Electoral_Integrity_Project

Electoral Integrity Project

Electoral Integrity Project

Project surveying academics on their perception electoral integrity worldwide

The Electoral Integrity Project is a project based at Royal Military College of Canada and the University of East Anglia, England, which publishes rankings by country according to the project's view of its electoral integrity.[non-primary source needed] It also organises international conferences and workshops. The 2021 Electoral Integrity Global Report, covered 480 elections in 169 countries from mid 2012 to the end of 2021. It was directed by Holly Ann Garnett and Toby S. James.[citation needed] It was founded in 2012 by Pippa Norris and initially housed at Harvard University and the University of Sydney.[1][2][non-primary source needed]

Findings

One of the project's International Advisory Board, Andrew Reynolds, a political science professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, noted in the Raleigh-based The News & Observer that his home state's 2016 election integrity score was similar to Cuba, Indonesia and Sierra Leone.[3] The study ranked integrity of the state's congressional districts lowest in the nation just below similar outlier Wisconsin.[4][5]

Reception

Kaila White of The Arizona Republic described the methodology as being widely trusted and used to compare electoral performance around the world.[6]

The project received media attention in 2016 when it ranked the United States last among Western nations. An editorial in The Wall Street Journal ridiculed the study, noting that "Democracy in New York (which scored a 61) and Virginia (60) is supposedly more imperiled than in Rwanda (64), though Rwanda is controlled by an autocrat. The worst-performing state, Arizona (53), is outranked by Kuwait (55), Ivory Coast (59) and Kyrgyzstan (54)."[7] Dylan Matthews writing in Vox agreed that "it seems foolish to infer from that that the US is less of a democracy than Rwanda" but felt that the EIP had highlighted important issues such as gerrymandering and voter registration laws.[8]

Statistician Andrew Gelman critiqued the index as seeming like "an unstable combination of political ideology, academic self-promotion, credulous journalism, and plain old incompetence", noting among other things that the EIP's 2014 data release[9] has previously given the North Korean parliamentary election an 'electoral integrity' score of 65.3 and Cuba 65.6, higher than elections in EU members Romania and Bulgaria.[10][11] Norris replied to Gelman noting that her team had subsequently dropped the North Korean election from the dataset. Gelman, however, questioned her justification for this removal and continued to question the EIP's methodology more generally.[12]

References

  1. [1]
    Norris, Pippa (March 29, 2016). "Opinion: U.S. elections ranked worst among Western democracies. Here's why". The Washington Post.
  2. [2]
    "Leadership Team". The Electoral Integrity Project. 4 November 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-05-31.
  3. [3]
    Hamze, Adam (24 December 2016). "North Carolina's Democracy Ranked on Par with Cuba". HuffPost.
  4. [4]
    Reynolds, Andrew (December 31, 2016). "Opinion: North Carolina is no longer classified as a democracy". The News & Observer.
  5. [5]
    Fausset, Richard; Martin, Jonathan (23 December 2016). "Battle Lines Turn North Carolina's Moderation Into a Distant Memory". The New York Times.
  6. [6]
    White, Kaila (December 28, 2016). "Arizona the worst for electoral integrity, experts say". The Arizona Republic (USA Today). Retrieved 30 December 2016. Those indicators were interpreted into a 100-point scale. Arizona scored a total of 53, while the best state, Vermont, scored 75.
  7. [7]
    "Opinion: North Carolina's Iron Curtain". The Wall Street Journal. 30 December 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  8. [8]
    Matthews, Dylan (27 December 2016). "Political scientist: North Carolina "can no longer be classified as a full democracy"". Vox. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  9. [9]
    Norris, Pippa; Coma, Martinez i; Grömping, Max (18 February 2015). "The Year in Elections, 2014". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 2567075.
  10. [10]
    Gelman, Andrew (2 January 2017). "About that bogus claim that North Carolina is no longer a democracy . . ". Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.
  11. [11]
    Gelman, Andrew (4 January 2017). "The Bad Research Behind the Bogus Claim That North Carolina Is No Longer a Democracy". Slate. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  12. [12]
    Gelman, Andrew (2 January 2017). ""Constructing expert indices measuring electoral integrity" - reply from Pippa Norris - Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science". Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Electoral_Integrity_Project, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.