage woman in a state of grave distress up to 8 weeks.[113]
  39. If the woman is under age 14, the gestational limit is 14 weeks.
  40. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[117][118][39]
  41. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law.[120] The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is declared to be an integral part of the constitution, says that "Abortion, other than therapeutic, is prohibited and punishable by law."[121] It is unclear whether the therapeutic ground means only to save the woman's life or also to preserve her health. The UN source says that only the ground to save the woman's life is accepted as a general legal principle.[43]
  42. A judicial pardon may be granted to the woman for an abortion on this ground.[122]
  43. In some cases, the gestational limit is 12 or 24 weeks.
  44. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle, allowed by regulation and established by treaty.[129][130]
  45. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by treaty, whose application is requested by the Constitutional Court.[129][131]
  46. If the woman is of young age or immature and so unable to care for the child in a proper way, no limit is specified.
  47. Before independence, a judicial decision in the parent country allowed abortion for this ground, but the decision has not been explicitly recognized by Dominica.[137]
  48. The UN source says that this ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle. However, other sources say that abortion is not legally allowed under any circumstance in the Dominican Republic.[139][140]
  49. The UN source shows East Timor as allowing abortion also in case of risk to the woman's health or fetal impairment, citing the penal code enacted in March 2009 and entered into force in June 2009.[141][142] However, the penal code was amended in July 2009 to restrict abortion only to save the woman's life.[143][142][144]
  50. This ground is explicitly mentioned in the law only in case of rape of a woman with a mental disability, but it is also established by judicial decision in case of rape of any woman.[145]
  51. Abortion is permitted if the woman is under age 18.
  52. If the woman is under age 15 or over age 45, the gestational limit is 22 weeks.
  53. extreme poverty[156]
  54. Defined as 14 weeks of pregnancy, considered as 16 weeks from the last menstrual period.[162]
  55. The penal code says that abortion may be permitted to an underage woman in a state of grave distress up to 10 weeks.
  56. The criminal code specifies that abortion is not deemed an offence if the woman requests it, she has obtained counselling, and it is done by a physician within 12 weeks from conception. (Also, the woman is not punished for an abortion within 22 weeks if the other conditions are fulfilled.) The woman's living conditions are also taken into account in the indication of a serious risk to her health.[169][170]
  57. If the woman is a minor or incapable of resisting, the gestational limit is 19 weeks.
  58. If the woman is HIV-positive or contraception failure, the gestational limit is 16 weeks.
  59. A new penal code, published by presidential decree on 24 June 2020, would allow abortion on request in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. The code is set to take effect on 24 June 2024 unless modified before then.[177][178]
  60. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle.
  61. Up to 18 weeks if the woman is incapacitated or did not recognize the pregnancy due to illness or medical error, or in case of failure of a health institution.[180]
  62. Up to 24 weeks in case of prolongation of the diagnostic procedure, or no limit in case of fetal abnormality incompatible with life after birth.[180]
  63. No limit in case of "substantial foetal abnormalities".[182]
  64. Including the failure of contraception.[182]
  65. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law,[189] but it may be included in other legal grounds if the pregnancy causes unbearable hardship, such as significant harm to mental health or risk of suicide.[190][better source needed]
  66. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[191][192]
  67. This ground is only cited in instructions to health committees, not by law.[193]
  68. If the risk to life or health is immediate, no gestational limit is specified.
  69. Abortion is permitted if the woman is under age 18 or over age 40, or if she is not married or the pregnancy is not from marriage.[195]
  70. The UN source marks it as a legal ground but it is only established by treaty, not by law and not implemented as of 2020.[197][198]
  71. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle and established by judicial decision.[199][200][201][202]
  72. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[199][200][201][202]
  73. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[209] It is also mentioned in the National Guidelines on Management of Sexual Violence.[210]
  74. The penal code prohibits "unlawful abortion", defined as "abortion not authorized by medical doctor commission". The penal code also lists the principles of legitimate defense and necessity to save one's life, which lead to exemption from penal liability.[216] A decision by the Ministry of Health states that abortion is medically authorized, up to 28 weeks of gestation, due to certain medical conditions of the woman or fetus, rape, contraception failure, and certain socioeconomic conditions of the woman or her family.[217] A WHO source also shows Laos as allowing abortion on request up to 12 weeks of gestation, citing guidelines for health workers from 2016,[218] but they were issued before the penal code of 2017 defined "unlawful abortion" and are not mentioned in the decision by the Ministry of Health of 2021.
  75. If the woman is under age 13 or over age 49, no limit is specified.
  76. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law.[229] The UN source says that it is accepted as a general legal principle,[43] but other sources say that abortion is not legally allowed under any circumstance in Madagascar.[230][231]
  77. The law of Maldives is a combination of statutory and Islamic law.[234] The Maldivian penal code criminalizes abortion after 120 days of gestation, except for risk to the woman's life.[235] The Maldivian Islamic jurisprudence allows abortion only for risk to the woman's life, without gestational limit, or in cases of rape, incest, or certain medical conditions of a fetus conceived in marriage, up to 120 days of gestation.[236][237]
  78. Only for certain medical conditions of a fetus conceived in marriage.[236][237]
  79. The penal code prohibits abortion without any explicit exception,[241] but the UN source says that abortion to save the woman's life is permitted as a general legal principle.[43] The law on child protection prohibits abortion except for a "proven medical need",[242] and the law on reproductive health prohibits abortion except in case of risk to the woman's life.[243] The government has stated that the law of the country permits abortion on therapeutic grounds.[244]
  80. Abortion for this ground is permitted by law in all subdivisions except Guanajuato and Querétaro. In these two states, medical professionals at federal health facilities may provide abortion without prosecution,[247][248] while others may be prosecuted but not imprisoned, and they may request judicial relief by amparo.[40][41]
  81. Abortion for this ground is permitted by law in some states and Mexico City. In other states, medical professionals at federal health facilities may provide abortion without prosecution,[247][248] while others may be prosecuted but not imprisoned, and they may request judicial relief by amparo.[40][41]
  82. The penal codes of some states specify a gestational limit for abortion in case of rape. However, in July 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to set a limit for abortion on this ground.[249][250]
  83. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[40][41]
  84. If the woman is under age 15 or over age 40, the gestational limit is 21 weeks.
  85. In 2016, the government of Morocco proposed allowing abortion in cases of rape, incest, mental disability and fetal impairment. However, the parliament did not approve the proposal,[287][288] and as of 2021 the abortion articles in the penal code remain unchanged.[289][290]
  86. May be permitted with no gestational limit in case the fetus is not viable.[291]
  87. The Criminal Code of the predecessor of Nigeria prohibited abortion except to save the woman's life. A judicial decision on a similar law in the parent country allowed abortion also to preserve the woman's health, but the West African Court of Appeal, despite applying the reasoning of the parent country's decision, affirmed only the ground to save the woman's life in Nigerian law. The Criminal Code and its judicial precedent remain in force in the southern states of Nigeria. In the states corresponding to the former Northern Region, the Penal Code replaced the Criminal Code and its judicial precedent, and it also prohibits abortion except to save the woman's life.[297][298]
  88. The criminal law of North Korea, as amended up to 2015, does not mention abortion.[300][301] In 2015 the North Korean government issued a directive prohibiting medical professionals from performing abortions but did not indicate a penalty for doing so.[302] In 2016, the government stated that abortion was "legal" and "provided upon request by the woman concerned for reasons of risks to her life, physical and mental health and fetal malformation", but it is unclear whether these were the only permitted reasons.[303] It has also been reported that repatriated pregnant women are forced to have abortions to prevent children of mixed ethnicity.[304][305]
  89. May be permitted with no gestational limit in some cases.[306]
  90. The penal law prohibits abortion without any explicit exception, but it exempts from penal liability actions done by necessity to protect oneself or others from a severe and imminent danger, and in the practice of agreed medical activities or urgent medical intervention.[308] The law regulating medical practice prohibits abortion except for risk to the woman's life or of unbearable illness, and in case of fetal impairment up to 120 days of gestation.[309]
  91. Different sources specify this limit as 120 days or four months of gestation.[312][313]
  92. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law[314] but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[citation needed]
  93. The law prohibits abortion except to save the woman's life.[315] However, some sources say that abortion may also be permitted for health reasons and in cases of rape and fetal impairment,[316][317][318] while other sources say that it is not possible to obtain an abortion in any circumstance.[319]
  94. The law prohibits abortion done "unlawfully" without defining it, and it explicitly permits abortion to preserve the woman's life.[322] An opinion of the State Solicitor in 1982, based on court decisions on identical laws in the former parent country, considered that preservation of the woman's health was also a legal ground for abortion.[323][324] However, in 2018, in the case of a woman who had aborted at four months of pregnancy due to risk to health, the Supreme Court acquitted her because she had been wrongly charged for the crime of killing an unborn child, which only applies shortly before birth (section 312), but ruled that she should have still been charged for the crime of abortion (section 225).[325]
  95. The law prohibits abortion without explicitly mentioning any exception,[328] but in 2014 the Supreme Court ruled that indirect abortion done to save the woman's life was permitted under the principle of double effect.[329][330]
  96. This ground was mentioned in the law but it was invalidated by a judicial decision in 2020.[332]
  97. This ground was mentioned in the law but it was invalidated by a judicial decision in 1997.[333]
  98. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[342][343][62]:14
  99. In case of risk to the woman's life after fetal viability, the pregnancy may also be interrupted by attempting a live birth.
