Chemical_communication_in_insects

Chemical communication in insects

Chemical communication in insects

Add article description


Chemical communication in insects is social signalling between insects of the same or different species, using chemicals. These chemicals may be volatile, to be detected at a distance by other insects' sense of smell, or non-volatile, to be detected on an insect's cuticle by other insects' sense of taste. Many of these chemicals are pheromones, acting like hormones outside the body.

Pheromones can be used instead of insecticides in orchards. Pest insects are attracted by sex pheromones, allowing farmers to evaluate pest levels, and if need be to provide sufficient pheromone to disrupt mating.

Among the many functions of chemical communication are attracting mates, aggregating conspecific individuals of both sexes, deterring other individuals from approaching, announcing a new food source, marking a trail, recognizing nest-mates, marking territory and triggering aggression.

Chemical communication within a species can be usurped by other species in chemical mimicry. The mimic produces allomones or pheromones to influence the behaviour of another insect, the dupe, to the mimic's advantage. The process is important in ant mimicry where species that do not look like ants are accepted into the ant colony.

History of research

In 1960, Dethier, Brown, and Smith categorised chemical signals into six groups.[1]

More information Category, Resulting behaviour ...

In 1965, the entomologist Edward O. Wilson published a paper on chemical communication in the social insects, arguing that their societies were principally organised by "complex systems of chemical signals".[2] By 1990, Mahmoud Ali and David Morgan noted that the field had grown too large to review comprehensively.[1]

Semiochemicals

In addition to the use of means such as making sounds, generating light, and touch for communication, a wide range of insects have evolved chemical signals, semiochemicals. Types of semiochemicals include pheromones and kairomones. Chemoreception is the physiological response of a sense organ to a chemical stimulus where the chemicals act as signals to regulate the state or activity of a cell.[1][3]

Semiochemicals are often derived from plant metabolites.[3] They can be grouped by which individuals they act upon:

  • Pheromones serve communication between insects of the same species.[3]
  • Allomones benefit their producer by the effect they have upon the receiver.[3]
  • Kairomones benefit their receiver instead of their producer.[3]
  • Synomones benefit the producer and the receiver.[3]

While some chemicals are targeted at individuals of the same species, others are used for communication across species. The use of scents is especially well-developed in social insects.[3] Cuticular hydrocarbons are nonstructural materials produced and secreted to the cuticle surface to fight desiccation and pathogens. They are important, too, as pheromones, especially in social insects.[4]

Pheromones

A fanning honeybee exposes Nasonov's gland (white stripe at tip of abdomen) releasing pheromone to entice swarm into an empty hive

Pheromones are of two main kinds: primer pheromones, which generate a long-duration change in the insect that receives them, or releaser pheromones, which cause an immediate change in behaviour.[1] Primers include the queen pheromones essential to maintain the caste structure of social Hymenopteran colonies; they tend to be non-volatile and are dispersed by workers across the colony.[5] In some ants and wasps, the queen pheromones are cuticular hydrocarbons.[6]

More information Type, Function ...
Pheromonal glands (UPPER CASE) in social insects

Eusocial insects including ants, termites, bees, and social wasps produce pheromones from several types of exocrine gland. These include mandibular glands in the head, and Dufour's, tergal, and other glands in the abdomen.[5]

Mimicry

Chemical communication within a species can be usurped by other species in chemical mimicry. The mimic produces allomones or pheromones to influence the behaviour of another insect, the dupe, to the mimic's advantage.[7] The type of mimicry can be Batesian, in which the mimic gains protection by resembling a harmful insect;[8] it can also be Müllerian, in which different well-defended insects resemble each other, in this case chemically, to minimise losses to predators;[9] aggressive, enabling a predatory mimic to approach its prey;[10] or reproductive, as when an orchid chemically (and visually) resembles a pollinator such as a bee or wasp, which tries to copulate with the flower, transferring pollen in the process.[11] It occurs, too, in ant mimicry, where a mimic such as a butterfly larva is enabled to live within a colony of ants, that would otherwise kill it, by producing antlike semiochemicals.[12]

Human uses of pheromones

Human uses of pheromones include their application instead of insecticides in orchards. Pest insects such as fruit moths are attracted by sex pheromones, allowing farmers to evaluate pest levels, and if need be to provide sufficient pheromone to disrupt mating.[13]


References

  1. Ali, Mahmoud Fadl; Morgan, E. David (1990). "Chemical communication in insect communities: a guide to insect pheromones with special emphasis on social insects". Biological Reviews. 65 (3): 227–247. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01425.x. S2CID 86609942.
  2. Wilson, Edward O. (3 September 1965). "Chemical Communication in the Social Insects". Science. 149 (3688). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS): 1064–1071. Bibcode:1965Sci...149.1064W. doi:10.1126/science.149.3688.1064. PMID 17737837.
  3. Gullan, P. J.; Cranston, P. S. (2005). The Insects: An Outline of Entomology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-1113-3.
  4. Hefetz, Abraham (28 March 2019). "The critical role of primer pheromones in maintaining insect sociality". Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 74 (9–10): 221–231. doi:10.1515/znc-2018-0224. PMID 30920959.
  5. von Beeren, Christoph; Pohl, Sebastian; Witte, Volker (2012). "On the Use of Adaptive Resemblance Terms in Chemical Ecology". Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 2012: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2012/635761. hdl:2123/11217.
  6. Augner, Magnus; Bernays, Elizabeth A. (1998). "Plant defence signals and Batesian mimicry". Evolutionary Ecology. 12 (6): 667–679. doi:10.1023/a:1006581415114. S2CID 24632371.
  7. Dettner, K.; Liepert, C. (1994). "Chemical Mimicry and Camouflage". Annual Review of Entomology. 39 (1): 129–154. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.001021.
  8. Eberhard, William G. (1977-12-16). "Aggressive Chemical Mimicry by a Bolas Spider". Science. 198 (4322): 1173–1175. doi:10.1126/science.198.4322.1173. PMID 17818935. S2CID 35215325.
  9. Akino, T.; Knapp, J. J.; Thomas, J. A.; Elmes, G. W. (1999). "Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 266 (1427): 1419–1426. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0796. PMC 1690087.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Chemical_communication_in_insects, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.