  100. Permitted until fetal viability in case of a fetal anomaly that poses a risk to the woman's health.
  101. Abortion may also permitted up to 40 days of gestation for other reasons that are not economic or social concerns.[348][349][350]
  102. The penal code prohibits abortion without any explicit exception,[351] but the code of medical ethics permits abortion to save the woman's life.[352][43][353] The government has stated that abortion is authorized in case of risk to the woman's health.[354]
  103. In some cases, abortion may be allowed up to fetal viability or 26 weeks of gestation.[357][358]
  104. Sierra Leone established that the laws in force in England in 1880 would be in force in Sierra Leone from 1965.[359] One of these laws prohibited abortion done "unlawfully" without defining it.[360] A judicial decision in England in 1938 clarified that this law always implicitly allowed abortion at least to save the woman's life, and the decision allowed it also to preserve her health.[361] It is unclear whether Sierra Leone applies only the original legal principle or also the judicial decision.[362][363] In 2015 the parliament of Sierra Leone passed a law allowing abortion on request but it was not signed by the president so it did not come into force.[364][365]
  105. In some cases, the gestational limit is 12 weeks.
  106. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[clarification needed]
  107. The laws of South Korea prohibited abortion except for risk to the woman's health, rape, incest, or certain medical conditions, up to 24 weeks of gestation.[375] On 11 April 2019, the Constitutional Court ruled that the abortion restrictions were unconstitutional, giving the legislature until the end of 2020 to amend the laws to allow abortion on request with some gestational limit. In October 2020 the government proposed a limit of 14 weeks for abortion on request and 24 weeks for certain other cases, but the legislature did not approve this or any other proposal on the subject before the end of the year, so the abortion laws became automatically invalid on 1 January 2021.[376] As of 2023, the legislature had still not approved any of the proposals, leaving abortion decriminalized without a clear gestational limit.[377]
  108. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is established by judicial decision.[376]
  109. In case of a fatal anomaly, no limit is specified.
  110. From conception.
  111. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law[383] but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[citation needed]
  112. In mainland Tanzania, articles 150 to 152 of the penal code prohibit abortion done "unlawfully", and article 230 of the same law permits abortion to preserve the woman's life. Article 219 additionally prohibits "child destruction", meaning abortion after fetal viability, presumed at 28 weeks of pregnancy, but still permits it to preserve the woman's life.[390] In Zanzibar, the penal act has equivalent articles 129 to 131, 213 and 200.[391]
  113. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law. A judicial decision by the East African Court of Appeal, with jurisdiction over the predecessors of Tanzania, allowed abortion also to preserve the woman's health, and sources state that this decision remains binding after independence.[392]
  114. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law[396] but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[397]
  115. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law[400] but it is accepted as a general legal principle and established by judicial decision.[clarification needed][401][402]
  116. If the woman is under age 15 or over age 45, the gestational limit is 22 weeks.[409][410]
  117. Permitted in case of a fatal anomaly up to 120 days of gestation.[411]
  118. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is considered to be included in a ground for preserving physical or mental health.[412][413][414]
  119. Abortion for this ground is permitted only in Northern Ireland, up to 12 weeks of gestation.[415]
  120. Abortion for this ground is not permitted in some states.
  121. Permitted in case of a lethal anomaly up to 20 weeks from fertilization, considered as 22 weeks from the last menstrual period.[419][418]
  122. A law prohibiting abortion on this ground is set to come into force on 8 June 2024.[422]
  123. This U.S. state has explicitly amended its constitution to guarantee the right to an abortion to its residents.
  124. Permitted until viability if the fetus has a fatal anomaly.[425]
  125. Defined as 20 weeks from fertilization, considered as 22 weeks from the last menstrual period.[417]
  126. Prohibited after embryonic or fetal cardiac activity is detected, which is possible after approximately 6 weeks of gestation.
  127. Defined as 13 weeks from fertilization, considered as 15 weeks from the last menstrual period.[430][432]
  128. Defined as 10 weeks from fertilization, considered as 12 weeks from the last menstrual period.[433]
  129. Permitted in case of a lethal anomaly up to 20 weeks from fertilization, considered as 22 weeks from the last menstrual period.[433]
  130. A law prohibits abortion on this ground or sets a lower gestational limit but it is suspended by judicial decision.
  131. Permitted in certain cases of fatal anomalies.[439][440]
  132. Abortion after viability is allowed if a physician judges it "necessary" under the "applicable standard of care".[441]
  133. The law states that "the State may not interfere" with abortion on this ground before viability.[442] Sources disagree whether it is actually prohibited after viability.[443][417][444]
  134. Also allowed after this period if there is an absence of fetal viability.[456]
  135. Permitted up to 24 weeks of gestation in case of a life-limiting anomaly.[457]
  136. In case of a lethal anomaly or a severe brain abnormality, no limit is specified.
  137. Defined as 8 weeks from implantation, approximately 11 weeks from the last menstrual period. If the patient is a minor or an incompetent or incapacitated adult, abortion in case of rape is permitted in the first 14 weeks from implantation, approximately 17 weeks from the last menstrual period.[474]
  138. Permitted with no gestational limit if the fetus has a lethal anomaly.[474]
  139. A judge may also remove the penalty for abortion on this ground in the first 3 months from conception.[483]
  140. The penal code says that abortion is permitted for "good medical reasons"[485] but is unclear whether it means only to save the woman's life or also to preserve her health. The UN source marks it as a permitted ground.
  141. The law of Vatican City is primarily based on the canon law of the Catholic Church and applies the Italian penal code in force in 1929 with local modifications.[486] Both sources of law prohibit abortion without explicitly mentioning any exception.[487][488] Article 49 of the penal code lists the principle of necessity to save one's life, which removes punishment for any action that would otherwise be a crime,[489][490] but the Church's official interpretation of canon 1398 is more restrictive, allowing in such cases only indirect abortion under the principle of double effect.[491][492]
  142. Depending on the capacity at each level of hospital.[497][498][499]
  143. Abortion is not permitted for rape within marriage.[504]
  144. The 2014 Guidelines for Comprehensive Abortion Care says "In Zimbabwe termination of pregnancy may be permitted for HIV-positive women if they choose to do so."[505]
  145. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law, but the identical text in the law of the parent country is considered to include this ground in a ground for preserving physical or mental health.[412][413][414]
  146. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is accepted as a general legal principle.[62]
  147. The parliament has proposed a law allowing abortion also in case of risk to health, rape and fetal impairment,[514] but it has not yet been approved.[515]
  148. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law, but it is established by a judicial decision in the parent country. A UN source states this it in unclear whether this judicial precedent also applies to the Cook Islands, but it lists this ground as permitted there.[516]
  149. Although illegal, the government does not prosecute abortions performed under rules similar to other countries, including on request.[518]
  150. Permitted up to 16 weeks of gestation if medical circumstances make the woman unfit to care for her child.[520]
  151. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law but it is considered to be included in the ground for preserving physical or mental health.[521][522]
  152. Although the law permits abortions on request, no medical providers in the territory perform them except to save the woman's life.[526][527]
  153. In Alderney and Sark, this ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law.[528] A judicial decision on an identical law in the parent country clarified that the law always implicitly allowed abortion at least to save the woman's life, and the decision allowed it also to preserve her health.[361] It is unclear whether Alderney and Sark apply only the original legal principle or also the judicial decision.
  154. This ground is permitted in the jurisdiction of Guernsey, but not in Alderney or Sark.[528][529]
  155. Although not allowed by Alderney law, abortions are provided in Alderney under the same conditions as in Guernsey, as health services in Alderney operate under Guernsey law.[530] To resolve the legal contradiction, in 2022 the States of Alderney passed an abortion law identical to the one in Guernsey, and it awaits a regulation to establish the effective date.[531]
  156. A law enacted by New Zealand for Niue in 1966 prohibited abortion done "unlawfully", without defining it,[537] but a judicial decision applicable in New Zealand allowed abortion in case of risk to the woman's life or health, and a UN source states this judicial precedent probably applies to Niue as well.[538] In 2007, New Zealand repealed the sections of law that prohibited abortion in Niue,[539] but they remain in force in Niue[540] as legislation enacted by New Zealand after 1974 does not apply to Niue without its consent.[541]
  157. The territory's constitution prohibits abortion "except as provided by law", and the territory has no law about the subject.[542] A law from the predecessor of the territory prohibited abortion done "unlawfully" without defining it, and although predecessor laws remain in force in the territory unless modified, a judicial decision ruled this abortion law invalid for being too vague.[543] As a result, although abortion remains prohibited in principle by the constitution, abortion providers cannot be prosecuted for it as there is no law specifying a penalty. Still, in practice, authorized medical providers in the territory perform abortions only to save the woman's life and possibly in case of rape.[544] In 1995, an opinion issued by the territory's attorney general concluded that U.S. judicial decisions allowing abortion on request also applied to the territory, but these decisions were overturned in 2022.[542]
  158. Applies English law in force in 2010 unless locally modified.[545]
  159. The penal code prohibits abortion except in case of risk to the woman's life or health.[546] In 1980, a decision by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico expanded the health criteria to also include mental health, including emotional, psychological, family and age aspects, with no gestational limit. However, the decision still maintained the prohibition on abortion if done without any therapeutic consideration.[547][548]
  160. Applies English law in force on 1 January 2006 unless locally modified, in each part of the territory.[549] Tristan da Cunha explicitly applies the abortion law of the United Kingdom with minor modifications.[550]
  161. Although illegal, the government does not prosecute abortions performed under rules similar to other countries, including on request.[62]
  162. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law. The judicial handbook says that abortion is permitted for medical reasons but is unclear whether it means only to save the woman's life or also to preserve her health.[553]
  163. This ground is not explicitly mentioned in the law. A judicial decision on an identical law in the parent country clarified that the law always implicitly allowed abortion at least to save the woman's life, and the decision allowed it also to preserve her health.[361] It is unclear whether the territory applies only the original legal principle or also the judicial decision.
  164. All states have an exception for the mother's life.
    • Exception for risk to mother's physical health: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
    • Exception for risk to mother's general health: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, Rhode Island, Virginia, Washington.
    • Exception for pregnancy due to rape or incest: Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, North Dakota, South Carolina, West Virginia, Utah, and Wyoming.
    • Exception for lethal fetal abnormality: Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, South Carolina, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Utah.
    Note that these exceptions may have a time frame in which pregnant woman can use the exceptions to get an abortion; current time limits for these exceptions range from cardiac-cell activity (or 6 weeks) to the entire pregnancy before birth (no limit).
  165. This generally happens in the 6th week LMP.
  166. Typically, it is between the 23rd or 24th week LMP.
  167. Variously defined as through 27th or 28th week LMP; in Massachusetts, 24 weeks from implantation ≈ 27 weeks LMP.
  168. Some examples of gestational age calculated from the first day of the last menstrual cycle:[563][564][565][566][567][excessive citations]
  169. For example Luxembourg abortion law states: "Avant la fin de la 12e semaine de grossesse ou avant la fin de la 14e semaine d'aménorrhée[...]" which translates to "Before the end of the 12th week of pregnancy or before the end of the 14th week of amenorrhea".[228]
  170. Also known as the "Menhennitt ruling".

    References

    1. Niewiarowski, Erik. "France makes abortion a constitutional right in historic vote". PinkNews. Retrieved 5 March 2024.
    2. "Abortion Rates Similar In Countries That Legalize, Prohibit Procedure, Study Says". International Consortium for Medical Abortion (ICMA). Archived from the original on 23 March 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
    3. Sedgh, Gilda; Henshaw, Stanley; Singh, Susheela; Åhman, Elisabeth; Shah, Iqbal H. (13 August 2007). "Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide". The Lancet. 370 (9595): 1338–1345. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X. PMID 17933648. S2CID 28458527.
    4. Susheela, Signh; Darroch, Jacqueline E.; Ashford, Lori S.; Vlassoff, Michael (2009). Adding It Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing in Family Planning and Newborn Health (PDF). New York: Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund. pp. 17, 19, 27. Some 215 million women in the developing world as a whole have an unmet need for modern contraceptives[...] If the 215 million women with unmet need used modern family planning methods....[that] would result in about 22 million fewer unplanned births; 25 million fewer abortions; and seven million fewer miscarriages....If women's contraceptive needs were addressed (and assuming no changes in abortion laws)...the number of unsafe abortions would decline by 73% from 20 million to 5.5 million. A few of the findings in that report were subsequently changed, and are available at "Facts on Investing in Family Planning and Maternal and Newborn Health" (PDF). Guttmacher Institute. November 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 March 2012.
    5. Joffe, Carole (3 April 2009). "Abortion and Medicine: A Sociopolitical History". Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy: Comprehensive Abortion Care: 1–9. doi:10.1002/9781444313031.ch1. ISBN 9781444313031 via Wiley Online Library.
    6. "Decree on Women's Healthcare". People's Commissariat of Health. 18 November 1920. Archived from the original on 18 December 2021.
    7. Avdeev, Alexandre; Blum, Alain; Troitskaya, Irina (1995). "The History of Abortion Statistics in Russia and the USSR from 1900 to 1991". Population: An English Selection. 7: 39–66. JSTOR 2949057.
    8. Overy, Richard (2004). The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia. W. W. Norton Company, Inc. ISBN 978-0141912240.
    9. "Status of abortion in Japan". IPPF Medical Bulletin. 1 (6): 3. 1967. PMID 12304993. Archived from the original on 5 February 2009. Retrieved 10 December 2008.
    10. "Eugenic Protection Law in Japan" (PDF). Institute of Population Problems, Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan. 1960. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 26 June 2022.
    11. Campo, Juan Eduardo (2009). Encyclopedia of Islam. Infobase Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-4381-2696-8.
    12. Various sources:
    13. 国务院关于印发中国妇女发展纲要和中国儿童发展纲要的通知, Government of the People's Republic of China, 2021 (in Chinese).
    14. "Zákon č. 68/1957 Sb., o umělém přerušení těhotenství". Zákony pro lidi (in Czech). 1957. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
    15. "Vývoj potratovosti v České republice 2003 - 2014". Český statistický úřad. 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
    16. Penal Code, 2012. Article 214 (in French).
    17. Law on interruption of pregnancy (abortion law), Lovdata. "[A]mending law of 16 June 1978 no. 66 from 1 January 1979 according to resolution of 1 December 1978" (in Norwegian).
    18. Abortion permit for hospital in Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean Legal Portal, 16 June 2012.
    19. Termination of pregnancy law, Government of the Netherlands (in Dutch).
    20. Tsogt, Bazarragchaa; Seded, Khishgee; Johnson, Brooke R.; Strategic Assessment Team (2 September 2008). "Applying the WHO Strategic Approach to Strengthening First and Second Trimester Abortion Services in Mongolia". Reproductive Health Matters. 16 (31 Suppl): 127–134. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31383-4. eISSN 1460-9576. ISSN 0968-8080. PMID 18772093. S2CID 206112339 via Taylor & Francis Group.
    21. Penal Code of Guinea-Bissau, Judicial Police of Guinea-Bissau, 20 May 2019. Article 112 (in Portuguese).
    22. Portuguese Penal Code of 1886, University of Coimbra, 1919. Article 358 (in Portuguese).
    23. "Për ndërprerjen e shtatëzënësisë" [On the Interruption of Pregnancy]. Law No. 8045 of 27 December 1995 (in Albanian). Parliament of Albania.
    24. Penal Code, Government of São Tomé and Príncipe, 2012. Book II, title I, chapter II (in Portuguese).
    25. Law of revision of the Penal Code, Gazette of the Republic of Mozambique, 31 December 2014. "The present law enters into force one hundred and eighty days after its publication." (in Portuguese)
    26. Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals (PDF). Vol. XIII. London: United Nations War Crimes Commission. 1949. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 July 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
    27. "En Uruguay, le Parlement vote la dépénalisation de l'avortement". Le Monde (in French). 17 October 2012. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
    28. Colombia decriminalizes abortion in historic ruling, Colombia Reports, 21 February 2022.
    29. Abortion in Mexico: the Supreme Court decriminalizes the voluntary interruption of pregnancy in a historic ruling for the country, BBC, 7 September 2021. "The ruling only obligates Coahuila to modify its penal code in this regard. Therefore, it does not imply that abortion is now legal in all of Mexico, nor that the decriminalization affects all states automatically or that they are obligated to change their local legislation." (in Spanish)
    30. Mexico decriminalizes abortion: what will happen now in the states of the country?, El País, 8 September 2021. "They will be able to, thus, continue sending to court the women who abort outside of the local norms, but the judicial process will not allow them to enter jail." "It is possible that there are still judges who dictate jail for some women, and this would force them to sue in local and federal processes first and then apply for an amparo before a district judge. This one would have to follow, finally, the judicial precedent." (in Spanish)
    31. Grimes, David A. (25 January 2016). "United Nations Committee Affirms Abortion As A Human Right". HuffPost. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
    32. World Population Policies 2017: Abortion Laws and Policies, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020.
    33. "Findings of termination of pregnancy inspections published". Care Quality Commission. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved 17 July 2012.
    34. Table 2: Countries by legal grounds for abortion (recoded), United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Policies 2017: Abortion laws and policies.
    35. "О здравоохранении" [On Health Care]. Article 40, Law of 29 January 2016 (in Russian). People's Assembly of Abkhazia.
    36. Penal Code, Government of the Republic of Afghanistan, 7 October 1976.
    37. Penal Code, Official Gazette of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, 15 May 2017 (in Pashto and Dari).
    38. Hasrat-Nazimi, Waslat (5 May 2012). "Afghan women use abortion as a way out". Deutsche Welle.
    39. Collection of Regulatory Texts relative to the Management of Health Establishments, Med Ould-Kada, December 2020. Law 85-05 of 16 February 1985 regarding the protection and promotion of health. Article 72 (in French).
    40. Law 9/2005, of 21 February, qualified of the Penal code, Official Gazette of the Principality of Andorra, number 25, year 17, 23 March 2005. Articles 27, 107–109 (in Catalan).
    41. Bernhard, Meg (22 October 2019). "Andorra's abortion rights revolution". Politico Europe. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
    42. Penal code draft, Global Abortion Policies Database, World Health Organization (in Portuguese).
    43. Law that approves the Angolan Penal Code, Journal of the Republic of Angola, 11 November 2020. Articles 154–158 (in Portuguese).
    44. Infant Life (Preservation) Act, Laws of Antigua and Barbuda.
    45. Antigua and Barbuda, Population Policy Data Bank, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2001. Archived from the original on 27 December 2005.
    46. Pheterson, Gail; Azize, Yamila (c. 2005). "Safe Illegal Abortion: An Inter-Island Study in the Northeast Caribbean". Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
    47. Abortion law: a national perspective, Tom Gotsis and Laura Ismay, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, May 2017, pp. 13, 40. This government publication, reflecting laws up to 2017 (including the Termination of Pregnancy Law Reform Act 2017 in the Northern Territory), lists New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory as the subdivisions of Australia not allowing abortion on request. Since then, laws allowing abortion on request have entered into force in Queensland (2018), New South Wales (2019) and South Australia (2022). The abortion law in the Northern Territory was amended in 2021 but still requires approval by a medical professional based on the same criteria as in 2017, thus it is still not considered as allowing abortion on request.
    48. Abortion is no longer a crime in Australia. But legal hurdles to access remain, The Conversation, 3 March 2021. "With the exception of the Northern Territory, where abortion remains a medical practitioner's decision regardless of the gestation, and the ACT, where no gestational limits apply, Australian jurisdictions now permit abortion on request up to varying points in a pregnancy."
    49. Crimes Act 1900, ACT Legislation Register.
    50. Health Act 1993, ACT Legislation Register.
    51. Christmas Island Act 1958, Federal Register of Legislation.
    52. Cocos (Keeling) Islands Act 1955, Federal Register of Legislation.
    53. Jervis Bay Territory Acceptance Act 1915, Federal Register of Legislation.
    54. Norfolk Island Applied Laws Ordinance 2016, Federal Register of Legislation.
    55. Criminal Code 2007 (NI), Federal Register of Legislation.
    56. Termination of Pregnancy Law Reform Act 2017, Northern Territory Legislation.
    57. Termination of Pregnancy Act 2018, Queensland Legislation.
    58. Termination of Pregnancy Act 2021, South Australian Legislation.
    59. Abortion Law Reform Act 2008, Victorian Legislation.
    60. Public Health Act 2016, Western Australian Legislation. Sections 202MC to 202ME.
    61. Criminal Code, Federal Legal Information System of Austria. Sections 96–98 (in German).
    62. Penal Code, Statute Law of the Bahamas. Article 313.
    63. Bahrain Penal Code, 1976, Global Abortion Policies Database, World Health Organization.
    64. Legislative decree no. 7 for 1989 on the practice of human medicine and dentistry, Ministry of Health of Bahrain, Global Abortion Policies Database, World Health Organization.
    65. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Government of Barbados, 10 May 1983.
    66. Law of the Republic of Belarus on health care, National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus (in Russian).
    67. "LOI – WET". www.ejustice.just.fgov.be.
    68. Family planning, Belgian Federal Public Service (in French).
    69. Law no. 2012-12 of 20 December 2021, General Secretariat of the Government of Benin (in French). Published on 7 January 2022.
    70. Penal Code of Bhutan, Judiciary of Bhutan.
    71. Human rights in the field of sexual and reproductive health in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina, United Nations Population Fund, January 2021 (in Serbo-Croatian).
    72. Penal Code, Government of Botswana. Article 160.
    73. Penal Code, Decree-Law no. 2848, of 7 December 1940, Presidency of Brazil (in Portuguese).
    74. Reproductive rights: legal abortion, Public Defenders' Office of the State of São Paulo, July 2018 (in Portuguese).
    75. Woman obtains judicial authorization to interrupt risky pregnancy, Brazilian Family Law Institute, 11 August 2020 (in Portuguese).
    76. Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013, Brunei Darussalam Government Gazette, 22 October 2013. Articles 158–164.
    77. Law no. 025-018/AN bearing the penal code, Police Academy of Burkina Faso. Articles 513-10 to 513–19 (in French).
    78. Law no. 1/27 of 29 December 2017 bearing revision of the penal code, President of the Republic of Burundi. Article 534 (in French).
    79. Norms and Standards in Reproductive Health-Family Planning in Cameroon, Ministry of Health of Cameroon, 2018 (in French).
    80. Abortion Coverage by Region, National Abortion Federation Canada.
    81. "Access at a Glance: Abortion Services in Canada | Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights". Action Canada for Sexual Health & Rights. While abortions after 20 weeks are statistically very rare (<2.5% of all abortions), there are people in Canada who require abortion beyond 20 weeks for serious and important reasons. There are only three service locations in Canada that offer abortion up to 23 weeks and 6 days (one in British Columbia, one in Southern Ontario, and one in Quebec). No providers in Canada offer abortion care beyond 23 weeks and 6 days.
    82. Penal Code, 2010. Article 79 (in French).
    83. Colombian Penal Code (Law 599 of 2000), compiled by José Fernando Botero Bernal, University of Medellín. Article 122 (in Spanish).
    84. Sentencia C-355/06 (Constitutional Court 10 May 2006).
    85. Penal Code, University of Alicante Intellectual Property and Information Technologyart. Article 304 (in French).
    86. Penal Code, Ministry of Justice of the Republic of the Congo. Article 317 (in French).
    87. Penal Code, Government of Costa Rica. Article 93 (in Spanish).
    88. Ministerial resolution no. 24, Ministry of Public Health of Cuba, 1 April 2004 (in Spanish).
    89. "ΝΟΜΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΤΡΟΠΟΠΟΙΕΙ ΤΟΝ ΠΟΙΝΙΚΟ ΚΩΔΙΚΑ" [AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL CODE] (PDF). CyLaw - All Cyprus Bar Association (in Greek). 16 April 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2021.
    90. "Zákon České národní rady o umělém přerušení těhotenství" [Act of the Czech National Council on Abortion]. Act No. 66 of 20 October 1986 (in Czech). Czech National Council.
    91. "Vyhláška ministerstva zdravotnictví České socialistické republiky, kterou se provádí zákon České národní rady č. 66/1986 Sb., o umělém přerušení těhotenství" [Decree of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Socialist Republic, which implements the Act of the Czech National Council No. 66/1986 Coll., On Abortion]. Decree No. 75 of 7 November 1986 (in Czech). Ministry of Health
    92. Health law, Ministry of Health of Denmark, 26 August 2019 (in Danish).
    93. Decree no. 2008-0098/PR/MS regarding the Code of Medical Deontology, National Order of Medical Professions of Djibouti (in French).
    94. Abortion in Djibouti, Human Village, April 2015 (in French).
    95. Offences Against the Person Act, Government of Dominica, version of 1995. Sections 8, 56, 57.
    96. Dominica, Population Policy Data Bank, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2001. Archived from the original on 27 December 2005.
    97. "Los diputados dominicanos rechazan ley polémica por el aborto" [Dominican deputies reject controversial abortion law] (in Spanish). Swissinfo. 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
    98. Penal code of the Democratic Republic of Timor Leste, Global Abortion Policies Database, World Health Organization.
    99. Penal Code, Court of Appeals of East Timor, March 2010 (in Portuguese).
    100. Attitudes towards the legal context of unsafe abortion in Timor-Leste, Suzanne Belton, Andrea Whittaker, Zulmira Fonseca, Tanya Wells-Brown, and Patricia Pais, Reproductive Health Matters 17(34):55–64, November 2009.
    101. "قانون العقوبات" [Penal Code]. Article 61 and Chapter 3, Law 58 of 1937 (in Arabic). Parliament of Egypt. With amendments as 15 August 2021.
    102. Profession Ethics Regulations. Archived from the original on 3 November 2021.
    103. Andemariam, Senai W. (2015). "PENAL CODE OF THE STATE OF ERITREA" (PDF). Ref World. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 September 2015.
    104. Dr. Yirgu Gebrehiwoth (2020). "Federal Ministry of Health - National Norms & Guidelines for Safe Abortion Services in Ethiopia second edition - original 2013/2014 modified 2018" (PDF). St. Paul's Hospital, Addis Ababa. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2021.
    105. "p.616" (PDF). Pascar.org. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
    106. criminal code art.550
    107. Crimes decree 2009, Republic of Fiji Islands Government Gazette, 5 November 2009. Section 234.
    108. Voluntary interruption of pregnancy, Public Health Code articles L2211-1 to L2223-2, Légifrance (in French).
    109. Penal Code, Official Journal of the Gabonese Republic, 30 June 2020. Title X (in French).
    110. The Gambia's Political Transition to Democracy: Is Abortion Reform Possible?, Satang Nabaneh, Health and Human Rights, 9 December 2019.
    111. Criminal Code (Act No. 25 of 1933), Gambia, International Labour Organization. Chapter XV, sections 140–142, and chapter XX, sections 198–199.
    112. Women's Act, 2010, Office of the Vice President and Ministry for Women Affairs of Gambia, July 2010. Section 30.
    113. Law of Georgia on health care, Legislative Herald of Georgia, version of 8 August 2014.
    114. On the approval of the rules for the implementation of abortion, Minister of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, 7 October 2014 (in Georgian).
    115. Order of the Second Senate of 28 May 1993 – 2 BvF 2/90, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany.
    116. German Criminal Code, Federal Office of Justice of Germany. Section 218a.
    117. Penal code, Ministry of Justice of Greece, 27 August 2019 (in Greek).
    118. Criminal Code. Articles 234, 250(2).
    119. "chapter 3" (PDF). Mcd.gob.gt. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
    120. Report on the Right to Health in Guinea-Bissau, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, April 2017, pages 14–15.
    121. Toward a decriminalisation of abortion in Haiti, Le Figaro, 16 July 2020 (in French).
    122. Honduras ratifies a reform that prohibits abortion and same-sex marriage, El Periódico Extremadura, 29 January 2021 (in Spanish).
    123. Law on the protection of fetal life, Wolters Kluwer (in Hungarian). Retrieved 27 September 2021.
    124. "Lög um þungunarrof" [Law on Abortion]. Law No. 43 of 22 May 2019 (in Icelandic). Althing.
    125. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, of India Code, with Amendment Bill 2020. Version as of 16 December 2021.
    126. Comprehensive abortion care, training and service delivery guidelines, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of India, 14 June 2018. Page 6.
    127. "Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Pasal 60" [Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health. Article 60] (PDF) (in Indonesian). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. p. 33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 October 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
    128. "Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Pasal 463 dan Penjelasan atas Pasal 463" [Law No. 1 of 2023 on Criminal Code. Article 463 and Explanation of Article 463] (PDF) (in Indonesian). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. pp. 160, 321. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 October 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
    129. Medical abortion law, Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 25 Khordad 1384 (15 June 2005) (in Persian). Archived from the original on 1 November 2020.
    130. Familiarity with medical abortion cases, Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran (in Persian).
    131. Abortion and its types, Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran (in Persian).
    132. Abortion in Iranian Legal System, Mahmoud Abbasi, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, and Neda Allahbedashti, Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, vol. 13, no. 1, February 2014.
    133. Abortion, in case of disgrace and unbearable hardship, Islam Quest, 17 Farvardin 1394 (6 April 2015) (in Persian).
    134. Penal Code, Ministry of Justice of Iraq.
    135. Abortion Law: Conflict of Maternal-Fetal Rights, Dr. Khaled Hamad Fayadh, University of Fallujah College of Law.
    136. First Amendment to Instructions to Health Committees, Government of Iraq, 29 October 2001 (in Arabic).
    137. Law no. 2019-574 carrying the Penal Code, Official Journal of the Republic of Ivory Coast, 10 July 2019 (in French).
    138. The Offences Against the Person Act, Laws of Jamaica, 7 April 2014. Articles 72 and 73.
    139. Abortion Policy Review Advisory Group Final Report, Ministry of Health of Jamaica, 19 February 2007.
    140. Abortion 'right'?, The Gleaner, 25 August 2013.
    141. Abortion attitudes, training, and experience among medical students in Jamaica, West Indies, Glenmarie Matthews, Jessica Atrio, Horace Fletcher, Nathalie Medley, Leo Walker, and Nerys Benfield, Contraceptive and Reproductive Medicine, 1 May 2020.
    142. "母体保護法の施行について" [On Enforcement of the Maternal Health Act]. Act No. 122 of 25 September 1996 (in Japanese). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
    143. Public Health Law No. 47 of 2008, FAOLEX Database (in Arabic). Article 12.
    144. Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on public health and healthcare system, Legal Information System of Regulatory Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 7 July 2020. Article 150.
    145. Penal Code, revised edition of 2012, National Council for Law Reporting. Articles 158–160 and 240.
    146. The Constitution of Kenya, National Council for Law Reporting, 2010. Article 26(4).
    147. Penal Code, VERTIC. Page 214.
    148. Law no. 03/L-110 for termination of pregnancy, Official Gazette of Kosovo. Articles 6–7, 14–16.
    149. Penal Code, Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic, 26 June 2017.
    150. "ຂໍ້ຕົກລົງ ວ່າດ້ວຍ ການຄຸ້ມຄອງ ການໃຫ້ຖືພາແທນ ແລະ ການໃຫ້ຫຼຸລູກ" [Decision on the Management of Surrogacy and Abortion]. Decision No. 2077 of 8 July 2021 (in Lao). Ministry of Health of Laos. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2021.
    151. Organizational procedures for termination of pregnancy, Likumi.lv, 27 October 2007 (in Latvian).
    152. Sexual and Reproductive Health Law, Likumi.lv, 1 September 2017 (in Latvian).
    153. قانون العقوبات 1943/3/1 مرسوم اشتراعي رقم 340 - صادر في [Lebanon Penal Code 1943 Arabic - Decree No. 340] (PDF). Learning Partnership (in Arabic). 25 July 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 July 2021.
    154. "Penal Code Act, 2012 | Lesotho Legal Information Institute". lesotholii.org. Archived from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
    155. "Law No. 106 of 1973 Promulgating the Health Law" (in Arabic). Ministry of Justice of Libya. 13 December 1978. Archived from the original on 31 January 2023.
    156. "Law No. 17 of 1986 on Medical Liability" (in Arabic). Ministry of Justice of Libya. 4 November 1986. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023.
    157. Translation of Liechtenstein Law, Criminal Code of 24 June 1987, Legislationline.org, version of 1 January 2021, translated 21 January 2021. Article 96.
    158. Penal code, Ministry of Justice of Madagascar, updated 31 March 2005. Article 317 (in French).
    159. In Madagascar, clandestine abortions are the second cause of maternal deaths, Radio France Internationale, 1 October 2021 (in French).
    160. "Penal Code. Article 243" (PDF). Malawi Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 July 2021.
    161. Constitution of the Republic of Maldives 2008, Attorney General's Office of Maldives.
    162. Law no. 6/2014, Penal Code of the Maldives, University of Pennsylvania Law School.
    163. Country Profile on Sexual and Reproductive Rights: Maldives, Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women, 2017.
    164. "Ruling 6/2013" (PDF) (in Divehi). Islamic Fiqh Academy, Ministry of Islamic Affairs of Maldives. 11 December 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2014.
    165. Law no. 2001-79 of 20 August 2001 bearing the Penal Code, Droit Afrique. Article 211 (in French).
    166. Law no. 02-044 of 24 June 2002 relative to reproduction health, President of the Republic of Mali. Article 13 (in French).
    167. Penal Code, Official Journal of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, 9 July 1983. Article 293 (in French).
    168. Ordinance no. 2005-015 bearing the penal protection of the child, Military Council for Justice and Democracy of Mauritania, 5 December 2005 (in French). Article 33.
    169. Law no. 2017-025 regarding reproductive health, Official Journal of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, 27 December 2017. Article 21 (in French).
    170. List of issues and questions in relation to the combined second and third periodic reports of Mauritania, Addendum, Replies of Mauritania, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 17 March 2014. Page 20.
    171. The Criminal Code (Amendment) Act 2012, Official Gazette of Mauritius, 23 June 2012.
    172. Aborto legal, Andar (in Spanish).
    173. The Supreme Court of Mexico decriminalizes abortion in the whole country, The New York Times, 6 September 2023. "Wednesday's ruling does not affect local laws, and abortion remains illegal in 20 of the 32 states of the country. But even in those states, now women may legally abort at federal hospitals and clinics. The ruling also prohibits personnel of these centers from being penalized for performing abortions." (in Spanish)
    174. Penal Code for the State of Aguascalientes, Government of Aguascalientes, 22 January 2024. Articles 101 to 103 (in Spanish).
    175. Decree No. 36, Official Journal of the State of Baja California, pages 21–26. Archived from the original on 15 November 2021.
    176. Decree 2832, Official Journal of the State of Baja California Sur, 14 June 2022 (in Spanish).
    177. Penal Code of the State of Campeche, Congress of Campeche, 10 May 2022. Articles 155 to 159 (in Spanish).
    178. Penal Code for the State of Chiapas, Congress of Chiapas, 4 November 2020. Articles 178 to 183 (in Spanish).
    179. Penal Code of the State of Chihuahua, Congress of Chihuahua, 6 July 2022. Articles 143 to 146 (in Spanish).
    180. Penal Code of the State of Coahuila de Zaragoza, Congress of Coahuila, 6 October 2017. Articles 357 to 361 (in Spanish).
    181. Penal Code for the State of Colima as of 15 June 2022, Directorate of Legislative Process. Articles 138 to 142 (in Spanish).
    182. Penal Code of the Free and Sovereign State of Durango, Congress of Durango, 26 May 2022. Articles 148 to 150 (in Spanish).
    183. Penal Code of the State of Guanajuato, Congress of Guanajuato, 14 June 2022. Articles 158 to 163 (in Spanish).
    184. Decree No. 180, Official Gazette of the State of Guerrero, 20 May 2022 (in Spanish).
    185. Decree No. 728, Official Gazette of the State of Hidalgo, 6 July 2021 (in Spanish).
    186. Penal Code for the Free and Sovereign State of Jalisco, Congress of Jalisco, 17 May 2022. Articles 227 to 229 (in Spanish).
    187. Cachon, Hector Gonzalez (29 July 2020). "CÓDIGO PENAL PARA EL DISTRITO FEDERAL" [PENAL CODE FOR THE FEDERAL DISTRICT] (PDF). Mexico City Congress (in Spanish). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 November 2020.
    188. Penal Code of the State of Mexico, Government of Mexico State, 10 June 2022. Articles 248 to 251 (in Spanish).
    189. Penal Code for the State of Michoacán de Ocampo, Congress of Michoacán, 13 January 2020. Articles 141 to 146 (in Spanish).
    190. Penal Code for the State of Morelos, Government of Morelos, 28 July 2021. Articles 115 to 120 (in Spanish).
    191. Penal Code for the State of Nayarit, Congress of Nayarit, 9 January 2020. Articles 368 to 372 (in Spanish).
    192. Penal Code for the State of Nuevo León, Congress of Nuevo León, 10 June 2022. Articles 327 to 331 (in Spanish).
    193. Decree No. 806, Official Journal of the State of Oaxaca, 27 October 2019 (in Spanish).
    194. Penal Code of the Free and Sovereign State of Puebla, Congress of Puebla, 1 July 2022. Articles 339 to 343 (in Spanish).
    195. Penal Code for the State of Querétaro, Congress of Querétaro, 27 May 2022. Articles 136 to 142 (in Spanish).
    196. Penal Code for the Free and Sovereign State of Quintana Roo, Congress of Quintana Roo, 7 September 2022. Articles 92 to 97 (in Spanish).
    197. Decree number 004, Official Journal of the State of Quintana Roo, 28 October 2022 (in Spanish).
    198. Penal Code of the State of San Luis Potosí, Judiciary of San Luis Potosí, 18 May 2022. Articles 148 to 150 (in Spanish).
    199. Decree no. 79, Official Gazette of the State of Sinaloa, 11 March 2022 (in Spanish).
    200. Penal Code of the State of Sonora, Congress of Sonora, 6 June 2022. Articles 265 to 270 (in Spanish).
    201. Penal Code for the State of Tabasco, Government of Tabasco, 13 April 2022. Articles 130 to 136 (in Spanish).
    202. Penal Code for the State of Tamaulipas, Congress of Tamaulipas, 14 June 2022. Articles 356 to 361 (in Spanish).
    203. Penal Code for the Free and Sovereign State of Tlaxcala, Government of Tlaxcala, 10 May 2021. Articles 241 to 243 (in Spanish).
    204. Penal Code for the Free and Sovereign State of Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, Congress of the State of Veracruz, 2 March 2022. Articles 149 to 154 (in Spanish).
    205. Penal Code of the State of Yucatán, Judiciary of Yucatán, 15 June 2022. Articles 389 to 393 (in Spanish).
    206. Penal Code for the State of Zacatecas, Congress of Zacatecas, 8 June 2022. Articles 310 to 313 (in Spanish).
    207. "Ordin cu privire la efectuarea întreruperii voluntare a cursului sarcinii în condiții de siguranță" [Orden Regarding the Voluntary Termination of the Safe Course of Pregnancy]. Order No. 647 of 29 September 2010 (in Romanian). Ministry of Health of Moldova.
    208. "Zakon o uslovima i postupku za prekid trudnoće" [Law on Conditions and Procedure for Termination of Pregnancy]. Government of Montenegro (in Croatian). 6 October 2021. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021. pdf download
    209. Penal code, consolidated version of 5 July 2018, Ministry of Justice of Morocco (in French).
    210. Penal code, consolidated version of 14 June 2021, Ministry of Justice of Morocco (in Arabic).
    211. Law of Revision of the Penal Code, Bulletin of the Republic of Mozambique, 24 December 2019 (in Portuguese).
    212. "MYANMAR THE PENAL CODE" (PDF). The Warnath Group Consultants. 6 December 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 September 2020.
    213. Abortion Policy Landscape: Myanmar, World Health Organization.
    214. Crimes Act 2016, Nauru's Online Legal Database. Articles 53, 63–69.
    215. Re-characterizing abortion in Nigeria: an appraisal of the necessity test, Victor Nnamdi Opara, International Law Students' Association Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol. 11, issue 1, article 8, March 2005.
    216. Penal Code (Northern States) Federal Provisions Act, 30 September 1960. Police and Human Rights Resources, Amnesty International.
    217. "Cyprus Turkish Medical Association "Medical Professional Code of Ethics"" (PDF) (in Turkish). TRNC Prime Ministry Department of Regulations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
    218. Medical Law of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (2000), Unification Legislation Database (in Korean).
    219. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1 June 2016.
    220. Written Contribution for Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), Tomás Ojea Quintana, for his upcoming report to the 46th Human Rights Council session in March 2021.
    221. Law of Termination of Pregnancy, Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, 22 May 2019 (in Macedonian).
    222. The Penal Law Promulgated by Royal Decree 7/2018, Ministry of Legal Affairs of Oman, 11 January 2018. Articles 315–320, 44 and 51.
    223. Why Deadly Abortions Keep Killing Women in Pakistan, Pulitzer Center, 15 July 2021. "Because laws on abortion are vague, the decision to provide an abortion or not often comes down to a provider's personal or religious beliefs, which for many, makes the prospect unthinkable."
    224. Abortion in Pakistan, Guttmacher Institute, November 2009.
    225. Penal Code, Policinglaw.info. Article 1309.
    226. Palestinian Legislative Council Public Health Law, Health, Development, Information and Policy Institute (HDIP), 23 April 2004.
    227. The Unique Landscape of Abortion Law and Access in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Health and Human Rights, 9 December 2019. "As one lawyer from Gaza explained in an interview, "[...] [Abortion] is only allowed for health reasons for the mother or for fetal anomalies."
    228. For Palestinian women, abortion can mean lies, jail or worse, Reuters, 8 March 2016. "When fetal impairment is detected, an abortion can be performed if both parents consent, [...] the ministry said."
    229. Palestine: 'Marry-Your-Rapist' Law Repealed, Human Rights Watch, 10 May 2018. "Salhieh, the chief prosecutor, said that prosecutors obtained permission for seven women to have abortions in 2017, all in cases in which the women alleged that the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest and they were in the early stages of pregnancy."
    230. Palestine's Abortion Problem, Foreign Policy, 4 December 2015. "Abortion, after all, is illegal under Palestinian law; while it is technically legal in order to protect the life of the mother, in practice, according to experts, it is impossible to get such a procedure. Especially for those [...] who might want an abortion without the knowledge of their husbands."
    231. Criminal Code Act 1974, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute. Articles 225, 226, 280, 312.
    232. Woman cleared in abortion case, The National, 27 June 2018.
    233. Law No. 3440, BACCN, 20 August 2008. Article 109.4 (in Spanish).
    234. "Guía Técnica Nacional de Aborto Terapéutico" [National Technical Guide - Therapeutic Abortion (modified 2015)] (PDF). Regional Directorate of Health of Cusco, Peru (in Spanish). 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 November 2021.
    235. The Revised Penal Code, Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, 8 December 1930. Articles 256–259.
    236. Imbong v. Ochoa, Supreme Court of the Philippines, 8 April 2014.
    237. Ninth periodic report submitted by the Philippines under article 18 of the Convention, Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 6 July 2021. Paragraph 123.
    238. Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October 2020, act K 1/20, Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, 27 January 2021, item 175 (in Polish).
    239. Penal Code, Electronic Journal of the Republic (in Portuguese).
    240. Law No. 11 of 2004 Issuing the Penal Code, Qatar Legal Portal. Abortion. Articles 315–317.
    241. "Федеральный закон от 21 ноября 2011 г. № 323-ФЗ "Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации"" [Federal Law of November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ "On the fundamentals of protecting the health of citizens in the Russian Federation"] (in Russian). Minzdrav.gov.ru. 5 April 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
    242. Offences Against the Person Act, Law Commission of the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs of Saint Kitts and Nevis, revised edition as of 31 December 2017. Sections 53–54.
    243. Infant Life (Preservation) Act, Law Commission of the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs of Saint Kitts and Nevis, revised edition as of 31 December 2002.
    244. Criminal Code, revised edition as 31 December 2005, Government of Saint Lucia, Chapter 1, Part 1, Sub-part D.
    245. Criminal Code, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Section 149.
    246. Crimes Act 2013, Ministry of Police of Samoa, 1 May 2013.
    247. Law no. 127 – Regulation of the voluntary interruption of pregnancy, Grand and General Council, 7 September 2022. Articles 4–7 (in Italian).
    248. Maffi, I.; Tønnessen, L. (2019). "The Limits of the Law: Abortion in the Middle East and North Africa". Health and Human Rights. 21 (2): 1–6. PMC 6927385. PMID 31885431.
    249. Penal Code of Senegal, 21 July 1965, with amendments up to 29 January 1999. Article 305 (in French).
    250. Code of Medical Ethics, National Order of Physicians of Senegal, 10 February 1967. Article 35 (in French).
    251. Combined third to seventh periodic reports due in 2010, Senegal, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 13 December 2013. Page 55.
    252. Dr. Katarina Sedlecki (30 September 2013). "НАЦИОНАЛНИ ВОДИЧ ДОБРЕ КЛИНИЧКЕ ПРАКСЕ ЗА БЕЗБЕДНИ ПРЕКИД ТРУДНОЋЕ" [NATIONAL GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDE FOR SAFE TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY] (PDF). Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Serbia (in Serbian). Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2016. pdf download
    253. Termination of Pregnancy Act, consolidated to 30 June 2012, Seychelles Legal Information Institute.
    254. Reproductive health policy for Seychelles, Ministry of Health of Seychelles, January 2012.
    255. Courts Act, 1965, Government of Sierra Leone. Article 74.
    256. Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Legislation.gov.uk. Articles 58–59.
    257. Rex v. Bourne, Central Criminal Court of England and Wales, 18–19 July 1938.
    258. Supplementary Information on Sierra Leone, scheduled for review by the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women during its 57th Session (February 2014), Center for Reproductive Rights, 24 January 2014. "This interpretation of the Offences Against the Person Act has not been tested in case law in Sierra Leone and therefore it remains unclear whether women terminating a pregnancy on such grounds would be criminally liable."
    259. Understanding Abortion Access in Africa, Catholics for Choice, 19 February 2014. "Sierra Leone is one of several Commonwealth countries to model its abortion policy after England's 1938 Rex v. Bourne decision, which established necessity  that is, threats to a woman's mental and physical health  as grounds for legal abortion."
    260. Fighting Unsafe Abortion and Abortion Stigma in Sierra Leone, Women's Health and Reproductive Rights Organization, 20 April 2021.
    261. "Zákon Slovenskej národnej rady o umelom prerušení tehotenstva" [Act of the Slovak National Council on Abortion]. Law No. 73 of 23 October 1986 (in Slovak). Slovak National Council.
    262. "Vyhláška Ministerstva zdravotníctva Slovenskej socialistickej republiky, ktorou sa vykonáva zákon Slovenskej národnej rady č.73/1986 Zb. o umelom prerušení tehotenstva" [Decree of the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Socialist Republic, which implements the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 73/1986 Coll. on abortion]. Decree No. 74 of 5 November 1986 (in Slovak). Ministry of Health.
    263. Penal Code, Laws of Solomon Islands. Articles 157–159, 221.
    264. Provisional Constitution, University of Minnesota: Human Rights Library, 7 September 2012. Article 15.5.
    265. Penal Code, Global Abortion Policies Database, 6 December 1962. Article 36 and part X.
    266. Penal Code, Somalilandlaw.com.
    267. Jama, Ibrahim Hashi (30 January 2012). "THE 2000 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND - english translation" (PDF). Somaliland law. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2012.
    268. "Penal Code Act. Article 216" (PDF). Sudantribune.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
    269. Penal code, Citizens Lanka, version as of 2002. Sections 303–307.
    270. Penal Code, European Country of Origin Information Network, 1991.
    271. Abortion law, Riksdag of Sweden, version as of 1 June 2013 (in Swedish).
    272. Swiss penal code (Interruption of pregnancy), Federal Assembly of Switzerland (in French).
    273. "قانون مزاولة المهن الطبية في الجمهورية العربية السورية" [Law on the Practice of Medical Professions in the Syrian Arab Republic]. Article 47b, Legislative Decree No. 12 of 5 January 1970 (in Arabic). People's Assembly of Syria.
    274. Genetic Health Act, Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China, 8 July 2009.
    275. Enforcement Rules of Genetic Health Act, Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China, 5 April 2012.
    276. "Abortion legislation and its implementation in Europe and Central Asia" (PDF). International Planned Parenthood Federation. December 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 November 2021.
    277. "The Penal Code, revised edition of 2019". Tanzania Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on 4 December 2021.
    278. Penal Act, 2018, Zanzibar House of Representatives, 16 March 2018.
    279. Act, Amendment of the Criminal Code (No. 28), Royal Government Gazette of Thailand, 6 February 2021 (in Thai).
    280. Law No. 2007-005, On Reproductive Health, Official Journal of the Togolese Republic, 10 January 2007 (in French).
    281. "Criminal Offences". www.paclii.org.
    282. "Приказ Министерства здравоохранения и социальной защиты Приднестровской Молдавской Республики о порядке проведения и показаниях к операции искусственного прерывания беременности" [Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic on the procedure and indications for artificial interruption of pregnancy] (in Russian). Zakon PMR. 13 August 2004. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023.
    283. "CRIMINAL LAW ACT CHAPTER 10:04 - original 2006 updated 2016 modified 2018" (PDF). Legal Affairs.Gov.TT. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 June 2022.
    284. "Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi". www.mevzuat.gov.tr.
    285. "Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi". www.mevzuat.gov.tr.
    286. Penal Code of Turkey (2004, amended 2016), Legislationline.org. Article 99.
    287. Law of Turkmenistan on the protection of the health of citizens, Neytralny Turkmenistan no. 138-139, 2 July 2015. Article 19 (in Russian).
    288. "Про реалізацію статті 281 Цивільного кодексу України". Офіційний вебпортал парламенту України.
    289. Women's reproductive and sexual healthcare, Government of the United Arab Emirates, 11 July 2021.
    290. Britain's abortion law, British Pregnancy Advisory Service.
    291. Abortion Act 1967, Legislation.gov.uk.
    292. State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy, Guttmacher Institute, 29 August 2023.
    293. Alabama Human Life Protection Act, Alabama Legislature, 2019.
    294. Section 26-23B-5, Alabama Legislature.
    295. SB 1164, Arizona State Senate, 2022
    296. SB149, Arkansas General Assembly, 2019.
    297. SB6, Arkansas General Assembly, 2021.
    298. CS/HB 5, Florida House of Representatives, 2022.
    299. Section 18-622, Idaho Legislature, 2023.
    300. Section 18-604, Idaho Legislature, 2023.
    301. Senate Bill 1, Indiana General Assembly, 2022.
    302. KRS 311.722, Kentucky General Assembly.
    303. Gonzalez, Oriana (16 February 2023). "Kentucky Supreme Court refuses to block state abortion bans". Axios.
    304. Act No. 545, Louisiana State Legislature, 2022.
    305. Title 22 §1598. Abortions, Maine Revised Statutes, Maine Legislature.
    306. Health – General §20–209, Statutes, Maryland General Assembly.
    307. Abortion Policies in Maryland, Guttmacher Institute.
    308. Abortion penalties; repeal, Michigan Legislature.
    309. 145.412 Repealed, Minnesota Statutes, Minnesota Legislature.
    310. 145.412 Criminal acts, 2022 Minnesota Statutes, Minnesota Legislature.
    311. House Bill 1400, Mississippi Legislature, 2014.
    312. Senate Bill 2391 Mississippi Legislature, 2007.
    313. HB126, Missouri General Assembly, 2019.
    314. Legislative Bill 574, Nebraska Legislature, 22 May 2023.
    315. House bill 1609-FN, General Court of New Hampshire, 2022.
    316. Chapter 45, article 25-A, section 2599-BB, Abortion, Consolidated Laws of New York, New York State Senate.
    317. Session law 2023-14, General Assembly of North Carolina.
    318. SB 2150, North Dakota Legislature.
    319. , Ohio Constitution.
    320. Section 21-861, Oklahoma Senate, 2019.
    321. SB 612, Oklahoma Legislature, 2022.
    322. Title 44 – Health, Chapter 41 – Abortions, South Carolina Code of Laws, South Carolina Legislature.
    323. Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, South Carolina General Assembly, 2023.
    324. Codified law 22-17-5.1, South Dakota Legislature.
    325. HB1029, Tennessee State Legislature, 2019.
    326. HB136, Utah State Legislature, 2019.
    327. SB174, Utah State Legislature, 2020.
    328. Chapter 9.02, Abortion, Revised Code of Washington, Washington State Legislature.
    329. House Bill 302, West Virginia Legislature, 2022.
    330. "Chapter 253, Maternal and child health". Wisconsin State Legislature.
    331. "Abortion Laws in Wisconsin" (PDF). Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau. December 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 February 2017.
    332. Lehr, Sarah; Faust, Margaret (21 September 2023). "Abortions resume in Wisconsin after 15 months of legal uncertainty". NPR. Retrieved 3 October 2023.
    333. HB0092, Wyoming Legislature, 2022.
    334. HB0152, Wyoming Legislature, 2023.
    335. Gruver, Mead (22 March 2023). "Judge halts Wyoming abortion ban days after it took effect". AP News. Retrieved 22 March 2023.
    336. Law on voluntary interruption of pregnancy. Abortion law, National Directorate of Prints and Official Publications, 30 October 2012 (in Spanish).
    337. Penal Code, National Directorate of Prints and Official Publications, updated on 9 July 2020 (in Spanish).
    338. "Об утверждении стандартов искусственного прерывания беременности" [On approval of standards for artificial termination of pregnancy]. Law No. 312 of 10 September 2013 (in Russian). Archived from the original on 21 November 2021.
    339. "Laws of the Republic of Vanuatu, consolidated edition 2006 – Penal Code, Ch. 135. Article 117" (PDF). International Labour Organization. 17 November 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 October 2021.
    340. Law on the sources of law, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, Supplement for the laws and provisions of Vatican City State, 1 October 2008. (in Italian)
    341. Penal code for the Kingdom of Italy, 1889, University of Brescia College of Law. (in Italian)
    342. Report to His Majesty the King from the Minister Keeper of the Seals (Zanardelli) at the hearing of 30 June 1889 for the approval of the final text of the penal code, pp. 145–146. "On the agreed proposal of the parliamentary commissions, the provision that was read in the bill, according to which it was declared 'not punishable the doctor or surgeon, when he justifies having acted in order to save the woman's life, endangered by the pregnancy or by childbirth', was deleted"; "The vote expressed in agreement in parliament led me to the aforesaid deletion, not to exclude the application of the concept that was expressed there, but because it was superfluous and inappropriate to declare it, providing if needed article 49 number 3, the application of which would be only, and without reason, restricted." (in Italian)
    343. Criminal abortion in the Italian penal code, Pasquale Tuozzi, Filippo Serafini Legal Archive, 1902, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 29. "However, if you want to search for a provision in our code that covers the surgeon, in addition to article 45, in which the aforesaid reason is rooted, there is also number 3 of article 49, where it is declared the nonresponsibility of one who acts compelled by the need to save himself or others from a serious and imminent danger to the person, to which he did not voluntarily give cause, and which he could not otherwise avoid. Well, these extremes of the state of necessity all apply in the case of the surgeon, who, put in the harsh condition, not created by him, extinguishes an imperfect and perhaps uncertain existence, to save a certain and real existence, which is that of the woman in childbirth." (in Italian)
    344. Abortion and the Catholic Church, Pro-Life Activist's Encyclopedia, American Life League.
    345. Penal Code of Venezuela, Official Gazette of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, 20 October 2000. Article 435 (in Spanish).
    346. Protocols of care. Prenatal care and emergency obstetric care, Government of Venezuela, March 2014 (in Spanish).
    347. Trần Minh Nghĩa (24 August 2018). "HƯỚNG DÉN QUỐC GIA" [NATIONAL GUIDELINES] (PDF). Ministry of Health - Government of Vietnam (in Vietnamese). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 November 2021.
    348. Country Profile on Sexual and Reproductive Rights: Vietnam, Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women, 2017.
    349. The Termination of Pregnancy Act, National Assembly of Zambia.
    350. "Induced Abortion and Postabortion Care in Zimbabwe". Guttmacher Institute. October 2018. In practice, it is extremely difficult to obtain a legal abortion; as a result, most abortions are clandestine and potentially unsafe. Updated as of 16 July 2019.
    351. "National Guidelines for Comprehensive Abortion care in Zimbabwe - 2014" (PDF). Ministry of Health and Child Care. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 October 2021.
    352. Abortion Ordinance, Sovereign Base Areas Gazette, 21 October 1974.
    353. 46.3903 Authorized abortions, Annotated Code of American Samoa, American Samoa Bar Association.
    354. Criminal Code of Anguilla, Government of Anguilla, 15 December 2014.
    355. Criminal Code of Aruba, Government of Aruba, 28 September 2021. Articles 2:270 to 2:272 (in Dutch).
    356. Criminal Code Act 1907, Bermuda Laws Online, 30 August 2020.
    357. Criminal Code of the Virgin Islands, Government of the British Virgin Islands, 1997.
    358. Penal Code, Government of the Cayman Islands, 2019.
    359. Crimes Act 1969, Cook Islands Sessional Legislation, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute. Sections 202–207.
    360. Crimes Bill 2017, Cook Islands Parliament.
    361. Bills, Cook Islands Parliament.
    362. Cook Islands, Population Policy Data Bank, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011.
    363. Criminal Code, Government of Curaçao, 2019. (in Dutch)
    364. Much-needed abortion law is missing, Antilliaans Dagblad, 17 February 2015. (in Dutch)
    365. Crimes Ordinance 2014, Falkland Islands Government, 2019.
    366. Crimes (Amendment) Act 2019, Government of Gibraltar.
    367. Law No. 232, Law for Greenland about Termination of Pregnancy, Government of Greenland, 12 June 1975 (in Danish and Greenlandic).
    368. Offenses against the family, Compiler of Laws of Guam, 2018.
    369. No abortion providers on Guam, Pacific Daily News, 30 June 2018.
    370. Law on abortion, Guernsey Legal Resources, 1910. (in French)
    371. Abortion (Guernsey) Law, 1997, Guernsey Legal Resources, consolidated text effective 2 February 2022.
    372. Billet d'État (state note), States of Alderney, 20 July 2022.
    373. Abortion (Alderney) Law, 2022, Guernsey Legal Resources.
    374. Abortion Reform Act 2019, Isle of Man Legislation.
    375. Termination of Pregnancy (Jersey) Law 1997, Jersey Legal Information Board, 2019.
    376. Decree-Law no. 59/95/M, Official Press of Macau, 2004. (in Portuguese)
    377. "Penal Code" (PDF). Government of Montserrat. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2018.
    378. Niue Laws, Volume 3, Government of Niue, December 2006, p. 1168. Niue Act 1966, sections 166–168.
    379. Niue, Population Policy Data Bank, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Archived from the original on 11 January 2005.
    380. Niue Act 1966, New Zealand Government, reprint as of 1 March 2017.
    381. Table of Acts in Force, Government of Niue, 1 June 2016.
    382. Niue Laws, Volume 1, Government of Niue, December 2006, pp. 15–16. Constitution of Niue, section 36.
    383. Attorney General Opinion, Commonwealth Law Revision Commission, 10 March 1995.
    384. Crimes and punishments, Trust Territory Code, chapter 2.
    385. Health clinics performing abortions?, Saipan Tribune, 25 May 2000.
    386. Pitcairn laws, Government of the Pitcairn Islands.
    387. Penal Code of Puerto Rico of 2012, Government of Puerto Rico, 7 June 2022. Articles 98 to 100 (in Spanish).
    388. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Pablo Duarte Mendoza, Decisiones de Puerto Rico, 17 April 1980 (in Spanish).
    389. Criminal Code, Government of Sint Maarten, 2013. (in Dutch)
    390. Crimes, Procedure and Evidence Rules 2003, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute, 2016.
    391. Handbook for the Law Commissioners of Tokelau, Government of Tokelau, August 2008.
    392. Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands, 31 March 2018.
    393. Abortion, 2019 US Virgin Islands Code, Title 14 § 151.
    394. Worrell, Marc. "Abortion Laws Worldwide". Women on Waves.
    395. "The World's Abortion Laws | Center for Reproductive Rights". reproductiverights.org. Retrieved 7 January 2020.
    396. "El Salvador will seek third trial of woman accused of 'murdering' stillborn". The Guardian. Reuters. 6 September 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 7 January 2020.
    397. "El Salvador: Court Hears Case on Total Abortion Ban". Human Rights Watch. 23 March 2023. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
    398. Choices, NHS (18 October 2017). "Abortion". www.nhs.uk.
    399. "gestational age". TheFreeDictionary.com.
    400. Center for Reproductive Rights. (n.d.). Picketing and Harassment. Retrieved 14 December 2006. Archived 30 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine
    401. Bhalla, Nita (3 November 2020). "Kenyan charities urge government to quit U.S.-led anti-abortion pact". Reuters. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
    402. Azoulay v. The Queen, 1952 CanLII 4, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 495 (11 April 1952), Supreme Court (Canada)
    403. R v Davidson (Menhennitt ruling) [1969] VicRp 85, VR 667, Supreme Court (Vic, Australia)
    404. R v Sood (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 762, Supreme Court (NSW, Australia)
    405. Advocate Achyut Prasad Kharel v. Office of Prime-minister and Council of Ministers, Kathmandu and Ors. (Supreme Court of Nepal 4 August 2008), Text.
    406. "INTERRUPÇÃO DA GRAVIDEZ" [PREGNANCY INTERRUPTION]. Supremo Tribunal Federal - Justice - Brazil (in Portuguese). 26 April 2013. Archived from the original on 27 June 2014.
    407. "P. and S. v. Poland" (PDF). Center for Reproductive Rights. 11 April 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 May 2013.
    408. "Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia" [Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice] (PDF). Government of San Salvador (in Spanish). 28 May 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 January 2021.
    409. RPA 0787/15/HC/KIG, Women's Link Worldwide, 30 October 2015.
    410. Ruling No. 4/2563 (2020), Constitutional Court of Thailand, 19 February B.E. 2563 (2020). Archived from the original on 10 November 2021.
    411. Manetto, Francesco (21 September 2021). "La Suprema Corte invalida la objeción de conciencia médica e insta al Congreso a revisar la ley" [The Supreme Court invalidates medical conscientious objection and urges Congress to review the law]. El País (in Spanish).

    Other sources


    Share this article:

    This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Abortion_on_demand, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.